Slashdot Mirror


New Mexico the Most Coal-Heavy State To Pledge 100 Percent Carbon-Free Energy By 2045 (arstechnica.com)

New Mexico's state House of Representatives passed the "Energy Transition Act" on Tuesday, where it's expected to be signed quickly by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. The bill "commits the state to getting 100 percent of its energy from carbon-free sources by 2045," reports Ars Technica. From the report: The bill includes interim goals mandating that 50 percent of the state's energy mix be renewable by 2030 and 80 percent of the energy mix be renewable by 2040. The state currently buys no nuclear power, which is not renewable but qualifies as a zero-carbon energy source. The bill passed yesterday does not require that 100 percent of the state's energy be renewable by 2045; it just specifies that no electricity come from a carbon-emitting source.

New Mexico is unique among these states because it is a relatively coal-heavy state, generating 1.5 gigawatts of coal-fired electricity as of November 2018. Last month, the state's Public Service Company of New Mexico had slated its 847MW San Juan coal plant for shut down by 2022, but a New York hedge fund called Acme Equities swooped in with an offer to buy the 46-year-old plant. According to Power Magazine, Acme intends to retrofit the plant with carbon capture and sequestration technology. If the deal goes through, Acme would use the captured carbon in enhanced oil recovery, where carbon is forced into older or weak oil wells to improve the pressure of the well and extract more oil. But with the passage of this bill, Acme's offer may not stand. New Mexico In Depth writes that the bill puts "$30 million toward the clean-up of the [San Juan] coal-fired power plant and the mine that supplies it and $40 million toward economic diversification efforts in that corner of the state and support for affected power plant employees and miners."

1 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Re: Clean, Powerful Coal by sfcat · · Score: 1, Informative

    He's actually more correct than not. Sherman's March did raze large sections of the south. The South was in economic ruins and the plantation owners were also in ruins. Slavery was paid for in blood and treasure. Jim Crow, you can argue was not. But then, the whole idea behind the Great Society rhetoric which expanded welfare and the like in the 1960s, was to jump-start black economic progress. It didn't work out that way did it? And yet trillions were spent.

    Actually, from the 1960s to the 1980s, approximately half of all African-Americans moved from lower class to middle class. The great society was actually hugely successful. But then in the early 1980's Reagon cut all of those programs and that progress halted and even reversed. Its likely that we have much larger bills for policing and social services today because we cut those programs in the 1980s. But do go on repeating what Rush or whatever AM talk radio personality you got that from.

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."