Slashdot Mirror


'Your AirPods Will Die Soon' -- The Shrinking Charge Capacities of Lithium-Ion Batteries (theatlantic.com)

Some of the same podcasters who first extolled AirPods are now complaining about them, reports the Atlantic: The battery can no longer hold a charge, they say, rendering them functionally useless. Apple bloggers agree: "AirPods are starting to show their age for early adopters," Zac Hall, an editor at 9to5Mac, wrote in a post in January, detailing how he frequently hears a low-battery warning in his AirPods now. Earlier this month, Apple Insider tested a pair of AirPods purchased in 2016 against a pair from 2018, and found that the older pair died after two hours and 16 minutes. "That's less than half the stated battery life for a new pair," the writer William Gallagher concluded. Desmond Hughes, who is 35 and lives in Newport News, Virginia, has noticed a similar thing about his own set: At first, their charge lasted five hours, but now they sometimes last only half an hour. He frequently listens to one while charging the other -- not optimal conditions for expensive headphones. He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair....

The lithium-ion batteries that power AirPods are everywhere. One industry report forecast that sales would grow to $109.72 billion by 2026, from $36.2 billion in 2018. They charge faster, last longer, and pack more power into a small space than other types of batteries do. But they die faster, too, often after just a few years, because every time you charge them, they degrade a little. They can also catch fire or explode if they become damaged, so technology companies make them difficult, if not impossible, for consumers to replace themselves. The result: A lot of barely chargeable AirPods and wireless mice and Bluetooth speakers are ending up in the trash as consumers go through products -- even expensive ones -- faster than ever....

Of the 3.4 million tons of electronic waste generated in America in 2012 -- an 80 percent increase from 2000 -- just 29 percent was recycled.

The article notes that Wednesday Apple announced a new generation of AirPods -- but "did not say whether the devices would have longer lives."

They also report that Apple "does allow consumers to pay for what it calls a 'battery replacement' for AirPods, but each 'replaced' AirPod is $49."

6 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Shocking! by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Funny

    SHOCKING I SAY!

    Why, they very notion that an overpriced product that gives inferior sound quality, and has a propensity to get lost, or ingested by toddlers, could have such a shortened service life compared to the older tech it replaced! Who could have forseen it! /s

    1. Re:Shocking! by religionofpeas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair....

      Sounds like it's working as designed.

    2. Re:Shocking! by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. They bought a product with non-replaceable batteries. Have they been living under a rock? What did they think would happen?

      If only there was a way to power headphones using a cable instead of relying on batteries.

      --
      No sig today...
  2. Perfect Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a great idea. What if you had headphones that didn't use a battery but instead plugged directly into a hypothetical Jack on a source of sound? I know it sounds crazy but it would work and could even be made universal.

    1. Re:Perfect Solution by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 5, Funny

      It would take a truly courageous company to invent a "Headphone Jack" such as you're proposing.

      Sadly, I don't think there are any such companies around.

  3. Lesson by dromgodis · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's now gearing up to plunk down more money on another pair...

    Yeah, that will really teach Apple a lesson!