Slashdot Mirror
Over A Dozen Satellites From SpaceX's December Launch Can't Be Identified (theverge.com)
In December a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket deployed 64 satellites into space. But four months later, more than a dozen "have yet to be identified in space," reports the Verge. "We know that they're up there, and where they are, but it's unclear which satellites belong to which satellite operator on the ground...."
"Many of the satellite operators do not know which of these 19 probes are theirs exactly, and the Air Force can't figure it out either." For a good portion of these satellites, it's possible that they have experienced some kind of technical problem, preventing the operators from contacting the spacecraft in orbit. But part of the identification issue stems from the SSO-A "SmallSat Express" mission's structure. This was a rocket ride-share, a type of launch that's become popular in the industry. As satellites grow smaller, operators can pack a bunch of these tiny probes together on larger launch vehicles, sending them into space all at once. But with so many satellites going into orbit at the same time, it can be hard for the Air Force's technology to distinguish the satellites from each other. And that, in turn, can make it hard for satellite operators to decipher which satellites are theirs...
Not knowing the exact location of a spacecraft is a major problem for operators. If they can't communicate with their satellite, the company's orbiting hardware becomes, essentially, space junk. It brings up liability and transparency concerns, too. If an unidentified satellite runs into something else in space, it's hard to know who is to blame...
One problem is that most of the spacecraft on board all look the same. Nearly 50 satellites on the SSO-A launch were modified CubeSats -- a type of standardized satellite that's roughly the size of a cereal box. That means they are all about the same size and have the same general boxy shape. Plus, these tiny satellites are often deployed relatively close together on ride-share launches, one right after the other. The result is a big swarm of nearly identical spacecraft that are difficult to tell apart from the ground below.
"It's possible that some of the owners of the unidentified satellite got in touch with their vehicles recently and just have not informed the Air Force where they are," the article acknowledges. But Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at Harvard and spaceflight tracker, points out to the Verge that five of the 13 satellites launched on an Electron rocket in December are still unidentified -- as are eight of the 72 satellites deployed on a Russian Soyuz rocket in 2017.
And four months after its launch in December, the web site for Trevor Paglen's "Orbital Reflector" art project (deploying a giant reflective balloon that can be seen from Earth) is still giving visitors this discouraging message.
"Due to the large number of satellites aboard #SSOA, the satellite tracking information is taking longer than we originally anticipated..."
"Many of the satellite operators do not know which of these 19 probes are theirs exactly, and the Air Force can't figure it out either." For a good portion of these satellites, it's possible that they have experienced some kind of technical problem, preventing the operators from contacting the spacecraft in orbit. But part of the identification issue stems from the SSO-A "SmallSat Express" mission's structure. This was a rocket ride-share, a type of launch that's become popular in the industry. As satellites grow smaller, operators can pack a bunch of these tiny probes together on larger launch vehicles, sending them into space all at once. But with so many satellites going into orbit at the same time, it can be hard for the Air Force's technology to distinguish the satellites from each other. And that, in turn, can make it hard for satellite operators to decipher which satellites are theirs...
Not knowing the exact location of a spacecraft is a major problem for operators. If they can't communicate with their satellite, the company's orbiting hardware becomes, essentially, space junk. It brings up liability and transparency concerns, too. If an unidentified satellite runs into something else in space, it's hard to know who is to blame...
One problem is that most of the spacecraft on board all look the same. Nearly 50 satellites on the SSO-A launch were modified CubeSats -- a type of standardized satellite that's roughly the size of a cereal box. That means they are all about the same size and have the same general boxy shape. Plus, these tiny satellites are often deployed relatively close together on ride-share launches, one right after the other. The result is a big swarm of nearly identical spacecraft that are difficult to tell apart from the ground below.
"It's possible that some of the owners of the unidentified satellite got in touch with their vehicles recently and just have not informed the Air Force where they are," the article acknowledges. But Jonathan McDowell, an astrophysicist at Harvard and spaceflight tracker, points out to the Verge that five of the 13 satellites launched on an Electron rocket in December are still unidentified -- as are eight of the 72 satellites deployed on a Russian Soyuz rocket in 2017.
And four months after its launch in December, the web site for Trevor Paglen's "Orbital Reflector" art project (deploying a giant reflective balloon that can be seen from Earth) is still giving visitors this discouraging message.
"Due to the large number of satellites aboard #SSOA, the satellite tracking information is taking longer than we originally anticipated..."
Musk got another shovel full of gold from the taxpayer's pockets. That's a win for Musk.
13
Sounds like a lot of overzealous tech startups jumped on the cubesat hypetrain since it was a pricepoint they could afford. Unfortunately they didnt understand they couldn't deliver broken software and expect patches after the fact to fix their problems like they do with web 2.0 garbage.
Seems like there needs to be a standard for identification much like we have for aircraft. Even more so really, given aircraft arenâ(TM)t going to be in flight for years.
What in the world does this have to do with Musk? The problem wasn't the rocket or the procedure. It's the general strategy of mass deployment and the individual owners not taking steps to identify their sats to the authorities.
I guess some sort of transponder system would be really really really expensive....
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Somebody should have written their MAC addresses down before rocket launch... ^_^'
Give til it hurts
Are you an idiot? Of course they have radios. You have to AIM THE DISH PRECISELY AT THEM to get the return signal back, derp. That requires individual tracking which is non-trivial for tiny satellites. Read a bit! Jesus.
This whole story doesn't make sense. The question is "can they communicate?".
The Amateur Radio Community routinely communicate with clusters of satellites,
it doesn't matter that there are a bunch of them in essentially the same orbit.
The antennas used have a fairly wide beam-width, so accurate pointing is not necessary.
However over time the bunch spreads out, so it becomes easier to identify individual satellites.
And if the satellites were not intended to communicate, what are they used for?
Awesome Blog
http://iguruservices.com/support/
They are a bunch of spacists; all satellites look the same to them.
Table-ized A.I.
You have to AIM THE DISH PRECISELY AT THEM to get the return signal back, derp.
Says the AC that obviously doesn't know how things work in the real world.
and see which 3 letter american agencies \ military sections scream.
Surely they should be independent modules on one larger, easier to manage and de-orbit satellite. The backbone could provide power and navigation. Given that all these cubes are going in the same orbit anyway.
Is it Chicago deep dish?
Wait til Amazon gets theirs up there.
And there were recent Slashdot articles talking about companies launching thousands more of them...
Oh, the owners know exactly which satellites are theirs. In fact we do to, they're the ones paid for in North Korean won or Iranian rials, or that arrived packed in lead-line containers.
With extra cheese.... mmmmmm cheese
The owners of these satellites don't care which one is which in the tracking info, the air force really doesn't either. CubeSats are small, almost anyone can have one launched if you pay a little and follow some simple rules - https://xkcd.com/1992/
Cubsats are primarily used for proving a technology, zero g experiments and sometime measuring something. You send it up, it does its thing, it reports back the results and then it burns up in the atmosphere. As long as I know generally where in the sky it is I don't need to care which one it is. It will be in its little posy of other cubsats that rode the same rocket up and that's good enough.
But what you get back is ultra-thin crust, hence the problem.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
Place your nations spy satellite behind the many new satellite systems and detect what type of data is been sent up for earth.
Where on earth too.
Encrypted and complex mission work? Mission is working and very successful.
Diagnostic communications? Mission might be successful one day.
Repeated attempts for any communications?
Dont have that kind of advanced spy satellite network with lots of extra fuel?
Place generations of spies into the US education system. Let them get work in the space sector. With needed security clearances as they are well educated US citizens.
Have them listen for gossip about what their company is doing, the contracts won.
What industrial espionage shows a competing US company is doing in space.
Wait for the generations of spy reports back.
Dont have them use any modern communication network. A holiday in anther safe nation is a good time for a full report in person.
Return to work and keep talking to colleagues about advances in US satellite use and who is bidding for what projects.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
There are enough other agencies - some in competition with the DoD - that they may intentionally be keeping the Air Force out of the loop.
Give them a number and record which belongs to who on a piece of paper.
This is a perfect application for blockchain!
I guess some sort of transponder system would be really really really expensive....
Sure.
Look at the price per kilo (or pound or whatever) of sending anything into space. Add a transponder, add weight, add a lot of cost.
Of course, the cost also means few bothers sending junk into space. They operate their satellite, they just haven't bothered informing the authorities.