Slashdot Mirror
The New York Times CEO Warns Publishers Ahead of Apple News Launch (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader shares a report: Apple is expected to launch an ambitious new entertainment and paid digital news service on Monday, as the iPhone maker pushes back against streaming video leader Netflix. But it likely will not feature the New York Times. Mark Thompson, chief executive of the biggest U.S. newspaper by subscribers, warned that relying on third-party distribution can be dangerous for publishers who risk losing control over their own product. "We tend to be quite leery about the idea of almost habituating people to find our journalism somewhere else," he told Reuters in an interview on Thursday. "We're also generically worried about our journalism being scrambled in a kind of Magimix (blender) with everyone else's journalism."
What you said is literally not true. You are fake news.
By providing a platform, the Times is implicitly endorsing each of these articles. If what was said was objectionable, the Times would naturally no-platform the offender.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
"We're also generically worried about our journalism being scrambled in a kind of Magimix (blender) with everyone else's journalism."
The NY Times gave up journalism in favor of click-bait a long time ago. It's understandable, they were bleeding subscribers before they did it. But they are now indistinguishable from every other click-bait site.
The Associated Press is a nonprofit business cooperative. It can't be owned by any one company or person.
I don't believe that Reuters is owned by anyone in the Rothschild family, but it is at least a private organization which could, potentially, be owned by someone. Maybe there's a Rothschild somewhere who owns some stock or something.
Your claims are dumb.