Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Could Automatically Uninstall Buggy Windows Updates (windowslatest.com)

Microsoft is reportedly working on a new functionality that will automatically remove botched updates from Windows 10 to fix startup issues and other bugs preventing the PC from booting. "The support document was quietly published a couple of hours ago and for some reasons, Microsoft has also blocked the search engines from crawling or indexing the page," reports Windows Latest. "In the document, Microsoft explains that Windows may automatically install updates in order to keep your device secure and smooth." From the report: Due to various reasons, including software and driver compatibility issues, Windows Updates are vulnerable to mistakes and hardware errors. In some cases, Windows Update may fail to install. After installing a recent update, if your PC experience startup failures and automatic recovery attempts are unsuccessful, Windows may try to resolve the failure by uninstalling recently installed updates. In this case, users may receive a notification with the following message: "We removed some recently installed updates to recover your device from a startup failure."

Microsoft says that Windows will also automatically block the problematic updates from installing automatically for the next 30 days. During these 30 days, Microsoft and its partners will investigate the failure and attempt to fix the issues. When the issues are fixed, Windows will again try to install the updates. Users still have the freedom to reinstall the updates. If you believe that the update should not be removed, you can manually reinstall the driver or quality updates which were uninstalled earlier.

64 comments

  1. Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will it get so advanced that it eventually just uninstalls Windows 10 altogether?

    Ba dum DUM

    I'll be here all week, folks..

    1. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you pirated it, sure. Nothing puts you at risk more than an illegal copy of Windows, Office, any Microsoft PC game, Firefox, Linux, Adobe Flash, or 'Slashdot THE APP!'. Seriously, they know what's best. Let them do their job.

    2. Re:Will it get so advanced... by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 1

      And also replaces it with Windows 7.

    3. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but they are working on functionality of reinstalling if the uninstaller accidentally uninstalls a good update.

    4. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      If they were any good at "doing their job" the need for updates would be much reduced in the first place...

    5. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the document, Microsoft explains that Windows may automatically install updates in order to keep your device secure and smooth."

      Dear Microsoft,

      Fuck you and your forced updates.

      Windows 10 is shit and the forced updates are buggy.

      Just fuck you.

    6. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now they want to throw pop-ups in Windows 7 to force 10 all over again, WHILE making you pay $100 for a year of updates and they're only doing the criticals and you know they're going to half-ass it even worse...

      The time to hard quit the Microsloth heroin is right the fuck now.

    7. Re:Will it get so advanced... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Will they also add an uninstaller for the reinstaller of the uninstaller of the updater? If they can't get the update right, why should we trust them to get the uninstall of the update right, which triples the number of failure points, the install, the uninstall, and being able to roll back to the previous state.

    8. Re:Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it get so advanced that it eventually just uninstalls Windows 10 altogether?

      Ba dum DUM

      I'll be here all week, folks..

      *Please wait while we get ready to uninstall update, this may take a while.*

    9. Re: Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more updates a developer pushes out, the more incompetent they are because they keep failing to get it right.

    10. Re: Will it get so advanced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the obligatory "Jim Kelly from Microsoft here..."

  2. Can it uninstall itself and reinstall Windows 7??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd be grrrrrreat.

  3. I see no potential for problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a one.

  4. You just KNOW what's going to happen by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    The update intended to fix the buggy update will itself have a bug...and we'll be doubly screwed.

    Respecting a long-standing tradition, Microsoft will, of course, insist that the problem is the user's fault.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  5. FFS, Microsoft by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You force updates on people seemingly non-stop, several of them cause huge problems, including data loss, and now you're building functionality to remove botched updates?

    Here is a radical idea for you: Give us back control of when to apply updates.

    Not defer them for a few days. Not select a slower update track. Put a damn setting that makes it our own responsibility to go click the update button again.

    1. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ This.

    2. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An issue only fixable by law. Every unwanted update that causes problems results in a $1,000 fine for each installation affected.

    3. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then can we also fine every idiot that fails to install a patch and gets their machine as part of a botnet?

    4. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure! Deciding when to install patches doesn't turn the machine into a bot.

    5. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then can we also fine every idiot that fails to install a patch and gets their machine as part of a botnet?

      Are you implying fully patched Windows boxes don't become part of botnets? Hahaha, good one...

    6. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it can. If there is a huge security flaw discovered that allows infection via the internet (eg the winxp one) by not installing the update you could become part of a botnet

    7. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you had to pay $1,000 before you were allowed to install Flash.

    8. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we also fine Microsoft for any machine that becomes part of a botnet because they automatically uninstalled a botched patch then? Cool.

    9. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You simply firewall WU access. It's not rocket surgery. You enable it a few days to a week after an important update gets released and feedback has had a chance to trickle in.

      Otherwise you are literally playing Russian roulette with your PC.

    10. Re:FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give us back control of when to apply updates.

      Not defer them for a few days. Not select a slower update track.

      I'm pretty sure corporate users get more control of that, so the functionality is presumably there. The problem is you are one of a very narrow subset of users, and they'd rather not hire more people to deal with the problems of systems not being updated, plus take the possible hit to their reputation of those problems.

      Maybe the solution is only essential security updates, but you get a version of windows that is only supported for a year?

    11. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Might as well have said 'You simply remove the bandwidth embigulator from the direct alternating current generator from the air tape sharpener. It's not rocket surgery.' This would have made just as much sense.

      You realize that to 99% of people, what you have said makes no sense whatsoever. They have no idea what this 'simple' solution means, don't know how and in most cases don't have the equipment to actually do that. The terms used have about as much use to most people as a foreign language.

      What would happen if WU makes a secure outbound on a port like 443 that just has to be kept open no matter what and your solution doesn't do any good. What would happen if windows ignored DNS server settings, kept changing WU host addresses, proxy settings, etc.,... Look at the newer windows update medic service who's job, entirely, is to make sure windows update is running. Haven't found how to disable that one yet but if you try, windows assumes you didn't mean to cause any problems so it 'fixes' itself re-enabling autostart.

      Your comment may be good for bragging but it isn't as useful to the masses when it comes to the stability and predictability (the only things most really want) of their computers. Nobody wants to waste time re-learning stuff, waiting for their kit to spend time updating itself as if the only reason to have it is stand by watching it update itself.

    12. Re:FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Microsoft would rather take a different hit to their reputation in the form of instability, inconsistency and unreliability instead?

      There is a difference between solving a problem and shifting a problem. The former is a fix, the latter is just tossing around a hot potato which just makes things more difficult as everyone now has to keep track of the potato.

    13. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck in Windows 1809 I have tried the same trick to disable SearchUI.exe that worked in Windows 1803 but it didn't work (.bat file to kill SearchUI.exe and immediately rename the directory it's living in). New Windows version probably has a countermeasure and I'm unsure if someone will come up with a new trick. So I now have a useless process wasting 1% or more of my RAM.

    14. Re:FFS, Microsoft by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Here is a radical idea for you: Give us back control of when to apply updates.

      That doesn't address the root of multiple problems:
      a) it results in perpetually unpatched systems becoming a health hazard to the rest of the internet.
      b) people generally aren't upset at getting updates, they are upset at the reboot schedule and that those updates break things.

      I don't want options from MS, I want actual quality so that I have no need for options.

      Put a damn setting that makes it our own responsibility

      People can't be trusted to be responsible. This has been clearly demonstrated with widespread harm caused by previously patched security bugs being none the less exploited.

    15. Re:FFS, Microsoft by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People can't be trusted to be responsible. This has been clearly demonstrated with widespread harm caused by previously patched security bugs being none the less exploited.

      Microsoft can't be trusted to be responsible. This has been clearly demonstrated with tricky/forced migration from older OS versions, data loss, and dead PCs.

    16. Re: FFS, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows 10 can bypass any personal firewall installed on it and perimeter firewalls are useless if you ever take your computer elsewhere.

    17. Re:FFS, Microsoft by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      a) it results in perpetually unpatched systems becoming a health hazard to the rest of the internet.

      I wish this meme would die. Not all unpatched systems are a health hazard to anyone, much less your little part of the world. They DO need to do productive work, and when they stop working it costs a lot of money to get working again.

      I just had to waste an hour this morning driving to a site to reboot a computer because "windows detected a potential problem and shut the system down to prevent damage to the hardware." How nice. It's one of those systems that is behind a strong firewall and is not a "health hazard" to anyone.

      I don't want options from MS, I want actual quality so that I have no need for options.

      That's a stupid meme, too. People use computers for different things, and people run different software on them. The fact that your games run just fine and you have no devices more complicated than a keyboard doesn't mean that's what everyone else does. Some of us have stuff that breaks when MS decides to change how things work and force updates. We have PRODUCTION systems that need to keep running, and we get paid to verify that changes won't break things before we apply them -- and MS doesn't give a shit if one of my production systems stops working because they change something.

  6. Popcorn time by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    Came for the comments about it uninstalling itself...Was not disappointed!

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Popcorn time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you have time to enjoy your popcorn?

    2. Re: Popcorn time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. That was timely and topical

    3. Re:Popcorn time by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      2... maybe 3 pieces...

    4. Re:Popcorn time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. I ate the popcorns yesterday though.

  7. How long until it uninstalls Firefox by tratson · · Score: 1

    Doing this automatically is exactly how Microsoft could remove it's competitors products. I foresee a time when "buggy patches" changes to "shit we don't like".

    1. Re:How long until it uninstalls Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already do that. there's been numerous reports over the years of mrt (the monthly malware removal tool) and windows 10 upgrades/feature updates flagging software as 'bad' or 'incompatible' when it is, in fact, not... and either blocking the software from running or deleting it altogether.

    2. Re:How long until it uninstalls Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, PhotoShop was sad :( so we uninstalled it. That's how we help and protect our peps.

      (Re-install PhotoShop along with all the cloud crap including a re-download.)

      Want to change your default image opener to PhotoShop? The Photos app is new and really hip so it is like automatically cooler, better and comes with free StarBucks (subscription required after free trial), want to check it out?

  8. Hope it can be DISABLED by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    We all know how well THAT will work. It will uninstall the "update" and who know's what else!

    1. Re:Hope it can be DISABLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it can be disabled. By using a different OS. Problem solved.

  9. Jesus! Really?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is reportedly working on a new functionality that will automatically remove botched updates from Windows 10 to fix startup issues and other bugs preventing the PC from booting.

    Really?! This is easier and better than just not issuing "botched updates"? Holy shit!

    1. Re: Jesus! Really?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes really. Avoiding botched updates requires months of testing on widely varied hardware and software combinations.

      Push the update and you get immediate feedback on what devices and software to target for avoiding "botched updates". Give yourself the ability and make the decision to roll back an update automatically, and things are going to typically be more efficient for all involved.

  10. enh, maybe not by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows 10 (Windows in general, actually) has had a bad record on automatic installs. I don't think I want it automatically uninstalling anything.

    I understand what they're trying to do, but as someone else said, the hot setup is not to push out buggy installs in the first place.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:enh, maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I want it automatically uninstalling anything.

      Why not? Seemed to work fine for Windows RG!

  11. It'll work this time?? by Voyager529 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, MS has had this since Windows 7...but every time it tried pulling out a failed update, it would either fail to remove (leaving the machine in an unbootable state), or pull it out, then reinstall it on the next reboot, then fail, then revert, and so on...also leaving a machine basically unusable.

    This isn't what Windows 10 needs.

    What Windows 10 needs is simple: security-only updates with a 10MB maximum per update, references to actual KB articles that explicitly state the exploit they mitigate, and a return to 'service packs', released annually. Want to call them 'feature updates'? fine. Support security updates on service packs N, N-1, and N-2, and allow users to permanently opt out of service packs and have manual installers available for those service packs, so users can do the major updates on their own terms.

    Even the handful of people who actually care about the new features being added to Win10 are either in the Insider program (where they opt into this-might-break-stuff updates), or else they consider those new features secondary to existing functionality.

    It's really that simple.

    1. Re:It'll work this time?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's simple to identify the problems. Any sane person could do that. The problem is getting Microsoft or any other of these evil scumbag companies to actually care. They *really* don't *want* to make a great OS.

    2. Re:It'll work this time?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, not even the OSS world runs that way. BSD only just releases new versions, for example.

      Also, this means that instead of supporting Windows 10, they suddenly have to support thousands of possible frankenstein mixtures. That's why they moved to cumulative updates (why should Microsoft backport a security fix to build 1684 when they could simply say "update to build 1800"?)

      (numbers made up)

    3. Re:It'll work this time?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft *should* do right by their clients by deploying well tested and stable updates that don't break machines and wipe data. Further, they should allow their customers to choose when to install these updates.

      Microsoft wants to make things easier on themselves by being really pushy with their customers. Not to mention invasive.

      It's not cool. It's why I am moving to Linux.

  12. Windows 10 is a bug (but they call it a feature) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm looking forward to the rise of the Linux desktop once windows 7 goes the way of the dodo, and its purist refuse to use that buggy piece of rubbish called Window 10.

    All I need to do is browse websites, Photoshop, play mp3s and video and the odd game on steam... we are close people.

  13. Microsoft: MORE control? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    "Windows 10 Could Automatically Uninstall Buggy Windows Updates."

    Judging from past experience, there is probably a hidden reason: Microsoft will have even MORE control over customer's computers. That will make "buggy updates" financially important to Microsoft. Microsoft wants permission not only to install software, Microsoft wants full control, apparently.

    Windows 10 is possibly the worst spyware ever made. "Buried in the service agreement is permission to poke through everything on your PC." (Aug. 4, 2015)

    1. Re:Microsoft: MORE control? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Wait up, removes bad updates, like the ones the stop windows 10 from booting up, exactly how?!?

      I am going with a play station on monitor and linux boxen and a switch.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  14. Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious way for malware to induce removal of patches that might interfere with it and keep them away for 30 days. So expect to see a rash of this in the future.

    Plus MS tossing sh*t at the customers to see what sticks. After all if it's no good Windows will just remove it. It's like the self correcting program again.

  15. So, they automagically install bugs overnight by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    while your laptop is closed and presumably offline (fuck that shit). Then they will automagically uninstall bugs the next night to fix the problems with last night's install while your laptop is closed and presumably offline (fuck that shit).

    Good luck figuring out why your laptop is unstable every few months.

  16. We're losing the 'free' internet... by Iwastheone · · Score: 1

    About 10 years ago, years before MS bought out Skype, I bought an Android tablet that had Skype pre-loaded. I told a relative via a phone call (who works for an un-named U.S. government agency), "Hey, now we can 'Skype' to each other!" My relative immediately said to me, "No, it's not secure." That told me volumes about how insecure the internet was. Slowly but surely the 'free internet' is being locked down, bit by bit. Say or do nothing on any device that you would not want to be repeated back in any open courtroom. Phones are mini computers that have a 'phone app', and are basically spy-devices that we pay for monthly. Slowly but surely 1984 is becoming a reality. Act accordingly.

  17. Start with uninstalling MS spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After you remove spyware^H^H^H^H^H^H^H telemetry I will consider Windows 10.

  18. Uninstall this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 10 Could Automatically Uninstall Buggy Windows Updates

    Will there also be an new update for Windows 7 that can uninstall this horribly buggy 'Windows 10' app that somehow got installed into my system?

  19. It did! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what a friend's experience with Windows 10 on his laptop consisted in. The laptop spent hours/days upgrading unprovoked, then Windows 10 immediately uninstalled Windows 10 and reverted to Windows 7. Or maybe my friend REFUSED the EULA.

  20. Our Production Systems Are Not Their Test Beds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They need to clean up their quality control on updates. We've seen some pretty stupid ones over the past few years breaking crystal reports, pdf's, and a variety of other small things that should of been tested before deployment. Now after they fail to do quality control on updates they expect us to trust them to remove the bad updates the previously missed? Yeah I'm calling bull shit on this one, our production environments aren't your test bed.

  21. So many reversions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen several times over the years when Windows Update would spend something like an hour trying to install a major update, then fail, and then spend another hour reverting the update. Most of the time that "worked" in that it did not make my system unstable and it could still boot up after the failed update got backed out.

    However, the Windows 10 1809 update was a complete disaster the first time I tried to install it. After spending something like an hour or two trying to do the 1809 update, I got an error and Windows tried to back 1809 out. However, while doing the uninstall of the failed 1809, Windows said something went wrong (very vague message) and rebooted. Then it was stuck in a boot loop and could never repair the failed update. I could not even get to the troubleshooting menu. Nothing would work. BTW, this was a few months after 1809 was released, then yanked, then re-released, then yanked, etc, etc.

    Fortunately, I only run Windows in a virtual machine and will never let it touch the actual hardware. Since I don't put any personal files on the Windows VM, I was able to just blow away the VM, download the updated Windows 10 installation media, and reinstall. Such a pain, but I feel sorry for the suckers who actually use Windows on a daily basis.

  22. block the problematic updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows will also automatically block the problematic updates from installing automatically for the next 30 days

    Tell me more about this new un-documented feature? It sounds like something I desperately need.

  23. Reminds me of a movie by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    “We apologise again for the fault in the subtitles. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.”

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  24. So now what...just wait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computer takes forever to boot and when it does it's very slow in responding. Task Manager Disk is at 100%. Do I just wait for MS to fix this?