Slashdot Mirror


California Man Sentenced To 20 Years In Deadly Kansas 'Swatting' (fox4kc.com)

slipped_bit writes: Tyler R. Barriss, 26, who pleaded guilty to multiple counts of "swatting" attempts, including the case that caused an innocent man to be killed by police in 2017, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison. The case in 2017 was all because of a dispute between two online players over a $1.50 bet in the "Call of Duty: WWII" video game. A total of 51 federal charges related to fake calls and threats were made against Barriss. "Barriss' prosecution in Wichita consolidated other federal cases that had initially been filed against him in California and the District of Columbia involving similar calls and threats he made," reports FOX 4 Kansas City. "Prosecutors had asked for a 25-year sentence, while the defense had sought a 20-year term."

"The intended target in Wichita, Shane Gaskill, 20, and the man who allegedly recruited Barriss, Casey Viner, 19, of North College Hill, Ohio, are charged as co-conspirators," the report adds. "Authorities say Viner provided Barriss with an address for Gaskill that Gaskill had previously given to Viner. Authorities also say that when Gaskill noticed Barriss was following him on Twitter, he gave Barriss that old address and taunted him to 'try something.'"

5 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Ars Technica link... by Iwastheone · · Score: 4, Interesting
    https://arstechnica.com/tech-p...

    Ars also has an informative story with lots of links. This guy does deserve the sentence he got. If his jail sentence means others will learn not to do horrendous acts that endanger peoples lives then GOOD! No sympathy for this sociopath or psychopath. Don't parents teach kids that video games are not reality?

    1. Re: Ars Technica link... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The cop opened the door expecting a shooter about to execute a number of people

      Nonsense. He was standing on his front porch, unarmed, with his hands visible, and the cop shot him from across the street.

      Go watch the videos on YouTube.

      Or read the description of the shooting.

  2. Why the minimum I wonder by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Considering he actually got someone killed, and his sentence helps send a message to other potential swatters... the minimum amount of fla, err, sentence doesn't seem quite enough.

    On the other side of this coin how is it possible after years of swatting action, that it's still really possible to swat anyone? It seems at this point like just a single source call should not be quite enough to trigger such an extreme response, or more recon should be done, or something.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. And the one who pulled the trigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Serves zero time.

  4. Charging the target by Krakadoom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It just seems weird to me that the intended target was charged as a co-conspirator. Was it for giving a fake (old) address? Seems a really low bar to co-conspire in something, if you can get charged for misdirection against and evading someone actively trying to cause you harm.