Astronomers Discover 83 Supermassive Black Holes at the Edge of the Universe (cnet.com)

"A team of international astronomers have been hunting for ancient, supermassive black holes -- and they've hit the motherlode, discovering 83 previously unknown quasars," reports CNET: The Japanese team turned the ultra-powerful "Hyper Suprime-Cam", mounted to the Subaru Telescope in Hawaii, toward the cosmos' darkest corners, surveying the sky over a period of five years. By studying the snapshots, they've been able to pick potential quasar candidates out of the dark. Notably, their method of probing populations of supermassive black holes that are similar in size to the ones we see in today's universe, has given us a window into their origins.

After identifying 83 potential candidates, the team used a suite of international telescopes to confirm their findings. The quasars they've plucked out are from the very early universe, about 13 billion light years away. Practically, that means the researchers are looking into the past, at objects form less than a billion years after the Big Bang. "It is remarkable that such massive dense objects were able to form so soon after the Big Bang," said Michael Strauss, who co-authored the paper, in a press release. Scientists aren't sure how black holes formed in the early universe, so being able to detect them this far back in time provides new avenues of exploration.

Comments

"Edge of the Universe"

[olsmeister]

I think they mean, edge of the observable universe.

Re: "Edge of the Universe"

[burtosis]

The size of the universe may in fact be infinite. How me measure this is by how flat space is. Depending on the energy density of space this could be positive or negative curvature, or flat if the energy density is balanced exactly wth gravity. So far the measurement is almost exactly flat, with a margin of error of about 2% so the universe could still be positive or negative slightly. We know with certainty then, the actual universe roughly at least 10,000 times the volume we can see, and we may show with accepted theory one day the universe is infinite but we will never be able to measure it because measurements can't be made with infinite precision. A detailed explanation is here

Holly

[Knossos]

It's always the way, innit? You hang around for three million years in deep space and there hasn't been one, then all of a sudden eighty three turn up at once.

Universe expanding

[sjbe]

Light scatters in all directions (for the most part) from the origin of a single point of event.

No, a photon will travel in a straight line from it's point of origin unless acted upon by an outside force. You are describing what happens to the innumerable photons that are emitted from a typical light source which is not the same thing. The photons that we see from these distant sources have traveled a long distance in a straight line (*) to get to us.

(* straight in this context is not the same Euclidean geometry straight line you might have learned about in high school)

So if it happened 13 billions year ago, how is it still observable?

Because the universe expanded faster than the speed of light. Space itself is expanding to this day and so some light that was emitted a long time ago is just now reaching us. Some light that was emitted a long time ago will never reach us because it's too far away and space is expanding too fast for it to ever get to us.