Slashdot Mirror


Laptops To Stay in Bags as TSA Brings New Technology To Airports (bgov.com)

Air passengers at a growing number of U.S. airports will no longer need to remove electronics, liquids, and other items from their carry-on luggage at security checkpoints as the Transportation Security Administration rolls out new technology. From a report: The TSA took a major step in a broader plan to revamp its overall screening process with faster, more advanced technology when it signed a contract Thursday for hundreds of new carry-on baggage screening machines, Administrator David Pekoske said on a press call Friday. The agency has tested the new technology at more than a dozen airports since 2017, along with the relaxed protocols that allow passengers to leave items such as laptops and toiletries inside their luggage. The rollout of the computed tomography, or CT, machines will begin this summer, Pekoske said. The $97 million contract will buy 300 machines, but the list of airports receiving them has yet to be made final, Pekoske said. The technology creates 3-D images of bags' contents and will eventually be able to detect items automatically that the TSA now asks passengers to remove, he said.

5 of 160 comments (clear)

  1. So, a more important question... by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...It's good to see that there's less stuff required on our end, but when will they finally get rid of the rest of the security theater?

    I mean, okay, it's cool that we don't have to bang laptops around in bins anymore (and the rigamarole of answering dumb questions like "...why do you need two laptops, Sir?"), but the 4th Amendment violations in the name of reassurance continue apace - just that we're using electronics to do it. *shrug*

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  2. It's like travelling in the future. by nicolaiplum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amsterdam Airport Schiphol has had this for some months now. It's great. It's like travelling in the future. I know because I travel there very regularly.

    You unload your pocket contents into a jacket, bag, or onto a tray. You put your jacket, bag, etc, into the same or more trays. You don't take anything out of your bags. You also don't take your shoes off unless they are heavy boots.

    It all goes through a scanner. You pick it up the other side. Maybe the scanner pass takes slightly longer, but you save time overall because you don't have to unload and reload everything.

    The rate of secondary search is far less than with the old scanners, and after a few months' practice the staff are almost as fast with the old scanners too - queues are shorter than they used to be.I take all sorts of stuff in my bag (laptop and cables, several electronics, medicines, keys, carabiners, etc) and I still rarely get a secondary search. Yet, I know from shoulder-surfing the scanner operator that they can identify and check suspicious things more carefully - there's a great zoom-pan-rotate function for inspecting any item in detail. It's a little uncanny.

    You can even take any liquid you like through - I often take a water bottle still full of water. Sometimes that gets a secondary check in a liquids inspector, but that's still not a problem.

    It is far better than the current USA TSA experience. It is far, far less stressful and much faster.

    The staff like it too; they're very pleased with the scanners and the smoother passenger experience. I've talked to them several times about it (try talking to a TSA agent...) and they are enthusiastic about how good the scanners are. Of course, the Dutch security staff are much more reasonable than the TSA overall.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
  3. Security theater - TSA failure rate is 95% by sinij · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TSA repeatedly failed to detect 95% of threats in independent tests performed by Red Teams. TSA is next to useless as a security measure and is nothing but a make-work project.

    1. Re:Security theater - TSA failure rate is 95% by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With those two in place, we could roll everything else back to pre-911 levels and not lose one iota of security.

      The third exception is air marshals. Every plane didn't have an air marshal embedded in the flight before 9/11. Now they may have more than one. So it's those three, not those two. We could still eliminate the long queues for sexual abuse, however.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Re:Bullshit by Q-Hack! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You don't need to bother. Just overvolt and breach the cells. BANG!

    The difference between a Li-Po battery exploding and the same size bit of semtek exploding is several orders of magnitude.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.