Slashdot Mirror
Are Online Activists Silencing Researchers of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? (reuters.com)
Zorro (Slashdot reader #15,759), shares Reuters' report about Michael Sharpe, a medical researcher studying chronic fatigue syndrome, "a little-understood condition that can bring crushing tiredness and pain."
Eight years after he published results of a clinical trial that found some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome can get a little better with the right talking and exercise therapies, the Oxford University professor is subjected to almost daily, often anonymous, intimidation... They object to his work, they said, because they think it suggests their illness is psychological. Sharpe, a professor of psychological medicine, says that isn't the case. He believes that chronic fatigue syndrome is a biological condition that can be perpetuated by social and psychological factors...
Sharpe is one of around a dozen researchers in this field worldwide who are on the receiving end of a campaign to discredit their work. For many scientists, it's a new normal: From climate change to vaccines, activism and science are fighting it out online. Social media platforms are supercharging the battle. Reuters contacted a dozen professors, doctors and researchers with experience of analysing or testing potential treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome. All said they had been the target of online harassment because activists objected to their findings. Only two had definite plans to continue researching treatments. With as many as 17 million people worldwide suffering this disabling illness, scientific research into possible therapies should be growing, these experts said, not dwindling. What concerns them most, they said, is that patients could lose out if treatment research stalls.
Sharpe says he's no longer researching treatments, because "It's just too toxic." And he tells Reuters that other researchers appear to be reaching the same conclusion.
"Of more than 20 leading research groups who were publishing treatment studies in high-quality journals 10 years ago, Sharpe said, only one or two continue to do so."
Sharpe is one of around a dozen researchers in this field worldwide who are on the receiving end of a campaign to discredit their work. For many scientists, it's a new normal: From climate change to vaccines, activism and science are fighting it out online. Social media platforms are supercharging the battle. Reuters contacted a dozen professors, doctors and researchers with experience of analysing or testing potential treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome. All said they had been the target of online harassment because activists objected to their findings. Only two had definite plans to continue researching treatments. With as many as 17 million people worldwide suffering this disabling illness, scientific research into possible therapies should be growing, these experts said, not dwindling. What concerns them most, they said, is that patients could lose out if treatment research stalls.
Sharpe says he's no longer researching treatments, because "It's just too toxic." And he tells Reuters that other researchers appear to be reaching the same conclusion.
"Of more than 20 leading research groups who were publishing treatment studies in high-quality journals 10 years ago, Sharpe said, only one or two continue to do so."
Once again, turning otherwise normal people into hateful persons who believe themselves to be ridden with problems whose fault is anyone's but theirs. They have an illness? The fault is of the dishonest doctors who won't cure them because they're mediocre. Having devoted one's life to study and research is nothing to them, compared to collecting information on Facebook groups, made by real people and not by big-pharma servants.
Kind of moronic to shout down anyone researching the disease, then, isn't it?
And just who is going to find that actual treatment if the activists drive out all the researchers?
I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
> Your question is kind of like who will solve our energy problems if we drive all the perpetual motion cranks away?
Well, there are good mathematical, theoretical and experimental foundations to presume perpetual motion is a crank hobby and not real science.
There are also good clinical foundations for psychosomatic illness to be an actual thing.
So your analogy is really terrible...
=Smidge=
I believe troll is the recognised term. But psycho works too. When they come from a position of nonsense, they're not hard to identify. Usually the first words out are deluded speak.
Facebook does a great job of friending them all to one another so they can amplify the recruiting process.
The weirdest part is if one goes through an argument logically with them they rather quickly try to change the subject or throw a myriad of red-herring in to derail the exchange. Meaning they know it's all bullshit.
As a fusion reactor is by no means a perpetual motion engine, I would wager that laughing at perpetual motion cranks gets people to actually look into energy, mass, quantum field theory and physics in general and not to chase pipe dreams.
Something being of psychological nature is not blaming the sick person. And the researcher is not even saying that chronic fatigue symptom IS psychological, only that some psychological treatments might help a little. If it is a neurological issue, psychological treatments to dampen the symptoms might be the best we have until medicines are developed.
I bet a lot of the ones harassing researchers are not sick. They are lazy bastards who claim to have chronic fatigue symptoms to scam the government out of disability checks and are scared that the real disease gets mapped and a working treatment they will be found out. Are your ears burning, Dog-Cow?
Those that really have chronic fatigue symptoms would probably give an arm and a leg to get cured.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Well, it worked for gender dysphoria. It's a real condition, but despite a total lack of physiological evidence they managed to bully the entire medical industry into removing it from the Mental Illness category.
I read this article a few days ago. This is the biggest problem with these whole social-justice social media warriors. They bully and bully and bully to get their way. These idiots draw conclusions, or more accurately, they _jump_ to conclusions. In this case the researcher did some research that suggested that exercise therapy can bring some relief. So they jump to conclusion that they think its all in their head and start bullying the researcher till he quits. Its fucking idiotic. These asshats have no clue how research works. for starters telling people that research is showing that exercise can bring some relief implies, in no way, that they are done and thats the best you can hope for. Why wouldn't you share this non-invasive and multi-theraputic finding with the world? The benefits of exercise are very pervasive. Furthermore, once you find a link, that's where the interesting part happens, WHY does it provide relief? Is it a dopamine response? A serotonin one? Perhaps there is something going on with exercise and the lymphatic system... Research starts at a 5000ft overview and starts zooming on on things that help until they find the 1 or more, most effective responses. THEN they figure out how to increase this to provide greater relief.
These social bullies dont deserve treatment, and thats exactly what they are doing with their behavior. REAL science is about following the research REGARDLESS of whether you _like_ the results or not. Its not about what you like. Do you want to be right or do you want to be happy? There is no room in science for prejudices. Leave that shit at the door and follow the research empirically. The idea that you can make science conform to your expectations is such an abortion of logic, these idiots should be forced to take a 12 week course on nothing but the scientific method. Revoke their driving privilege till they pass a course. The only reason they are not called out for this is because they happen to also be easily made to agree with any other policy issue. In other words they are free votes / allies on any topic they dont understand. It reminds me of that guy on youtube that goes around asking people at college stuff and listen to them give the most ridiculous answers based on prejudices.