Slashdot Mirror


Wells Fargo Sued By 63-Year-Old Pastor They Wrongfully Accused of Forging Checks (nj.com)

Wells Fargo has been hit with a lawsuit from a 63-year-old pastor at the United Methodist Church of Parsippany. Wells Fargo sent his ATM photos to the police, which he says led to false arrest, malicious prosecution -- and humiliation. NJ.com reports: In the lawsuit filed Thursday in Morris County Superior Court, attorneys for the 63-year-old pastor sought unspecified damages against Wells Fargo, which has come under fire over a series of scandals in recent years. Also named were the State Police detectives who originally brought the charges against him last year after bank security officials allegedly mistakenly identified a photo of Edwards taken at an ATM machine as a suspect in a series of fraudulent check deposits....

In the lawsuit, Edwards' attorney wrote that Wells Fargo notified the State Police when it discovered the bogus transactions, and the bank was asked to provide any still photos or video images taken from the ATM at Parsippany where some of the checks were deposited and later cashed out. The bank sent photos of Edwards, who had made his own deposit of checks at the same ATM the very same day, according to the complaint...

The pastor said he first discovered he was the focus of a criminal investigation last year after a parishioner texted him a State Police Facebook posting requesting the public's help identifying a man suspected of depositing fraudulent checks at an ATM... In an interview, Edwards said after seeing the post, he called the detectives and shared a copy of his banking transactions to show he had not deposited the fraudulent checks. "I thought it would clear things up," he said. "They said all their information was from Wells Fargo..." Last September, Edwards said he was asked to come down to the State Police station in Holmdel. After he got there, he said he was shocked to find out he was being arrested and charged with third degree forgery. When he protested and said somebody made an error, he said one of the investigators asked him if the case did go to trial, who would the jury believe -- a bank security expert or him?

"They fingerprinted me. Took my mug shot and gave me a court date," he said.

The case fell apart, but the 63-year-old pastor says he never received an apology from the police, or from Wells Fargo. "The carelessness of both Wells Fargo and the State Police is kind of appalling, and I wonder what happens to somebody who might not have the resources to defend themselves," the pastor told NJ.com. "I told them yes that was my picture and yes I was in the bank that day. That's all they needed to arrest me."

A spokesman for Wells Fargo told the reporter they'd be unable to comment "since this is a pending legal matter." But the story was submitted to Slashdot by someone claiming to be pastor Jeff Edwards. "Wells Fargo carelessly provided ATM pictures [of] me to the state police in a fraudulent check investigation that led to my arrest," reads the original submission.

"The case was dismissed when it was demonstrated that Wells Fargo had been grossly irresponsible."

6 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. Irresponsibility as usual by execthts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the 'Guilty until proven innocent' game again.

    1. Re:Irresponsibility as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Extremely difficult when the timestamps aren't in sync, or when the logger is behind and the logger is the one adding the timestamps to its messages.

      Software design matters. Nearly every logger I've seen provides its own timestamps. But they shouldn't need to read the log files. They should be checking the transaction ids and the photos should be linked to transactions, not timestamps. Again, good design matters. But we're just guessing at how Wells Fargo fucked up. Since it's Wells Fargo, it's easy to believe that the fraud ATM user had his face covered and the operator just picked this guy instead since his transactions where close enough. What's the chances that this guy deposited the same amount of checks as the scammer? Were the deposits made into the same bank account?. WTF is going on with the people in this investigation?

      Excellent job taking this to court. Please don't settle. Keep in mind all the other people who where scared into taking a plea bargain. I've been in that position and almost admitted to something I didn't do. The social pressure the police put on you to agree to everything they say can be overpowering.

      Also, don't help the police. Time and time again they've shown they aren't to be trusted.

    2. Re:Irresponsibility as usual by jordanjay29 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, don't help the police. Time and time again they've shown they aren't to be trusted.

      I find it really sad that this was my first thought upon reading that the pastor voluntarily went to the police station. You'd think a pastor would be able to trust that his word would be taken seriously and in good faith, but not even our pillars of the community get the benefit of the doubt anymore.

      The police are not on your side, unfortunately. Don't talk to them without a lawyer, you will get burned.

  2. Never, ever talk to the police. by Phaid · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guy's first mistake was thinking he could somehow talk to the police himself and "clear things up". You will never, ever succeed at that. Always consult a lawyer first, and always have your lawyer talk to the police on your behalf. And I haven't seen a link to James Duane's famous Don't Talk to the Police video in a while, which explains why this is the case a lot better than I could in a couple of paragraphs.

  3. Re:well, it's worth suing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ....but no law enforcement organization is going to admit guilt (or issue an apology) under a civil suit. Worse, any money you win from them comes from you eventually in the form of taxes.

    That's why I think that all police malpractice judgements should come out of the police retirement fund, not tax revenues. This would break the "blue wall" by incentivizing officers to inform on each other to protect their own interests.

  4. Re:Mandatory Arbitration will Kill the Suit by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If he has an account with Wells Fargo then one of the things he had to agree to was mandatory arbitration.

    Ah, a non-lawyer posts how the law works. It's a valid point you raise, but it may not matter. I've got friends who are lawyers and I have learned a lot about how the law really works from them. I can assure you that it still may be possible to sue Wells Fargo even if the customer agreed to arbitration. The arbitration clause may not cover this kind of conduct. Also, even when people agree to clauses like this, it's still possible to argue that the customer was coerced into signing it. We'll see what happens in court.