Slashdot Mirror


Class-Action Lawsuit Accuses AT&T of Lying To Customers About DirecTV Now (kctv5.com)

A massive class-action lawsuit is accusing AT&T of lying to customers about DirecTV Now when it bought Time Warner. KCTV5 reprots: At the time, they promised customers and investors, they would be cutting prices for their streaming service called DirecTV Now. However, the lawsuit accuses the company of switching up TV packages, confusing customers by getting rid of the bundles it had been offering, charging higher prices for new types of bundles, and then bringing back the original bundles at a higher price. Investors were not happy about this because stock prices tanked. DirecTV Now was hemorrhaging customers, losing about 260,000 customers in December. "AT&T's registration statement 'touted yearly and quarterly growth trends... including quarterly subscriber gains in its DirecTV Now service sufficient to offset any decrease in traditional satellite DirecTV subscribers, such that AT&T was experiencing an ongoing trend of total video subscriber 'net additions,'" reports Ars Technica, citing a segment of the complaint.

"But in reality, 'DirecTV Now subscribers were leaving (i.e., not renewing) as soon as their promotional discount periods expired, while at the same time new potential DirecTV Now customers were unwilling to pay the higher prices and therefore not subscribing at all,' the complaint said. By the time AT&T bought Time Warner, 'AT&T's reported 'net additions' growth trend was already reversing into a severe 'net loss.' [T]he AT&T registration statement 'purported to warn of numerous risks that 'if' occurring 'may' or 'could' adversely affect the company while failing to disclose that these 'risks' had already materialized at the time of the acquisition,' the complaint said."

14 of 35 comments (clear)

  1. Playing fast and loose with the truth? by stevez67 · · Score: 1

    Kinda like 5GE isn't it? Make that shyte up and trowel it out.

  2. About effin time by Snotnose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These mergers are always sold as "synergy, better service for less cost". They always turn out to be "Less competition, higher prices, folks out of jobs".

    1. Re:About effin time by luther349 · · Score: 1

      thats what happens when your share holders are so short sighted and greedy they can see the long term damage these merges cause.

  3. Class actions are losers by WCMI92 · · Score: 2

    Only the lawyers get rich. And the companies don't pay enough to hurt them.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  4. dial tone patent by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

    the only thing AT&T will have left is a dial tone patent and cross connect fees. big iron got rusty and their retirees are not following their insurance and lawyers presented actuarial tables for unfunded liabilities and debt relief. oh well, momma bell sad to see you with and die, but hey, you had a good run. had to cute down a pine tree the other day, sad, but was encroaching upon my home and insurance company was frowning at me. oh well, from nut to nuthing.

  5. But of course... by cpotoso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had this offer for DirecTV for $35/month for 3 months and a free 4K appleTV. Used it twice. Once to get my $160 appleTV for $105. The second to get another one and sell it for $120. Basically never used the service itself which was COMPLETELY USELESS. Most channels had GARBAGE and you could not skip the commercials (if you came back to the channel after surfing away, you got hit by the commercial again... ah, the beauty of streaming). So it is Netflix, Tubi or TPB for me and that's it. (But I have been considering subscription for Mubi... seems an interesting idea.)

  6. Garbage service, not promotion expiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a long suffering DTVNOW subscriber (now moving on to PlayStation Vue), I can assure ATT investors that the cause of DTVNOW's decline has far, far more to do with their completely shitty service than any promo expirations. Having tried a few streaming services, I can safely say DTVNOW is the absolute worst. I would have abandoned it long ago if they weren't the only service with my favorite channel (TVG). Fortunately, that channel is now available separately for a nominal fee, and so adios DTVNOW! The buffering, inexplicable failures, lost DVR content, and just general garbageware that is DTVNOW (bordering on fraud) has driven away many many more subscribers than the $10 price bumps (after all, pretty much every other service has bumped their prices too)

    1. Re:Garbage service, not promotion expiration by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      As one of those people that abandoned Directv Now after my promotional expired, all I can say is good riddance. The DVR service was horrible, 20 hours or 30 days I think, and they only allowed 2 streams. Three if you where willing to pitch in a extra $5. Then they where going to raise the price $5 for the package I had. I kicked cable to the curb for that bullshit.

      PSvue is superior to directvnow but doesn't have the history channel. Which is why I left it and went with directv now. But I've found that, for me, nether directv now or psvue are worth $50+ a month. I found that Philo, $14 a month has everything my family wants and is pretty cheap.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    2. Re:Garbage service, not promotion expiration by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      On Philo, can you skip commercials on dvr'd programs? I assume it's some sort of "cloud dvr"?

    3. Re:Garbage service, not promotion expiration by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      It is cloud based dvr, but yes you can skip commercials on on the dvr.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  7. What do they mean now? by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

    They've been lying for years.

    Oh, that's Direct TV Now?

    Oh, that's different. Never mind. This is Emily Litella.
     
    /Actually, it's not different. It's business as usual.

  8. Why I left DirecTV Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have an account but can't be buggered to log in. Anyway, I was a DTV customer of theirs for quite a while, and I loved the package I was on, I wish it carried my local stations, but you can't win them all. Then one day I got an email from DTV saying, in essence, "Hey, that cool package you're on? Yeah, you're losing it. But here's the replacements!" The new packages had half the stations, same cost, no local stations....and I couldn't get everything I wanted that I had before, and they TRIPLED the cost of HBO.

    No thanks. So I dumped them. Instantly. Hopped over to Playstation Vue, got all the previous stations, HBO and Showtime, and all my local stations (which was pretty awesome), and the only station I lost was the History channel. A small price to pay considering the cost remained the same for me--oh, and HBO and Showtime were included in the cost.

    So, if some twat from DTV sees this: this is why you lost me, and lots of other people--your abject stupidity and greed. You didn't listen to the customers, you didn't provide good service, and your prices upon change to the "new format" were shit. This is ENTIRELY YOUR FAULT.

    I sincerely hope the class action process nets me as little as 10 dollars, because to me, that's the pound of flesh I would be happy with to show them how utterly stupid AT&T became. They had been in a prime position....and squandered it. Fuck 'em.

    1. Re:Why I left DirecTV Now by PPH · · Score: 1

      the only station I lost was the History channel

      History did nothing wrong.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Why I left DirecTV Now by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Except force bundling.