Slashdot Mirror


Alibaba Founder Defends Overtime Work Culture As 'Huge Blessing' (reuters.com)

Alibaba founder and billionaire Jack Ma has defended the grueling overtime work culture at many of China's tech companies, calling it a "huge blessing" for young workers. Reuters reports: The e-commerce magnate weighed into a debate about work-life balance and the overtime hours demanded by some companies as the sector slows after years of breakneck growth. In a speech to Alibaba employees, Ma defended the industry's "996" work schedule, which refers to the 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. workday, six days a week. "I personally think that being able to work 996 is a huge blessing," he said in remarks posted on the company's WeChat account. "Many companies and many people don't have the opportunity to work 996," Ma said. "If you don't work 996 when you are young, when can you ever work 996?"

"In this world, everyone wants success, wants a nice life, wants to be respected," Ma said. "Let me ask everyone, if you don't put out more time and energy than others, how can you achieve the success you want?" Ma referred to the tech industry today where some people are without jobs, or working at companies in search of revenue or facing closure. "Compared to them, up to this day, I still feel lucky, I don't regret (working 12 hour days), I would never change this part of me," he said.
On Thursday, an unnamed author published an opinion piece in a state newspaper, arguing that 996 violates China's Labor Law, which stipulates that average work hours cannot exceed 40 hours a week. "Creating a corporate culture of 'encouraged overtime' will not only not help a business' core competitiveness, it might inhibit and damage a company's ability to innovate," the author wrote.

132 comments

  1. TRANSLATION (IMHO)!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Americans!!! Protest China!!! Be our SJW!!! It's to hard and dangerous for ourselves to do!!! You fight for us!!! You don't have anything else to do anyway!!!"

    1. Re: TRANSLATION (IMHO)!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking liberal. If you don't want to work hard to get what you want don't expect us to carry you. You work 996 like a real man or quit complaining.

    2. Re: TRANSLATION (IMHO)!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell 'em, Comrade Wang!

  2. There is a name for this .., by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exploitation.

    Talk about a complete lack of respect for people's time, space, mind, and health.

    1. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone please define what a "blessing" is? Is that just another word for good luck, but when you try to attribute it to something supernatural?

    2. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Slavery is a blessing" Chinese proverb

    3. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When the alternative is starving to death, yes, 996 is a blessing.

      When the alternative is 955, then 996 is a curse.

      It is all relative.

    4. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is even worse: The productivity you get this way is wayyyy lower than with a 40h week. I can only think it is some idea that the underclass has to be tortured and a tiny number of those that take the torture without complaining and ask for more can be lifted up.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    5. Re: There is a name for this .., by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Young people don't know how to use excess time wisely anyway and they certainly don't know how to enjoy life. Might as well work. It's a great teacher.

    6. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one cares what you pretend to pay your imaginary employees. The employees you say you can't find.

      I can't find my $2 Tesla either. Maybe if we imported more workers.

    7. Re:There is a name for this .., by quantaman · · Score: 2

      It is even worse: The productivity you get this way is wayyyy lower than with a 40h week. I can only think it is some idea that the underclass has to be tortured and a tiny number of those that take the torture without complaining and ask for more can be lifted up.

      Productivity per hour goes down, and you eventually burn out or piss off employees entirely until they just quit, but at least for that stretch productivity will be way up.

      That's one of the reason you need labour laws and/or unions. Employees compete with each other, so they'll feel pressured to outwork the other, and it's profitable for management to encourage this, meaning you'll get eventually reach a "996" workplace culture.

      The big issue I see is 996 is crazy enough that you don't actually have a personal life. For 6 days of the week you literally only have 4 hours to get home, shop, eat, etc. You can't join a sports team, you can't go on a date, you basically have 1 day a week to build a life. Maybe you can endure it for your 20s, but what do you do when you're done?

      --
      I stole this Sig
    8. Re:There is a name for this .., by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I work less now than I ever have, and I'm vastly more productive than I've ever been.

      This is for a couple of reasons.

      1) I can take public transportation, and triage emails before I get in in the morning, and take care of a few things after I leave so there's less built up in the morning. I show up with a list of what needs to be done, and no need to waste 20 minutes filtering.
      2) My shit is organized. I put a lot of time and effort into that, and I offload a lot of mental energy by not having to remember a lot of things. That means I've got a lot more mental energy to spend on what I really need to be thinking about.
      3) When I'm not productive I leave. Ass in the seat doesn't produce results just because that's happening. A rested brain can do awesome shit. The trick is making sure that it gets rest, and you don't just assume that more thinking time will produce awesome results. It won't.
      4) (2a) I kick off at quitting time even if I'm mid-flow. I just lay down some quick notes about where I'm at and what needs to happen next. I dump what it's in my head, and then walk away with a clear head, leaving that for tomorrow. Tomorrow 3 minutes of skimming and I'm not doing that shit, because somehow in the last 12 hrs my brain realized that's not what I should be doing, and I now know what I really should be doing. I swear, 2/3 of the time that I brain-dump and leave, I come back the next day knowing that that's not going to be productive.

      I've dropped some 10s, and even a few 12s, and none of them were as productive as my regular 7s are.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    9. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you are done and burnt out you claim disability. I wonder if there is disability benefits in China

    10. Re:There is a name for this .., by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I work less now than I ever have, and I'm vastly more productive than I've ever been.

      This is for a couple of reasons.

      1) I can take public transportation, and triage emails before I get in in the morning, and take care of a few things after I leave so there's less built up in the morning. I show up with a list of what needs to be done, and no need to waste 20 minutes filtering.

      You're still working, you just found a way to do some work during your commute.

      2) My shit is organized. I put a lot of time and effort into that, and I offload a lot of mental energy by not having to remember a lot of things. That means I've got a lot more mental energy to spend on what I really need to be thinking about.

      That's working more effectively, but it doesn't mean that you're more productive by working less.

      3) When I'm not productive I leave. Ass in the seat doesn't produce results just because that's happening. A rested brain can do awesome shit. The trick is making sure that it gets rest, and you don't just assume that more thinking time will produce awesome results. It won't.

      Some days my brain is done after 7 hours and I take off, though I have a bad habit of hanging around longer.

      But some days my brain is still doing great after 10 or even 12, and I don't mind staying in it and getting extra stuff done.

      4) (2a) I kick off at quitting time even if I'm mid-flow. I just lay down some quick notes about where I'm at and what needs to happen next. I dump what it's in my head, and then walk away with a clear head, leaving that for tomorrow. Tomorrow 3 minutes of skimming and I'm not doing that shit, because somehow in the last 12 hrs my brain realized that's not what I should be doing, and I now know what I really should be doing. I swear, 2/3 of the time that I brain-dump and leave, I come back the next day knowing that that's not going to be productive.

      I've dropped some 10s, and even a few 12s, and none of them were as productive as my regular 7s are.

      Obviously 996 is really broken, and everyone has a different threshold, but I'm not sure the strict 9-5 mentality is particularly healthy either.

      You spend a huge portion of your life working, do you really want to spend the last quarter of every day watching the clock. I don't mind finding enough meaning that I sometimes go over. I just try to make sure that my co-workers don't feel pressured to do the same.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    11. Re:There is a name for this .., by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I really wonder when it will be widely accepted that the optimal amount work hours for intellectual work (aka programming) is 6h a day, and probably over a course of a week, 4 days are optimum.

      Intellectual workers, aka programmers, have several mental subprocesses anyway, that work all day and all night.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:There is a name for this .., by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Productivity per hour goes down

      Productivity is already "per hour". Output per hour, to be precise.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      but at least for that stretch productivity will be way up.

      No. Output might go up, but it'll likely do so less than proportionally to the hours worked. And it might even go down if people are so tired they're making errors that cost time to fix.

      If you're making 1.5 times as much stuff but taking twice the time then productivity (at least if you use the word to mean what it actually does) falls by 25%. This has been known since forever.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:There is a name for this .., by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Productivity per hour goes down

      Productivity is already "per hour". Output per hour, to be precise.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      but at least for that stretch productivity will be way up.

      No. Output might go up, but it'll likely do so less than proportionally to the hours worked.

      You're picking straws over terminology.

      Productivity per hour will go down.

      But productivity per employee will go up.

      And it might even go down if people are so tired they're making errors that cost time to fix.

      If you're making 1.5 times as much stuff but taking twice the time then productivity (at least if you use the word to mean what it actually does) falls by 25%. This has been known since forever.

      Yes, that's a factor as well. It's like the Laffer curve, too little it's efficient but you get nothing, too much and you get diminishing returns.

      There's no reason to think 40 hours is the magic number, it's going to vary by individuals and it's going to vary by jobs.

      In some cases there's people who can see a substantial productivity increase going from 70 to 80 hour work weeks. On other cases someone might be outrageously productive in only 5 hours a week, but beyond that they're just not that useful.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    14. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about a complete lack of respect for people's time, space, mind, and health.

      Alibaba is a Chinese company and Jack Ma is Chinese. They have been working people to death for thousands of years now. This is nothing new.

    15. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, you finally figured it out.

      So... do you intend to do something about it or are you just watching? You do know its impossible to change this if you just 'asskiss', 'conform', 'betray others for a few $', 'be easily manipulable' - after all this exploitative system feeds on exactly those things.

    16. Re: There is a name for this .., by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the underclass are the deplorables, so it's OK to shit all over them. Let's not pretend like we care about the working class.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No

    18. Re:There is a name for this .., by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I've dropped some 10s, and even a few 12s, and none of them were as productive as my regular 7s are.

      I can do crunches and put in a bunch of 10s and 12s at a higher rate of productivity than my usual working days. The problem is that after a while my productivity nosedives to almost nothing. With luck that happens after the deadline, but not always. And then I need a long recovery period after when my productivity is very low.

      It certainly doesn't average out to a net win.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    19. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a benefit. It's a truck that roams the city looking for
      "criminals." When it finds a criminal, they're harvested for (body) parts.

      A criminal in China could mean anything...

    20. Re:There is a name for this .., by swillden · · Score: 1

      It is even worse: The productivity you get this way is wayyyy lower than with a 40h week.

      That depends on the nature of the work. For intellectual work, what you say is true (in the long run, anyway, the the short run productivity per hour can actually be higher due to increased focus), but for rote work productivity doesn't fall off that much.

      I'm not suggesting that Alibaba's approach is good, just correcting your overbroad claim.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    21. Re:There is a name for this .., by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      No. Usually, individual employee productivity (total output) in a 72 hour workweek is higher than a 40 hour week. Not proportionally (80% higher), but certainly more than you'd normally get with a 40 hour workweek.

      The problem lies with the waste this engenders within management -- they'd take a path, reverse it, have you to do meaningless crap reports, ignore inefficiencies and problems because "you're on it", basically for free, etc.

      As a result, the productivity of the entire system goes down.

    22. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh another commie who doesn't want to work hard for his money. If these people were meant to be rich and have a high standard of living they'd just work harder! Let me guess you want welfare for everyone. Fuck you lefties are lazy.

    23. Re:There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working that much isn't bad, depending on your organization. I spent four years after my doctorate putting in non-stop 70-to-80-hour work weeks except around the holidays. I was never pushed to do overtime, though. I also was paid for all of that overtime and was fortunate enough that my organization let me do all of that overtime at home.

      I've now got a beach-front house that I completely paid off through investments I made with that overtime pay. I can retire at any point. From my perspective, both of these perks are worth the lack of a life beyond basically working, sleeping, and exercising for those four years.

    24. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm my alternative is like 923. But whatever floats your boat.

    25. Re:There is a name for this .., by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      As I hinted at, one of the big things I've found working less is that I spend less time going down the unproductive rabbit-hole without noticing. That's something that's really easy to do, especially if you're mentally fatigued and "just trying to get it done so I can go home".

      When it's quitting time I jot down some notes (often just drop a few lines to a paragraph of comments and/or pseudo code) and pack it up. The next day I often look at the direction I was intending to go and realize that it's not going to be productive.

      Had I spent a few more hours the night before banging at it, I might have realized it as well, but regardless, that time would have been lost. The difference is that I'm in well rested and mentally sharp in the morning, and not dragging because I put in a late night being unproductive. I'm still where I left off, just far more equipped to move forward than I would have otherwise been.

      The times that it looks like I was on the right track, I often come in with a mental framework for how to quickly move on from that and push pretty deep into the problem I'm trying to solve. That's the brain working overnight when I was resting it, and the energy and focus to execute available. Again, that makes for a damn productive morning that I might not otherwise have had.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    26. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Your comment is worthless. Obviously we are talking about productivity per individual, not per hour. That makes your comment completely bereft of insight.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    27. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Productivity per hour will go down.

      But productivity per employee will go up.

      It will not. You can get productivity up bu working overtime for about a week, with two weeks recovery time needed. After that week , you will get the same productivity you had before and a week later you will be below that. Unless you work hard enough to damage your health, then you can do this for a few weeks, but even then productivity will drop below what the 40h week gives you. And yes, obviously we are talking productivity per employee.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    28. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It will happen when they realize that most programmers have negative productivity (it is more effort to clean up after them than to start from scratch) and when they start competing for the good ones.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    29. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Have a look into the literature. The 40h/work peak efficiency per worker is for _manual_ work.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    30. Re:There is a name for this .., by gweihir · · Score: 1

      It is not. It is _lower_. Have a look into the scientific literature before you claim nonsense next time.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    31. Re: There is a name for this .., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wealth was stolen from the hands of the workers who produced it.

    32. Re:There is a name for this .., by swillden · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. Have a look into the literature. The 40h/work peak efficiency per worker is for _manual_ work.

      Manual rote work or manual dangerous work? As I recall, the reason early studies suggested more than 40 hours was too much was not because productivity fell off but because accidents got too high.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    33. Re:There is a name for this .., by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      My last 20 years as a programmer were 90% clean up work ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    34. Re:There is a name for this .., by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      (Shrug). Can't find it. Here's what I did find... What's going on with the managerial class.
      http://www.ccl.org/leadership/...

      Slave drivers tend to make more money - upto a point - the more they drive their slaves. What you seem to be talking of is productivity _per hour_ worked, which is a different topic.

      Do you have a time versus output curve?

  3. 996, the neighbor of the beast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Working 996 sounds like hell to me. How good do you expect people's work to be after they've been at the same thing for so many hours and so many days of the week?

    1. Re: 996, the neighbor of the beast... by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      Medical and surgical residents and fellows in the US often work anywhere from 786 to 596 by this naming scheme, depending on specialty... for years... at about 2x minimum wage or less. And then newspapers write articles like "the problem with doctor salaries".

    2. Re: 996, the neighbor of the beast... by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      News stories have also reported how medical residents make frequent medical mistakes, as they're often too tired to think properly.

    3. Re: 996, the neighbor of the beast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but even when they're making mistakes, those hours are billable. The hospital doesn't really give a shit if they make mistakes as long as the patient survives and can pay.

  4. classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    play your employees against each other with implied threats of "if you don't work harder than the person next to you, you will not be successful". This guy should be run out of there with pitchforks.

    1. Re:classic by jrumney · · Score: 2

      Also the "if you don't do it while you're young" thing only works when companies are burning out their employees and forcing them out of the industry in their 30s.

  5. Fuck Jack Ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was a new hire at his company, I'd work 4 hours per day, 4 days a week, giving 0 fucks. #440

    1. Re:Fuck Jack Ma by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it would take an entire week to lose your job, or just a couple of days.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  6. Stuff like this by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Stuff like this reminds me of old white supremacists quacking on about how slavery in the old South was a boon to the slaves.

    1. Re:Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *smugly posted from sjames iphone*

    2. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *only* reason that Abraham Lincoln ended slavery in America is because he happened to be president at the time.

      Slavery ended because the world was technologically capable of surviving without it, and culturally ready to see it as cruelty. Abe wasn't more enlightened than prior world leaders, he was just born into an environment where ending slavery made sense.

    3. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Republicans were liberals at the time and conservatives were Democrats, so yes, he would be considered a liberal or at best a RINO today.

      It's not rewriting history, it's understanding history.
      The Republican party as you know it came about it when Barry Goldwater pulled conservatives to the Republican party, mostly over anger over the of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965.

    4. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lincoln also had the endorsement of the Communist Party. And Nazis were Socialist in name only (Hitler & Co had the actual socialists purged and killed). Now, shut the fuck up, faggot.

    5. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for trying, with actual knowledge and proper historical facts, to balance-out (in vain, I'm afraid) the shitload of ignorance and stupidity that has made Slashdot the infected boil of anti-intellectualism and deliberate disinformation it has become today.

    6. Re: Stuff like this by illiac_1962 · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true liberal

    7. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is only good when read at -1. All of the interesting and insightful comments are posted AC.

    8. Re: Stuff like this by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You must not understand history. The Conservative Democrats all dumped their party in protest of the Civil Rights Act and became Conservative Republicans as a part of Nixon's Southern strategy. This created the strange bedfellows between a fiscal conservative pro-business wing with the social conservative rural wing. The GOP today is *not* the Party of Lincoln since it still courts the segregationists.

      Don't just rehash debunked talking points from the far right, learn something for yourself for a change.

    9. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GWARSH

    10. Re: Stuff like this by Rolgar · · Score: 0

      Or not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Specifically, 20 out of 21 Southern Democrats stayed Democrat after the Civil Rights Act. Republicans still weren't able to dominate the south until a whole generation after the beginning of the Southern strategy.

      It's very interesting to me that the Klan and it's supporters were highly supportive of abortion to keep the numbers of blacks low, but modern 'racists' are pro-life, which if their policy goals were implemented would increase the number of blacks much faster than the number of whites.

    11. Re: Stuff like this by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why as AC? Now nobody will read the one comment in the whole thread that's actually insightful.

      Or were you afraid to tarnish your name with a posting that is actually not only on topic but also informative? I know, it doesn't belong here anymore , that could easily ruin your karma...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lincoln also had the endorsement of the Communist Party. And Nazis were Socialist in name only (Hitler & Co had the actual socialists purged and killed). Now, shut the fuck up, faggot.

      Which only proves his point. Everyone knows that the only thing a socialist hates more than a capitalist is a different variety of socialist. Marxists murdering trotskyists, international socialists murdering national (and vice versa), with Leninysts, Mensheviks, Bolsheviks and so on. Gulags had way more socialists incarcerated than former nobility, whoose only fault was adherence to a slightly different variation of socialism than the current Leading Party.

    13. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why as AC? Now nobody will read the one comment in the whole thread that's actually insightful.

      Or were you afraid to tarnish your name with a posting that is actually not only on topic but also informative? I know, it doesn't belong here anymore , that could easily ruin your karma...

      Some of us care more about substance than reputation.

      A lost attitude that was common here until all the trolls with good karma pushed most of us out.

    14. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why as AC? Now nobody will read the one comment in the whole thread that's actually insightful.

      Or were you afraid to tarnish your name with a posting that is actually not only on topic but also informative? I know, it doesn't belong here anymore , that could easily ruin your karma...

      Most signed posts aren't worth anything more anyway, it's just a mod point circle jerk.

    15. Re: Stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did it anonymously because, well, have you seen this place lately?

      It's bad enough left vs right but throw in that my account has a female name, I don't need the hassle it can create. The jerks here will chase me around and trash my karma and that would be the least of my concerns. Maybe it would be fine, maybe not, I didn't want to risk it.

  7. Fck Him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a piece of work employing psychological techniques to have his employees remain content (and for some, work even harder) with the abuse that they are dealt.

  8. see what happens when you don't have a union? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    see what happens when you don't have a union?

    1. Re: see what happens when you don't have a union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, because Communists aren't supposed to need unions.

      But support your local unions

    2. Re: see what happens when you don't have a union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China isn't communist, just because it has that in the name doesn't make it so.

    3. Re:see what happens when you don't have a union? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You only need a union if the government is at the mercy of the corporations. In many developed nations we don't need unions as the government is still for the people.

    4. Re: see what happens when you don't have a union? by Dr.Saeuerlich · · Score: 1

      You're both right and wrong here. China does have unions but they are part of the Chinese Communist Party and just enforce it's decisions. The logic here is: Communism is for the people and there is a union. If you are exploited, then either turn to the existing union or stfu, because Communism is supposed to be a workers' paradise! And forming unions that don't belong to the party isn't allowed because of that logic. Note that Jack Ma is a fairly important member of the CCP sitting in its national committee.

    5. Re: see what happens when you don't have a union? by philmarcracken · · Score: 1

      They are communist in name only, unless you want to use your argument for declaring north korea as a democracy.

  9. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's a blessing for his company (and him financially) anyway.

  10. Do it for Jack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack needs to become EVEN RICHERRR and only your hard, underpaid work can make that happen! Think of poor little Jackie the next time your girlfriend asks when you are coming home.

    Jack would do it for you... well, no he wouldn't.

  11. The one lucky guy among the millions... by ffkom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... whose hard work actually gained him a fortune is bad enough at statistics to understand that for the vast majority, hard work will get them just a little extra money at best, but very likely ruin their chances to stay healthy and happy.

    Just like the nonsense that sports celebrities speak when inspiring the youth to follow their example - while they should know that most just become wrecks, not highly paid professionals.

    1. Re:The one lucky guy among the millions... by gweihir · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is even worse than that: Preaching hard work will get _him_ less money, because individual productivity peaks at around 40h/week and drops above that. This guy mast have gotten really lucky, because he does not even understand the basics of work. Not that different from the average CEO, though.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re: The one lucky guy among the millions... by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Nah. For the high performers, the extra hours will be productive but consuming people's time is a key tool of all cults. It will endear them to the company who will own all of thier will and innovations--safe from thier competition. That's what they really want.

    3. Re: The one lucky guy among the millions... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nah. For the high performers, the extra hours will be productive

      They are not. This myth is pervasive though.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  12. Been there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Done that....
    Moved on!

    To the extent I have a choice I will never work "for" a company again.
    I am quite open to working WITH any company where a mutually beneficial agreement can be negotiated.

  13. "Success" by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Let me ask everyone, if you don't put out more time and energy than others, how can you achieve the success you want?"

    Not everyone dreams of becoming a sociopathic executive when they grow up. Most just want to live relatively comfortably, have the means to raise a family, be able to afford a few indulgences now and then, and have a good work-life balance.

    Civilization is not a zero-sum game.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
    1. Re:"Success" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And not everybody has so little to offer as a person that they need "success" to be able to feel they are somebody.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:"Success" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! The very question presupposes that "success" is a scarce commodity for which people must contend, and that work hours and physical exertion are the only metrics which matter.

      What ever happened to "working smarter"?

      And who defines what "success" is in the first place? There seem to be an infinity of permutations. Was Thomas Jefferson successful? He died a debtor.

      Nothing prevents anyone from exerting himself or herself "productively" at a 996 level, irrespective of whether wages are paid for it. In fact, such wage-less exertions would seem to appear more noble in the grand scheme of things.

      Perhaps a good response is: "Life is bigger than you...and you are not me."

      In the end we are all dead and soon forgotten. The only legacy we leave is what remains in the world (good or bad) after our departure.

      Or perhaps Solomon said it best, "All is vanity!"

  14. The wrong question by rgmoore · · Score: 2

    If you don't work 996 when you are young, when can you ever work 996?

    This is asking the wrong question. The question is not "when can you ever work 996?", it's "should you ever work 996?" There are plenty of studies that show working overtime is only effective in the short term. The extra hours give extra time to get work done, but they also wear people out. Tired workers are less productive than well rested ones, so the amount of work done on the day someone works overtime is less than expected based on the time they worked. And being tired carries over, so they're less and less productive each day of working overtime. In fairly short order- no more than a few weeks- they're less productive working 996 than they would be working a conventional 40 hour work week, because they're too frazzled to do their best work.

    And this isn't something that's limited to people doing physical labor. It holds just as true of people doing mental labor. This is why businesses were willing to accept a 40 hour work week. It wasn't just pressure from the workers; it was also evidence showing that demanding longer work weeks wasn't getting any more work done. It's amazing that so many people have either ignored or refused to learn this.

    --

    There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    1. Re:The wrong question by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. This stupidity constantly amazes me. The 40h work week goes back to Henry Ford, as far as I know, and he was certainly not under any suspicion of wanting to do anything nice for his workers. The plain unadorned fact is that at 40h/week work, productivity peaks for manual workers and it is even lower for mental workers. Work more, be _less_ productive and less valuable to your employer.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  15. You want to live, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "In this world, everyone wants success, wants a nice life, wants to be respected," Ma said. "Let me ask everyone, if you don't put out more time and energy than others, how can you achieve the success you want?"

    50% of people are below average. Most of them know they're below average. Success to them means working enough to have a decent life outside of work, not finding excuses to work many more hours in the hope that by incompetence they'll be put in a position of substantial pay for relatively little work--as a ratio of pay vs hours worked.

    50% of people are above average. Most of them know they're above average. Success to them means working enough to have a decent life outside of work, not finding excuses to work many more hours in the hope that by some competence they'll be put in a position of substantial pay for relatively little work--as a ratio of pay vs hours worked.

    Between 0-20% of people are workaholics. They think working 80 hours/week is good because work is good. It doesn't matter to them that they could live comfortable on 40 hours/week pay nor that there's plenty of other people willing and capable of filling that other 40 hours/week of work. They actively look down on people who don't live to work because to them that's what life is about. They don't understand that "burnout" is code for "I tried living "up"--really sideways--to the absurd expectations of workaholics and finally recognized I'd rather live than work.

    What Jack Ma has to say? Being in a position where he can almost force people to pretend to be workaholics just to have a job just to live, I got to say to him: "I personally think that you haven't gotten a bullet through your head yet is a huge blessing," This is the sort of abuse which was, at least principally if not practically, the basis for communistic rejection of capitalism and the exploitation of workers in the name of profit. Of course communism ended up being worse because then the state became the exploiter of workers, but even in the US there's a recognition at least in principle of how abusive and exploitative such actions and viewpoints are.

    The one saving grace is a person who is overworked is probably too tired to raise a gun to his head or a knife to his throat. Even in the abject poverty of depressions, you don't see much in the way of constant looting and murder of such assholes even though they practically are begging for it when government is so disinclined to really do anything about it because "freedom". I don't think mob rule is nor should be some sort of great equalizer, but it's definitely quite amazing it doesn't happen a lot more often even with all the horror that it brings.

    Certainly what Jack Ma brings isn't blood soaked streets, but the actions he pushes for is the fundamental destruction of time in people's lives for his own ends. That is a much smaller scale, but still very real, horror. It's why there was so much push in countries to enshrine 40 hour work weeks as a limit and overtime as a sort of punishment. Maybe some day Jack Ma will learn this lesson. Maybe all it'd take would be to force him to only work a couple hours a week, to see what his life would be like if he was prevented to do the thing he wanted to do and saw it go to ruin because he wasn't there.

    1. Re:You want to live, right? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      If you put all your energy into work, you are not living, plain and simple. Any imagined "success" you work towards is meaningless.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:You want to live, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to be told what your "success" is, it isn't. Happiness isn't a checklist. Happiness isn't a size of bed, or yard, or car, or spouse. Happiness isn't a certain audience number in arts or sports. Happiness isn't the number of people you have executive power over.

      I'm not trying to pinch a loaf of inspirational pillow cases, I'm saying that YOU decide what tastes good, feels good, sounds good; not some Suggested Viewing or Recommended Purchases list. YOU decide what was an accomplishment over past-you, not a public ranking. YOU decide what a goal is, what a satisfying task is. Not the "expected" life duties you've been groomed to believe you must meet. If you let the world write your story for you, you're an automaton.

      This is only becoming more important as our immediate "sight" has expanded to a tribe of thousands, and you're even more inclined to think that your own tastes should be overwritten.

    3. Re:You want to live, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight. "Happiness" is, by defintion, when you are happy. If some define "happiness" as making to every work meeting in a week, that means that work means more to them than anything else in life. Some might fit that description but I don't think that most of us do. For my part, happiness is more about getting to attend every one of my daughter's dance performances than being at every late work meeting. Sure I work hard to fulfill my work goals but seeing the joy on my daughter's face when I'm supporting her is priceless. Some live to work, others work to live. I'm happy working to live.

  16. Productivity by manu0601 · · Score: 2

    Even from the employer point of view, 996 is probably a bad idea. Who can pretend to be productive for 12 hours in a row, 6 days a week? I take repetitive jobs aside, since it is obviously not what he is talking about.

    1. Re:Productivity by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are some very old studied done by Henry Ford and others. They wanted to optimize worker efficiency. They found that the best outcome is at 8h per day, 5 days a week for manual work and 6h per day, 5 days a week for mental work. Work more and your productivity drops due to mistakes, sick-days (even if uncompensated, you are still not working) and other effects.

      Of course, the US has forgotten that and China has probably never found out. In both cases, the mistaken thinking is that the more you exploit your workers, the better the profits. That is patently untrue, but requires dropping greed and the superiority complex of the average capitalist and rationally looking at facts instead. Few people with money or a deep desire for money are capable of that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re: Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I applaud Henry caring, I'm suspicious of testing methods 100 years ago. I'd like to see some new data.

    3. Re: Productivity by gweihir · · Score: 1

      He did not care for anything but maximizing his profits.

      Here is some starting-point with lots of references for you if you really find yourself google-challenged: https://www.askspoke.com/blog/...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re: Productivity by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      At least if youâ(TM)re busy working you have fewer hours to commit social media crimes in China.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    5. Re:Productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8h per day, 5 days a week for manual work and 6h per day, 5 days a week for mental work.

      I work 6 hour days in an office environment where the others work 8 hour days and I'm less productive now than when I worked 4 hour days remotely. When I have to do deep work I can't really be productive that long, and being interupted in an office makes my effective hours really few, so the solution is to work in the mornings with less interruptions, but that also often means 8 hours days resulting in the same or a tad bit more personal workoutput as if I worked 4 hours.

      I think this is a really hard issue.

    6. Re:Productivity by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The high amount of work hours keeps the people exhausted and ready to drink and do other recreational drugs and keep them away from critical thinking and pushing reforms or a true change or a revolution, that is all what it is about.

      Work slaves who drink themselves into sleep to get up next morning early, have no time to think about revolting ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Productivity by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I guess nobody would call Henry Ford a bleeding heart socialist, but he was the one that doubled worker's pay in his factories and introduced 8/5 work weeks.

      And considering his success, he must have known something that got lost in the time since.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Productivity by gweihir · · Score: 1

      That, a bit generalized, is basically the only real explanation for keeping people working so long. It certainly is not profit optimization.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:Productivity by gweihir · · Score: 2

      It is pretty clear Ford wanted to optimize his profits. Hence both the work-time reduction and the better wages must have been beneficial to his profits. And they were.

      What got lost is very basic things and they did not get lost. There are just ignored by the current failures we have as "industry leaders". Ford war a real capitalist. He had no problem doing things that benefited his workers as long as long as they benefited his profits. Modern employers usually claim to be capitalists, but they do not even understand the concept. Instead they are basically slave-holders of the worst kind that think their employees must be miserable, work as long as possible and paid the minimum possible and that this is the best approach. This fundamentally fails at being "capitalist". Not only does it results in less absolute productivity, it also reduces the amount of goods employees can buy and thereby reduces cash-flow and market-size. About the worst things you can do to capitalism. It also leads to them not having access to the best workers, namely those that have new ideas or can really optimize things. Stupidity, arrogance and short-sighted greed.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  17. 996 is a "blessing" by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Well of course no one can really complain about it. When you have billions of "willing" workers (willing at the end of a communist dictatorship GUN), who wouldn't want to do anything BUT work.

  18. Also creates social "peace" by gweihir · · Score: 1

    True, it is the peace of the grave and of people too exhausted to even think about what kind of country they live in and how that is pretty bad, but it certainly works. Exhausted workers start no riots.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re:Also creates social "peace" by killfixx · · Score: 1

      There are so many more layers to his "challenge"/speech; competition, national pride, youthful exuberance (and pride), etc...
      All of it carefully crafted to keep costs low and productivity high. Full stop.

      Clever monster...

      --
      "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
    2. Re:Also creates social "peace" by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Actually, not that clever. Productivity with this schedule is massively lower than with a 40h work-week and costs are massively higher. Unless the actual benefits outweigh that...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  19. Sociopathic Monster by killfixx · · Score: 1

    This is Rick acting like a god and telling his microverse inhabitants that they can only be truly happy by working for his betterment.

    Fucking monster.

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  20. Hard work in a modern market is like gambling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One guy gets lucky. Everyone else loses.

  21. How about you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Ma, do *you* work 996?

    1. Re:How about you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And before you answer, we mean work. Not sit in "dinner meetings" or have "golf meetings".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  22. Extended by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    ..and by extension, most large American companies find chinese overtime culture to be a huge blessing as well. No wonder the North American worker has no leverage.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  23. THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    ..UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES.

    "I personally think that being able to work 996 is a huge blessing," he said in remarks posted on the company's WeChat account. "Many companies and many people don't have the opportunity to work 996," Ma said. "If you don't work 996 when you are young, when can you ever work 996?"
    No shit, I read this and thought "this bastard sounds like an internet troll". What a total piece of shit this guy is. No wonder workers in China commit suicide, who wouldn't being treated that way?

  24. Calculate Your Hourly Rate by turp182 · · Score: 1

    If you work for a company with a 40 hour week policy and in the US are exempt, 10 extra hours is an effective 20% reduction in your effective pay per hour.

    Granted, I'm not familiar with Chinese labor regulations or Foxconns policies.

    Anyway, time worked over your company's policy, over a period of time (once in a while is fine, circumstances), is a clear sign of under staffing. Unless you get a bonus consummate to the extra time. Or are paid hourly (the contractors).

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  25. Congratulations by jdawgnoonan · · Score: 1

    Congratulations for being proud to treat people like slaves and then have the balls to call it opportunity. Time is much more valuable than money. If your employees do not realize that you treat them as slaves just wait another generation or two and treating people like this will no longer be acceptable in China as it isnâ(TM)t in other countries.

  26. Confucius Say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Idle hands are the (capitalist) devil's workshop."

    1. Re:Confucius Say by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Idle hands allow you to raise the head, take a look around and ponder for a moment whether what you do actually gets you anywhere.

      And that's dangerous for those that benefit from you not doing so. Because you might notice that you're better off without them.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  27. Why not 997? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    Wage slavery is all the rage in China. Jack Ma should export that idea!

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  28. Re:Hard work in a modern market is like gambling.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think professional sports go around asking hopefuls how hard they worked? Because that's what gets you a team slot?

    And that's an extremely meritocratic scenario. The conditions you're living in were built by chance. I know mine were. I work hard, but I know the Other Losers did too. I was just luckier. "Working even harder" would change nothing, I'd still be sitting in the musical chair.

  29. Tom Sawyer by mentil · · Score: 2

    It's not every day you get to whitewash a social ill, eh?

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  30. people are so easy to manipulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we got them exactly were we want them

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_union_busting_in_the_United_States

    And you can thank corruption for all this. Idiot people let corruption grow and it weakens any organization, unions too. After that its the simple thing of
    vultures to come and devour the pieces unable to resist.

    So next time you see an asskisser you can thank him for helping you get where you all are today and you can thank yourself for keeping your mouth shut - it kept you your job didn't it?

  31. hard work and effort always translates into succes by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It must be true because Jack Ma told us. You are always rewarded 100% of the time for your efforts and promotions are 100% based on merit. There is no arbitrary decisions made by management. There is no luck or chance in the system. And special treatment is absolutely impossible and never occurs ever.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  32. Overtime. by Larryish · · Score: 1

    No wife. No kids.

    Overtime is the reason I own 7 motorcycles.

    Fuck all you fat video game faggots.

    Overtime FTW!

    1. Re:Overtime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having children would cost much more than 7 motorcycles. Overtime on low pay not producing enough money to afford a wife and kids is a problem, not a solution.

      I don't work overtime, but I also don't fuck all the fat video game faggots, or own 7 motorcycles, as I don't aspire to either of those.

      English and decent pay FTW.

    2. Re:Overtime. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Or you could have my job, no overtime but better pay. I own a couple apartment houses which, unlike your motorcycles, generate additional revenue.

      I literally make money while playing video games. Try that with your motorcycles.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. 697 is best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people need loving from 6 am to 9 pm every day of the week.

  34. can someone please explain what philanthropist is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack Ma (born Ma Yun, Chinese: ; pinyin: M Yún, [ma yn];[3] born 10 September 1964) is a Chinese business magnate, investor, and philanthropist.

    Its kinda confusing, seeing how 'Philanthropy means the love of humanity. '. Is this part of propaganda?

  35. I get the feeling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that after a certain level of wealth, this sort of thing is less about money and more about people.

  36. I believe anything a C-Level says by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    as soon as he subjects himself to whatever he considers a boon, blessing or huge advantage to those affected. Then we can talk. Before that, he's just doing what he's best at: Bullshitting people.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:I believe anything a C-Level says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and while getting paid that rate, etc.
      Upper mgmt often does work long hours, and as stake holders they get rewarded for it.
      I have talked to too many upper mgmt that seem to think that all employees should also have the same 'dedication' as them (without the possible payoff). And as you noted, if presented with the 'opportunity' to be in their shoes, most execs would not do so.

    2. Re:I believe anything a C-Level says by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't consider sitting in "business dinners" and at "golf meetings" working.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  37. Re:can someone please explain what philanthropist by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think of them as I do of philatelists. They collect stamps, appraise them, trade them, buy and sell them...

    Philantropists probably collect humans. Appraise them...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Of course he defends it by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    Using people unwilling or unable to say no to exploitation, has always been the preferred choice for building an empire.

  39. China can and should burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost everything about Chinese business culture is vile. Cheating on manufacturing contracts in China is the norm. Copyright and Patent protection is non existent and humans are regarded as disposable cogs.

    Jack Ma talks about success and respect - but neither can be achieved by workers when they throw away half of their lives every day for the benefit of their masters.

    If you haven't read Paul Midler's book "Poorly Made in China" you need to read it:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poorly_Made_in_China

    American is often accused of having poor business morals and poor worker protections but we are absolute saints compared to the Chinese in this regard.

     

  40. It most certainly is a blessing...... by doubledown00 · · Score: 1

    ......for him and his bottom line.

    He does make valid points though. There can be a time and place for 996, like when one forms their own new business. And indeed it is easier to do when you're young, healthy, and unencumbered by spouse / kid obligations.

    Of course working those hours doesn't guarantee anything. There are multiple paths to success and multiple ways to evaluate when you get there.

  41. Jack Ma is an anti-capitalist by radarskiy · · Score: 1

    The median businessman has no idea how capitalism works, and the 90% percentile is actively opposed to capitalism.

    Marginal productivity eventually declines as work day increases, yet this guy still pays the same marginal wage. He's be better off setting a quarter of his money on fire, he could at least cook some dinner with it.

  42. VINDICATES by NewYork · · Score: 1

    "Behind every great fortune there is crime" --Balzac

    change.org/p/13002798

  43. Aren't Drugs Illegal in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be doing a shitload of high grade pharmaceuticals if you think your employees are lucky to be working themselves to death for absolutely no compensation.

    If you want your employees to perform like this, they need to have a stake in what they are working towards. What kind of delusional fuckwit thinks that a person should willingly sacrifice their chance at having a life to make you a fucking billionaire...

    People sure find new and exciting ways to be despicable, amoral shit heels... The fact that we look to these people as leaders is ridiculous.