Slashdot Mirror
Democrats Introduce 'Save the Internet Act' To Restore Net Neutrality (cnet.com)
As expected, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other House and Senate Democrats on Wednesday introduced the Save the Internet Act, which aims to restore open internet rules that were repealed in 2017. From a report: The Obama-era rules, which lasted from 2015 to 2018, banned broadband providers from slowing or blocking access to the internet or charging companies higher fees for faster access. Democrats in Congress have said the repeal allows for large broadband and wireless companies to "control people's online activities." "86 percent of Americans opposed Trump's assault on net neutrality, including 82 percent of Republicans," said Pelosi during the press conference on Wednesday. "With 'Save The Internet Act,' Democrats are honoring the will of the people." Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey tweeted out a copy of the bill on Wednesday, saying nearly every Democrat in the Senate had joined him to introduce it.
It's only 3 pages long, read it yourself: https://twitter.com/SenMarkey/...
Trump was the one that got rid of net neutrality through his appointments to the FCC. Let's not pretend that he's in favor of it. If it weren't for him, we wouldn't need a bill.
Well, they know that. It's the same as when the Republicans put bills on Obama's desk to repeal the ACA. They knew he'd veto it and that they wouldn't be able to override it. It's about signalling to the voters "this is what we'll be able to do if you put us in charge." It's not a new phenomenon.
The Republicans tried to repeal the ACA 54 times when Obama was in office. IIRC, only one of those times did a bill make it out of Congress and to Obama's desk, where he vetoed it. So I think it's "bill" in the singular.
If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
Ok.
Comcast quality of service has gone down, network speeds in general have gone down, Verizon cut off multiple firefighters tackling wildfires endangering the lives of crews and civilians, telemedicine has become unsafe.
That should be enough.
Either admit to being wrong or don't bother replying.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
hairyfeet is correct(Watch the interview) and your misinformed about whos being deplatformed. Quite the contrary violent left wing actors are not being thrown off but conservatives are for speech...
Time for a law to force freedom of speech to exist across any public platform over a given size.
Besides real net neutrality is neutrality of content, not of service levels and speeds for different types of uses.
Wrong. Net neutrality has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of packets - it's all about the delivery of those packets. The principle of net neutrality is that all packets, regardless of their source or destination, *within the same QoS tier* are given the same priority on the wires. That's it. (percieved) censorship/"deplatforming"/whatever is an entirely different discussion.