Slashdot Mirror


Kamala Harris Introduces Bill To Send Millions To Local Governments For Tech Support (theverge.com)

Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has introduced legislation that would allocate millions of dollars for local government to create dedicated teams that could "update and rebuild" government systems. The Verge reports: The United States Digital Service, an office established in 2014 after the widespread failures of Healthcare.gov, provides IT support for the federal government, bringing technologists into the government to work on tools like federal websites. It's continued to operate under the Trump administration, and some states, Harris' office notes, have experimented with similar teams. Harris' bill, the Digital Service Act, would provide an annual $50 million to the federal service, but it also goes further, allocating $15 million per year to state and local governments to create similar teams.

Harris' bill, the Digital Service Act, would provide an annual $50 million to the federal service, but it also goes further, allocating $15 million per year to state and local governments to create similar teams. Under the plan, the national Digital Service would offer two-year grants, giving state and local governments between $200,000 and $2.5 million per year. Those governments would be required to take on 20 percent of costs and to spend at least half of the money on talent, rather than tech. The national Digital Service, under the proposal, would report bi-annually to Congress on the progress of the grantees. The bill would provide funding through 2027.

6 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. Ah cool! directed government spending by oldgraybeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    technical support pork/subsidies for the tech industry! Little of which will actually be used for anything constructive.
    It is the government after all.

    Just my 2 cents ;)

    1. Re:Ah cool! directed government spending by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if your state is efficient and doesn't use all of it's allocation, there will be a year-end rush to spend it on something. Anything.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Ah cool! directed government spending by gtall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I don't agree with AOC on many things, and that Green Thing she helped push after Markey loaded it with the Communist Manifesto (she's also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America so it was an easy sell), I've watched her in some hearings on CSPAN. She does her homework. She's the woman Asshole needs to watch out for. She's not running for Pres but he'd better hope she never becomes a DA with subpoena power.

  2. Expanding by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like the bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.

  3. They'll tax us either way. Kamala wants her cut by raymorris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Two options when states need to do something:

    A. Your state decides what is needed in your state. State taxpayers approve it via whatever mechanisms your state has. Taxpayers pay the cost for it.

    B. Kamala Harris and the rest of the Washington politicians decide what your state needs. Washington politicians approve taxing you. Taxpayers send their money to Washington. Washington sends part of it back to your state. Tax payers pay the actual cost of program, plus the bureacracy cost of sending it back and forth, plus Washington's cut.

    It's pretty plain why Kamala Harris wants to send your money through Washington and keep a portion of it. Why YOU would agree with that I have no idea. Unless you're just a superfan of politicians that play for team D. Superfans do non-sensical things.

  4. Whether they went for Trump is irrelevant by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it just shows how truly awful a candidate Hilary was. We're talking about voting patterns overall, not one bad election with the most hated women in America.

    I don't need to "believe" anything, it's pretty well documented that states that lean to the GOP depend heavily on the Feds. It's not hard to understand why. They don't invest in their people, and when you don't do that the people who can leave because the roads, schools, water supply and air quality suck rocks. This is the part where you point out folks leaving California and ignore the folks moving there....

    Sowell's a hack, btw.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/