Slashdot Mirror


Apple Will Likely Replace iTunes on macOS With Standalone Music, Podcasts, and TV Apps in Next Major Update (9to5mac.com)

Developer and blogger Guilherme Rambo, writing for 9to5Mac: Fellow developer Steve Troughton-Smith recently expressed confidence about some evidence found indicating that Apple is working on new Music, Podcasts, and perhaps Books apps for macOS, to join the new TV app. I've been able to independently confirm that this is true. On top of that, I've been able to confirm with sources familiar with the development of the next major version of macOS -- likely 10.15 -- that the system will include standalone Music, Podcasts, and TV apps, but it will also include a major redesign of the Books app.

The new Books app will have a sidebar similar to the News app on the Mac, it will also feature a narrower title bar with different tabs for the Library, Book Store, and Audiobook Store. On the library tab, the sidebar will list the user's Books, Audiobooks, PDFs and other collections, including custom ones. The new Music, Podcasts, and TV apps will be made using Marzipan, Apple's new technology designed to facilitate the porting of iPad apps to the Mac without too many code changes.
Further reading: Steven Troughton-Smith Thinks iTunes Breakup is Nigh (DaringFireball).

51 comments

  1. long time coming by spoot · · Score: 1

    Get rid of that lumbering beast that is iTunes. But if a stand alone music app will handle music, will iTunes keep its moniker? Just take the leap and rename it Apple Explorer.

    1. Re:long time coming by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When not just call the standalone app iTunes and remove the other stuff? iTunes is still pretty recognizable as far as branding goes, so I don't see them throwing it away.

      It has been long overdue for this though. Too much cruft over the years has left it a bloated mess. Hopefully the put some sane developers in charge of these apps who just want a clean, efficient app instead of the usual baboons that would fuck with the UI in the most bizarre manner possible.

    2. Re:long time coming by laie_techie · · Score: 2

      I agree with "do one thing and do it well", so splitting up the functionality makes a lot of sense. Will iTunes still be the one application to sync everything between your laptop / desktop and your iDevice? Or is Apple pushing people to save everything on the iCloud?

    3. Re:long time coming by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      Personally I'd like a separate app that can sync to devices, cloud, etc. that's independent of the apps that manage, play, or download the content. My biggest gripe with iTunes is that since they started their cloud music service, it's completely fucked everything up as far as device/content management goes. Maybe they thought they were trying to make it simple so that anyone could use it, but the reality is that they turned it into a mess that makes it almost impossible to get it to do what you actually want it to do.

      What really kills software (and to a similar extend software companies) is that it gets too big and grows beyond what made it great to begin with and tries to glom all kinds of shit no one really wants onto that core product. Those inane and unwanted add-ons metastasize and ruin everything.

    4. Re: long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iSync is what youâ(TM)re looking for. I long wished Apple would update iSync and couple it with Time Capsule as a lightweight home server/nas. Alas, they never went that direction.

    5. Re:long time coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will iTunes still be the one application to sync everything between your laptop / desktop and your iDevice? Or is Apple pushing people to save everything on the iCloud?

      Bring back iSync:

      * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISync

  2. Still Wont Use Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. sorry. They are still going to be trash.

  3. Ugh by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

    As long as I don't ever need to use iTunes again I'll be happy. When it came out it had about 10% of the capability of the software I was using, 200% of the bloat and 1000% of the advertising.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  4. iTunes by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    iTunes is ... not great. I just hope the replacement will keep the ability to play/download local music, not be chained to the "clown."

  5. Hopefully replacement performs core functionality by gyepi · · Score: 1

    Let's hope the replacement will not skip in the middle of the tracks anymore, a major bug Apple is unwilling to address in iTunes for years (and removes apple discussion board forum posts if someone brings it up)!

    --
    Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
  6. I'm surprised marketing let them by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    iTunes is one of the most recognized brands out there. It'll be difficult to maintain that brand identity when you start splitting up features.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Except it was "branded" as a music player and utility but was just really 80% a retail store.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Other than if you start splitting off features that are seldomly used anymore, and are simply vestiges of the past.

      Who uses iTunes to install apps on their phone anymore? Who uses iTunes to back up data from their phone that isn't music-related?

      These functions made sense pre-iCloud (not really as it would have been nice to use bluetooth like every other phone out there, but just go with it), however they just aren't needed now, especially with over-the-air OS updates being complete since iOS 5 or so.

      It's time to tear that shit out and make iTunes an application for dealing with media, like it was meant to be back when it was called SoundJam before Apple bought it and started removing features (plug-in support for non-Apple devices, for example)

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    3. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The music app could still be called iTunes, though, and that's really where the good part if the identity came from. I don't know anybody who thinks it's as nice to use since they started packing everything else into it.

    4. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by wwphx · · Score: 1

      I hate the fact that they split the apps out of iTunes: it was one-stop convenience for me. Every morning I'd update apps and podcasts, then sync my phone, and everything was updated. I refuse to have my iPhone auto-update because I like to see what is updating and downloading. So now I update apps on the weekend and download podcasts daily. Only now it looks like, well, I don't know what. I don't listen to music a lot right now, so I guess I'll have the podcast app open all the time for downloading and syncing and iTunes open when I want to listen to music?

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    5. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      I use it to back up and install updates to apps all the time. I just recently updated my home Internet to an unlimited package so I was worried about my usage. It is great for only downloading an update once and installing it to my iPhone and iPad. I haven't updated iTunes or macOS in order to keep this functionality (and because there's nothing else in the updates to really want me to update). It's also easier for me to go into iTunes and update all the apps there than go into the App Store on each device and update everything.

      In addition I like having my backups on my computer, and backed up again when my computer is backed up. I don't need to have my device restored when I'm away from home. If I go on vacation I might switch to iCloud backups just in case something happens to my device but when I'm at home it's not a required feature.

    6. Re:I'm surprised marketing let them by beckett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      iMovie '08 was completely and abruptly redesigned from all previous iMovies. Final Cut Pro 7 was completely abandoned for FCPx. In each case, Apple said suck it up.

      Based on previous behaviour, they'll act the same way to legacy iTunes users. If people want to keep using their hardware, they will have to keep up with the software changes.

  7. Re:Thank you lord Jesus! by geekmux · · Score: 1

    iTunes fucking sucks ass.

    Don't underestimate Apples ability to make this three times worse.

    After all, no one could have predicted the consumer-raping clusterfuck that is Apple I/O.

  8. 18 year old code base - time to drop it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple is simply dropping the 18 year old code base given it's cheaper to develop a smaller app with a minimum viable product feature set, than to just maintain the old product.

    Cost in adapting iTunes to the new subscription model is also likely a big reason.

    Expect it to drop support phones and iPods older than 4 years too.

    All of which are cost savings, lets it reset from a too many features in a product to a much simpler product.

    My guess is older iTunes, purchase a song one at a time, revenue is declining or will start declining soon.

    Shortest answer: Business model changed - existing product does not fit business model

    Internal answer: Nobody at Apple wants to work on a obsolete product with limited ground for artistic types to redesign, limited ground for managers to deliver resume bullet quality new features, limited ground for development managers to get their team to deliver new features.

    Expect Apple, MS, Google and the like to accelerate retirement of older products.

  9. Re: Hopefully replacement performs core functional by ruddk · · Score: 1

    Now, now there. Apple never removes posts in their forum. (Laughs uncontrollably)

  10. Re:Hopefully replacement performs core functionali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had this happen with songs on my iPhone, where if I interrupted playback while the file was syncing from the cloud, it would never move past that point in the song.

    I never tested to see if the file continued to download after the playback was interrupted. It is possible that the interruption could have generated some corrupt data in the file that other players simply ignore.

  11. Sorry, that's too good a death by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    That beast deserves a long, painful death.

    1. Re:Sorry, that's too good a death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That beast deserves a long, painful death.

      You don't consider the current twitching, rabid, syphilitic mess to be painful? The only ones hurt by dragging it out are us.

      Take a lesson from Old Yeller.

  12. iPhone sync by doconnor · · Score: 1

    iTunes is also the application that lets you sync your iPhone and iPad. It's already confusing now that images get sent off to another application.

    1. Re:iPhone sync by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      iTunes is also the application that lets you sync your iPhone and iPad

      I guess that's technically true, but I have both of those devices, and haven't used iTunes for syncing them in years. iCloud takes care of that for me.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    2. Re:iPhone sync by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you have music transferred from physical media or purchased elsewhere, how do you put it on the iPhone? Now if you don't use it for music, that's perfectly understandable. I'm pretty sure that's the only syncing that still exists with iTunes now anyway other than a non-iCloud backup option.

    3. Re:iPhone sync by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Most of what I have is from Apple Music/Pandora/Spotify, if you have MP3's or ripped CD's, you could use iTunes Match to get those into iCloud, but you're right of course that you need iTunes to do that part.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    4. Re:iPhone sync by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you trust them. Haven't they been known to "match" slightly different versions of a song? I don't use i-devices, but I do meticulously maintain my metadata and album art and wouldn't want that all replaced with something worse.

    5. Re:iPhone sync by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      I've been lucky so far. It definitely works better than third-party stuff from back in the day like Tune-Up or Picard.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
  13. Re:Hopefully replacement performs core functionali by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I also hope the Podcast app will let you adjust the speed of playback. The iPhone app has it. The iTunes app you need a $4.95 extension. (?!?!?!?)

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  14. i feel old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " next major version of macOS -- likely 10.15"

    we used to label things sensibly.... that looks like a patched version number

    1. Re:i feel old by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Only if you haven't been paying attention for the last 18 years.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  15. Marzipan apps are currently terrible by mccalli · · Score: 4, Informative

    They really, really do not feel like Mac apps and are very clunky. Try to manipulate a list in the Home app - it is nothing at all like the drag and drop you'd expect, it's clearly built around the idea of a long-press triggering some kind of mode, then reordering, then saying 'Done'. A phone app, in other words.

    iTunes may not be everyone's favourite, but at least it's designed for a computer interface. It's also more powerful than the iOS one too, with things like smart playlists not syncing properly over to the iOS app (try a smart playlist that's dependent on another playlist - eg. all tracks from a certain playlist that are also rated above three stars - won't sync).

    I hope it doesn't start a dumbing-down of the apps and a transition to a less Mac-like interface. If Apple can't be bothered to use their own native APIs and start cross-porting, why should any other developer show interest?

  16. At. Fucking. Last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple like to think they're still good at UI. iTunes has long put the lie to this.

    1. Re:At. Fucking. Last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS has always been shit. They have tiny little blue text buttons in all of the apps and they place them in the weirdest locations. Why the fuck is the 'Done' button up in the top right corner of the page, when what I was working on is in the center bottom portion of the page? Fuck.

    2. Re:At. Fucking. Last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For hierarchical navigation consistency.

  17. NO 000 OOO 000 OOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my VHS/TV/Hi-Fi combo media centers in my living room. Just as I like my video/music/jpeg combo media centers on my laptop. Bests of classes all in one tidy package. WHO the hell does Apple think it is?!

  18. It just works* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * You may have to relearn everything and get frustrated when things don't work the same as they used to and when options are moved around, but when you finally find what you're looking for, from that point on it just works.

  19. Like AC or Green Screens you don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to do a reset:
    1. Take existing feature bloated, costly to maintain software, retire it
    2. User base complains for existing users
    3. Release new much simpler product - AKA the 'Pepsi Generation'
    4. New users don't care nor know about the legacy product
    5. Big clump of legacy system users move to new system with much angst
    6. Remaining users of legacy system slowly stop using it
    7. Legacy system is fully retired, unsupported and uninstalled from your machine or iPad or iPhone after 2 years
    8. Apple has less headaches and one less large legacy application to worry about

    How do you unpaint yourself from the corner?
    You go to another room and start painting all over.

    Combine with the 'we don't own it and are not responsible for it' open sourcing existing products with much shorter support lifecycles - where llong term support is now 2.5 years instead of 7 - and much more frequent releases and major vendors can dump most legacy applications off their cost centers in 5 years.

    Expect Apple to stop producing OS updates for iphones/ipads 2.5 years after they are first released. Which means, your average purchaser buying 6 months after the hardware device is released will get 2 years of OS updates or less since Apple releases an iOS update every 1.5 years.

  20. Re: Die itunes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the sequel? We'll be waiting...

  21. copy one file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once tried to copy one file from my Macbook to an iPad Air using iTunes.
    I haven't found yet.

  22. When will Apple replace its bad hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we ever hear from Apple nowadays are announcements about services.

    But what Apple's customers (and potential customers) are clamoring about is hardware. For laptops, that's:

    - keyboards that work
    - large 17+ screens
    - headphone jacks
    - protective charging cables e.g. Magsafe
    - replaceable batteries, RAM, and hard drives
    - a smorgasbord of ports for every need
    - internal disk drives (not external "super" drives)

    and on and on. I can't be the only one sick of hearing about services while the hardware wilts.

    It's like crowing about the shiny new roof you put on your house while the foundation of the house is washing away.

  23. Apple will find a way to make it worse by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    iTunes has needed a haircut for ages, but I have a strong suspicion Apple will find a way to make the sum-total of these new apps somehow *worse* overall.

    Hopefully they don't completely kibosh the original iTunes for a release (or five)... Given that it still is what provides legacy support for older iDevices. My iPod Classic 160G isn't going anywhere any time soon, and I'm sure a new Apple Music desktop app will have basically no support for it because it will be written by Silicon Valley 22 y/o techies who don't remember life before 4G LTE.

    Exit question: What happens with the Windows version? Although I have Macs now, I went through a very long period with just Windows and Android, so I've kept my PC as my "primary" system for managing all music and taking care of synchronizing and whatnot, even as iDevices have come and gone. Hopefully nothing changes any time soon there.

  24. Now that Jobs is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that Jobs is dead they can finally flush that turd. (What took so long?)

    I just feel so sad for the the people close to where that turd is going to wash up.

  25. Re:Thank you lord Jesus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very few applications evoke in me such a visceral hatred. I've used both Windows and Mac versions (and due to many circumstances, have usually used Windows). Although Mac iTunes is a slightly better experience, I will do almost anything to avoid using the mess that is iTunes on any platform.

  26. Windows? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Will iTunes stay like this in Windows? :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  27. Re:Thank you lord Jesus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. Does anyone think apple will actually replace this piece of shit with anything that isnt equally or greater in shittiness. apple is a terrible software company.

  28. Re:Hopefully replacement performs core functionali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We at apple are sorry about this major bug that has effected a small amount of users."