Slashdot Mirror


Democrats Will Introduce Bill To Bring Back Net Neutrality (thehill.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Hill: Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced Monday that Democrats will introduce a net neutrality bill to replace the open internet rules that were repealed in 2017. In a letter to her Democratic colleagues, Pelosi said a bill called the "Save the Internet Act" will be unveiled Wednesday and will be introduced in the Senate as well. The text of the legislation has not been released, and it's unclear what will be included in the bill. Democrats have railed against the Trump administration's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) vote to repeal the net neutrality rules, which happened more than a year ago. The 2015 regulations prohibited internet service providers from blocking or throttling websites or creating internet fast lanes.

10 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Trump overruled by the Senate already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Net Neutrality has something like 80% + positive support among voters. Trump is already having the GOP Senate OVERRIDE his emergency order, if he picks another losing position before the election like vetoing what people want he's just risking more of the moderates he desperately needs having another irrefutable example that he's all swamp, in the pocket of big money and not doing his job of protecting them. Not all Republican voters are completely stupid. Just most.

    1. Re:Trump overruled by the Senate already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Trump is already having the GOP Senate OVERRIDE his emergency order

      Yes, the senate will vote against the declared national emergency... then the bill ends up on the desk of Trump who will veto it.

      The votes simply do not exist to override that first veto.

      Sure a shame so many on the left were happy to have Obama ruling with a 'pen and a phone' in leu of actual legislation, creating yet another damning precident which allows Trump to do that and more.

      We tried to warn you how you were moving the overton window... you called us racist instead.

      risking more of the moderates he desperately needs having another irrefutable example that he's all swamp

      Except he's the devil the voters know... thus far the hard left democrats who have thrown their hats into the ring aren't exactly well known options nationally. Sure, we'll learn more as they battle it out... Trump comes in with an automatic advantage of being an incumbent.

    2. Re:Trump overruled by the Senate already. by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Using Obama as an excuse to defend any and every action by Trump is not working.

      I voted against Obama twice. I suspect die-hard Trump supporters were too busy watching reality TV in 2008 and 2012 to even know there was an election.

      And while Obama did have his pen and phone, Trump is signing EOs at a faster pace and Obama never signed an EO or declared a national emergency just to bypass the power of Congress to control the purse strings.

      which allows Trump to do that and more

      Oh really? So, eventually you expect us to devolve into a dictatorship where we still "officially" have a Constitution and separation of powers, but in practice we don't at all.

      you called us racist instead.

      Nobody called anyone a racist (excepting internet trolls) just for criticizing Obama, but the fact is there was a lot of racism directed towards him and there still is.

      Except he's the devil the voters know...

      Interesting. I've heard many Trump supporters say he was the devil we DIDN'T know in 2016 and that's why they voted for him. They knew what to expect from the career politicians so they gambled on Trump. Except some of us knew who Trump was too and I don't mean from his TV show either. That's why we voted against him.

    3. Re:Trump overruled by the Senate already. by penandpaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody called anyone a racist (excepting internet trolls) just for criticizing Obama

      I remember the very next day after Obama was elected in 2008, I was watching CNN and someone said to the effect of: "What we learned last night was that there were not enough racists to beat Obama."

      Forgive me, but Obama and the media were happy to pull the racism card on anything.

  2. Re:Veto by trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As a Republican, I'm perfectly fine with reasonable neutrality legislation while I also agreed with Ajit's pulling the plug. Using ancient common carrier classifications to regulate the internet was not the right way to do it. Doing it through proper legislation from Congress is the correct way. Legislation that understands modern communications and data. Not some agency deciding to use rules designed for POTS carriers to regulate the internet.

    It was the wrong way to do it and needed to be ended. If Congress succeeds, it means that Ajit succeeded in forcing Congress to do its job.

  3. Read it and weep by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do hope everyone here will read what the bill ACTUALLY SAYS, rather than merely the claims that are going to be made about the bill...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Read it and weep by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately, this is true. It's a safe bet that it was written by lobbyists for their corporate masters, and that the American public will get totally and thoroughly screwed. I mean, I could be wrong, but statistically speaking, I'm probably not.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Re:Should of done it this way in the first place by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You mean like the Tax Cut? The one that gave all the cuts to the top 1%? How many pages was that? And nobody got to see it even before it was brought to a vote? Yeah Pot, go ahead, call Kettles black.

    My paycheck grew, so whatever was in the tax cuts worked for me.

    --
    I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
  5. Re:Should of done it this way in the first place by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My paycheck grew, so whatever was in the tax cuts worked for me.

    The clown and his circus fucked with withholdings to trick the masses into assuming it was tax cuts.

    Tax day rolls around and millions are pissed they either get to pay or their refund is crap. LOL suckers.

  6. Re:Veto by trump by Shotgun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering that they consistently have worked against your interests for the last 50 years, how do you motivate still calling yourself a Republican?

    Against my interest? How is having the federal government take over every aspect of my life so that I can be as equally poor as you in my interest? How do you even know what my interests are? How is guaranteeing a living wage to people who can't work, or don't want to work in my interests? How in ruining the greatest healthcare system and the greatest economy in the world in my interests?

    You are a willfully blind idiot that can not see how great the country you live in truly is. Please leave at your earliest convenience and take all the rest of the self-hating, racist democrats with you.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba