Slashdot Mirror


Cities In India Ban 'PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds' Over Fears It Turns Children Into 'Psychopaths' (yahoo.com)

Player Unknown's Battlegrounds is facing a "ferocious" backlash in India, Bloomberg reports: Nowhere has resistance to the game been quite like India. Multiple cities have banned PUBG, as it's known, and police in Western India arrested 10 university students for playing. The national child rights commission has recommended barring the game for its violent nature. One of India's largest Hindi newspapers declared PUBG an "epidemic" that turned children into "manorogi," or psychopaths. "There are dangerous consequences to this game," the Navbharat Times warned in a March 20 editorial. "Many children have lost their mental balance...."

What's different about India is the speed with which the country has landed in the strange digital world of no laws or morals. It skipped two decades of debate and adjustment, blowing into the modern gaming era in a matter of months. Rural communities that never had PCs or game consoles got smartphones in recent years -- and wireless service just became affordable for pretty much everyone after a price war last year. With half a billion internet users looking for entertainment, PUBG has set off a frenzy.

Over 250,000 students entered one recent PUBG competition, according to the article.

At least one local minister criticized the game as "the demon in every house."

163 comments

  1. Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I thought they were all dirt poor.

    1. Re:Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They obviously are better educated than you also.

    2. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      And yet education doesn't prevent shitting in the street and raping women en masse.

    3. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A horrible fucking game. If I ever catch anyone trying to get my kids to play it there will be hell to pay.

    4. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of education are we talking about? A masters in sociopathy?

    5. Re:Indians can afford to play it? by XXongo · · Score: 0

      They obviously are better educated than you also.

      You thought wrong.

      India has a middle class, and the middle class is larger than the population of the United States.

    6. Re:Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Generally speaking, anyone educated in any capacity has a "greater" or "better" education than you low-info Republican denialist trashminds. Sorry. That's why Trumptards keep getting the simple word "exhonerate" 100% wrong.

      You're just not very well educated, it's a major part of why you're collectively backing a traitor fraud. Like the Duhnold, you just don't have the tools to navigate the world. It's not your "fault" really, except when you celebrate it...

    7. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gosh this is really the end of your script?

      no wonder you gimps are losing this so badly.

    8. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Aside from the fact half the population still doesn't have access to a toilet, Indian "middle class" is not on par with other counties with smaller middle class populations. Even screened windows are a luxury item in India. I suggest you actually spend time in India rather than browsing Wikipedia.

    9. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your ignorant mind if you care to read up. http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/caste3

    10. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by GillBates0 · · Score: 0

      In India, we Hindus cherish peace of mind more than money. Have your big box dollar stores and mansions given you peace of mind? Have they now? I think not, seeing the aggression that typically spews from the western world.

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    11. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hinduism = "Accept your caste, slave" state propaganda. Anything gov dislikes is dirptive to peace of mind. PUBG exposes youth to more free thinking wordviews.

      The Buddha should not represent peace of mind or contentment, for did he not taste both the palace life and the life of the poor acetic? How can you find a "middle path" if you do not know where the two extremes lie? Those who are coddled by "peace of mind" shreik in terror at the first minor hardship or obstacle -- such as your youths being revealed that their prescribed lot in life is shit, and they should instead be free to taste the palace life too, if they can earn it.

      TL;DR: PUBG = talk to international players = state censored because those kids are now wise to the caste system bullshit.

    12. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

      Caste is as bad as socio economic oppression, racial bias etc. Hinduism is not all about caste as your media/mind may have you believe. Dont believe everythink you think. Think twice before you judge, moreso before you type. Google is your friend. http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/cas... . Spock out.

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    13. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by GillBates0 · · Score: 0

      I should have said: Casteism is only as bad as Racism.
      s/first sentence/with above/post above

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    14. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2
      “Peace of mind” and “non-violent” are not the first things that come to mind when trying to describe India and its people’s disposition. That’s fine, each to their own, but let’s not pretend that it’s only the western world that is predominantly violent.

      the global explosion of radical Islam

      Really poor choice of words there, pal... and a case in point.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    15. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      In India, we Hindus cherish peace of mind more than money

      Well sure explains why they've been fleeing to Canada for the last ~50 years, for the explicit purpose of getting more money. And why we basically have a low-scale ethnic war in Brampton, Ontario between Indian Hindus and Pakistani Muslims, more so with the current crop of 2nd generation kids who are muslims who think that bashing some Hindu's on a Friday night is the height of fun. Which I'm sure makes plenty of sense, not so much over here. The funny thing is, money(wealth) can create an amazing amount of peace of mind. It can save your life, improve your standard of living, get more people away from hand-to-mouth starvation. My guess is, if Norman Borlaug hadn't decided to fix India's food crisis ~40 years ago, you wouldn't be here. That, is a great example of western wealth and western humanitarianism changing things for the better.

      Have your big box dollar stores and mansions given you peace of mind? Have they now? I think not, seeing the aggression that typically spews from the western world.

      Well yes. See, if you really want to look at "aggression of the western world" let me paint you a picture. Where we threw off the olde days of religion, then fought each other over trivial territorial issues, got bored of it, then decided that conquering the world had a nice ring to it. The irony of course is that despite your complaints over it, the fundamental impact of that western culture on India was so fundamentally transformative that you basically decided to shatter your society twice as hard with the existing caste system, and then piss up wind on the peons at the bottom daring to try crawling up from it to the point that the 'poorest' were the most likely to GTFO and become wealthy to escape the mess.

      Simply, you should be glad that "western society" isn't say as aggressive as even 80 years ago. If it was, the stunt with the nuclear reactor and breaking treaties and in turn going nuke-hot would have led to a hot fast war.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    16. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Republicans keep misusing the term "facts", it will lose meaning. I think that's what they're aiming for.

    17. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we talking about India, or a typical U.S. college town....

    18. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many middle class and rich people in India. Income inequality is big and it is like two completely different world living together where upper middle class people living in walled gardens, trying to copy Western lifestyle and lower income people living in dirt poor.

      However this change of the middle class is on money and buying power. Not in mentally. So racism, castism and video game is bad, women's are to serve men type mentality is preveling

    19. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All religions are ignorant and stupid. Thinking cows or any other animals are sacred is a great example.

    20. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So India is like San Francisco...

    21. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have done violent video game studies time and time again.

      F*** you stupid helicopter parents who don't know they have concluded a long time ago: VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES DO NOT MAKE KIDS VIOLENT

      If you want a factual, valid reason, it should be to prevent game addiction. People need to stop regurgitating outdated and false rhetoric.

    22. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by GillBates0 · · Score: 0

      Wow, aggressive and threatening. Please, conquer your own mind and leave the world as it is. Nobody needs you saving it.

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    23. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by GillBates0 · · Score: 0

      Ooos, did i say we dont need you saving the world? I meant exploiting s/saving/exploiting

      --
      An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    24. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India was an amazing pluralistic place with 20-25% of world trade share before the West entered the stage (Brits, specifically, but also Dutch, Portuguese and French). In 200 years, they did the following good and bad things. Not everything is black and white.

      1. Setup a formal civil service and bureaucracy that created a long lasting administrative structure. GOOD
      2. Drained the wealth of India and brought it from a 1st world to a 3rd world country. BAD
      3. Created rail network that jumpstarted industrialization. It was done to expedite the movement of goods and draining of wealth (see #2) but it ended up being beneficial. GOOD
      4. Trashed every cultural heritage of India as being backwards and enforcing that all that was Western was good. In the process, we lost a lot of medical and other scientific knowledge. Also eroded the massively secular Hindu philosophy that kept Indian society and civilization together for millennia. Hint: Hinduism is not a religion like the Abrahamic ones. It is a philosophy encompassing economics, politics, sociology, psychology, and spirituality. In other words, what the West thinks of as religion is about 20% of Hinduism. The rest of it is not religion at all and does not require any belief in God. BAD

    25. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, punish them by letting them see you and your kids playing classics like Duke Nukem 3D and Unreal: Tournament on a PC. It'll likely freak them out!

      Just kidding, but this game is awful sauce compared to even games from 10+ years ago. Android is the new Nintendo, featurewise.

    26. Re:Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pelosi and Feinstein and Morgan versus Trump and Cheney and Giuliani... Not sure anyone's a winner, here.
      Nancy "Let Indonesia burn(peat)" Pelosi
      Senator "Encryption is bad, m'kay" Feinstein
      Piers "Monarchy forever!" Morgan
      Donald "Murdoch's media got me nominated" Trump
      Dick "Oops did I shoot that?" Cheney
      And the ambiguous Mayor Judy "Police state" Giuliani.

    27. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberal definition of facts: "The way I feel about something"

    28. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Wow, aggressive and threatening. Please, conquer your own mind and leave the world as it is. Nobody needs you saving it.

      If you think that was aggressive and threatening, you don't know much history. That was stating of reality, I mean in your case these days I'd be more worried about China and them back-channel arming Pakistan.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    29. Re: Indians can afford to play it? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Ooos, did i say we dont need you saving the world? I meant exploiting s/saving/exploiting

      Funny, it sure looks like you need the Americans to do that for you. You can't even keep ships safe from pirates in your own territorial waters, and go running to either Japan, S.Korea or the US who all have a regional defense agreement with each other to cover the that type of stuff.

      But, exploiting hmm. Well, considering westerners were using sanitation 500 years ago and you're still dumping untreated shit and piss directly into the streets. I'd say you should be happy that someone is taking care of the issues you have, so you can actually fix your country.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  2. I don't think its the game guys... by SirAstral · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think its the game turning people into psychopaths... it looks like power-tripping is doing a much better job of that, maybe they psychopaths in government like to be an inclusive club, no 3rd party imitations allowed?

    1. Re: I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The psychopaths are the marketing folks who told everyone how great the game was while withholding material information

    2. Re: I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gonna stand there and wring your hands while CNN shows him being carted off with his head hung low?

    3. Re: I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think everybody is glued to CNN watching US politics? Here's what will happen. You will spend a lot of time dwelling on it because you are lonely autistic piece of shit. It will involve following dudes around slashdot all day and repeating yourself, because you are also a giant faggot.

      See which predictions come true.

    4. Re: I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump dies in prison either way, you just admitted. Thanks, that's all I'm concerned about. Traitors like Trump need to hang from their faggot necks. (YMMV)

    5. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The more modern leanings on that subject are psychopaths are born not made, born with genetic cerebral defects, that are sufficient in nature to define them as a parasitic sub-species, they preys upon human society rather that contributing to it cooperatively. Sociopaths are made as a result of abuse, most often by psychopaths. All PvP attract psychopaths, it's the gaming style as well as narciccists, they also much prefer, PvP as purse vs purse, where they can pay to beat free players who are basically there as smarter than cheap AI targets (in fact in future, smart PvP game developers will alter AI players to act like real players and pretend to be real players, basically just targets, cheaper that providing free network service to free to play targets).

      The games do not create psychopaths, they only attract them and start with a high population and the normal ratio being about 1 in 100 being pyschopaths, start with a billion and that is a lot of psychopaths and that game whilst not creating them, certainly could trigger them. For the rest of the population, honestly PvP is not that popular, they generally much prefer coop gaming, PvE, where they work together to defeat an AI enemy.

      The problem is profitability of PvE vs PvP. PvP will always generate most of it's profit by creating a environment where you must pay to win and target that at psychopaths and narcissist, those who accept cheating as winning and hence are content to buy game legal cheats in order to beat those who would beat them, playing upon an equal basis, their disturb genetic nature, forces them to win by any means, fair competition undesirable to the extreme and they will pay and pay through the nose to feed their ego, to abuse others and win.

      In PvE, by far the majority prefer equal game play and when you win, another person does not necessarily lose, those sometimes they can. The majority have no interest in buying game legal cheats because why play the game if you need to cheat to win. The only real profit possible is for cosmetic if the free ones are purposefully ugly or in account upgrades, new maps, faster travel, AI companions, special characters.

      They can never match the profit style of say Grand Theft Gaming, 'er', Auto, where the profit is based upon selling a better gun, to PvPers, so they can win against those who do not buy that gun and then selling an even better gun, to force them to buy it to start winning again and then selling an even better gun etc. basically psychopaths preying upon gullible and readily manipulable psychopaths for whom cheating is winning and they will pay to feed their ego (drawing up a new gun with better statistics dirt cheap compared to having create a new map and story line).

      The problem for those companies all piling on the PvP, pay to cheat to win, yeah just a tiny percentage of the market, 1% to 3% counting narcissists and they will eat each others lunch pretty quick and of course the psychopaths will eventually wake up to reality, they are being manipulated and conned by other psychopaths, to pay for nothing but trigger by losing ego, must win, cheating is winning, paying for cheats is winning, yeah (no you sucker you are being straight up scammed and when the AI gets good enough to pretend to be real players, with pretend hurt feelings the psychopaths can abuse, it will become even more profitable to scam psychopaths, them paying to pretend they are abusing real people, it feeds the corrupted ego of psychopaths).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more modern leanings on that subject are psychopaths are born not made, born with genetic cerebral defects, that are sufficient in nature to define them as a parasitic sub-species, they preys upon human society rather that contributing to it cooperatively. Sociopaths are made as a result of abuse, most often by psychopaths.

      I admit you've explained Donald Trump entirely.

    7. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by nyet · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it is safe to say you never played sports.

      How about chess?

      Competition draws psychopaths? Ok.

    8. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exposure to certain "values" or the lack thereof, day after day on young impressionable minds, is equivalent to brainwashing. Game addicts always calim it does not affect them, while game opposers claim violence and social madness are increasing. The hard facts in society over the last few decades bear out the latter. I say good on India, they are ahead of the 'developed West' in banning this rubbish.

    9. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by MikeS2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His comment was a little rambling so I found it hard to understand, but I got the impression that he is talking about "Pay to Win" attracting psychopaths; whereas a fair fight (say games like Quake 3 where every player is equal, or indeed Chess) which is PvP, attracts normal people looking for a challenge.
      Same thing with cheaters = psychopaths enjoy going on, cheating and beating other people over and over again - whereas normal people would find this fun for a few matches then deeply boring. Of course whether any of this is true or not...

      I enjoy a good game of Quake 3 and I'd hope I'm not a psychopath, indeed I work at a school and occasionally we'll have a game of Quake with the students. I've never been into the PubG / Battle Royale kind of games as every game seemed to be 15 minutes of wandering around picking up loot only to die to an unseen sniper in 5 seconds.

      Of course as others pointed out, the real reason behind this ban is probably censorship. Either old people fearing what they don't understand, or they don't want the poor lower caste individuals knowing too much "truth" outside their village. I wonder if they'll start censoring websites critical of the State, Caste and Hinduism next - then we will know for sure.

      --
      120 characters should be enough for anybody
    10. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing it is safe to say you never played sports.

      How about chess?

      Competition draws psychopaths? Ok.

      Well, how about chess? Have you read about some of the greatest chess masters? Alekhine, Fischer...

    11. Re: I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that violent crime is decreasing? I agree, it does say a lot.

    12. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      The more modern leanings on that subject are psychopaths are born not made, born with genetic cerebral defects, that are sufficient in nature to define them as a parasitic sub-species, they preys upon human society rather that contributing to it cooperatively. Sociopaths are made as a result of abuse, most often by psychopaths.

      THIS!

      Ever wonder about the myths of Vampires and Werewolves? The bite of a vampire (psychopath) will turn its victim into a sociopath all while draining it dry of energy only to be expended as a used husk. Or, a useful minion during the last discard phase known as the "path". It's pure evil. For those that don't turn, they either escaped or endured long enough to go "berserk"; they turn werewolf via temporary insanity. Werewolves might be an evolutionary adaptation against the vampires.

      So what can YOU do about being under the influence of a psychopath?! If early, leave ASAP. Keep your distance and remain silent. Go stealth. If too late, the alternative is to make your blood/energy tainted. Sour the experience for the psychopath. Make it worth so much of an annoyance and too much trouble that they leave you. Remember, you can't leave a psychopath - they won't let you be in control of that decision. Many will hunt you with arousal to the ends of the Earth. Again, you must make it a giant PITA to the point where the psychopath gives up. Wear garlic my friend :) Be that Jovian cock!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    13. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is profitability of PvE vs PvP. PvP will always generate most of it's profit by creating a environment where you must pay to win

      Ok, that whole post is one long generalization and massive "citation needed", but this is demonstrably ridiculous. As someone who has actually bothered to try playing PUBG, I would very much like you to explain how, exactly, anyone is paying to win at PUBG. Or Overwatch. Or CS:GO. Or Fortnite. Or Apex: Legends.

      Yes, there are pay-to-win games. They probably attract more than the average share of jerks (which, apparently, "psychopath" is a synonym to you). But the statement "PvP will always generate most of it's (sic) profit by creating an environment where you must pay to win" is a flat out falsehood.

    14. Re:I don't think its the game guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, of course it isn't. In USA, we had violent videogames from the beginning, and didn't see massive epidemics of people trying to imitate 'wrestling games' breaking their backs or starting revolutionary wars because playing military games like all those flight simulators, side-scrolling shooters, etc. I'd be highly shocked if said hyperbole happens anywhere that isn't totally bubbleboys and girls.

      Yeah, because it's not like it's the culture in general turning them into bullies. No sir, couldn't possibly be the parents or neighbors' kids or the school system or the highly-regulated mass media. It's got to be the video games. They should rent Jack Thompson out for their complaining'n'blaming campaigns.

  3. Dangerous consequences... by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

    I t certainly explains the huge number of people parachuting into the countryside and shooting everybody in sight.

  4. Two Decades? by XopherMV · · Score: 1

    What's different about India is the speed with which the country has landed in the strange digital world of no laws or morals. It skipped two decades of debate and adjustment, blowing into the modern gaming era in a matter of months.

    The modern gaming era began long before 1999. Pong was one of the earliest video games. That came out in 1972. The modern gaming era is almost 50 years old.

    1. Re:Two Decades? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The modern gaming era is almost 50 years old.

      Like me! Gamer since 1976...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Two Decades? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd already given up by then, too many mainstreamers.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's different about India is the speed with which the country has landed in the strange digital world of no laws or morals. It skipped two decades of debate and adjustment, blowing into the modern gaming era in a matter of months.

      The modern gaming era began long before 1999. Pong was one of the earliest video games. That came out in 1972. The modern gaming era is almost 50 years old.

      I think the article is trying (poorly) and failing (badly) to imply that the "Modern Gaming Era" means online multiplayer and mobile-based gaming. So in that context, it's only really been a widespread part of gaming culture since around 2001 when Halo introduced the "Everyday Joe" to online 1st person shooters.

      And to answer the inevitable response yes, I'm aware that there was online gaming prior to that, aware that Quake was the first massively popular online shooter, etc. but it was the Xbox and Halo that really catapulted gaming in general, and online gaming in particular, into the realm of "acceptability" to regular people. Prior to that, gamers were still widely regarded as "nerds and geeks and losers."

      Anyhow, the point of the article is that for most of India, this sort of cultural shift has only recently came about, because most people simply didn't have access. And now they are, quite predictably, and somewhat unironically, attempting to "shoot the messenger." Failing to realize that the far more sinister gaming genre will be the endless parade of mindless "housewife" games which we got to first experience in the form of Flash-based Facebook 'games' and the army of shitty clones which infest the mobile App stores.

    4. Re:Two Decades? by Real+Data+Collection · · Score: 1

      Spacewar! came out in 1962 for the DEC PDP-1.

    5. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The modern gaming era began long before 1999." No, it didn't. Pong is a 1 on 1 game at most. The "modern gaming" refers to massive multiplayer online games. You're being stupid intentionally, it's normal for here.

    6. Re:Two Decades? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      The "modern gaming" refers to massive multiplayer online games.

      Oh, you mean MU*s? The first truly multiplayer online one was available in 1978, but of course, they didn't hook it up to arpanet until about 1980....

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ever since then, I have been building a starship to go to war.

    8. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't popular in 1978, they were niche. "Modern gaming" is some large % of kids. Most people didn't even have computers in 78. Now ~everyone has a gaming phone. Why is this so hard for you old farts?

    9. Re:Two Decades? by sjames · · Score: 1

      True, but a square going "BIP! Boop!" doesn't present much moral dilemma. It took a bit over a decade and a half before video games presented anything like realistic imagery.

    10. Re:Two Decades? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The modern gaming era is almost 50 years old.

      ... and the first moral panic about games corrupting the youth came a few months later.

    11. Re:Two Decades? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      True, but a square going "BIP! Boop!" doesn't present much moral dilemma.

      It is very easy to dehumanize a rectangular paddle, but it is a slippery slope from there to blasting spaceships.

      It took a bit over a decade and a half before video games presented anything like realistic imagery.

      Once pixels depict realistic images, we need laws to protect them.

    12. Re:Two Decades? by XopherMV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the article is trying (poorly) and failing (badly) to imply that the "Modern Gaming Era" means online multiplayer and mobile-based gaming. So in that context, it's only really been a widespread part of gaming culture since around 2001 when Halo introduced the "Everyday Joe" to online 1st person shooters.

      And to answer the inevitable response yes, I'm aware that there was online gaming prior to that, aware that Quake was the first massively popular online shooter, etc. but it was the Xbox and Halo that really catapulted gaming in general, and online gaming in particular, into the realm of "acceptability" to regular people. Prior to that, gamers were still widely regarded as "nerds and geeks and losers."

      Mobile-based gaming didn't really take off until smart phones came around 12 years old. That was long after the start of the "modern gaming era."

      Between PC, Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft, the XBox is only a portion of the overall market. Halo meant nothing and continues to mean nothing to anyone who doesn't own an XBox. It didn't matter how "acceptable" it was to anyone else. Further that first came out in 2001, years after online multiplayer had already gone mainstream on PCs.

      Quake was certainly the game that popularized online deathmatch starting in 1996. That I could see as the start of the widespread online multiplayer era.

    13. Re:Two Decades? by XopherMV · · Score: 1

      "The modern gaming era began long before 1999." No, it didn't. Pong is a 1 on 1 game at most. The "modern gaming" refers to massive multiplayer online games. You're being stupid intentionally, it's normal for here.

      You're drawing an arbitrary line and assuming people agree with you. Modern gaming could just as easily be defined as any sort of video game. That's how I'd define it.

    14. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you have a new stalker! At least this one isn't trying to kill you. Yet.

      Nobody here wants you to die. Except your stalkers, and maybe someone running the local morgue.

      Can you please address this problem instead of ignoring it? I'm telling you, these stalkers are dangerous. I don't want to see anything bad happen to you. Really!

      APK is ready to defend you. Just say the word . . . and spread his praises.

      ALL HAIL APK

    15. Re:Two Decades? by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Oh come on, Trek was awesome!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    16. Re: Two Decades? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      And Pong is, to be fair, utterly devoid of morals.

    17. Re: Two Decades? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      The "modern gaming era" would by definition have to include LAN games like Mechwarrior and Starcraft.

    18. Re: Two Decades? by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It took a bit over a decade and a half before video games presented anything like realistic imagery.

      Personally, I never thought CGA graphics looked that realistic.

    19. Re:Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If stopping his lying would kill Bill, I'd still be fore it...

    20. Re:Two Decades? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They weren't popular in 1978, they were niche. "Modern gaming" is some large % of kids. Most people didn't even have computers in 78. Now ~everyone has a gaming phone. Why is this so hard for you old farts?

      I'm not sure you comprehend how many kids then had regular access to an Atari, Odyssey 2, Amiga, Apple II, or regularly hung out at the local mall's arcade. Videogames have been extremely popular with kids for several generations now. The first generation are now in their forties and fifties, and mostly understand the appeal, and as such aren't as scared shitless by the way kids get sucked into these games.

      Previous generations of adults freaked out about Mortal Combat and the terrible influence it was having on our youth. Before that, I guess it was D&D that promoted devil worship. Hell, even Pokemon has been banned in some countries. Fortnite and PUBG are just popular right now - nothing more, so become targets. This is nothing new. Just the latest in a long line of reactive old farts being busybodies, trying to protect everyone from themselves.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    21. Re: Two Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you are the best kind of correct.

    22. Re: Two Decades? by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      I'm freaking out that you didn't spell Mortal Kombat correctly. I'm off to write a sternly worded letter to my congressman!

    23. Re:Two Decades? by Macdude · · Score: 1

      So in that context, it's only really been a widespread part of gaming culture since around 2001 when Halo introduced the "Everyday Joe" to online 1st person shooters.

      Ummm, have you never heard of EverQuest? a.k.a. EverCrack?

      --
      "Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
    24. Re: Two Decades? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about CGA? SVGA was the key evolution there (though EGA looked good compared to CGA, it's not that great in retrospect).

      Even with that, it took a really immersive game to get the player to forget they were looking at CGI.

  5. So I got a D&D red box over thirty years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My grandma was concerned it would make me worship the devil.

    In india there are sudden and large shifts happening because everyone can get a smart phone. And the older generation is all up in arms because the changes to society, loose morals of children, women on street corners, devil worshipping, lack of respect of the eldars, etc etc etc.

    Give it twenty years and the old folks will have died off a bit, the younger folks will have had their own kids and this won't be a problem anymore.

  6. Fish rots from the head down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UK government has been taken over by psychos using the techniques of social media and gamer culture.

    1. Re: Fish rots from the head down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh I tried to download it once but I didn't have a product license so I only tried the trial version and it wasn't fun and it was extremely graphic and I didn't bother buying it or even finishing the first level. Too bad! Indians are correct.

  7. Not worse than some other games by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Compared to Rage or Grand theft Auto, that doesn't sound worse.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  8. Protectionism by any other name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like China they ban foreign competitors with fake concern trolling bullshit.

  9. It didn't skip them by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's going through them right now. Same thing happened here but it was Mortal Kombat.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  10. Bogus Bot Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you have to do is stand still like you're camping and a bot comes along every time. Most players are completely unaware that they're the ones being gamed.

  11. fuck china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good. Ban it in China next. Fucking cheaters the whole damn country.

    1. Re: fuck china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care where they ban it. Just please ban it.

  12. Re: Indochimps can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be a mistake. Have your lawyers start calling after you circle back. Very sad. They must have left out the page that listed the actual numbers and response times. Probably conveniently on the floor of a Muslim print shop somewhere

  13. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only folks who HAVEN'T been psychopaths in the western nations have been the kids.

    It's all the non-game playing adults that seem to have gone bug-nutty.

  14. "Shanghai" Bill is a known liar many times over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill got caught lying 12-25 times repeatedly stating "Blood plasma is sterile" and then later that "The Chinese Govt does not directly censor Chinese citizens" and other absolute bullshit head-in-ass retard-level lies. You're not trustworthy.

    You are not a source of information that anyone should or even could trust, knowing your dishonest history. Sorry. That's what accountability means when you get caught lying repeatedly, over and over, even after directly corrected.

    You're a liar, Bill.

  15. "Shanghai" Bill is a known liar many times over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill got caught lying 12-25 times repeatedly stating "Blood plasma is sterile" and then later that "The Chinese Govt does not directly censor Chinese citizens" and other absolute bullshit head-in-ass retard-level lies. You're not trustworthy.

    You are not a source of information that anyone should or even could trust, knowing your dishonest history. Sorry. That's what accountability means when you get caught lying repeatedly, over and over, even after directly corrected.

    You're a liar, Bill.

  16. Re:GAY NIGGER ASS-OCIATION OF AMERICA GNAA FELCH F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a GNAA membership post, possibly. Or masking as one.

    Sadly, despite updating the copyright and changing the name to Tim Cook, the shitpost is the same as it ever was. They need new copy.

  17. That's cute. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 4, Funny

    Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:That's cute. by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 0

      No different than some of the other stuff that go on there or in other democracies. The Land of the Free isn't so free anymore in case you haven't been paying attention. Neither is the rest of the free world in case you think I'm picking on the US.

    2. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You see, in India they have one big exam once a year in highschool that every 10th grader and 12th grader in the whole country writes that determines their future. As you can imagine, the competition is fierce and people get rejected from their program because their GPA was a fraction of a point too low. Now, imagine being the parent of an otherwise very intelligent kid who love playing video games. It is hard enough to not tell him to do something he loves when he's the only one doing it. But all of his pretty smart friends are also playing video games. But your kid isn't competing against just his friends for the coveted spots in a reputable university - he's competing against the whole country. So, as you can imagine, it is very easy for all the parents in a town or city to want a ban on videogames during the month leading up to these exams.

      It is easy to sit in a Western country where you get many, many chances to recover. In India (and China), the reality is that every fuck-up costs massively. So, as you can imagine, people are very much on edge when it comes to opening doors for their kids.

    3. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games.

      Well, children should not be playing it at all - it is rated K16 in most countries.

    4. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is easy to sit in a Western country where you get many, many chances to recover. In India (and China), the reality is that every fuck-up costs massively.

      In Western countries, you are already fucked up at birth if you weren't born to rich parents.

      Yeah, it does reduce the stress though as it no longer matters how hard you study. LOL

    5. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "arrests children for playing games." Trump faces serious criminal liability one would hardly... oh, you meant India. I bet Kushner beg-mailed them for bailout money too. Oy, that 5th avenue building is like a money fire!
         

    6. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. New zealand will put you in jail for 14 years for having a text file.

      AND everyone is cheering them for it.

    7. Re:That's cute. by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      When only 1 in a 10k/100k gets admission, what's the point in someone working "hard"? the point is you can't just work and succeed there. The thing/passion must be inside you - ie you live and breathe every second for that skill/domain/subject - else you are not going to be the one. Such a person will not get distracted by PUBG or anything else or need a "parent" to guide him/her.

    8. Re:That's cute. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games.

      I'm confused, what are you complaining about? That children in some countries are obliged to follow laws? How ... errr.... horrible?

    9. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games.

      As if that's not enough, in world's most remotest democracy, children were killed for praying

    10. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good point. If these more sensitive cultures are scared of damaging the children, they could enforce the age limits in such a way that under 16 minors using K16 or K18 products will get treated the same as if they were drinking liqueur, along with their parents. Assuming the over 18 year olds can do that of course. "My baby played PUBG repeatedly and I lost her to the authorities!"

    11. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World's biggest shit hole democracy.

    12. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They're going to be working for Western companies anyway so who gives a shit?

    13. Re:That's cute. by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      one thing that has happened between the 80's when many of the older /. crowd and now is that today's high schoolers are advised to send applications to every school they remotely might be interested in instead of the ones they have the best chance of being accepted to

    14. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just do like everyone else and help them cheat. Yeah, there's a reason people hate having (the culture of) Chinese students. :(

    15. Re:That's cute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, China qualifies for the word democracy, because if you're not in the majority ethnic groups, your life doesn't mean s***. Not all democracies are made alike. What people are really thinking of is individualistic cultures, where you typically have a right-to-be-left alone, by default, but have laws that cut away at that. The opposite of that is society having privileges that they hand out piecemealwise.

      An interesting thing is the approaches to 'social programs' and infrastructure that exist in various countries. In the USA, you have a huge number of people on food stamps AKA EBT/SNAP/etc. along with help paying utility bills during worst months, and rent subsidies. And this is considered one of the least 'socialist' countries in existence. In both USA and China, you have big military contractors who make their living propping up their military recruits and intelligence services, in the name of the 3 major parties in those 2 countries.

      Another comparison is gun culture among government employees. In China, even police aren't trusted to own their own weapons, and turn them on a moment's notice for 'inspection' if a minority during some 'holiday'/anniversary of some big political stink. In USA, police are expected to have their own collections and ammo and are able to buy automatics in most jurisdictions. XD

      Haha, recaptcha: REVOLTS

  18. Dungeons and Dragons 2.0... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    meh

  19. "the demon in every house." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Windows??

    1. Re: "the demon in every house." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every few months you hear of someone being raped on a bus there so..they need to do something...I played many games before playing brutal blood and angst inducing first person shooters. Maybe they should of given them a ps1 before letting them kill they're friends online..

    2. Re:"the demon in every house." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will do the needfull?

  20. There is a very simple test here. by F34nor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does a dog know the difference between play fighting and real fighting? Yes. If any dog in the park crosses that line they all know basically simultaneously. Do you really think children are less perceptive of the difference between real and play? If not that kid has a problem and video games have nothing to do with it.

    1. Re: There is a very simple test here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are children who have trouble making that distinction, they're the ones that end up shooting up their school.

      More should be done to detect these troubled children and get them help before it gets that far, rather then try to ban games for everyone. But providing mental health care to kids sounds far too socialist to be allowed.

    2. Re: There is a very simple test here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are children who have trouble making that distinction, they're the ones that end up shooting up their school."

      Do you have any evidence that school shootings were carried out by kids who couldn't distinguish between games and reality? From what I've read about it, it seems like the shooters knew exactly what they were doing and were under no illusions that they were acting in some kind of play act.

    3. Re: There is a very simple test here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are children who have trouble making that distinction, they're the ones that end up shooting up their school.

      There's a substantial difference between being unable to distinguish between fantasy/play and reality, and just not giving a shit about human life.

    4. Re: There is a very simple test here. by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what school shootings are? Revenge acts. Nothing else.

      Why do they shoot up schools? If you're after a body count, go shoot up a mall on a busy weekend. Way more people to off there. Invariably, though, they go to a school. And not just any school, but their school. And they don't shoot just anyone but very specific people.

      It's revenge. And you don't influence this by computer games, movies or anything else outside the school. You influence this by fighting bullying.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re: There is a very simple test here. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's revenge. And you don't influence this by computer games, movies or anything else outside the school. You influence this by fighting bullying.

      And also fair application of existing rules by the administration. Although, to be fair, unfair application of those rules is a kind of bullying.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: There is a very simple test here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. Having had two open heart surgeries and about to have a spine surgery my 450+ lb. principal went over his desk knocking everything off of it because his office was so small scaring the crap out of me. Why? Because he accused me of fighting since it was obvious since I had a black eye. Nice police work there, Lou. Anyhow, I said, "Oh really? Let me show you what would fucking happen if "I" had been the one fighting as I rared back about to slug the only kid in 6th grade smaller than me (late bloomer who was going to be tall... but picking on me to throw off the rest from bullying him) and smaller than all the girls in the grade below right in his, least up until that point, smirking face thinking he'd had gotten away with it. (Yes I noticed.) The kid grabbed my hand as I was half jogging to the principal's office (low oxygen from heart problems, etc.) and snuck me in the eye. Was seeing red and scared and never heard him. What I did hear was him yelling to the coach where he thought I was going and asked if he should get "me". Was on the way to tell the principal that there was no need to summon me for kicking him off of me as he tried to hit me... again. We'd agreed this was what I should do when I made that suggestion because defending yourself apparently wasn't allowed and he said he didn't believe me when I said coach did nothing when I tried to tell him. I had made contact first, preemptive or not and I was "going to get into serious trouble" next time. After cussing him and calling him a liar everytime he lied to my dad in his explanation of the days events, I went over the whole thing from the first incident point by point and made them both listen. My dad was aware of most of it as I had reported to him. I was still so "hot" they sent me home and said they'd talk to the school board. I was nervous but in the end I got an "early out". Basically an expulsion and I didn't have to return the last 5 weeks or so with no penalties on my record. They were scared and I had made sure that principal was certain I would not shut up if I was punished, point blank. I had snapped and had enough. Get this... even though I normally aced tests I had a F in science (favorite subject for many here, right guys?) so they let me come back for two weeks in just that class and work it up to a D. I think that is the only reason even though the thought of going back haunted me, I got over it all. I got to relax most of the time and play with the hedgehog and pull it out bare handed to hand to the kids with gloves who couldn't be gentle enough with them on. lol.

      This was before Columbine, thank God. Was almost me. Coach for P.E. that year (same class as the little jerk above) also had made me stand behind the backstop since I was the last picked uneven man on the teams so I didn't get a team. And everyone moved closer to the backstop move than usual... Like literally moved home plate back some. Why? So they didn't leave me out of course.... yay? Was so confused. Then all of a sudden whoever wanted could take turns spitting on me before they took their swing(s). And so on. No child should have to deal with this type of abuse, but if I did, I doubt I am alone. Wasn't the only school or even the most egregious stuff I'd dealt with. If a child snapped and wasn't as fortunate as me to have seen the love I had at that point and known Jesus, I couldn't really "blame" him for whatever happened no more than I could a dog that you yanked on his ear and he bit you. You feel trapped, claustrophobic with your non-existent options, often with (single) parents not sure what to do or even believe, hell I still don't if it weren't for I experienced it.

      caption - muddling

  21. Re: "Shanghai" Bill is a known liar many times ove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did you lie about there being a sealed indictment?

  22. It's sealed, like your brain to what words mean : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sealed indictment :An indictment can be sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested or has been notified by police.[13]

    https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sealed-indictment/

    An indictment is a formal accusation of a felony, issued by a grand jury based upon a proposed charge, witnesses' testimony and other evidence presented by the public prosecutor (District Attorney). It is the grand jury's determination that there is enough evidence that the defendant committed the crime to justify having a trial voted by a grand jury. In order to issue an indictment, the grand jury doesn't make a determination of guilt, but only the probability that a crime was committed, that the accused person did it and that he/she should be tried. District Attorneys do not present a full case to the grand jury, but often only introduce key facts sufficient to show the probability that the accused committed a crime.

    The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment of a Grand Jury." . Therefore grand juries are often used in charging federal crimes. However, states often use a "preliminary hearing" held by a lower court judge or other magistrate in place of a grand jury to determine whether the prosecutor has presented sufficient evidence that the accused has committed a felony. If the judge finds enough evidence that the accused committed a crime, the case will be ordered to be sent to the appropriate court for trial.

    A sealed indictment an indictment that is sealed so that it stays non-public until it is unsealed. This can be done for a number of reasons. It may be unsealed, for example, once the named person is arrested.

    The following is an example of a federal rule dealing with sealed indictments:

    The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment’s existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons.

    Sealed. It means it's not opened yet. Even a retarded Republican traitor can understand how this works, one imagines...

  23. Social media by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    Social media is "turning" people into "psychopaths". Adults who should know better believing in anything they read and then forming angry murderous mobs to carry out justice.

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  24. Re: Indochimps can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is a Hindu country.

  25. fewer than the number with smartphones today = yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm not sure you comprehend how many kids then had regular access to an Atari, Odyssey 2, Amiga, Apple II, or regularly hung out at the local mall's arcade. " Fewer than the number with smartphones today, as a % of kids.

    The "modern gaming" set as kids have exploded it in the last 20 years is a much larger proportion of kids than D&D MUD nerds in the 70's. That's just a hard demographic fact.

    " The first generation are now in their forties and fifties, and mostly understand the appeal, and as such aren't as scared shitless by the way kids get sucked into these games." -The games have changed.

    The motivating factors that socialize children have changed. I was there when Mortal Kombat's gore scared the church crowd, that's not related. Loot boxes, shaming, hacking, doxxing, bullying, these are serious things.

    Those didn't really exist in the size, scale, scope, or speed of escalation in the 70's, 60's. Sorry. That's also just a hard fact. It's not "video games" as a general thing, it's what they specifically are reinforcing in society.

    Fantasy violence isn't so bad by itself. MMO wolfpacks targeting people for real-life consequences, SWATTING, etc? That's not your grandpa's colecovision.

  26. Carmageddon is banned in Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PUBG is banned in India

    Haha

  27. Re:fewer than the number with smartphones today = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern gaming is about portability and realism.

    The subject matter, morality, and choices you make in games have not changed.

    In fact I think some games have become LESS complex. You can argue that your grinding and milling and crafting is more complex than the arcana in Ultima or the six person full gear layout of an AD&D pools of radiance type game.

    But violence is violence, realistic or not. "Satantic" or "demonic" content (as the indians prefer) has been argued about "modern approaches" since Communism and Bepop.

    Swatting? No, that is new because police are *trigger happy* now. If police didn't shoot first and ask later swatting would be related to a brief "knock-knock" "oh, you're playing games?" question and it wouldn't make a splash. Cops killing people is what swatting is all about.

    You want to feel special, but you are not, unless you want to count police killing people in their homes playing games as 'modern', which i guess it could be since its broadcast online while its happening, but thats not what the article is talking about, is it?

  28. I don't favor blanket bans of any media type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but we're foolish to believe that violent and anti-social media (of all types) does NOT have the potential to influence a percentage of our population which is more susceptible to influence and manipulation.

    The problem is that this debate has almost always been polarized, black or white, when it comes to adults. Certain adults should never drink, certain adults should never consume this type of media.

    I include so-called social media, as it ends up used, in the category of anti-social media.

    The fact that we haven't created real laws, and sociatal pressures, to prevent young minds from exposure to it (like we have alcohol) is a shame and at least some component of our rise in apparent mental illness and anti-social behavior.

    We're all cursed to "live in interesting times", I am extremely concerned about the life and worlds my kids will have.

  29. Manorogi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Manorogi does not mean a psychopath.
    Mano = of the Mind
    Rogi = Diseased

    Manorog is a general term for any mental illness.

    Indians generally have a very poor concept of mental illness. It is held as a taboo and not openly discussed. Politicians are typically ill advised and are no better than public. The only thing mental that Indians talk about is meditation, not things like depression, dependency or mania.

    This is probably just India's delayed reaction to the same gaming addiction that China was handling in its own way. I am not saying it is proper, but everyone is confused on what to do when their kids become zombies before the screens, stop studying and ignore their family for the screen.

  30. Swatting is an exclusively US problem by DrYak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MMO wolfpacks targeting people for real-life consequences, SWATTING, etc? That's not your grandpa's colecovision.

    And isn't your {insert latest popular console or computer gaming platform here} neither, here around in the "rest of the world".

    Swatting is a very specific problem of the US - a country whose police has tons of big toy that they are itching to send whenever some actions is happening.

    The rest of the world doesn't even have "Swat" to begin with and wouldn't understand why sending military-like tanks whenever somebody phones in telling they "heard gunshots".

    In other word, the problem aren't the games, the problem is your dysfunctional country where it is possible to send tanks at somebody else's house with a simple phone call. What is wrong with you guys ?!

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Swatting is an exclusively US problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only ones with SWAT? - Nope. French, German, UK, and most of Europe have SWAT like agencies (some tied to military not Police, but same difference in essence). Germans I know first hand; seen some of their Polizei demos (they have tanks btw ;) ).

    2. Re:Swatting is an exclusively US problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many innocent people have been shot by all of those countries combined? Does it reach 1% of just the US police deaths, let alone + SWAT?

      For reference, police shot someone in England last week and everyone is crazy about it, the second time in a few years!! That's like...small town america, except an entire country.

      Nice try with false equalism, yes every country has 'heavily armed special police'.

    3. Re:Swatting is an exclusively US problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nixon and Clinton happened.

    4. Re:Swatting is an exclusively US problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rest of the world doesn't even have "Swat" to begin with

      I don't live in the US, but SWAT teams are pretty common, just not as armed as their counterparts in the US.

      SWAT teams are usually called in to handle things that the police cannot easily control (like hostage situations or bomb threats). Usually the hierarchy for escalations is a) Local Police/Security folks, b) Police, c) Special Weapons and Tactics teams (SWAT), d) military.

  31. Re: Indochimps can afford to play it? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    India is a Hindu country.

    Over 20% of India's population (260 million people, enough people that the non-Hindu population alone would make India the 5th most populous state in the world) would disagree with you, no matter how hard the BJP is trying to claim otherwise.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  32. Re:So I got a D&D red box over thirty years ag by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    lack of respect of the eldars, etc etc etc.

    Everyone knows that this is a problem and that it might let Chaos triumph, yet everyone's afraid to be accused of heresy if they dare to voice their concerns...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. priorities by sad_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    good thing India has it's priorities in order.
    banning and arresting people for playing PUBG is a more urgent matter then dealing with all the rape problems they're having.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the Fuck was this upvoted?!? Yes, we all know how countries can only focus on one thing at a time. To deal with kids playing games, they stopped arresting rapists and other criminals because OMG GAMES. Literally everyone in the police force stopped enforcing other laws to deal with this. The government couldn't do a SINGLE OTHER THING while they decided this. This is stupid tripe with should be downvoted into oblivion.

    2. Re:priorities by sad_ · · Score: 1

      i'm not saying they stopped any of the other things they were doing, BUT they allocated resources to it, probably a reasonable amount too.
      if you look at the scale of priorities, this one is pretty low i would assume, and those same resources probably would have benefitted the ones higher up the scale much more.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  34. Re: Indochimps can afford to play it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do posts like this stay up for >30 minutes, and the posts where I make fair, rational points both sides can relate to are deleted in 10 minutes? Maybe I didn't say libzzztard or consurrvturddd enough times?

  35. I feel old now .... by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember when Ozzy Osbourne music was the root of all of this evil for teens.

    1. Re:I feel old now .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but the moral panics of every generation bring back fond memories. I wonder what will happen if the Indians find out about Night Trap.

    2. Re:I feel old now .... by meglon · · Score: 1

      Booze, marijuana, biker gangs, rock and roll, drugs, dungeons and dragons, metal music, rap.... and now PUG. Seems there's always been people looking for a scapegoat for the fact that they're getting old and crusty.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    3. Re:I feel old now .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Judas Priest...

    4. Re:I feel old now .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      “The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.” -- Socrates

  36. Now we know by meglon · · Score: 1

    At least one local minister criticized the game as "the demon in every house."

    Now we know where Jack Thompson retired to after he got disbarred.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  37. Not strange at all they're reacting like this by heldal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just think about it. What if, you were minding your own business, and then suddenly a wave of relatively inexpensive, highly portable VR headsets that covered all the six senses emerged from Dubai. The kids and young adults got hooked in, arabic became the coolest language in town and suddenly you also find out that they are having huge tournaments playing jihad wargames. How would you react?

    Granted, parts of the example might be over the top - but it's important to realize how these sudden social, economical and cultural changes are affecting emerging countries. As someone here already mentioned, they've never had the time to gradually adapt like we did (and even then, for us it went pretty fast -- and we still have a lot of ethic/moral concerns yet to be addressed). I can only imagine how it must be to be a parent, watching my kids yearn after something so extremely different and unknown. Seeing them adapting foreign cultural norms (that might totally crash with my own upbringing) and experiencing the feeling of having absolutely no control. Is it really that strange they're going nuts about it?

    1. Re:Not strange at all they're reacting like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      multiplayer first-person shooter games aren't exactly "sudden" - they've literally been around for decades.

      Captcha: worried

    2. Re:Not strange at all they're reacting like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only imagine how it must be to be a parent, watching my kids yearn after something so extremely different and unknown. Seeing them adapting foreign cultural norms (that might totally crash with my own upbringing) and experiencing the feeling of having absolutely no control. Is it really that strange they're going nuts about it?

      That's a sign of horrible parenting. Why can't parents try to understand why their kids are hooked into it? Morals aren't getting worse, it's just people looking for the newest scapegoat so they can absolve themselves of the responsibility they need to enact as parents.

  38. Will they ban religion next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Religion has created more psychopaths than any game or games ever will.

  39. Better Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worlds biggest democracy arrests children for playing games, yet allows call center scammers to bilk old Americans out of their life savings.

  40. Gang rape ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the way I see it, India has huge social problems .. you know, like gangs of people raping women on buses.

    To me, India demonstrates a really scary fact about humans .. that we're all just barely above animals, and all of our talk about being enlightened and moral is just window dressing.

    Video games isn't the issue here, but the fact that humans are barely above the level of barbarism, especially when you factor in archaic bullshit raping women in retaliation for crimes of male relatives.

    Indian society, and indeed all human society, is at any point only just barely above the level of complete barbarism.

  41. Re:GAY NIGGER ASS-OCIATION OF AMERICA GNAA FELCH F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNAA is classic slashdot. right up there with Natalie Portman's hot grits in soviet Russia, you insensitive clod.

  42. I see no one is actually from India by junglee_iitk · · Score: 2

    I see no one is actually from India. Porn and PUBG are the biggest bandwidth consumers in the cheap 4G market of India, and the biggest 4G provider "Reliance" is currently financing the central government. Notice how it says "western India" because western states in India are currently ruled by the same party BJP. Since they cannot directly ban either Porn or PUBG they have taken other routes such as bribing a judge to pass "ban porn" judgments and banning PUBG via flimsy "health" reasons. The older generation doesn't understand the internet, and young people aren't voting anyway.

  43. The torch is passed? by Poison.Pill · · Score: 1

    Great! It's ok to play Dungeons and Dragons again now!

  44. Sixties and Seventies actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it is possible there are a few in their eighties or nineties who were the originals.

    My dad was a gamer back in college in the 80s in his early 30s, held on just long enough to get me into videogames, then decided it was pointless and moved on to other enjoyments in life. I was talking to a guy in his 60s at an electronics store the other day who was looking for something to buy for his grandson. He looked a little lost, but when I asked him about it, he wasn't lost at the subject of games, but rather that all they had on the shelves was steam cards and boxes that all said they only included an online code inside. Having been a gamer like me back in the 80s (or perhaps earlier on mainframes) he found it extremely weird to buy copies of games that didn't include physical media and felt like it was giving less value as a result.

    So no, the original video gamers are even older than you think, and may even predate that if you get into RPGs and prior to them, wargames, which may date back decades or centuries without including even older and simpler games.