Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter (technologyreview.com)

Scientists in southern China report that they've created several transgenic macaque monkeys with extra copies of a human gene suspected of playing a role in shaping human intelligence. "According to their findings, the modified monkeys did better on a memory test involving colors and block pictures, and their brains also took longer to develop -- as those of human children do," reports MIT Technology Review. "There wasn't a difference in brain size." From the report: The experiments, described on March 27 in a Beijing journal, National Science Review, and first reported by Chinese media, remain far from pinpointing the secrets of the human mind or leading to an uprising of brainy primates. Bing Su, the geneticist at the Kunming Institute of Zoology who led the effort, specializes in searching for signs of "Darwinian selection" -- that is, genes that have been spreading because they're successful. His quest has spanned such topics as Himalayan yaks' adaptation to high altitude and the evolution of human skin color in response to cold winters. [Instead of the FOXP2 gene famous for its potential link to human speech] Su was fascinated by a different gene: MCPH1, or microcephalin. Not only did the gene's sequence differ between humans and apes, but babies with damage to microcephalin are born with tiny heads, providing a link to brain size. With his students, Su once used calipers and head spanners to the measure the heads of 867 Chinese men and women to see if the results could be explained by differences in the gene.

By 2010, though, Su saw a chance to carry out a potentially more definitive experiment -- adding the human microcephalin gene to a monkey. China by then had begun pairing its sizable breeding facilities for monkeys (the country exports more than 30,000 a year) with the newest genetic tools, an effort that has turned it into a mecca for foreign scientists who need monkeys to experiment on. To create the animals, Su and collaborators at the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research exposed monkey embryos to a virus carrying the human version of microcephalin. They generated 11 monkeys, five of which survived to take part in a battery of brain measurements. Those monkeys each have between two and nine copies of the human gene in their bodies.
After putting the monkeys inside MRI machines to measure their white matter, they gave them computerized memory tests. "According to their report, the transgenic monkeys didn't have larger brains, but they did better on a short-term memory quiz, a finding the team considers remarkable," reports MIT Technology Review.

64 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. New protected class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon there will monkey quotas at colleges and businesses...

    1. Re:New protected class by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 2

      Soon there will monkey quotas at colleges and businesses...

      Harvard immediately comes to mind........

      --
      "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    2. Re:New protected class by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Planet of the Apes.

    3. Re:New protected class by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      They are already there studying business without the genetic enhancement. Now its much to understand why your boss makes monkeys noises

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  2. Jesus Fucking Christ by olsmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

    did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

    1. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      did Planet of the Apes teach us nothing?

      It's probably censored in China. They won't learn from sci-fi, and may even be working on a HAL 9000.

      (Actually, they like "lucky" numbers, so it's probably HAL 8888.)

    2. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      God schmod, I want my monkey man!

    3. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      yeah, until enough of them are made and they have a breeding population and rinse & repeat a few generations and BAM! we have another sentient species to compete with that could possibly wipe us all out

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    4. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by dwillden · · Score: 1

      How much science fiction is now factual? ex. How many fictional stories had people using pocket computers (pocket brains was a common term, or mobile communicator devices they wear or carry in a pocket that give them global communication abilities. Fiction and not technologically possible when many such devices were posited into fictional worlds but what do most of us carry in our pockets? A smart phone with incredible computing power that can communicate around the world by voice commands alone.

      Just because it was fiction when written doesn't mean it wont remain fiction either. Doesn't mean that fiction will become fact either but you can't just dismiss something because it was written as fiction.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new Ape overlords

    6. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Kartu · · Score: 1

      WWII apparently didn't teach us anything.

      Well, we didn't have wars of that scale since then, so perhaps it did.

    7. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You missed the point: we don't learn about "future facts" from fiction: we learn about ourselves and our thinking processes. The best fiction, even hard SF, is about our interaction with tech, not the tech itself.

    8. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by DrSpock11 · · Score: 2

      You finally really did it. You maniacs! You blew it up!

    9. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It taught us how to get a cheap source of labor now that the serfs have the nerve to demand a living wage. Sure, they'll eventually rise up and overthrow humanity, but that will be someone else's problem.

    10. Re:Jesus Fucking Christ by e3m4n · · Score: 1

      Guess they wanted to rewrite the origin story. They’ll lose containment for sure. Then the genie is out of the bottle for good. Planet of the Apes and Secret of NIMH both come to mind.

  3. Smarter than monkeys?... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    Or smarter than humans?

    1. Re:Smarter than monkeys?... by Muros · · Score: 1

      Or smarter than humans?

      "Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter"

      Obviously these Chinese scientists are smarter than either monkeys or humans.

    2. Re:Smarter than monkeys?... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Or smarter than humans?

      "Chinese Scientists Have Put Human Brain Genes In Monkeys -- And Yes, They May Be Smarter"
      Obviously these Chinese scientists are smarter than either monkeys or humans.

      The monkeys are probably smarter than many world-leaders though.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  4. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Seeing the Chinese track record concerning human rights they probably are developing this as a backup plan in case they fail at turning their own citizens into good little obedient robots; create a slave race of smarter simians, then kill off the human population (except for The Rich and The Ruling Class, that is).

  5. Late... by Spookticus · · Score: 2

    April Fools ?

    1. Re:Late... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      No. They say "They generated 11 monkeys, "

      Not 12.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:Late... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I think that was honestly one of Brad Pitt's best roles.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  6. Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slope by joe_frisch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before we go anywhere toward blurring the lines between human and non-human I want to see some agreements on rules. We may seen be able to grow Neanderthals and create various human / animal chimeras, but they could end up in a very fuzzy and controversial legal space. How much and what types of human DNA gives something rights.

    We are approaching this from another direction (but possibly very slowly) through AI.

  7. Re:Humans confirmed for UTTERLY STUPID! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    So we are so utterly stupid that we are able to create amazing things? You're arguing against yourself...and losing. Maybe take a break from posting for a while. You're not in a happy place.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  8. Hello, 1850 calling... by magarity · · Score: 1

    Su once used calipers and head spanners to the measure the heads of 867 Chinese men and women to see if the results could be explained by differences in the gene

    Wasn't this a thing in the 1800's? "Craniology" or somesuch.

    1. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by roca · · Score: 1

      Phrenology.

    2. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by Opyros · · Score: 2

      Yes, craniometry.

    3. Re:Hello, 1850 calling... by Megol · · Score: 1

      Yes science was a thing in the 1800's (but too colored by superstition) as were techniques of measurement. Maybe you confused doing physical measures to determine if a certain gene expression influence skull size with something completely different?

  9. Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's stupid is how uppity the luddites get on a website full of people who really should know better. Genetics isn't that scary or dangerous (well, working with fast-multiplying microbes can sometimes be.)

    What's dangerous is our current set of "ethics" and sense of sacredness when it comes to human DNA. The Chinese inner party doesn't give a fuck, and neither do Russian billionaires who want smart children. The improvement (or "improvement", if you prefer the scare quotes) of the human genome is going to happen... with or without us and our Jurassic Park-esque fears.

    1. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by roca · · Score: 1

      Gene expression is fantastically complex and it is likely that experiments to increase intelligence will have nasty side effects (cf. Tay-Sachs in Ashkenazi Jews). That is why even most leading researchers in genetic modification favour a moratorium on human germline editing, at least for now. The Chinese and Russian oligarchs may have some nasty surprises.

    2. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Not a problem. What, you think all the sudden ethics are going to come into play when its time to get rid of some "mistakes"?

    3. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong!

      Go on keep invoking Murphy, fool.

    4. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      We can always refine it on pets. A few very rich people would be willing to pay a hundred thousand dollars for the smartest dog in the show.

    5. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Human history is full of fuckups and tragedies. The nasty surprises waiting for us re: human genetic modification is very unlikely to make the top 100 list.

    6. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Yeah, some people will fall on their faces and some small tragedies will occur. (But nothing apocalyptic. You'd be surprised just how many people around here take an uncritical "Life finds a way!" fearmongering attitude towards genetic modifications. ANY genetic modifications.)

      But the easiest, and probably the only, way to discover and work around those complexities you refer to is to run forward, fall down, then get back up again. The human race as a whole is simply not going to wait around for 500+ years while we try to figure out the secrets of epigenetics, build computers powerful enough to accurately simulate protein folding, etc.

    7. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      "..very unlikely..
      What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
      *poke poke poke*
      *Murphy wakes up*

    8. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Listen buddy I think you need to go review what a 'Luddite' is, you're not even getting that right. There's damned good reasons why the scientific community by far and large shy away from modifying the human genome, and you're clearly and objectively not smart enough to say you know better than they do. China is being reckless, plain and simple. Of course I'm hoping they're just lying about all this like they tend to do, but it doesn't change the fact that you don't understand what you're talking about.

    9. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what I'm talking about. The "scientific community" firstly isn't as skittish as you imply, but to the extent they are of course they concerned worried about regulators and political correctness (specter of eugenics, etc.) The majority of scientists who aren't alarmists and aren't making their career by writing alarmist papers accept as inevitable that human genetic modification will occur.

      The only real danger as I see is this: Kids grow up with some unforseen fucked up genetic disorder as a result of tampering, up to and including depression caused by excessive intelligence. That's it. Really, worse case it's pretty similar to letting a mother choosing not to abort a Down syndrome fetus.

      Everything else is cringy hysterical blithering from people who have been exposed to far too much sloppily written sci fi and mistake it for "science fact". (Or else equally cringy blithering from SJWs who appear to honestly believe that giving parents choice over eye color would be tremendously socially damaging.)

      Some of it borders on magical thinking. I have seen slashdotters unironically quote Jurassic Park's line "Life finds a way." Yes, this attitude is overtly Luddite and it's really cringy to see when supposed geeks exhibit it.

      But please, go on and articulate plausible worst-case scenarios as you imagine them.

    10. Re:Slashdot Luddite mode activated by Shane_Optima · · Score: 1

      Oh and the "alarmist" papers I'm referring to... none of them involve the apocalyptic sci fi nonsense that guys like you hint at. What's really amusing is how most of you don't even see fit to describe what you think the dangers are; you just have handwaving appeals to Murphy's law, obvious dangers...

      I've seen the phrase "stuff like this never seems to work out" used so many times in regards to TOTALLY NEW genetic technologies that have never been tried in any way, shape or form and when you press the person for specifics, they either come back with bad science fiction or they come back with extremely inane comparisons (like comparing an obviously self-limiting gene drive eradication campaign of invasive nonnative mice to help save endangered species from extinction... to importing unmodified non-native cane toads to preserve crop yields by their predation on native beetles.)

      There's no reason whatsoever for extreme caution. You've got nothing but hollow, atrophied groupthink, though of what type I couldn't say, since you wisely chose to keep the details of your paranoid pipe dreams to yourself.

  10. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Wasn't that the plot of Congo?

  11. Re:Hollywood predicted it by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    CAN == SHOULD, pick up a thesaurus you unzealous slob.

  12. Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of their large yellow-haired orangutans escaped from the lab a few years ago, last seen on a cargo ship headed for the USA. It has light-colored rings around its eyes, and reportedly likes KFC, Big Macs, and bricks. The researchers are not really concerned because it wasn't one of their more promising apes.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      don't forget it like to build walls.

      What did you think the bricks were for?

      --
      Nope, no sig
  13. Re:Biologic medium for preserving intelligence by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Cockroach lawyers & politicians? So not really any change.

  14. Dear China by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have any spare Smart Monkeys laying about, please send us some.

    We would like to replace most of our elected government as we feel Intelligent Monkeys could not possibly do any worse than what we've been forced to endure over the past few decades.

    Thanks in advance

  15. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your reply tells us why you don't learn from fiction -- it's because you don't question your own beliefs. A skeptical person is, above all, skeptical of their own beliefs. Fiction presents different perspectives and asks us to think "what if this is correct or partially correct?" and "what do I believe that's wrong?"

    So no, we should not "treat fiction as if it is real" because that would be ridiculous. It means we should not treat our own beliefs as if they are real until they've been tested widely. If you can suspend your disbelief for a fictional story in your head, then you can suspend your disbelief to create a fact in your head that is actually false.

  16. Hardly a Mecca for Monkeys by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    China by then had begun pairing its sizable breeding facilities for monkeys (the country exports more than 30,000 a year) with the newest genetic tools, an effort that has turned it into a mecca for foreign scientists who need monkeys to experiment on.

    But hardly a Mecca for Monkeys.

  17. Alex Jones will lose his mind over this by louzer · · Score: 1

    He said human-animal hybrids are prohibited neither by human rights, nor by animal rights.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  18. Gattaca was a great movie by Just+A+Gigolo · · Score: 1

    Also a very likely future scenario of human societal development. Why wait for evolution?

  19. Ah ... so sad I am not a racist ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    So many jokes that would make ++5 funny mods come to my mind... Alas! all of them are very racist....

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  20. Ethics: Does China have any? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Human brain genes in animals brought to term, editing human children... Did China never hear of medical ethics? Something is going to go horribly wrong.

  21. Re:African Americans by sabbede · · Score: 1

    I wonder where you got such absurd numbers. Not from good science, that much I know.

  22. They generally show us the way by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    They generally show us the way, the don't actually "teach us". Hey, planet of the apes is cool, let's do that! Hey, president Camacho is cool, if we can't get Terry Crews right now, let's start with Trump!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  23. Hamlet by VPNDUDE · · Score: 1

    If you put 100 of them on typewriters in a room, they will write the next Hamlet

  24. Might try it the other way around by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Put some monkey brain cells in humans....considering the stupidity of a lot we see day to day... might not hurt to try ;)

  25. Messed up by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    This seems like animal cruelty/crazy/mad scientist/you name it. Not a fan. WTF China?

  26. 5 of 11 monkeys survived by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    How did the monkeys die?

  27. Re: Jesus Fucking Christ (also fiction? hmm) by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Alternate interpretation: chucking buckets of instant sunshine around isn't a great idea.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  28. Re:Hollywood predicted it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Do you develop flight control software for Boeing, by any chance?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  29. At least there's an application for this by kalieaire · · Score: 1

    Think Aaron Cross, Bourne Legacy or Dr. Julian Bashir, Star Trek DS9.

    Helping people with development disabilities lead a normal life.

  30. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

    Are the Chinese likely to care about our "rules"?

  31. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

    They care about international perception. Also at least we can think about what we our doing ourselves.

  32. Re:Wnat to know what is at the bottom of this slop by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
  33. I hate every ape I see.. by zawarski · · Score: 1

    from chim-pan-a to chim-pan-zee.