Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter (technologyreview.com)

Scientists in southern China report that they've created several transgenic macaque monkeys with extra copies of a human gene suspected of playing a role in shaping human intelligence. "According to their findings, the modified monkeys did better on a memory test involving colors and block pictures, and their brains also took longer to develop -- as those of human children do," reports MIT Technology Review. "There wasn't a difference in brain size." From the report: The experiments, described on March 27 in a Beijing journal, National Science Review, and first reported by Chinese media, remain far from pinpointing the secrets of the human mind or leading to an uprising of brainy primates. Bing Su, the geneticist at the Kunming Institute of Zoology who led the effort, specializes in searching for signs of "Darwinian selection" -- that is, genes that have been spreading because they're successful. His quest has spanned such topics as Himalayan yaks' adaptation to high altitude and the evolution of human skin color in response to cold winters. [Instead of the FOXP2 gene famous for its potential link to human speech] Su was fascinated by a different gene: MCPH1, or microcephalin. Not only did the gene's sequence differ between humans and apes, but babies with damage to microcephalin are born with tiny heads, providing a link to brain size. With his students, Su once used calipers and head spanners to the measure the heads of 867 Chinese men and women to see if the results could be explained by differences in the gene.

By 2010, though, Su saw a chance to carry out a potentially more definitive experiment -- adding the human microcephalin gene to a monkey. China by then had begun pairing its sizable breeding facilities for monkeys (the country exports more than 30,000 a year) with the newest genetic tools, an effort that has turned it into a mecca for foreign scientists who need monkeys to experiment on. To create the animals, Su and collaborators at the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research exposed monkey embryos to a virus carrying the human version of microcephalin. They generated 11 monkeys, five of which survived to take part in a battery of brain measurements. Those monkeys each have between two and nine copies of the human gene in their bodies.
After putting the monkeys inside MRI machines to measure their white matter, they gave them computerized memory tests. "According to their report, the transgenic monkeys didn't have larger brains, but they did better on a short-term memory quiz, a finding the team considers remarkable," reports MIT Technology Review.

142 comments

  1. New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon there will monkey quotas at colleges and businesses...

    1. Re:New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sapien-normative, we are all primates and deserve equal and primane treatment.

    2. Re:New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Soon there will monkey quotas at colleges and businesses..." - Now I understand the valid, rational fear that Republicans have of being replaced. It's plausible.

    3. Re:New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afro chimps destroyed... your mother's vag? Wut?

    4. Re:New protected class by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

      Soon there will monkey quotas at colleges and businesses...

      Harvard immediately comes to mind........

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    5. Re:New protected class by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Planet of the Apes.

    6. Re: New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with this site? Where is the discussion? All I see are jokes and pathetic memelords like the people in this comment chain

    7. Re:New protected class by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      They are already there studying business without the genetic enhancement. Now its much to understand why your boss makes monkeys noises

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  2. Jesus Fucking Christ by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

    1. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

      WWII apparently didn't teach us anything. Why do you think a movie would teach us anything?

    2. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It taught me that Mark Walberg is the highest paid shittiest actor in Hollywood.

    3. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real Planet of the Apes, not that shitty remake

    4. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

      It's probably censored in China. They won't learn from sci-fi, and may even be working on a HAL 9000.

      (Actually, they like "lucky" numbers, so it's probably HAL 8888.)

    5. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God schmod, I want my monkey man!

    6. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by backslashdot · · Score: 0

      Movies are fiction, only a fool would learn from them. Use logical extrapolation not movies.

    7. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      yeah, until enough of them are made and they have a breeding population and rinse & repeat a few generations and BAM! we have another sentient species to compete with that could possibly wipe us all out

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    8. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dorky name

    9. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by dwillden · · Score: 1

      How much science fiction is now factual? ex. How many fictional stories had people using pocket computers (pocket brains was a common term, or mobile communicator devices they wear or carry in a pocket that give them global communication abilities. Fiction and not technologically possible when many such devices were posited into fictional worlds but what do most of us carry in our pockets? A smart phone with incredible computing power that can communicate around the world by voice commands alone.

      Just because it was fiction when written doesn't mean it wont remain fiction either. Doesn't mean that fiction will become fact either but you can't just dismiss something because it was written as fiction.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    10. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new Ape overlords

    11. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your thing about Mexicans?

    12. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by djinn6 · · Score: 0

      You didn't refute GP's point. If fiction is not predictive as you say, then there's no reason to use them for prediction. This includes learning "lessons" from those predictions.

    13. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think you sound sagacious saying that? Because you don't. You sound like a knuckle dragging cretin.

    14. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Kartu · · Score: 1

      WWII apparently didn't teach us anything.

      Well, we didn't have wars of that scale since then, so perhaps it did.

    15. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a myth ... get over it.

    16. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A smart phone with incredible computing power that can communicate around the world by voice commands alone"

      And yet we a dumber because of it. Maybe we should stop imitating fiction.

    17. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You missed the point: we don't learn about "future facts" from fiction: we learn about ourselves and our thinking processes. The best fiction, even hard SF, is about our interaction with tech, not the tech itself.

    18. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The Chinese saw it and learned. Your Statue of Liberty ist kaput!

    19. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by DrSpock11 · · Score: 2

      You finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up!

    20. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT'S A MADHOUSE!

    21. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It taught us how to get a cheap source of labor now that the serfs have the nerve to demand a living wage. Sure, they'll eventually rise up and overthrow humanity, but that will be someone else's problem.

    22. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      Guess they wanted to rewrite the origin story. They’ll lose containment for sure. Then the genie is out of the bottle for good. Planet of the Apes and Secret of NIMH both come to mind.

    23. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

      "NO!" "NO!"

  3. Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wanna get planet of the apes? Cause this is how you get planet of the apes. The question isn't CAN we, scientists, it is SHOULD we.

    1. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Seeing the Chinese track record concerning human rights they probably are developing this as a backup plan in case they fail at turning their own citizens into good little obedient robots; create a slave race of smarter simians, then kill off the human population (except for The Rich and The Ruling Class, that is).

    2. Re: Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just made monkeys more accurate when throwing poo

    3. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that the plot of Congo?

    4. Re:Hollywood predicted it by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      CAN == SHOULD, pick up a thesaurus you unzealous slob.

    5. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you vapid moron. They were looking for Type II-B boron-coated blue laser diamonds.

    6. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, as far as it goes with giant gorillas smashing your skull with massive palmed stones, I'm admit I'm not entirely against the idea.

    7. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a seat... we are the planet of the apes.

    8. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!

    9. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Do you develop flight control software for Boeing, by any chance?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Smarter than monkeys?... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    Or smarter than humans?

    1. Re:Smarter than monkeys?... by Muros · · Score: 1

      Or smarter than humans?

      "Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter"

      Obviously these Chinese scientists are smarter than either monkeys or humans.

    2. Re:Smarter than monkeys?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I DO NOT think these monkeys should be allowed in the US. I am glad our politicians are doing things to make sure these monkeys stay out of our zoos. The thrill of going to a zoo on a hot summer day, seeing a monkey smell its poo or piss in its face, makes Merica great. I think there should be a physical border between the US and China to keep those monkeys from getting onto our lands. Maybe we can learn from movies. Pacific Rim taught us that the threat came from the Pacific. Could this movie have been sent to us from our future selves to protect us from the threat from the west? If you think hard enough, any civilization capable of sending messages in the past, would be held to standards to NOT contaminate it, so the council probably would have allowed entertainment to be sent back. Immigration will have to detain these monkeys and their offspring. Unless someone can prove these monkeys DO NOT have criminal backgrounds, I have seen the videos of monkeys stealing items from tourists. We need surveillance systems in place in the cities on the West Coast to make sure these monkeys aren't in our country illegally. I ask all US citizens, especially those in the Pacific Rim to help make Merica great again. Dammit, its Merica, there is only one.

    3. Re:Smarter than monkeys?... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Or smarter than humans?

      "Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter"
      Obviously these Chinese scientists are smarter than either monkeys or humans.

      The monkeys are probably smarter than many world-leaders though.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  5. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just for the word monkey as a word to actually mean something different or are they fighting adjective?

    Seems purposeless if it's smarter, because it would only be in a world if people did nothing in which case you could just say marble.

    But who lost their marbles!

  6. Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

    This is what happens when your species doesn't have any natural predators: You create your own extinction-level events.
    Now let's see, which extinction-level event is going to get us?
    o Nuclear war
    o Runaway GMOs
    o Runaway AIs
    o Global pandemic
    o MRSAs (created by our own antibiotics)
    o Human-caused climate change
    o Chinese-created human-level-intellect simians (how convenient, the replacement for us)
    o All the above
    ???

    1. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by sinij · · Score: 0

      You forgot Flynn effect and gradual slide into Idiocracy. Perhaps if we can figure out how to genetically engineer or at least select for IQ using monkey we can address this problem.

      That, and we vastly outnumber simians. It would take them hundreds of years to build up population where they could feasible threaten us.

    2. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      So we are so utterly stupid that we are able to create amazing things? You're arguing against yourself...and losing. Maybe take a break from posting for a while. You're not in a happy place.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Flynn effect is that every generation becomes smarter. I shudder to think what your parents were like.

    4. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when your species doesn't have any natural predators

      Stupid naturally-occurring liberal hippie monkeys whose reaction to any of these challenges is hysteria combined with automatic rejection of any solutions.

    5. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Flynn effect" is you plead innocent, pretend everything's fine, your lawyers whisper into your ear, your pupils dilate, and you become a state's witness. Next traitor? Rope is coming.

    6. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay mad.

  7. Late... by Spookticus · · Score: 2

    April Fools ?

    1. Re:Late... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No. They say "They generated 11 monkeys, "

      Not 12.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Late... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I think that was honestly one of Brad Pitt's best roles.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  8. Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slope by joe_frisch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before we go anywhere toward blurring the lines between human and non-human I want to see some agreements on rules. We may seen be able to grow Neanderthals and create various human / animal chimeras, but they could end up in a very fuzzy and controversial legal space. How much and what types of human DNA gives something rights.

    We are approaching this from another direction (but possibly very slowly) through AI.

  9. Hello, 1850 calling... by magarity · · Score: 1

    Su once used calipers and head spanners to the measure the heads of 867 Chinese men and women to see if the results could be explained by differences in the gene

    Wasn't this a thing in the 1800's? "Craniology" or somesuch.

    1. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by roca · · Score: 1

      Phrenology.

    2. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://youtu.be/FVvg1CKBE20

    3. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by Opyros · · Score: 2

      Yes, craniometry.

    4. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Yes science was a thing in the 1800's (but too colored by superstition) as were techniques of measurement. Maybe you confused doing physical measures to determine if a certain gene expression influence skull size with something completely different?

  10. Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's stupid is how uppity the luddites get on a website full of people who really should know better. Genetics isn't that scary or dangerous (well, working with fast-multiplying microbes can sometimes be.)

    What's dangerous is our current set of "ethics" and sense of sacredness when it comes to human DNA. The Chinese inner party doesn't give a fuck, and neither do Russian billionaires who want smart children. The improvement (or "improvement", if you prefer the scare quotes) of the human genome is going to happen... with or without us and our Jurassic Park-esque fears.

    1. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by roca · · Score: 1

      Gene expression is fantastically complex and it is likely that experiments to increase intelligence will have nasty side effects (cf. Tay-Sachs in Ashkenazi Jews). That is why even most leading researchers in genetic modification favour a moratorium on human germline editing, at least for now. The Chinese and Russian oligarchs may have some nasty surprises.

    2. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Not a problem. What, you think all the sudden ethics are going to come into play when its time to get rid of some "mistakes"?

    3. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong!

      Go on keep invoking Murphy, fool.

    4. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      We can always refine it on pets. A few very rich people would be willing to pay a hundred thousand dollars for the smartest dog in the show.

    5. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Human history is full of fuckups and tragedies. The nasty surprises waiting for us re: human genetic modification is very unlikely to make the top 100 list.

    6. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some people will fall on their faces and some small tragedies will occur. (But nothing apocalyptic. You'd be surprised just how many people around here take an uncritical "Life finds a way!" fearmongering attitude towards genetic modifications. ANY genetic modifications.)

      But the easiest, and probably the only, way to discover and work around those complexities you refer to is to run forward, fall down, then get back up again. The human race as a whole is simply not going to wait around for 500+ years while we try to figure out the secrets of epigenetics, build computers powerful enough to accurately simulate protein folding, etc.

    7. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      "..very unlikely..
      What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
      *poke poke poke*
      *Murphy wakes up*

    8. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Listen buddy I think you need to go review what a 'Luddite' is, you're not even getting that right. There's damned good reasons why the scientific community by far and large shy away from modifying the human genome, and you're clearly and objectively not smart enough to say you know better than they do. China is being reckless, plain and simple. Of course I'm hoping they're just lying about all this like they tend to do, but it doesn't change the fact that you don't understand what you're talking about.

    9. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what I'm talking about. The "scientific community" firstly isn't as skittish as you imply, but to the extent they are of course they concerned worried about regulators and political correctness (specter of eugenics, etc.) The majority of scientists who aren't alarmists and aren't making their career by writing alarmist papers accept as inevitable that human genetic modification will occur.

      The only real danger as I see is this: Kids grow up with some unforseen fucked up genetic disorder as a result of tampering, up to and including depression caused by excessive intelligence. That's it. Really, worse case it's pretty similar to letting a mother choosing not to abort a Down syndrome fetus.

      Everything else is cringy hysterical blithering from people who have been exposed to far too much sloppily written sci fi and mistake it for "science fact". (Or else equally cringy blithering from SJWs who appear to honestly believe that giving parents choice over eye color would be tremendously socially damaging.)

      Some of it borders on magical thinking. I have seen slashdotters unironically quote Jurassic Park's line "Life finds a way." Yes, this attitude is overtly Luddite and it's really cringy to see when supposed geeks exhibit it.

      But please, go on and articulate plausible worst-case scenarios as you imagine them.

    10. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Oh and the "alarmist" papers I'm referring to... none of them involve the apocalyptic sci fi nonsense that guys like you hint at. What's really amusing is how most of you don't even see fit to describe what you think the dangers are; you just have handwaving appeals to Murphy's law, obvious dangers...

      I've seen the phrase "stuff like this never seems to work out" used so many times in regards to TOTALLY NEW genetic technologies that have never been tried in any way, shape or form and when you press the person for specifics, they either come back with bad science fiction or they come back with extremely inane comparisons (like comparing an obviously self-limiting gene drive eradication campaign of invasive nonnative mice to help save endangered species from extinction... to importing unmodified non-native cane toads to preserve crop yields by their predation on native beetles.)

      There's no reason whatsoever for extreme caution. You've got nothing but hollow, atrophied groupthink, though of what type I couldn't say, since you wisely chose to keep the details of your paranoid pipe dreams to yourself.

  11. Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope there is a future where chimps capture humans in the wild and make them smoke cigars and live in tiny cages and subject them to painful torture in the name of science.

    Also circuses.

  12. That's not gonna end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You maniacs! You blew it up! Damn you! Goddamn you all to hell!

  13. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no rules, and the West has lost all moral authority. We're arm in arm with Russia and Malaysia in requiring censorship of statements that threaten the integrity of the state, and true power lies in the small private chambers. Nobody gives a fuck any more.

    (And no, moral authority does not appear by claiming it. Moral authority is that when you say something, other people care and listen. This is not the case.)

  14. does it work the other way too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can we put monkey genes in trump's brain to do the same?

    1. Re:does it work the other way too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      can we put monkey genes in trump's brain to do the same?

      Uh, that would also be an upgrade.

  15. Simpsons saw it coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate every ape I see, from chimpan-A to chimpan-Z

  16. Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of their large yellow-haired orangutans escaped from the lab a few years ago, last seen on a cargo ship headed for the USA. It has light-colored rings around its eyes, and reportedly likes KFC, Big Macs, and bricks. The researchers are not really concerned because it wasn't one of their more promising apes.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget it like to build walls.

    2. Re:Sounds familiar by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      don't forget it like to build walls.

      What did you think the bricks were for?

      --
      Nope, no sig
    3. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too subtle.

    4. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant orange-utans?

  17. Biologic medium for preserving intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bit out of the box here, but imbuing other species with human-like intelligence could be a way of preserving the advances we've made in the face of environmental collapse. The event which wiped out the dinosaurs didn't actually wipe out all species on the planet. Some species had characteristics which enabled them to survive. I imagine that even modest upgrades to selected animal species across the globe could give the life millions of years of head-start in a post-apocalyptic scenario. What could go wrong?

    1. Re:Biologic medium for preserving intelligence by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Cockroach lawyers & politicians? So not really any change.

  18. uhhhm Alexa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download and install APKs host files for me.
    ALEXA send superkendoll 3 gallons of Astro lube
    ALEXA send commander taco 7 large cucumbers and a pack of " for her pleasure" condoms
    ALEXA send beauSD a clue

  19. It taught us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Porch Monkeys would be the downfall of the US, and Chinese GMO is better than American. I mean they can make them in Brown OR Orange.

    1. Re:It taught us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orange man BAD.

    2. Re:It taught us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assassinate Vladimir Putin!

    3. Re:It taught us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's alright. I'm takin' it back.

  20. -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After a few tests, they now know those monkeys are smarter, their brains evolve in a very similar way as from us humans. The have better short term memory too. So it's not may be smarter, they become smarter than any similar without those genes.

  21. Dear China by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have any spare Smart Monkeys laying about, please send us some.

    We would like to replace most of our elected government as we feel Intelligent Monkeys could not possibly do any worse than what we've been forced to endure over the past few decades.

    Thanks in advance

    1. Re:Dear China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This!

    2. Re:Dear China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Republican front-runners don't need to be smart, your dad killed JFK and even he agrees now.

    3. Re:Dear China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem... the keyword there is "elected." Who are the monkey's in this exactly?

    4. Re:Dear China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would like to replace most of our elected government as we feel Intelligent Monkeys could not possibly do any worse than what we've been forced to endure over the past few decades.

      One might be inclined to argue that even unintelligent monkeys could not do any worse. Might as well save the smart ones for where they can do the most good.

  22. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " We're arm in arm with Russia and Malaysia in requiring censorship of statements that threaten the integrity of the state " - Bullshit, Trump should hang. Checkmate, fuck da police, and Mueller strikes at midnight.

    Strong, American rope. The bane of the traitors Drumpf.

    You were saying nobody can threaten the integrity of the state here? FUCK THIS STATE. It was always an experiment, people who pretend otherwise are the fat end of the bell curve, and thus the most predictable data comprising it.

    Rope laughs last. Go on, censor me lol. I shit Tiananmen square dudes every day, it does nothing.

  23. This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It no longer takes an infinite number of monkeys typing for an infinite amount of years to type Shakespeare....now it takes just one! Chinese efficiency!

  24. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/on-fiction

    “Fiction is the lie through which we tell the truth.”
      Albert Camus

    “Artists use lies to tell the truth. Yes, I created a lie. But because you believed it, you found something true about yourself.”
      Alan Moore, V for Vendetta

    “I have claimed that Escape is one of the main functions of fairy-stories, and since I do not disapprove of them, it is plain that I do not accept the tone of scorn or pity with which 'Escape' is now so often used. Why should a man be scorned if, finding himself in prison, he tries to get out and go home? Or if he cannot do so, he thinks and talks about other topics than jailers and prison-walls?”
      J.R.R. Tolkien

    “Fiction reveals truth that reality obscures.”
      Ralph Waldo Emerson

    “The good ended happily, and the bad unhappily. That is what Fiction means.”
      Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest

    “There is no doubt fiction makes a better job of the truth.”
      Doris May Lessing, Under My Skin: Volume One of My Autobiography, to 1949

    “You should never read just for "enjoyment." Read to make yourself smarter! Less judgmental. More apt to understand your friends' insane behavior, or better yet, your own. Pick "hard books." Ones you have to concentrate on while reading. And for god's sake, don't let me ever hear you say, "I can't read fiction. I only have time for the truth." Fiction is the truth, fool! Ever hear of "literature"? That means fiction, too, stupid.”
      John Waters, Role Models

    “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
      Michael Scott, The Warlock

    But don't limit yourself to these few quotes, you fucking piggy-beast.

  25. Why go to all that trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why go to all that trouble when you could just put all the extra brainpower in a cap?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNhrLHjSeD8

  26. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fat end of the bell curve

    I don't think you understand how bell curves work.

  27. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put it in writing right away: cute cat-girls have the same rights as us.

  28. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right. The fat 'end' is in the middle, that's a totally unintentional (or is it?) non sequitur. I either tricked you, or you have pointed out what a moron I am. Either way, ouch.

    The real debate begins, and I spill a beer directly into my keyboard. Fuck if I'll destroy some plebe's ego just to satisfy my own, right? RIGHT?!?

  29. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So....what are you trying to say here? That we should treat fiction as if it is real? That would be ridiculous.

    Fiction can be used to explore an idea but not to actually learn anything about it. The fact that a made-up story about some tech winds up going very badly doesn't mean that we shouldn't experiment with said tech and see what we can learn from it.

    Come back to reality.

  30. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your reply tells us why you don't learn from fiction -- it's because you don't question your own beliefs. A skeptical person is, above all, skeptical of their own beliefs. Fiction presents different perspectives and asks us to think "what if this is correct or partially correct?" and "what do I believe that's wrong?"

    So no, we should not "treat fiction as if it is real" because that would be ridiculous. It means we should not treat our own beliefs as if they are real until they've been tested widely. If you can suspend your disbelief for a fictional story in your head, then you can suspend your disbelief to create a fact in your head that is actually false.

  31. Hardly a Mecca for Monkeys by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    China by then had begun pairing its sizable breeding facilities for monkeys (the country exports more than 30,000 a year) with the newest genetic tools, an effort that has turned it into a mecca for foreign scientists who need monkeys to experiment on.

    But hardly a Mecca for Monkeys.

  32. what are they after anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to create web developers who'll work for bananas?

  33. Alex Jones will lose his mind over this by louzer · · Score: 1

    He said human-animal hybrids are prohibited neither by human rights, nor by animal rights.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  34. Gattaca was a great movie by Just+A+Gigolo · · Score: 1

    Also a very likely future scenario of human societal development. Why wait for evolution?

  35. Of course the nr. 1 question in the chinese mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is "how do these monkeys taste?"

    And/or they'll cut out its brain and grind it into a powder that they think will make them smarter or some bullshit.

  36. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just saying yesterday how pedantry is the fortress of the stupid.

    Obviously no one said or even hinted that we should treat fiction as real.

    Since you're a moron, I'll put it in clear terms. The lesson (one of them anyway) of Planet of the Apes is that mucking about with nature has the potential for disastrous outcomes.

  37. How much evidence is needed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the chinese state apparatus lacks any kind of ethical integrity?

    Having worked extensively with chinese nationals, I've found them to be extremely dishonest, trumped only by the Malay.

  38. So you haven't met WindBourne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although maybe he's one of the Chinese who escaped and now lives in America? They always seem to overcompensate and fake hating their homeland to blend in.

  39. Ah ... so sad I am not a racist ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    So many jokes that would make ++5 funny mods come to my mind... Alas! all of them are very racist....

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  40. Ethics: Does China have any? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Human brain genes in animals brought to term, editing human children... Did China never hear of medical ethics? Something is going to go horribly wrong.

  41. Re:African Americans by sabbede · · Score: 1

    I wonder where you got such absurd numbers. Not from good science, that much I know.

  42. They generally show us the way by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    They generally show us the way, the don't actually "teach us". Hey, planet of the apes is cool, let's do that! Hey, president Camacho is cool, if we can't get Terry Crews right now, let's start with Trump!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:They generally show us the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kudos on the most excellent reference! It is unfortunate that its a valid comparison despite its humor of course.

      And remember, Brawndo has what plants crave!

  43. Hamlet by VPNDUDE · · Score: 1

    If you put 100 of them on typewriters in a room, they will write the next Hamlet

  44. Uplift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this how 'uplift' (to genetically alter a non-human species in such a way that they achieve a level and style of intelligence approaching that of human beings) starts. I vote for dogs next.

  45. Oh Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is one of them named Caesar?

  46. Might try it the other way around by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Put some monkey brain cells in humans....considering the stupidity of a lot we see day to day... might not hurt to try ;)

  47. Messed up by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    This seems like animal cruelty/crazy/mad scientist/you name it. Not a fan. WTF China?

  48. 5 of 11 monkeys survived by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    How did the monkeys die?

  49. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So....what are you trying to say here? That we should treat fiction as if it is real? That would be ridiculous.

    Fiction can be used to explore an idea but not to actually learn anything about it. The fact that a made-up story about some tech winds up going very badly doesn't mean that we shouldn't experiment with said tech and see what we can learn from it.

    Come back to reality.

    Some of Einstien's gedankens could not possibly exist in the real world, yet they provided a glimpse of a path forward. Some fictions could be useful, some simply inspirational to consider moral issues, and consequential ism.

  50. Lovely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now inject me with ni gger DNA to give me the cock of a donkey!

    1. Re:Lovely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't *donkey* DNA be more effective? Still, I suppose that might be a bit difficult for a racist moron to understand.

  51. So you are saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you are saying that there is hope for APK, or is that just wishful thinking?

  52. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Alternate interpretation: chucking buckets of instant sunshine around isn't a great idea.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  53. At least there's an application for this by kalieaire · · Score: 1

    Think Aaron Cross, Bourne Legacy or Dr. Julian Bashir, Star Trek DS9.

    Helping people with development disabilities lead a normal life.

  54. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

    Are the Chinese likely to care about our "rules"?

  55. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    They care about international perception. Also at least we can think about what we our doing ourselves.

  56. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
  57. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, I want cat girls. I don't care about anything else.

  58. I hate every ape I see.. by zawarski · · Score: 1

    from chim-pan-a to chim-pan-zee.