Slashdot Mirror


Las Vegas Approves The Boring Company's Underground Loop (cnet.com)

The Boring Company's tunnel project in Chicago is "in doubt" (according to the Chicago Tribune), while a project connecting Washington to Baltimore "is waylaid in the environmental-review process."

But it looks like Las Vegas will officially get a tunnel from Elon Musk, CNET reports, "perhaps within this year." The billionaire's Boring Company on Tuesday got the approval from the 14-member board of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) to build and operate an underground loop that would carry people in autonomous electric vehicles at the city's convention center.

Musk has responded to the approval in a tweet, saying he'll make the tunnel "operational by end of year," even though the convention center's expansion won't be done until 2021, according to LVCVA's release... A LVCVA spokeswoman said in an email that the underground loop will be ready in 2021 if the contract with the Boring company is approved at LVCVA's board meeting on June 11.

The Las Vegas Sun has more details, pointing out that travellers would be carried in electric vehicles moving through two parallel tunnels, one running in each direction. And that fleet of electric vehicles "could include Tesla's Model X and Model 3 and a vehicle with capacity for about 16 people â" all manufactured by Musk. All the vehicles would be fully autonomous, meaning they won't have backup drivers, and would move at speeds of up to 50 mph."

The mayor of Las Vegas, also a member of the board, actually voted against the tunnel, calling the Boring Company "exploratory at this time" and warning that "we are considering handing over the reins of our most important industry."

81 comments

  1. The most... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most Boring news on Slashdot today.

  2. In before the knee-jerk Republican crybabies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it is news. You don't HAVE to scream and shout about Elon Musk, do you? Do we really have to do the entire song and dance all over again, because Musk? Musky Musk Musk, the Muskinator? Pass the Musky Joint?

    Are we trying to save the children or what? It's like a cave full of PEDOS in here!

    1. Re:In before the knee-jerk Republican crybabies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting on your break as minimum wage fry guy at Hardees?

    2. Re: In before the knee-jerk Republican crybabies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardee's has good fries. We need more people like him and less people like you. Maybe you should apply to be a fry guy?

  3. Re:1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dig this boring company, it's like Elon Musk is both deep and incredibly boring at the same time. Even more impress is his goals, to make tunnels for electric cars that can drive faster than polluting cars and drive underground because they don't dump out tons of CO2 and other NOx pollutants.

  4. Track shaped like a bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funding secured, my man

    1. Re: Track shaped like a bong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What if we all lived in a simulation?"

      *Passes joint*

      Far out man!!!

  5. what? this is impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i was assured 3d printers changed the game
    oh well
    we are still on track for colonizing mars right

  6. Performance guarantees? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I was on the board, I would insist on some timely delivery/end performance guarantees from Musk. Maybe backed by some kind of bond/at risk money. After all, Musk has a history of aggressive timeline announcements. While it may be ok to overstate how fast and how far things will go when developing a new technology, this is something they'll be relying on.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Performance guarantees? by UperPoti · · Score: 1

      Are bad The only reason to approve a loop would be as a tourist attraction.

    2. Re:Performance guarantees? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      this is something they'll be relying on.

      They are not relying on it. There are already ground-level shuttles between the convention centers in Las Vegas. The Loop will supplement that, not replace it. It will be faster, more convenient, and relieve congestion, so it is a no-brainer. They have nothing to lose by approving it.

      The mayor is just pissed because he was hoping to get a backhander or campaign donation. LV's municipal government has near Louisiana levels of corruption.

    3. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, either that or it will be ridiculously late, will have gigantic overruns, will not work, and will cause a quarter of the convention center to sink five feet while Elon tokes up on a big ole spliff and talks about Mars.

      Either way!

    4. Re:Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Bill, RTFA is saying in the end when tubes are ubiquitous mass transportation the shuttles will be relegated to the horse/buggy dept and hyperloop will be relied upon, ESPECIALLY in the super-hot surface sprawl that is Vegas.

      The mayor can say what he wants, the project is approved and he'll be gone before it's done.

    5. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention Republican Sillypersons: Tunnels actually aren't that difficult now. The technology "works" - how expensive remains to be seen. Crying unrealistically solves nothing. Harvest your tears, child. Save 'em.

      It's going to be a hot day in Vegas, you might get thirsty if you dry yourself out over falsehoods...

    6. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So rather than adding additional train cars to existing tracks and a mechanism to improve back and forth travel, let's dig a hole. Part of riding on the above ground rail is you get to see places you might want to visit while in town.

    7. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He? That's rich.

    8. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mayor is female, I knew that but used my "default" pronoun for mayors, it changes jack even if mildly embarrassing, so... golf clap? Golf clap. Bravo, correction noted. Equality achieved. (She'll be gone before it's done there too.)

    9. Re:Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow that was a stupid video. "High speed tunnels are bad because they won't fit in Manhatten." Couldn't watch any more.

    10. Re:Performance guarantees? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to let you know that the person who made that was so stupid and uninformed, I worry about you being able to die your own shoes or go outside in a rainstorm without drowning since you felt it should be shared... hope you are OK and you recover high mental functions soon!

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    11. Re: Performance guarantees? by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tell that to Boston and Seattle, where boring machines had major problems resulting in projects being years late and huge overages. Tunnels are not impossible, but they are difficult, expensive, and risky.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    12. Re:Performance guarantees? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Seems fairly low risk really. It's only a mile long, the tech is old and well established. I kinda wonder why Musk is even interested... Maybe as a way to refine a few tunnel building techniques at his startup.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um the mayor Caryoln Goodman ; that would be a she . RTFA

    14. Re: Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh, two of the largest tunnel projects ever had major problems therefore all other tunnel projects will too.

      "Chryslers are unreliable therefore all cars must be unreliable."

    15. Re:Performance guarantees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear wannabe smart ass (of which, you clearly are not and are attempting to be),

      You are inconsistent in your grammar and syntax invalidating any and all smart assery point you were trying to make. For instance: "hope" should be "Hope"; "[H]ope you are OK and you recover high mental functions soon!" would work better as two sentences; and "die your own shoes" should be "dye your own shoes". Please note that "die" and "dye" are not similar.

      In other words, my dear person, we must and certainly shall worry about your non-functioning mental capabilities concerning basic communication. Please take this opportunity to obtain help and counseling.

  7. rather stupid by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here in Chicago we already have vehicles in underground tunnels with a side going each way. They are electric trains. We also have some up in the air on elevated tracks.

    After going to the trouble to make tunnels, why not be smart and put a train in them, that's much more efficient than storing electric power in batteries for use later!

    Sure, vehicles might be used at the train stations to go to separate destinations, but that's the same thing that could be done in any city... maybe autonomous taxies to/from bus and train stop to homes could be market for Musk.

    Reinventing things badly seems silly. Put trains in tunnels!

    1. Re:rather stupid by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Nobody likes waiting for trains. So far there hasn't been a better option but that doesn't mean you should avoid better options when they're available.

      Model 3's don't seem likely, at least long term - "and a vehicle with capacity for about 16 people" as TFS says.

      Effectively they're describing autonomous short buses, presumably with constant availability.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:rather stupid by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Trains require bigger tunnels, much bigger stations, are slower, and are less responsive to variable passenger flows.

      Pods are much cheaper, faster, and more convenient. That is the whole point of the Hyperloop.

      Doubling down on the defects of trains, instead of fixing them, makes no sense.

    3. Re:rather stupid by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Except now that the LA tunnel is drilled, hasn’t Musk walked back the promise of pods there and gone back to his original intent of modified Teslas being the sole vehicle in the tunnel? So do we know he’ll stick with the plan in Vegas?

      Cars versus trains is a different argument than people pods versus trains.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:rather stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. The "whole point" of the hyperloop was zero-drag hyper-efficient large scale urban mass transportation, the side benefits of it being smaller and nimbler than trains are built into that "whole point"

    5. Re:rather stupid by kiviQr · · Score: 1

      OHare - downtown 40 min on CTA or depending on traffic 25min to 1.5h. It would help downtown/businesses to grow if you could get from Midway to OHare in 10 min.

    6. Re:rather stupid by Immerman · · Score: 1

      We're talking about Loop, not Hyperloop. Too completely different projects (though no doubt the tunneling technology will overlap if Hyperloop ever becomes real.)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:rather stupid by Immerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >After going to the trouble to make tunnels, why not be smart and put a train in them, that's much more efficient than storing electric power in batteries for use later!

      There's also another compelling alternative, if you want the responsiveness of pods/minibusses, without the cost of batteries to power them: streetcars. Run power lines along the ceiling to power the pods, and install (retractable) power brushes in the cars. Then you don't have to build infrastructure capable of handling the massive weight of a train, and don't need batteries in your cars, though small batteries to allow them to operate independently at the stations might be both safer and more cost effective.

      One of the nice things about autonomous pods is that it's relatively trivial to assemble them into trains on the fly. Either via actual hitches, or just operating them bumper-to-bumper to maintain a continuous slipstream. Much of the "science fiction" promise of how autonomous vehicles will vastly improve traffic flow and efficiency can actually be delivered in a system where one operator gets to set the rules for all the cars.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:rather stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, they're different, yet similar in "the point" being much more efficient mass transit in ALL metrics, not just efficient boarding and queuing. Those are selling points, not "the entire point" overall.

      Queuing logistics itself is not "the point" of the entire project as Bill asserted, as he does.

    9. Re:rather stupid by idji · · Score: 1

      No-one uses the Las Vegas Monorail anyway, why would they use the Boring Tunnel?

    10. Re:rather stupid by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This thing is only a mile long. It's basically what they have to shuttle people between airport terminals.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:rather stupid by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Well he's got to do something with the massive number of Model 3s sitting around being charged with diesel generators. Might as well put them in a tunnel!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    12. Re:rather stupid by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Apparently you weren't at this last CES... It was nearly always packed. Best way to get from the Convention center to the Venetian exhibits!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re:rather stupid by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      2nd express set of rails for Blue Line has long been discussed, would be 20 minute trip. Cost a bundle of course. Less than a Musk tunnel with autonomous cars however.

    14. Re: rather stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trains are theoreticaly more efficient, but they are relatively low volume, which means expensive both to build and to maintain. If Musk can provide a similar service with slightly modified mass - market vehicles costs might really plummet. Not to mention that one can imagine the 'subway' cars continuing onto the surface street to cover the last mile in the not to distant future. That sounds a lot like conventional underground roads, but with autonomous driving and electric-only operation the tunnels could be much smaller.

  8. Don’t quite understand the mayor’s sta by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    When she says "we are considering handing over the reins of our most important industry" - how is this giving control of the casino industry to Musk? Or does she actually consider tunneling to be Las Vegas’ most important industry?

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  9. Re:$10/month by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    While it may be ok to overstate how fast and how far things will go when developing a new technology, this is something they'll be relying on.

    It doesn't sound like there's much new tech to develop, just some dispatch software. Musk delivered the South Australia battery in 63 days:

    https://www.theverge.com/2017/...

    It sounds like he could be more than a year late and still be done before the convention center opens, but it's not just you and I that know that projects delivered late reflect poorly on the business.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. corruption by ed1park · · Score: 1

    Here's to hoping that the mayor of Vegas isn't hindering Tesla's contract to give it to one of his buddies instead.

  11. Re:$10/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "projects delivered late reflect poorly on the business." - Unless they're good enough for people to forget they came late, in the final tally.

  12. Re:$10/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tech involved is not much innovative at all here. It is all well known components. You could say it is 'boring' tech. (har har).

    But it is basically a tunnel which they can do. With electric cars on a fixed route (which they can do). Which their driver assist software on a known route with no cars changing lanes the software should handle with ease. There are pretty much only possibly items in front of the car (another car).

    The tricky part will be people queuing and breakdowns. Both are very manageable.

    This pretty much does seem like a no brainier.

  13. Re: Don’t quite understand the mayor’s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldnâ(TM)t expect a slashdot peon to understand business.

    Conferences are the most important industry for Vegas. 25-50k well paid business people with both personal and expense account money to burn come here weekly. They not only gamble and stay in hotels, they pay local residents to drive busses and private shuttles around (and those vehicles and all their supporting infrastructure) are indirectly paid for here by , they pay locals for all the taxis / Uber required, they load up government with airport and hotel taxes, I could go on and on. Your random ass vacation to Vegas where you coupon stack and set a hard hundred dollar gambling limit does nothing.

  14. Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by careysub · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Las Vegas currently has a monorail that sort-of connects the major resorts on the east side of the Strip. It started off pretty well in ridership, 7.9 million in 2007, but with the Crash of 2008 ridership collapsed, understandably so, but after the Great Recession ended ridership never recovered. In recent years the ridership has remained stuck in the mid 4 millions (it was originally projected to have 19-20 million riders).

    I say "sort-of connected" because does not actually attach or enter resort complex but is outside, separated and behind them, out of view. In one part it is quite far from the closest resorts. If the monorail had been integrated into the resort complexes, so that it could serve as focal point, and provide a "theme ride" type atmosphere, like the Disneyland monorail, then it might have a lot more riders. They probably could boost ridership considerably if they built an extension to the airport that is right next to it, but the bus, limo and cab companies would not have it.

    All this is background to this new tunnel scheme. Given that they already have a mass transit system centrally located in what is really a very small city core, which they fail to exploit effectively, what possible role would a new tunnel system provide? This proposed phase just provides a ride from one end of the convention complex to the other, in your car, sort of like what, I don't know, a short road might do, so it is a basically an underground ride attraction for the convention center.

    But wait! There's more! It could be extended to go along the Las Vega Strip, along the same route as the monorail, but underground! That is to say, even more out of view than the current underutilized mass transit system following the same route. The conceptual map shows the tunnel connecting to the airport, which has already been repeatedly vetoed for the monorail.

    Anyone here want to invest in this project? Hello? Anybody?

    Full disclosure - I have ridden on the monorail, and I liked it. I would have liked it a lot more if I didn't have to get off just outside the airport, and wait to board a bus to take me inside the fence to the terminal.

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    1. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      File this under "not all transportation projects end up the same"

    2. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      I rode the monorail once. Kind of a useless routing for me, as I usually stay on the west side of the strip. I have to think that making the monorail viable would do wonders for traffic in the area, but Vegas politics don’t really go that direction.

    3. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      The really weird thing about the Vegas Monorail is why it doesn't go to the airport. The runway and the Strip are close to each other but you're stuck going the long way around on a shuttle bus, taxi,...

    4. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't weird. The taxi cartel killed the idea of making it useful.

    5. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If the existing monorail just went to the goddamned airport, about another mile away, people might actually ride it.

    6. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by az-saguaro · · Score: 1

      An insightful comment, and there is yet another oddity in the rationale behind the loop. The loop as I understand it is for cars, but how would that work? The monorail, whatever shortcomings it may have in its implementation, is made to move people. You can walk on and walk off at will with no other concerns. But what are you going to do with your car after you exit the loop? Why drive it such a short distance? If you are going somewhere near the end of the line, where will you park your car at the other end, and for how much? It sounds like a recipe for parking congestion from hell. Or do you just intend to ride through, bypassing the congested Strip? That's what I-15 is for. Your analogy to a theme park or theme ride is spot on. But those rides work by walking onto the attraction, not riding your own vehicle onto another one. This sounds more like taking your car onto a bay crossing ferry, but where's the bay? It's a tech demonstrator project that most people will probably not see or be much aware of except for the hype they read. It seems like it would be a more functional and practical concept if they ran a high speed underground bypass below central Vegas and the Strip, from Henderson to the North 'burbs, so that locals going to school or business could bypass the downtown congestion.

    7. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 2

      And now, hasn't the taxi cartel been slammed by competition from Uber and Lyft?

    8. Re:Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by vix86 · · Score: 1

      During my one trip to LV a few years ago, I saw the rail from the ground. Me and my brother considered using the monorail at one point to get from one part of the strip to the other, but its not easy to find when you are going from the main street of the strip, into a casino, to the monorail. The signage for it was horrible, so I think the casino's just got way too caught up on trying to keep people from using it. In the end we just Uber-ed or walked.

    9. Re: Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have run the thing right down the middle of las vegas blvd and over to the airport. Fuck the taxis. It is a royal pain to have to walk all the way through the casinos to get to the monorail. Were talking a 15 to 20 minute walk in some of the casinos.

    10. Re: Time to Sing the Monorail Song? by Megane · · Score: 1

      Why should a casino want to make it easy for you to go a different casino?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  15. Re:Don’t quite understand the mayor’s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She obviously considers conventions to be Las Vegas' most important industry, which seems plausible. Saying that this gives control over them is obviously hyperbole though.

  16. Re: In before the knee-jerk Republican crybabies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh shutup, all of you.

  17. Re: Iggy is rather stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of slashdot users have this issue. It isn't just iggy.

    I'll name the ones Ive seen do it frequently:

    APK, iggy, Bill, c6gunner, syndon, dns-n-bind, Kendall, windbourne, REI.

    Tbh there are only a couple people on slashdot who are actually nice people: this list includes but not limited to:

    Drinkypoo, AmiMojo(I know you guys hate her but she always talks in a reasonable way and never insults anyone), bill_mc, Actually I do RTFA, 93 escort wagon, rosco, sometimes the binary guy.

    There are others but those are the ones I see moving the discussions forward and talking calmly about issues.

  18. Repeat after me. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Boondoggle.

    You can do it. Say it! SAY IT!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  19. Motive source and revenue by NEDHead · · Score: 1, Funny

    Supplied by One-Armed-Bandits at every seat

  20. Well, I'm not giving up on that ideal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A lot of slashdot users have this issue. It isn't just iggy." - True. I try to get each individual to acknowledge it about themselves, see if they can change themselves for the better - their own benefit, really. But also ours too.

    The lies cannot be allowed to drown out the facts without someone at least pointing it out, every time, indefatigably. I'm just one person attempting it, I hope others fact-check these constant "Assertionists" and moderate them accordingly.

    So far, no luck. Lies are more popular on slashdot than truth and there's really no groundswell to push back on that anymore if ever there was. Just a few holdouts.

    1. Re: Well, I'm not giving up on that ideal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, you are correct. It seems they are so confident about their lies, they spew them frequently and think we won't fact check. A couple of us are fighting the good fight.

  21. Re:1st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already have underground electric cars that drive in loops...its called the mother fuckin subway.

  22. Obligatory Thunderf00t Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He says it's bullshit!

    I quite agree with him. A previous video, that's also well argued.

    He has so many good ideas and execution, why does he go for this bullshit that just tarnishes his image? It's like the real Mr. Tesla, genius, who later married a pigeon and thought he was talking to aliens while promising a death ray.

    1. Re: Obligatory Thunderf00t Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla wasn't mad. He was just trolling the conspiracy theorists of the future.

  23. "Chas" is a sexless and clueless Fox News faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeating her dumb Fox News trope-retard self for nobody's benefit, indefinitely...

  24. I can tell you why by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    No-one uses the Las Vegas Monorail anyway, why would they use the Boring Tunnel?

    The reason few people use the Monorail is that it is utterly useless. Every stop it makes takes around ten minutes of winding through a casino and shops to get in or out of it (except I think for one entry point on the strip itself). So you are talking 20 minutes of dead time, at least, trying to get on or off. You are better off getting an Uber, or in lots of cases just walking.

    By contrast, the tunnel they are talking about having the Boring company build is made for ease of use and access. You get in on one side, you go to the other side of the convention center that would take 15-20 minutes of walking to reach, it's a huge time savings even with a few minutes to do down to the entry point.

    If they did the same tunnel under the strip with entrances/exits right on the street, it would be a massive hit (traffic up and down the strip is almost always slow and fairly horrible, garages also are a long way away from things if you bring your own car).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:I can tell you why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No-one uses the Las Vegas Monorail anyway, why would they use the Boring Tunnel?

      The reason few people use the Monorail is that it is utterly useless. Every stop it makes takes around ten minutes of winding through a casino and shops to get in or out of it (except I think for one entry point on the strip itself).

      That and it doesn't go to the airport (unlike in Fallout: New Vegas), which would make it very useful but the taxi lobby killed that and they'll probably kill this as well.

  25. No, exactly wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Except now that the LA tunnel is drilled, hasnâ(TM)t Musk walked back the promise of pods there and gone back to his original intent of modified Teslas>

    What he said that was that pods would be used by general transit but that Tesla cars could ALSO be slotted in to drive the tunnels as well (autonomously).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, exactly wrong by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      That’s not how I read his comments at the December tunnel demo - and others have also mentioned how he didn’t talk about pods at all. He talked about 4-5 passenger vehicles using the tunnel... modified Teslas, basically.

      https://la.curbed.com/2018/12/...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  26. Re: $10/month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lots of auto drive trains at airport

  27. Re:1st by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    mmmm meatball sub...

  28. Re:"Chas" is a sexless and clueless Fox News faggo by Chas · · Score: 1

    Oh wow.

    You can say bad words!

    I am SO impressed!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  29. Re: 1st by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    But the subway smells like pee...

  30. Re: Iggy is rather stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drinkypoo and Amimojo are trolls. I dont care how nicely Marxist fuckwits spew their murderous agenda. It is still a murderous Marxist agenda.

  31. Re: Don’t quite understand the mayor’ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, i just love that $30 taxi ride where the driver taxes you all the way around the strip along the interstate. The fucking airport backs up to the strip. You could be there in 60 seconds.

  32. Cuase he had trouble in LA by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    It doesn't sound like there's much new tech to develop, just some dispatch software

    The only example of the boring company we have, in LA, is behind schedule, and unable to deliver as promised so far. I would worry about it if I was in Las Vegas. The South Australia battery was a large run of something that had been in production (batteries) for quite a while, and by Tesla specifically in addition to generally in the world .

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!