Slashdot Mirror


Amazon To Offer Broadband Access From Orbit With 3,236-Satellite 'Project Kuiper' Constellation (geekwire.com)

Amazon is joining the race to provide broadband internet access around the globe via thousands of satellites in low Earth orbit, newly uncovered filings show. From a report: The effort, code-named Project Kuiper, follows up on last September's mysterious reports that Amazon was planning a "big, audacious space project" involving satellites and space-based systems. The Seattle-based company is likely to spend billions of dollars on the project, and could conceivably reap billions of dollars in revenue once the satellites go into commercial service. It'll take years to bring the big, audacious project to fruition, however, and Amazon could face fierce competition from SpaceX, OneWeb and other high-profile players.

Project Kuiper's first public step took the form of three sets of filings made with the International Telecommunications Union last month by the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Washington, D.C.-based Kuiper Systems LLC. The ITU oversees global telecom satellite operations and eventually will have to sign off on Kuiper's constellation. The filings lay out a plan to put 3,236 satellites in low Earth orbit -- including 784 satellites at an altitude of 367 miles (590 kilometers); 1,296 satellites at a height of 379 miles (610 kilometers); and 1,156 satellites in 391-mile (630-kilometer) orbits. In response to GeekWire's inquiries, Amazon confirmed that Kuiper Systems is actually one of its projects.

10 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. WHat will the projust be like by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As long as this product competes fairly with all other products and said company doesn't use it to unfairly advertise to or unduly influence any segment of society to their own products, then I'm all for this. Otherwise this will just turn into the same situation of Spotify versus Apple, where Spotify is automatically at a competitive disadvantage, but now it's because they can't afford their own satellites.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:WHat will the projust be like by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Are you sure it's not all those people living in rural areas who can't get broadband at any price? And the people who like to go out in the woods where there's no phone coverage?

      Having said that:
      a) How "broad" can it be from low-earth orbit? Iridium's best systems are still only at dial-up modem speeds.
      b) I'm sure Amazon will lobby against net neutrality so they can prioritize traffic from their own services and slow down Netflix etc.
      c) Launching 3236 new satellites into low-earth-orbits? What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:WHat will the projust be like by omnichad · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe theoretically/sometimes. In the real world, peak business hours especially, congestion increases that latency. This new constellation is LEO - so you will have latency that competes with traditional broadband.

  2. Re:Censorship and content blocking by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because they might find some of their satellites falling out of the sky until they do?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  3. 630 km? by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    They already drop their packages from too high on my porch.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  4. More space garbage by racermd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look, I'm in favor of LEO satellite internet as much as anyone else but I have VERY serious reservations about Amazon operating it in any capacity. They've shown, time and again, that they're not willing to do the Right Thing (tm) if it means any kind of hit to their bottom line. Going further, they seem quite intent on weaseling their way into our lives and using data about us all as a competitive advantage, both to their direct competition as well as to ourselves.

    And, last I checked, this is at least the second proposal that's offering to launch a constellation of LEO satellites to provide internet services. Didn't SpaceX propose exactly the same service no more than a few months ago? If Amazon manages to do this alongside SpaceX, that's TWO separate and distinct constellations of satellites in low-Earth orbit to contend with. The complications of getting ONE constellation in place without interference are quite high, let alone two. Plus, as more and more nations flex their satellite-hitting technology for military purposes, it can only lead to trouble with regards to dangerous space debris.

    Let's nationalize - no, GLOBALIZE this project so that a single constellation of satellites can serve multiple providers. That way, if China wants to censor content, that provider can do that for their territory. Heck, it wouldn't be that difficult to geo-lock signals to prevent, say, a North American provider out of Europe, Africa, Asia, and South America. But - one of the advantages of a global constellation of internet-providing satellites is that you could, in theory, get your internet subscription from your home territory and travel literally anywhere int he world and still get access.

    Regardless - this seems very much like a "Me too!" move from Bezos to counter Musk. They seem to be fighting over how much control one hyper-wealthy billionaire can have over the rest of us plebes. And I'm already tired of it.

    --
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  5. Laws [Re:Global Agreement] by XXongo · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the other hand - unlike municipal and other laws that prevent you from stringing your own cable on telephone poles or under roads: absolutely nothing is stopping you from putting up your own satellites.

    Actually, no, there are laws saying that you can't put up your own satellites without permission from your government. Even if you don't launch them from your own country. https://www.technologyreview.c...

    In the US, you need FCC permission to operate, and FAA permission to launch.
    https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/regulations/

  6. Re:Not about internet. by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Getting them all up there with no mistakes/debris might be a challenge though.

    Failure rate for that many satellites will be high, too. They'll need constant replacement/de-orbiting.

    --
    No sig today...
  7. Re:Lag? by RoccamOccam · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are much lower orbits (not geostationary).

  8. Kessler Syndrome? by pr0t0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think there are at least four distinct large constellations planned. I have mixed feelings. Competition = good, right? I don't think a Kessler Syndrome is likely, but it's likelihood increases with every single thing we put in orbit.

    SpaceX Starlink is roughly 12000 satellites.
    Amazon Kuiper is 3200 satellites
    Boeing 3000 satellites
    OneWeb 2000 satellites

    So roughly 20,000 new satellites. That's seems like pretty crowded sky. However, I just did some napkin math. With Earth's radius at 3950 miles and the satellites operating at a maximum altitude of 850 miles, 20k is roughly 1 satellite for every 145k square miles if distributed perfectly evenly at that altitude. So maybe not so bad?

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.