Slashdot Mirror
Facebook, Google, Twitter To Face US Lawmakers About Tech 'Censorship' (cnet.com)
Facebook, Google and Twitter are headed back to Washington next week to testify at a congressional hearing about alleged tech censorship. From a report: Tech companies have faced accusations that they're censoring conservative speech on their platforms. The companies have denied the allegations in the past. The hearing before the Senate Judiciary's subcommittee on the Constitution is scheduled for April 10 and is titled "Stifling Free Speech: Technological Censorship and the Public Discourse." A Facebook spokesperson said Neil Potts, its public policy director, will be testifying. Twitter and Google didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. A source familiar with the Senate hearing said Twitter and Google officials will also be attending. The hearing will likely mark Potts' second congressional appearance next week. Facebook and Google officials are expected to appear before the House Judiciary Committee on April 9 to answer questions about the spread of white nationalism on their platforms.
The problem is, they are either a platform or a publisher.
The difference is in responsibility. If they are a platform, then they have a wide range of latitude on content on that platform. They aren't responsible. The moment they start picking an choosing, they start to become a publisher, and the content protection narrows substantially.
Censorship is a natural tendency, and we all ought to fight against it in all its forms. The idea that some ideas are just "too dangerous" is a slippery slope that we don't want to ride down.
Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
It can be politically awkward to admit it, but there's a very plausible explanation for this: Maybe political views just correlate with things which violate the usage policy? Check out a few conservative sites and you don't need to go far to find 'gays are plotting to rape your children' conspiracy theories, people calling for illegal immigrants to be treated as hostile invaders and shot at the border, and rumors of an Islamic takeover. Hardly surprising that they would sometimes get caught crossing the AUP line.
And that's before you read the comments sections. Never read the comments sections. It's not healthy.
They do if they act like a public square, and they clearly do. https://mtsu.edu/first-amendme...
"I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
Google/Facebook/Twitter all want freedom from any liability for what gets posted on THEIR sites.
They got that from the government in return for ensuring freedom of speech on their sites.
If they don't want to support true freedom of speech, let them be liable for everything posted.
Because a couple of the members weren't radical leftists. 'Nuff said.
The problem is, they are either a platform or a publisher.
Yep, and that is what Congress is grilling them about - why should they remain classified as a platform when they are heavily shaping the views being published? As it stands Twitter is at this point just a really terrible newspaper.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
You are a fucking idiot. The "left" doesn't hate free speech, and never have. The problem is conservatives do nothing more than play the victim.... if someone tells you your bigoted asinine bullshit can't be posted on THEIR platform, you start whining like the victim you see yourself being. You try to be authoritarian little shits everywhere, and when some big company tells you to pound sand, you start trying to make every stupid excuse in the book why that's wrong.
It's THEIR platform... THEIR company...and they can tell you to fuck off if the want.
And the next time you want to say what the "left" wants or likes or whatever... just remember, you're too big of a fucking partisan piece of shit to actually know. And yes, FASCISM is what the conservatives and the GOP have been since 1994. You obviously don't have a fucking clue what it is, our you're just a natural born lying sack of shit.
Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
You say a general idea is not good, because a lunatic got away with bad behavior under its umberella, so...
Apparently the regulation/restriction of communications "for the public good", or for societal morals, or cultural cleanliness is also "NOT good for society" as you put it. Take a look at the NAZIs as a prime example. [it's fun when you can go all-in on Godwin for a good cause]
Hell's bells, All Marxist thought is bad. with over a hundred million corpses in the 20th century alone as a punctuation, when you consider the regimes of National Socialist Hitler, Soviet Socialist Stalin, and Communists Chariman Mao and Pol Pot as [as you say] "prime example[s]" examples of a unification of Marxism and controlled public speech "for the public good".
The founders of the USA had a much better idea: Let everybofy speak freely and let everybody wisely discern for him/her self whether a particular speaker is right or wrong, good or bad.