Slashdot Mirror


Hundreds of Millions of Chinese Chat Logs Leak Online (ft.com)

Hundreds of millions of private chat logs from Chinese users have been left exposed on the internet, a researcher has found, in another worrying case of weak data protection in China. Financial Times reports: Victor Gevers, a security researcher at the cyber-security organisation GDI Foundation, said that he had found a database of 364m records [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source.], containing social media profiles and chat logs linked to names and identity card numbers.

The database was freely accessible online to anyone who searched for its IP address, and user profiles were stored together with photographs, addresses and locations, said Mr Gevers. The main database was piping data to 17 other servers depending on which area the data came from, Mr Gevers said. [...] A large number of the records had the names and addresses of web cafes on them. Chinese cyber-security experts have long warned that web cafes collect vast amounts of customer data.

1 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. Re:May be paywalled? by msmash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hi, Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The New Yorker maintain a metered paywall, allowing users to read a certain number of articles at no cost. Once you have read the "free/sample" articles, you are required to pay for the subscription. The reason why we mention a link might be paywalled is because there is a chance that some readers won't be asked to pay for it when they click on the source link. [More context: Some outlets let you read an article for free if you visit their links in incognito mode, or if you tapped their link on Twitter or other platform. Disclaimer: Like other news aggregators that rely on news from a number of sources, we don't condone breaking paywall of a news outlet. We use an excerpt or two from their stories, and in return, send them some traffic.] This is in contrast to some other news outlets like say The Information, which has a hard paywall, that requires you to absolutely pay for content if you want to read an article there. If we link to The Information, we will 100 percent mention that the link is paywalled. And if you look at some of the stories we have covered that The Information broke, you will see that we have instead linked to other news outlets that rewrote The Information's stories. We try not to link to any paywalled outlet unless there is no alternative source available, in which case we have limited choice. Sometimes an alternative source is available but the story might be riddled with factual errors or too many grammatical mistakes, in which case, we again resort to the paywalled outlet. In any case, we try to link to an alternative source as well, which would not charge readers whenever that is possible.