Slashdot Mirror


GNU GPLv3 At the Heart of the Black Hole Image (www.tfir.io)

arnieswap quotes TFIR's report on the black hole image: Free and Open Source software was at the heart of this image. The team used three different imaging software libraries to achieve the feat. Out of the three, two were fully open source libraries. The source code of the software is publicly available on GitHub.

Richard M Stallman, the founder of the GNU Project will be glad to see that both libraries (Sparselab and ehtim) are released under GNU GPL v3. Yes, you read it right – GNU GPL v3.

56 comments

  1. Moscow Donald Lied about Trump Tower Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Because he is a Russian owned Traitor, as the KKK / Republican party that supports him.

    1. Re:Moscow Donald Lied about Trump Tower Moscow by Bobrick · · Score: 2

      You got the wrong thread.

    2. Re:Moscow Donald Lied about Trump Tower Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Nope, it's entirely appropriate to call out a traitor.

    3. Re:Moscow Donald Lied about Trump Tower Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      He does leave plenty of disparaging words against Communism in his pages and history, and you as a Communist aficionado of course hate that as much as you do the Russians and the rest of the Slavs for kicking Cuckmmunism out of their countries after practicing it longer than armchair theorists like yourself and figuring out it's dogshit when applied to states, so it doesn't surprise me that a Cuckmmunist would put the two together on the same balcony.
      However Cuckmmunism has been evicted from 90% of states it contaminated in the past, and that number is increasing, with no chance for the Cuckmmunist virus to return after antibodies are developed. In light of this fact I am happy to inform you that your laughably small and dying white neo-Cuckmmunist collective in the West where Cuckmmunism never went through the infecton/inoculation cycle, is a joke destined to meet complete erasure from existence. Enjoy your small time-frame of existence which is getting shorter with each country in the world evicting your ideology or twisting it into something unrecognizable.

    4. Re:Moscow Donald Lied about Trump Tower Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo.

  2. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Go get your dick wet.

    1. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I had sex last night, and unlike Moscow Donald neither I nor Vladimir Putin had to pay to get my dick wet.

    2. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Nobody cares Sean. And that was not sex you poor thing.

    3. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I came... she came... I guess that's the difference between me and Moscow Donald's tiny mushroom penis.

      That, and I don't have to pay for sex...

      And also I didn't lie about building Trump Tower Moscow while supporting and helping Russia's attack on America.

      Fuck the traitors. This thread is for Real Americans.

    4. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Your Fish Rots From the Head Down...

  3. Free Software Won? by martiniturbide · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe free software already won the "software wars", now I think there should be a fight against the "close source cloud".

    1. Re:Free Software Won? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Maybe free software already won the "software wars", now I think there should be a fight against the "close source cloud".

      Free software has won the software wars in academia, and in servers. Everywhere else is still dominated by proprietary software. (Handhelds are a mixed bag, because most of them run Android, and there is AOSP, but many of them can't run it. Etc.)

      What it's going to take for FOSS to take over the rest is the same thing it always was going to take. It's going to require that some people sit down and apply that last 50% of effort on the last 10% of the software, and polish it up. It's going to take some adequate kiddie-level documentation. It's not the hot, new and sexy. It's the practical and necessary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Free Software Won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I appreciate good tools like everyone else but leave culture politics out of it, for example from the article: It’s a victory of diversity in the era of homophobia and sexism.

    3. Re: Free Software Won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? There isn't a "war", and commercial software developers are not your enemy, we all use the same tools to get the job done. This is the dumbest us-versus-them-ism. Software licensing is an extremely good motivator to create quality software, deal with it.

    4. Re:Free Software Won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, how dare you trigger me in my safespace!!!!

    5. Re:Free Software Won? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe free software already won the "software wars", now I think there should be a fight against the "close source cloud".

      Build your own open cloud and if it's good, people will come. "Don't tell others what to do with their computers" is at the heart of the open movement. So stop telling closed cloud providers what they should do. Do it yourself, or shut up.

    6. Re:Free Software Won? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      now I think there should be a fight against the "close source cloud".

      There are multiple open source cloud projects and many corporate providers using these projects. Shop around. Or if you have a decent internet connection, download OwnCloud or Seafile and host it yourself.

  4. 8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    You wolf down Vladimir Putin's jizz just as eagerly as Moscow Donald.

    Russia replaced communism with kleptocracy, and on off chance that you are a Russian national instead of a kkk / republican traitor you should know that the reason your country is an impoverished shithole is that Vladimir Putin and his buddies stole all your money.

    Moscow Donald's campaign manager and lawyer because even though you republican treason-cucks support Russia over America, especially when the Russian government is attacking our country we still have laws, and we usually enforce them.

    My advice is to wipe Vladimir Putin's semen off of your face and to have yourself tested for herpes.

    8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._.

    1. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      The reason Russia and other Slav nations are impoverished is because a giant slave-labor force was in charge of production for decades, and once slave-labor couldn't keep up anymore with global competition or the backwards system it is based on, everything fractured with countries being plunged into post-Communist poverty as any nation experiences after throwing Cuckmmunism out and having to reform itself. Thankfully a lot of Slav nations have seen slow but steady improvement over the past 2 decades and some have already passed their past Cuckmmunist stats as they are figuring out new systems post-Cuckmmunism. Sadly for you my little white Cuckmmunist, your ideology is dead in a toilet. :^)

    2. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no communists anywhere outside of Russian puppet states like North Korea you fucking retard.

      I guess you are in a Russian puppet state that gives all of your wealth to Putin's buddies while the rest of the country is grateful for the scraps your corrupt puppet president allows to escape his grip?

      Good luck struggling to reach the standard of living that Western Europe has had for decades.

      Maybe you can commiserate with some likeminded treason-cucks about how good Vladimir Putin's semen tastes and how bad universal healthcare and indoor plumbing are.

      8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._.

    3. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of Communist-paraphilia/Soviet flag-waving Cuckmmunist among your identitarian left and ANTIFA clique of ever-moronic lolcows. It's always funny seeing it and it's always fun seeing support for your band of mentally unstable children keep dropping. The Ameriburger Democrats are now fractured and in civil war, while every news outlet left of FOX has seen a trust ratings drop beneath the levels of Congress for the first time in history, and the fact that posters like you have contributed to the FOX that we know becoming more trusted than once-respected news outlets like CNN, and that posters like you have contributed to even Obama coming out to call you identitarians moronic and telling the Democratic Party to get its shit together, makes my mouth pull an every-widening grin.
      All this Trump-Russia whining yet it turns out only 1% of the population views it as an important topic according to recent polls and stats. It makes your posts look like a laughable fart trying to overcome the entire atmosphere.

    4. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitting it out of the park!

    5. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But according to modern left-think, wolfing down jizz is perfectly normal and natural. How can a leftist use such a turn of phrase as an insult when other leftists celebrate such behavior?

      captcha: catcher (cant make this stuff up)

    6. Re:8==T=R=E=A=S=O=N=C=U=C=K==D -~-._. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reads like an Alex Jones comment section crapflood bot having a stroke...

      Are you ok, traitor?

  5. Don't be a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, it's entirely appropriate to call out a traitor.

    Go stand on the WH lawn and say it for real. Posting it here where nobody cares isn't brave at all.

    1. Re:Don't be a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Call out treason everywhere.

      Republican treason-cucks shouldn't feel welcome anywhere outside of Trump Tower where the Trump Jr / Jarad / Manafort treason team colluded with the Russian government's attack on America.

      If you don't like it maybe you can join Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian embassy until you smear shit on the walls.

      The the fuck out, traitors.

    2. Re:Don't be a Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      Love how leftists suddenly got this patriotic fervor. And since when is it OK to call people faggots?

  6. Don't be a toady faggot traitor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would saying it to a building be brave? You're a coward hiding from the truth. Trump is a traitor, everything he says is a lie, and you're a moron if you believe him on any of it - when he dies in prison you'll understand that.

    Until then, calling out the traitor is always appropriate.

  7. Learn English, Republican traitor cucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    You're a lying faggot in support of a traitor, so calling you that exactly is 100% deserved. Trump will die in prison and the Constitution will be protected from dumb, inbred Republican faggots that don't understand or value it.

    You aren't needed in this country. Try Moscow, traitor. Bring cash and your sucking-Putin's-cock face, like the traitors Drumpf.

    Noting that the cowardly liar and his treasonous beta faggot sons are bitches isn't a "leftist" position, that's just the facts.

    Trump's obese faggot corpse will hang right down the center of the gallows, and America will be great again right at that moment.

    1. Re:Learn English, Republican traitor cucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

      I am a veteran of the cold war. I even have a nice little certificate signed by Donald Rumsfeld thanking me for never launching any nuclear weapons.

      Remember when leftists hated Reagan for standing up to the USSR? Suddenly now leftists hate Russia and love America. How fickle. How amusing.

      And stop using the word faggot.

      Oh and one more thing. I never voted for Pres. Trump. I don't really support him. He does serve a useful purpose though. He exposes all of the vitriol that the left has for anyone to the right of Trotsky.

      The jig is up, amigo. No one is buying this brand of BS any more.

  8. Headline wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should read:

    GNU GPLv3 At the Heart of Richard Stallman's Butt Hoal

  9. Matlab is doing fine for now, but future uncertain by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've worked at a national institute in Europe and worked on software for reading out infrared cameras for space-observing satellites. Everywhere around me, both scientists and engineers, were replacing (or trying to replace) Matlab and other commercial software with Python. There were some Fortran holdouts, but these were also migrating to Python. Software engineers used C++ for the core, but these were little nuggets that shoved data from custom electronics to ethernet, and then Python would pick up the packets.

    For some specific stuff, especially electronics engineers were not replacing Matlab. For instance to model electromotors. Mechanical engineers likewise. I never knew what they were using, but open source was not used anywhere at our institute. But the rest: Python, NumPy and SciPy.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  10. Re: Matlab is doing fine for now, but future uncer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mathworks Mafia can burn in hell for all I care. Fuck that evilcorp!

  11. Skeptical by pedz · · Score: -1, Troll

    The short clip I saw about the "image" made me skeptical. They threw a bunch of shit together and came out with the image they were expecting... is that really science?

    1. Re:Skeptical by llamahunter · · Score: 2

      They did a lot of work to make sure they eliminated expectation bias from the image processing. And, I believe they had 4 teams working on different algorithms, not allowed to collaborate with one another, and all of whom came up with more or less the same result.

    2. Re:Skeptical by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      That speech seemed to present some frighteningly bad "science". To paraphrase: by building in filters to select from extremely noisy figures, we detect an image, much like sketch artists at a crime scene.

      But sketch artists are historically _awful_, with their results tainted by racial stereotype and whatever the first witness leads the other witnesses to conclude that they must have seen. The result has been many convictions of innocent people. This talk is actually quite alarming, the woman does not seem aware of the likely experimental bias of what she does.

    3. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the woman

      LOL, spotted the fucking incel piece of shit!

    4. Re:Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This talk is actually quite alarming, the woman does not seem aware of the likely experimental bias of what she does.

      Obviously you tuned out before she got to this, because she literally uses the word "biases" at 9:50. Just another Slashdot armchair scientist. You basically ignored the last 1/3 of the talk in order to confirm your personal biases.

  12. Tivoization by llamahunter · · Score: 0, Troll

    AFAIK, the v3 of GPL is partially in response to companies trying to do content distribution platforms using open source software. The content owners are very particular about having DRM, and the platforms on which that content is distributed have to provide some sort of secure boot chain that prevents unauthorized software from running on the *hardware*. Those companies comply with the open source GPL v2 license and publish their source code for others to use, but they do not allow modifications of that source code to run on their hardware. Not clear to me why a software license should extend to the hardware. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    1. Re:Tivoization by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It was because Tivo abused hardware locking to prevent any modification of the GPL based software they were providing. The freedom for users to modify software, "free as in speech", is one of the most critical aspects of "free software" licenses like the GPL. Tivo used GPLv2 software but locked its users hands by applying hardware based lockin, which was a direct violation of the spirit of the GPL.

    2. Re:Tivoization by llamahunter · · Score: 0

      Someone moderated this post as 'Trolling'??? C'mon. I am trying to educate people about what GPL v3 is about. :-(

    3. Re:Tivoization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect it's because of the last sentence. It implies that GPL v3 extends to hardware that ships with GPL v3 software. It doesn't. The issue with Tivo wasn't that people couldn't modify the hardware, it was that they effectively couldn't modify the software.

  13. GNUtard stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNU software is not free software. It was used because it was there, so it was convenient.

  14. Re:Matlab is doing fine for now, but future uncert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me about it. We've been trying to persuade some astronomers off of IDL / Intel Fortran for years to no success.

  15. Note the distinct line by evanh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    between engineers and scientists.

    Engineers are paid to deliver commercial products as quickly and cheaply as possible with little regard to actual knowledge ... until the company gets sued. There will be exceptions.

    Scientists are paid to solved questions with testable and repeatable solutions. There will be exceptions.

  16. Re:Matlab is doing fine for now, but future uncert by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    No Ada?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  17. you read it right – GNU GPL v3 by manu0601 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you read it right – GNU GPL v3

    Why is it remarkable? Is it because it is weird since the G of GPL already means GNU?

    1. Re:you read it right – GNU GPL v3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because of GPL v3 criticism:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#GPLv3_criticism

    2. Re:you read it right – GNU GPL v3 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why is it remarkable? Is it because it is weird since the G of GPL already means GNU?

      Yeah but the G in GNU means GNU so what we've really got here is the GNU Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix {caught buffer overflow exception} GNU Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix Not Unix {caught buffer overflow exception} Proprietary License. ... Version THREE!

    3. Re:you read it right – GNU GPL v3 by DdJ · · Score: 1

      I suspect the reason some people think this is remarkable is that a bunch of projects (like the Linux kernel) make a big deal out of staying on v2.

    4. Re:you read it right – GNU GPL v3 by DeVilla · · Score: 2

      Your buffer overflows appear to be part of an exploit to replace "Public" with "Proprietary". Better scratch and restore from backups.

  18. Figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPL3 is just like a blackhole - it sucks so hard it destroys everything it touches.

  19. i would be surprised by sad_ · · Score: 1

    i would be surprised if NO open source software would have been used.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  20. GPL means "General Public License" by jbn-o · · Score: 2

    Why is it remarkable? Is it because it is weird since the G of GPL already means GNU?

    While the initial "G" in GNU does mean GNU (GNU is a recursive acronym for "GNU's Not Unix"), the "G" of "GPL" stands for "General"—General Public License. The GNU GPLs are so widely used and discussed that one can get away with saying "GPL" to mean one or more versions of the GNU General Public License. 'General' here means not specifically written for a particular GNU program. When GNU started different GNU programs had their own license—GNU Emacs General Public License for GNU Emacs, for example. It's not hard to see how this approach doesn't scale up well. The GNU GPLs are the license for many GNU programs. Today GNU GPL v3 is the latest such license and the license itself and GNU's pages about that license make it clear that the proper full name of this license is "GNU General Public License".

  21. Re:Matlab is doing fine for now, but future uncert by Thelasko · · Score: 2

    Everywhere around me, both scientists and engineers, were replacing (or trying to replace) Matlab and other commercial software with Python.

    How ironic! That's what I'm doing today. It would really be nice if scipy.io.loadmat would import nested MATLAB structures structures without a bunch of hacks.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".