Slashdot Mirror


Google's New .dev Domain Opens To All (engadget.com)

On Thursday, Google began officially selling their new .dev domains to anyone, Engadget reports: To claim a .dev, all you need to do is sign up with your registrar of choice (Google, naturally, is an option). As a bonus, Google is offering a free .dev domain to anyone who applied for a ticket to the Google I/O event happening this May.

The domains will be secure by default, as they all require HTTPS, and Google has already moved many of its own sites (including web.dev, opensource.dev and flutter.dev) to the domain.

"The internet has come a long way from the days of .com, .org and .net," writes Engadget. "Now, you can get domains ending in anything from .cool to .ninja."

UPDATE (3/3/2019): Apparently the domain emacs.dev now points to the web site for Vim.

57 comments

  1. Whatever, it all gets blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of these vanity domains get blocked on my server because 99% are spam.

  2. And by bending our standards a little... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now, you can get domains ending in anything from .cn to .ru"

  3. HTTPS by default?... by dabadab · · Score: 2

    The domains will be secure by default, as they all require HTTPS,

    What does that even actually mean?

    --
    Real life is overrated.
    1. Re: HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here hoping for an answer as well. That doesn't make any sense unless they mean they will provide free certs with purchase

    2. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Informative

      See here for an explanation: https://security.googleblog.co...

      TL;DR is the entire TLD is on the HSTS preload list.

    3. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, just like the politically correct are constantly striving to lengthen the time it takes to spell and communicate simple concepts, Microsoft is bringing in More Secure HTTPS, the idea is that by adding even more letters you'll have to think about where you're going on the internet a little bit more, and the difference between HTTP and MSHTTPS is just going to stand out even further. Because it's just an arbitrary letter change, it's going to be backwards compatible for now, until it's in common use and updated versions only apply to Internet "Edge" Explorer. Due to licencing agreements and internal contracts, Facebook will have access to all data transmitted through MSHTTPS. Windows 10 (or n) will record all key strokes, and all this behaviour is tenfold vastly better than what Google is up to.

    4. Re:HTTPS by default?... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      The domains will be secure by default, as they all require HTTPS,

      What does that even actually mean?

      It's good to know that Google has figured out a way to prevent criminals and other evildoers from running https on their web servers.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lie. "Secure by default" is snake oil.

    6. Re: HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here hoping for an answer as well. That doesn't make any sense unless they mean they will provide free certs with purchase

      They provide free certificates as sponsors of the Let's Encrypt free certificate service.

    7. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That malicious URL cannot be loaded without enabling unrestricted local code execution.

      Therefore one must wonder how a "body" which requires manifest insecurity can claim security.

      Also, HTTPS does not provide "security", it provides "privacy" between the "two parties who are communicating against third-party eaves-droppers". Note that the "two parties who are communicating" are not necessarily who you might think they are.

    8. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The domains will be secure by default, as they all require HTTPS,

      What does that even actually mean?

      As far as I know, DNSSEC is used to secure DNS. Did Google not "get the memo" that the Internet is more than just World Wide Web websites? There are also many more protocols used in addition to https, including DNS. ;)

    9. Re: HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you have such deep dark learned wisdom. So wise. So been there done that. Tell me more sensei!

    10. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about MSHTTPSFORLGBTQBYGOOGATAMZN protocol, is it available?

    11. Re: HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they listen to what you host and take down your domain records if you're hosting using HTTP? (That would be deliciously evil.)

    12. Re:HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they develop HTTPSEC or HTTPSSEC? Or SEHTTPS. Everything is more secure with "SEC" at the end or "SE" before the name.

    13. Re: HTTPS by default?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Gs after a number?

  4. Too many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People got .com - you entered the name and added .com. Now people are forgetting what a URL even is, thanks in part to google who has confused them with the difference between a search on google and entering in an address. By adding more .TLDs google further aids this confusion. It also allows confusion between legitimate and illegitimate sites for various brands and products and generates a way of forcing companies to register more and more different .TLDs to protect their trademarks and web presence. Google, internet cartel.

    1. Re: Too many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, having a .dev domain linked to a company's .com domain, and that is on the HSTS pre-load list, is a smart move for internet standards.

      If Equifax can be breached, then what about dev projects which may only have security through obscurity? By having a third party set standards and automatically audit and enforce the compliance (via browser HSTS lists, etc.) it can reduce the confusion for execs and subsequently reduce the risk of red tape bureaucracy creating another major data leak.

      But capitalism is inherently lazy, so, probably not going to work.

    2. Re: Too many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTTPS would not prevent the Equifax breach. HTTPS merely means that MITM scripties cannot watch how the other scripties compromised Equifax.

    3. Re:Too many by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, Google also loves the new TLDs because it makes the whole URL system less understandable to most people. I mean, they already are training you not to understand the difference between a search query (forwarded to them) and a URL in the address bar.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  5. How Long Until Google Kills .DEV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, a .DEV domain may be worth having for a project. However, anyone relying on .DEV long-term is likely in for a disappointment given Google's past track record.

    Also, going forward, it's likely .DEV domain renewals will cost more than for .COMs. The price trade-off may be worthwhile for those who can get a decent vanity .DEV domain. However, to reiterate, Google could kill off .DEV anytime and/or change policy to take back / restrict particular domains.

    1. Re: How Long Until Google Kills .DEV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it usually when they get bored with a project or when it stops producing revenue for them? Or is there a difference?

  6. Goatse.dev already taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So much for my plans.

  7. In related news ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google's New .dev Domain Opens To All

    And their new ".notadev" domain opens to everyone else. Paradox imminent.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:In related news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hold on, I'm going to buy notadev.dev ...

    2. Re:In related news ... by Stan42 · · Score: 1

      Agree to this ! Unless they expand...

  8. Sweet! Pron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was always hoping for the .deviant web domains! The normal pron is getting so boring....crazy fake tits, yak yak yak, blowjob, eat pussy, fucking in weird positions, and then cum on face...YAWN!

    1. Re:Sweet! Pron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working three yaks into a scene is pretty out there. how jaded are you?

  9. Once again, confusing secure with complicated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't win them on the merits, baffle them with the bullshit. As far as I can tell, it's just a ploy to cut out some middlemen that might also want to slurp all your data, thus making Google's copy less valuable in comparison.

  10. Why did google get a top level domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might be missing something... How did they get one to give away? I though this was an independent registrar thing that wasn’t owned by anyone (apart from American stewardship).

    1. Re:Why did google get a top level domain? by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing a lot. Since 2011, in fact.

    2. Re:Why did google get a top level domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very helpful comment. Thanks!

    3. Re:Why did google get a top level domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is a site for techies - ie people who already know the answer, and are smug, big-headed and disrespectful about it - Development departments used to be full of them in the 80s and 90s until OH WAIT THIS IS WHERE THEY ALL WENT OFF TO

  11. jokes on trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i already bought trumpforprison.dev and nevertrump2020.dev

  12. Amazing by Time_Ngler · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The internet has come a long way from the days of .com, .org and .net," writes Engadget. "Now, you can get domains ending in anything from .cool to .ninja."

    What progress!

    1. Re: Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want my emoji tld.

    2. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most amazing advance in the history of human-kind. Better than fire, the wheel, printing press, assembly lines, nuclear and the transistor. All of that pales in comparison to .dev!

      numbnuts

  13. Just confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like when my auto insurance company tried to send my ID cards to a .com email address instead of the .org email address that I specified.

  14. Domain names are a protection racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing

    Domain names are a protection racket, and the registrars are a cartel.

    "What a nice website you have there, it would be a pity if it were to burn down. Better pay us every year for fire protection." [Registrar checks that the torches and lighters are in working order.]

    What's amazing is that so few people realize it.

    1. Re:Domain names are a protection racket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does help keep things orderly and makes it difficult to steal domain names. But yeah, the yearly few is weapons-grade retardation. Cloudflare might suck but at least they sell them for 'cost'.

      numbnuts

    2. Re:Domain names are a protection racket by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's a nice phone number you have there. Be a pity if you didn't pay your bill and lost your number. Right, that's literally what the bill is for.

  15. .com .net and .org are here to stay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest are shit

  16. This Could Be Awkward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confusion between the .fap and .faq domains led to the gTLD wars of 2030...

    1. Re:This Could Be Awkward by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Confusion between the .fap and .faq domains led to the gTLD wars of 2030...

      And creation of the seeming complimentary, but actually orthogonal, sub-domains "faq.fap" and "fap.faq" certainly did help. By comparison, the great Emacs vs Vi religious wars of the late 20th century now seems like a minor kerfuffle.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  17. Require SSL? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    How can a domain "require ssl"?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Require SSL? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Someone already asked that question and it has been answered.

      https://security.googleblog.co...

      Basically, browsers recognize the domain on a list and the browser enforces https.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re: Require SSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Browsers do? All browsers? But not curl, wget, my python code? Lame

  18. Now with surge pricing... by null+etc. · · Score: 3, Informative

    These new domain TLDs are apparently enforcing the law of supply and demand, by charging more for "coveted" and popular domains.

    For example, "so.dev" is a 2-letter domain, which Google prices at $720/yr. "sot.dev" is a 3-letter domain, but what the hell is a "sot", so that only cost $98/yr. Meanwhile, "sos.dev" costs $360/yr, because if you really need help, it should cost more. "pants.dev" is $98/yr, but if you want to save some money, you can just register "pant.dev", which is $56/yr.

    Even though this "nickel and dime" pricing is just the latest extension to our capitalist overlords trying to suck us dry for every cent we have, I hate the idea.

    1. Re:Now with surge pricing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it's 50/50 getting money but also, the reason they charge a premium for shorter domains is otherwise it'd be fairly cheap to bot-register the entire domain space say, 12 characters and under, and then flip them all via auction

    2. Re:Now with surge pricing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      More likely they use analysis of similarly named domains on other TLDs. Some suckers even used Google analytics on their .com to make it easier for Google to squeeze out every last cent. Think high speed trading meets real estate tycoon.

    3. Re:Now with surge pricing... by CRC'99 · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I threw in my online alias into it, $260/yr for the first year. Tried with another registrar, $19.95/yr....

      Seems like Google is playing the game.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    4. Re:Now with surge pricing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a 3 letter domain for $9, it really depends on what those 3 letters are.

  19. It's a trap. Google will steal your domain. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I just went to the google accelerated page for Reddit on my iphone safari browser. Guess what? It's no longer accessible in safari! google forces you to use chrome to reach it. Google is breaking the internet.

    If you get a .dev page then after a year it's going to not respond to https. it's will be only a google accelerated page only and only vailble by Ghttp protocol.

    don't fall for it.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  20. Just don't by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    dev an advanced and new ad blocker.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  21. Somebodies registered vim.dev and emacs.dev by watanuki · · Score: 2

    Check them out:

    www.vim.dev
    www.emacs.dev

    I did not found this, read it somewhere :)

  22. Not Trustworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would never trust Google to run my TLD. They are about as trustworthy as GoDaddy when it comes to respecting your personal rights.

  23. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I tried to go to https://www.registry.google/re..., My Firefox browser froze up on me and I eventually had to hard kill it. What was google trying to inject into my machine before letting me sign up? Isn't tracking everything done through their .dev TLD good enough?