Slashdot Mirror


Mysterious Safety-Tampering Malware Infects Second Critical Infrastructure Site (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Sixteen months ago, researchers reported an unsettling escalation in hacks targeting power plants, gas refineries, and other types of critical infrastructure. Attackers who may have been working on behalf of a nation caused an operational outage at a critical-infrastructure site after deliberately targeting a system that prevented health- and life-threatening accidents. What was unprecedented in this attack -- and of considerable concern to some researchers and critical infrastructure operators -- was the use of an advanced piece of malware that targeted the unidentified site's safety processes. The malware was named Triton and Trisis, because it targeted the Triconex product line made by Schneider Electric. Its development was ultimately linked to a Russian government-backed research institute.

Now, researchers at FireEye -- the same security firm that discovered Triton and its ties to Russia -- say they have uncovered an additional intrusion that used the same malicious software framework against a different critical infrastructure site. As was the case in the first intrusion, the attackers focused most of their resources on the facility's OT, or operational technology, which are systems for monitoring and managing physical processes and devices. The discovery has unearthed a new set of never-before-seen custom tools that shows the attackers have been operational since as early as 2014. The existence of these tools, and the attackers' demonstrated interest in operational security, lead FireEye researchers to believe there may be other sites beyond the two already known where the Triton attackers were or still are present.
"After establishing an initial foothold on the corporate network, the Triton actor focused most of their effort on gaining access to the OT network," FireEye researchers wrote in a report published Wednesday. "They did not exhibit activities commonly associated with espionage, such as using key loggers and screenshot grabbers, browsing files, and/or exfiltrating large amounts of information. Most of the attack tools they used were focused on network reconnaissance, lateral movement, and maintaining presence in the target environment."

4 of 50 comments (clear)

  1. Why are these sites connected to the Internet? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know it is inconvenient, but these sites should not be connected to the Internet.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:Why are these sites connected to the Internet? by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know it is inconvenient, but these sites should not be connected to the Internet

      CEO: What are you talking about?? They're not -- we moved them all to the cloud!

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    2. Re:Why are these sites connected to the Internet? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know it is inconvenient, but these sites should not be connected to the Internet.

      Except airgaps have vulnerabilities, or has Stuxnet not taught you anything?

      Even isolated networks need updating - and that's where a breach of containment can take place. If your goal is to destroy protections or equipment versus exfiltrate information, that's all you need - just hop from the laptop that was internet connected to the USB drive being used to update the production network and there you go.

      And because airgapped networks are a PITA to update, the software running on them is almost hilariously out of date, so finding a vulnerability so you can hop onto the network on USB insertion is laughably easy.

      Unless you're a super large organization with dedicated staff who do nothing but maintain the airgapped network (like say, the military) airgapping is not a panacea.

      And finally, like all factories, executives will also want some sort of feedback - production numbers and stuff. So there will need to be some sort of facility where production updates can happen in near real-time. Or perhaps some technician overseeing several facilities would like to know if some piece of equipment is failing more often than normal, or if something is approaching its end of life and needs replacement, or even better, if some common failure mode is starting to present itself. All of which are complicated if said tech has to visit every facility in question.

  2. Here we go by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's Russia again. Just when Russia was finally out of the headlines. Color me shocked. Call me when you have more proof than all the last times it was supposed to be Russia.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.