Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Is Working On a New Cryptocurrency For WhatsApp Payments (nytimes.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The New York Times: Some of the world's biggest internet messaging companies are hoping to succeed where cryptocurrency start-ups have failed by introducing mainstream consumers to the alternative world of digital coins. The internet outfits, including Facebook, Telegram and Signal, are planning to roll out new cryptocurrencies over the next year that are meant to allow users to send money to contacts on their messaging systems, like a Venmo or PayPal that can move across international borders. The most anticipated but secretive project is underway at Facebook. The company is working on a coin that users of WhatsApp, which Facebook owns, could send to friends and family instantly.

The Facebook project is far enough along that the social networking giant has held conversations with cryptocurrency exchanges about selling the Facebook coin to consumers. Telegram, which has an estimated 300 million users worldwide, is also working on a digital coin. Signal, an encrypted messaging service that is popular among technologists and privacy advocates, has its own coin in the works. And so do the biggest messaging applications in South Korea and Japan, Kakao and Line. The messaging companies have a reach that dwarfs the backers of earlier cryptocurrencies. Facebook and Telegram can make the digital wallets used for cryptocurrencies available, in an instant, to hundreds of millions of users. Most of them appear to be working on digital coins that could exist on a decentralized network of computers, independent to some degree of the companies that created them.
Facebook reportedly has more than 50 engineers working on their cryptocurrency. Their project is being run by former president of PayPal, David Marcus, and started last year after Telegram raised $1.7 billion to fund its cryptocurrency project. "The five people who have been briefed on the Facebook team's work said the company's most immediate product was likely to be a coin that would be pegged to the value of traditional currencies," NYT reports, citing a report from Bloomberg. "A digital token with a stable value would not be attractive to speculators -- the main audience for cryptocurrencies so far -- but it would allow consumers to hold it and pay for things without worrying about the value of the coin rising and falling." The coin should come out in the first half of the year.

48 comments

  1. No Thanks by sexconker · · Score: 2

    Good luck with all of that, Facebook.

    Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies aren't pegged to other currencies and are treated like an asset (because they are). Most cryptocurrencies anyone cares about are also decentralized and not under the control of any one company or group.

    Trying to establish and run your own currency is one of the fastest ways to get a lot of guns pointed at you.

    1. Re:No Thanks by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      TFA correctly states who cares most about the current cryptocurrencies: speculators. That's probably 97% of the trading volume. Then there's 1% people dealing in dodgy crap, 1% people paying for semi-dodgy crap (like anonymous payments for a VPN), and 1% actual mainstream transactions. In other words: pretty much no normal person gives a crap about cryptocurrencies. What they do care about is sending money quickly, safely and cheaply to friends or shops. PayPal does that, and I expect that the WhatsApp coin will actually not be all that different from using PayPal. Except that FB will get to see all of your transactions.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re: No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But people can buy drugs, guns, and sex using crypto. That's why the arseholes hype it up so much. It's easier to conduct business off the books that needs to be kept off the books.

      They haven't quite worked out that somebody, somewhere is always watching. But that is what it is. And it's their naive hype that Facebook is looking to exploit. They've proven themselves open to exploitation, and that is just too tempting to pass up...........

    3. Re:No Thanks by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Actually was made illegal for companies to create their own currencies, when fiat currencies were created. The game here, one giant ponzi scheme, a make believe company currency, that they sell at a fixed rate, no better or worse than any other in game currency for all the various monetisations and micro transactions of triple AAA (the association of anal arseholes) gaming. If the SEC let's this by, they will have serious criminal questions to answer in the future and many countries will stomp down hard on this rubbish but it is something everyone should expect from the scammy cunts that run facebook.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not illegal for companies to create their own currencies. Canada Tire money is one example. Printing "coupons" is another.

    5. Re:No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can't happen. Otherwise it will be too easy to send money to Isis and other bad people and the breaking bad community.
      Attempts to close down corner shop international money transfer services is in full swing because of this. I will change my mind if gold bar vending machines become legal (as they are in some Arab places) and a cryptocurrency barcode will make the machine cough up - globally.
      I can see it now, Stormy gets 35K cryptocurrency units and the lawyer argues no money changed hands.

    6. Re: No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but you're pulling those numbers directly out of your ass so...

    7. Re:No Thanks by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      There's also the usual issue we've already seen with a number of companies. A cryptocurrency (blockchain) is fundamentally a distributed, trustless system that anyone can join and use. If a company wants to build a blockchain for their own closed ecosystem under their control, they have either misunderstood the idea and/or they are trying to ride the blockchain hype.

      If you just want a new digital currency under central control, there are much lighter solutions than the blockchain. Meanwhile, businesses that understand cryptocurrencies/blockchains have already embraced existing systems such as Bitcoin with great success.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:No Thanks by sexconker · · Score: 1

      In the US, you are WRONG!

      You can't create your own currency. Coupons are not currency (not even the ones with the "cash value: 1/20th of 1 cent" disclaimer that's added in so that the coupon sheet they distribute is "valued" at less than 1 cent). Video game money and Disney bucks and arcade tokens are for a specific purpose in a given venue, they're not a currency for general use.

      Facebook is pushing a Facebook-controlled proxy for the US Dollar for general use. If Uncle Sam gets one whiff of this weakening the government's control over the economy, a lot of high level people within FB will be woken up in the middle of the night by men with guns. The only way FB's shit will be allowed is if the government is ultimately in control (guarantees for the currency to be treated as a credit of a specific value of USD, disclosures of risk for any vehicles deemed to be investments, FDIC insurance for any vehicles deemed to be cash-like, etc.). At that point, it's no different from the existing money transfer / currency exchange services.

    9. Re: No Thanks by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      It's only weakening government control if Facebook puts up some kind of impediment to them. They won't. The US government, foreign governments, bounty hunters - or anyone with a few hundred bucks to spare - will probably get whatever information they want out of Facebook.

    10. Re: No Thanks by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Personally I think Uncle Sam prefers this arrangement above all, that way he gets to keep the illusion we don't have a corporate-administered Social Credit System.

  2. Translation: by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    Facebook wants to stick their nose into your finances as well as everything else

    1. Re:Translation: by bogaboga · · Score: 1

      Facebook wants to stick their nose into your finances as well as everything else

      For this reason alone, I will not bite. In fact, I have avoided Facebook (proper) all thing time that I do not even see the [dis]advantages.

      I have not found a way to fend off WhatsAPP though. Telegram is my close alternative.

    2. Re: Translation: by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

      ... which is why my crypto of choice is Monero

    3. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point! It's just another fucking datamining operation against you.
      FUCK THAT and FUCK THEM.

      Also, any of the leading cryptocurrencies in actual consumer use, such as Bitcoin Cash BCH, work just fine for payments. Creating yet another shitcoin is not the solution.

    4. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've already tried that. There have been communications that banks have published where Facebook has requested access to bank customer information if they also have an active Facebook account. As they didn't provide reason for needing that access, thus far most (but sadly not all) banks have essentially told Zuckerbot to go suck his own crankshaft. When the government eventually stops pretending they don't love the datamining potential of Facebook and just flat out take it over, I imagine that will all change and we'll be legally required to have a Facebook account that directly interfaces with all personal records we have whether they be bank, medical (another they're currently attempting to hook in), or what type of porn you watch.

      The slippery slope is tilting ever more, and we're all starting to tumble.

  3. This is so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ungodly and unnecessary. Can this stupid fad die already?

  4. Waiting for the revival of Coinye by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can have Kim K. on the back? Southpark must have some funny character somewhere.

  5. Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    After 25 years posting on slashdot, Sexconker can't get it up anymore.

    Don't go on a tinder/grinder date with Sexconker unless you want to be seriously disappointed.

    1. Re:Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A/C is also struggling in the trouser-snake department.

      Don't go on a date with this A/C unless you want to be **seriously** disappointed.

  6. Trusted Face of the Internet! by sdinfoserv · · Score: 3, Informative

    FaceBook! The Trusted brand of the internet - what could possibly go wrong?
    No, they won't sell your purchase history to anyone...

    1. Re:Trusted Face of the Internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is expressly why they're NOT using decentralized p2p privacy coins like Zcash ZEC and even the less cryptographically protected Monero XMR... they want to datamine your ass and partner with goverments to control your ass.
      FUCK THAT and FUCK THEM.

    2. Re:Trusted Face of the Internet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that microsoft is the trusted face of software. Despite a bunch of nerds and geeks insisting their own contraption is so much better they have to give it away or nobody'll take it. microsoft is still the biggest bestest. Everyone uses their software and most don't need anything else. And every so often microsoft releases another bestest windows ever. Best ever windows! Again and again! A-ma-zing!

      So I don't see why facebook can't be the best website ever. Or even the only website you can ever access ("internet.org free basics"). Maybe teh zuck can be richest man on earth for a while, too.

  7. Where is Cremier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I miss Cremier. He's the only fag who made this shithole dead website interesting.

  8. Notice how by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Notice how everyone wants their own crypto. The jp Morgan coin the Facebook coin etc. They all want total control of the entire block chain so that the can run 51% attacks and roll back transactions. They also get the issue ipo coins for the Most wealth too.

    No one wants to use an existing chain but everyone wants their own gift card currency they can manipulate.

    And that is what will kill crypto. Incompatible coins that need constant conversions to from dollars to be useful.

    Like instant messaging incompatibility will make life miserable and medicore

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:Notice how by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The controls of funds to stop politics.
      Not just removing, reporting, deboosting.
      Defunding of sinful speech is the next step.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Notice how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually they don't. They want a coin, but they don't want a crypto-coin. In order for it to be a crypto-coin, It's operating mechanism must have anything at all to do with cryptography. This doesn't. It's just a business-administered account like World Of Warcraft Gold or Xbox Live Points.

  9. Show of hands! by jwhyche · · Score: 2

    Can I get so show of hands of people that will trust people with their money? Anyone? Anyone......

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re: Show of hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone with a bank account... or reloadable debut card... or holding an uncashed check?

      Seriously, who mods this stuff up?

    2. Re:Show of hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not your Private Keys, not your Cryptocurrency.
      Not your decentralized p2p cryptographic privacy coin, not your Cryptocurency.
      Not your transaction mining and relay nodes, not your Cryptocurrency.
      Not your spend and replace, not your Cryptocurrency.

      All else is nothing more than FIAT SHITCOIN.
      It's just that simple.

  10. Good luck by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't have a value pegged to a major currency, it's going to be useless, like Bitcoin.
    It's also going to be useless if there isn't a cheap, global means of converting "Facebook coins" into real money.

  11. krypto kurrency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    krypto kurrency, like facebook, is for suckers. you deserve each other. MAKE 'MERKA GREEDY AGAIN.

  12. Time for more cryptocurrency advertisement!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitcoin & all its cryptocurrency offspring are DYING!!!
    What to do???
    How about more cryptocurrency hype/advertisement attempt on Slashdot???

  13. "Stable Value" by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "A digital token with a stable value would not be attractive to speculators -- the main audience for cryptocurrencies so far -- but it would allow consumers to hold it and pay for things without worrying about the value of the coin rising and falling."

    Bullshit. That means inflation will have an effect on its value.

    These people failed basic economics. You're a fucking fool if you give them any money for this cryptocurrency shit.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  14. Facebook cryptocurreny? No thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The growing distrust of WhatsApp due to Facebook's ongoing integration with Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp puts a mighty big barrier for the desired security/privacy. We already know Facebook is reading WhatsApp so that last thing the community needs is a cryptocurrency run by Facebook. The alternatives of Signal and Telgram are considerably more appealing and are not tied to Facebook.

  15. I'm guessing the point by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    is to function as a sort of bank where they can trade money between people without transaction fees right up until the users need the cash to buy some real world good. It'd be a nice scheme if they could make it work.

    I'm guessing government will keep that from happening, and not necessarily for bad reasons. Banks are heavily regulated to prevent large ones from crashing the economy (well, heavily regulated for about 8 years until we put a batch of neo-cons in office long enough to strip away the repairs from the last recession, but I digress).

    Facebook is likely to end up in a rock and a hard place. The lefties won't let them operate without the heavy duty oversight that makes banking expensive. The righties won't want Facebook musclin' in on their territory.

    I predict the whole thing will fizzle out under the weight of regulations meant to protect consumers and regulations just plain meant to kill it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. signal too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck me, signal is falling into this shit too? And here I thought it was merely an end-to-end encrypted chat service...

  17. Ethereum by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    Just start using Ethereum and be done with it already!

    1. Re:Ethereum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethereum has security problems and was able to revert transactions in the past. Nothing is stopping them from doing it again.

  18. GNU Taler by Meneth · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they want GNU Taler.

  19. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever they will try, they will find that nChain already holds patents for it..

  20. No crypto needed by DrYak · · Score: 1

    But people can buy drugs, guns, and sex using crypto.

    People can also buy drugs and sex using plain simple money.
    It all depends if the country you're in considers it as something fundamentally evil that needs to be banned no matter what, or if it's just yet another market that at most needs to be regulated.
    But those countries just happen to be mostly on the other side of the Atlantic pond, on our "evil-euro-communist" side...

    It's easier to conduct business off the books that needs to be kept off the books.

    Wha.. ?!?... no !
    What part of "distributed trust" and "public ledger" don't you get?!
    Well, okay. The cryptographics concepts might be a little too complex.
    But the core idea that drove the development of Bitcoin is to avoid a central authority responsible for them. Instead, it relies on every node of the network holding its local copy of the transaction history and agreeing together (so no central authority could try to take over).

    That also mean that *every single node* on the network has a copy of the books. So it's quite the opposite of conducting business off the books.
    Bitcoin is *not* anonymous, by design. At best it's pseudonymous: the transaction aren't stored together with your real identity, they're instead linked to the cryptography key pair used to sign them. (But that won't prevent any big player to eventually manage to match a collection of keys with some real world identity. At the end of the day, those wares you mentions needs to be shipped somewhere).

    But the thing is, as there are no central authority, there's no single stop to *prevent* those exchange from happening. You can freeze the credit cards or paypal account of some controversial enterprise, but you can't go and ask some "Bitcoin, Inc" to freeze the transactions.
    (That's in fact part of the rose of popularity of the concept, after controversial websites like Wikileaks got heir donation request mecanism frozen).
    (Though nowadays, there's probably a couple of giant chinese mining pool which more or less work as a "bitcoin, inc" simply because together they deal more than 51% of all transaction mining).

    TL;DR: You're not *off the books*. You're off from someone knocking on your bank's door and saying "he's not allowed to do that, please block the transaction".

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  21. boo hiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how are we supposed to make money off this garbage.

  22. the only detail you need to know by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    When you hear the phrase "new cryptocurrency" it will be hacked. The end. It is going to be hacked with a >50% attack because it will be too small to prevent random miners from out-processing the rest of the network and forging false transactions. Use an existing, established currency or don't bother because it won't work.

  23. Coincircle by yetiblue · · Score: 1

    Come check out coincircle! You can earn up to $200 USD a day in ETH https://coincircle.com/l/qL4kP...

  24. Follower not a leader by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    WeChat has had mobile payments for yonks.
    I beats pointless cryptocurrencies i.e. wastes of electricity.

  25. ICOs by maxiposik · · Score: 0

    That really is interesting. I like the fact that there are so many new crypto projects. I mean, just visit ICOPulse, you can find dozens of them on the website. And a few ones are really perspective.