Slashdot Mirror


Ecuador Jails Swedish Programmer Over Alleged Ties To WikiLeaks (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the Guardian: A judge in Ecuador has jailed a Swedish software developer whom authorities believe is a key member of WikiLeaks and close to Julian Assange, while prosecutors investigate charging him with hacking as part of an alleged plot to "destabilise" the country's government. Ola Bini, 36, was ordered to held in preventive detention on Saturday pending possible cyber-attack charges and his bank accounts were frozen. Prosecutors were examining dozens of hard drives and other material he had in his possession, according to local media reports...

On Thursday, Ecuador's interior minister, Maria Paula Romo, said they had identified a "key member of WikiLeaks" who was "close to Mr Julian Assange". Secret visitors' logs seen by the Guardian show that Bini was one of Assange's many visitors in Ecuador's embassy in Knightsbridge, west London.... Speaking to local media on Thursday, Romo said Ecuador was at risk of cyber attack, hinting Wikileaks could retaliate for the termination of Assange's asylum. She added the government did not want the country "to turn into an international [cyber] piracy centre"...

Last week, the government of president Lenin Moreno, 66, accused WikiLeaks of being involved in a campaign implicating Moreno and his family in corruption. Moreno, who has long expressed his unhappiness over Assange's asylum status, complained that "photos of my bedroom, what I eat and how my wife and daughters and friends dance" had been circulating on social media.

45 comments

  1. Value for the dollar! by houstonbofh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Boy, when Ecuador is bought, they sure go all in! The dollar really does go a long way there... And $4.2 of them even longer!

    1. Re:Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next up: Ola Bini smells of Scandinavian fermented fish and tortures cute endangered animals in his basement.

    2. Re: Value for the dollar! by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      It's all one he'll of a coincidence.

    3. Re: Value for the dollar! by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 1

      Hell, godammit!

    4. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just cancelled my Ecuador vacation. Nobody wants to go to a country that's full of shit.

      Oh, and 9/11 was a controlled demolition. AE911Truth Org

    5. Re:Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bought out or did Assange just piss them off with his disrespectful behaviour while he was staying in their house?

    6. Re:Value for the dollar! by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "The dollar really does go a long way there"

      The US dollar is literally their legal tender.

    7. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ecuador doesn't care at all about assange. Probably pitied at one time. I doubt Ecuador ever wants to her his name again. They have their own problems now and Julian Assange has been permanently evicted from their list of difficulties.

    8. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump sent a few million to Quito and them boot him out. Not so hard right?

    9. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump? Don't you even pay attention to the politics you're commenting on? There probably was dirty money from the States involved. And it almost certainly came from Corporate Progressive Nazis.

    10. Re: Value for the dollar! by astrofurter · · Score: 2

      I'm really not convinced Ecuadorian President Moreno was bought. He seems like a pretty traditional upper class, anti-worker Latin American politician. No need to take bribes - he and is family and friends directly benefit from every public policy that kicks the poor or gives a government handout to the super rich. Standard issue banana republic capitalist dog.

    11. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No need to take bribes

      People who take bribes seldom do.

      The whole "it's harder to bribe rich" people is a myth.
      It has nothing to do with your financial situation and only to do with your morals.

      At most rich people will be more expensive to bribe, but when it comes to politics the value you get from bribing someone tends to become astronomical pretty quickly.
      Say that you want to start a mining operation in a natural preservation area. You can possible make billions from it, so a $100 million bribe isn't really something you can't afford and you can buy the President of the United States for a tenth of that.

      One can even argue that honest people won't get really rich, so it will be easier to bribe rich people.

    12. Re:Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ola Bini also does not clean up his cat's litter box and he too smears feces on his walls! off to Gitmo you go Ola. time for your daily rectal rehydration

    13. Re: Value for the dollar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreno wasn't bought by the US. he was already bought by his own corruption.

      Moreno's brother was discovered as the owner of 2 offshore fake shell corporations in the Panama Papers.

      https://periodismodeinvestigacion.com/2019/02/19/el-laberinto-offshore-del-circulo-presidencial/

      https://cuencahighlife.com/offshore-companies-owned-by-morenos-brother-spark-calls-for-investigation/

      https://defend.wikileaks.org/2019/04/03/ecuador-twists-embarrassing-ina-papers-into-pretext-to-oust-assange/

      yet somehow it is Wikileak's and Assange's fault that Moreno got caught colluding with his brother to commit financial crimes. but Assange had nothing to do with the Panama Papers--that was hacked by "John Doe", remember? and John Doe even uploaded the Panama Papers to Wikileaks for publication, but Wikileaks never replied to him nor did anything with it. (it's possible that Assange was being forced off-line at the time and so was not able to respond or publish.)

      considering that pretty much the entire ruling class of so-called Neoliberal nations have been outed in the Panama Papers (although conspicuously, nobody has gone to jail, gee, wonder why?), and their elected leaders names have been found in the Panama Papers as the secret owners of fake offshore shell corporations. Tereasa May's husband, Macron, the list of names in the Panama Papers is long. the stench of the "do as i say, not as i do" corruption wafts over the entire Western globe like the wind blowing over corpses piled in a mass grave dug in the ground. our leaders are all corrupt and robbing the people, and committing money laundering and tax fraud and bribery.

  2. Probable being tortured right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tortured to give up dirt on Orange Man.

    1. Re:Probable being tortured right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Once Assange admits that the DNC leaks came from Seth Rich it's game over for the Dems. Only the most goofey NPC could keep supporting them after that...

    2. Re: Probable being tortured right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean they won't have the popular vote in 7 of the next 8 general elections?

    3. Re: Probable being tortured right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you better hope all the torturers are good little corporate progressive nazis. Not the apolitical mercenary blackguards one expects to find working as torturers. 'Cuz we ALL know Assange has WAY more dirt on the Crooked Democrat party.

    4. Re: Probable being tortured right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! You people are so delusional.

  3. Teh hacker guilty is... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ...Moreno himself. Isn't it obvious?

  4. "Secret visitors' logs seen by the Guardian" by bug1 · · Score: 1

    And how did they obtain these secret visitor logs ?

    They must be teh haxors !!! (surely not a leak)

    The guardian used to be a reputable media outlet, now they collaborate with sources hostile to society to disseminate propaganda.

    1. Re: "Secret visitors' logs seen by the Guardian" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lick those capitalist boots!

    2. Re:"Secret visitors' logs seen by the Guardian" by evanh · · Score: 1

      The phrase will mean the logs are secret for the visitation only, as in a hidden camera scenario. Revealed after the recording is made.

      Ecuador will be spilling everything it has and spinning a yarn to go with it.

  5. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Purge all the spies.

  6. Not 'whom', just 'who' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or something like '..., whom authorities believe to be...'.

  7. Not a coincidence by XXongo · · Score: 1

    Not a coincidence, I think. One reason that Ecuador revoked Assange's asylum was that he was accused of leaking hacked information about Ecuadorian politicians.

  8. Deadman's switch? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 2

    A commentor on a different blog (that I can't find ATM) stated that he knew from inside knowledge that Julian has a "dead-man's switch" to be triggered if he's ever arrested, with damaging information on Ecuador.

    He also stated that the recent arrest definitely triggered the switch, and we should expect some interesting wikileaks drops in the next week or so.

    (Wikileaks takes care to verify it's information, which usually takes a couple of days. For example, it verifies the encryption signatures of E-mails. Also, it scans and removes information that might get someone killed(*)).

    Ecuador is in a panic right now, expecting to be fatally hacked. This might be, and the character assassination might be, damage control right before getting pwned.

    Take this with a grain of salt, but it's not unreasonable to wait a week and see if Julian cleaned up and with a shave talks reasonable at a press conference, or if Ecuador is exposed for doing some nasty shit.

    (*) Note that the "people were killed" thing from the "collateral murder" drop was done by accident by a Guardian reporter, not Wiklileaks. Also, it was just John McCain spouting off crap about something he didn't like.

    1. Re:Deadman's switch? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      [Wikileaks] scans and removes information that might get someone killed

      since when?! they dumped all quarter million pages of the Iraq stuff completely unredacted.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:Deadman's switch? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that Assange selectively releases information depending on what is personally beneficial and who he is and is not allied with?

    3. Re:Deadman's switch? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      it's not unreasonable to wait a week and see if Julian cleaned up and with a shave talks reasonable at a press conference

      That seems unlikely. He's not going to be treated well.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re: Deadman's switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd feel for him more, if they bothered to.

    5. Re: Deadman's switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since forever and even after they were deprived of donations by the US illegal pressure on international payment providers and cooperation with the "free journalism". You can only do so much with a few good employees.

      Be that as it may, I still have to see a verifiable story of someone killed because of a wiki leak.

    6. Re:Deadman's switch? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 0

      He Picked On Our Hillary!

      It Was Her Turn!

    7. Re:Deadman's switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take this with a grain of salt, but it's not unreasonable to wait a week and see if Julian cleaned up and with a shave talks reasonable at a press conference, or if Ecuador is exposed for doing some nasty shit.

      Can't be any nastier than the shit Julian left them with. Nobody likes to have to deal with that. It lowers your opinion of the human race in general.

    8. Re: Deadman's switch? by Vintermann · · Score: 2

      No, Guardian's David Leigh did, by foolishly releasing the password to an archive that had been entrusted to him precisely to do "responsible" redactions.

      WikiLeaks then decided that since all the spy agencies, big boys etc. anyone with a budget basically, now had access to it, the rest of us should as well.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  9. And he's also a retroactive rapist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Next up, women who formerly fucked Ola Bini now regret their decision and claim he retroactively raped them. Also, underage girls claim he raped them too. And the gov will find child porn on every hard drive they inspect... and there's no evidence someone like NSA planted it there.

    Or some such crap. Anything to dehumanize a target of political suppression. The political stage is just a Clown World at this point. We should all just hold a vote of no confidence in all governments, fire everyone and hire a new batch of mossad compromised pedophiles. Can't really be worse than the current crop.

  10. Staying at the source of it then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, can't stay at the evil puppet state of the evil US regime ... let's stay at the origin: The evil US regime!

    The reality distortion field (propaganda) is much stronger at the source!

  11. Not in panic. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    I can't say I am in any sort of panic right now. And what do you mean "fatally hacked"? You can only fatally hack an android or at least someone with a pacemaker...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  12. Link for you by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    Here's a link for you.

  13. Incoming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The phenomenon of Nordic political terrorism and related charges is born. Turn back the clocks, we are going all Viking here!!!

  14. Guilty for associating with journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's clear that the country most hostile to exposing journalism and press freedom is good old America itself who always tauts its "freedom and democracy". And now the corrupt psychopaths and war criminals are going after anyone they can to send the message: don't talk about our war crimes, or we put you in prison for life.

    What a dishonest piece of shit country America has turned into.

    1. Re: Guilty for associating with journalists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turned into? You jest, they've been this way.

  15. Perhaps you should read what Assange did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems Assange thought it was smart to interfere in Ecuadors election, even after being warned not to interfere in foreign elections! That was the final straw for them.

    "Ecuador’s government believes WikiLeaks spread leaked documents, known as the INA Papers, which allege Moreno and his family had corruptly benefited from offshore companies when he was a United Nations special envoy on disability in Europe. Moreno denies any wrongdoing."

    You might want to see what he was up to in the US elections, including passing hacked passwords to Trump Jr to be redistributed and offering Wikileaks as a propaganda outlet to receive selective papers presented as 'leaks'.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-secret-correspondence-between-donald-trump-jr-and-wikileaks/545738/

    “Hey Don. We have an unusual idea,” WikiLeaks wrote on October 21, 2016. “Leak us one or more of your father’s tax returns.” WikiLeaks then laid out three reasons why this would benefit both the Trumps and WikiLeaks. One, The New York Times had already published a fragment of Trump’s tax returns on October 1; two, the rest could come out any time “through the most biased source (e.g. NYT/MSNBC).”

    It is the third reason, though, WikiLeaks wrote, that “is the real kicker.” “If we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality,” WikiLeaks explained. “That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing on Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won’t be perceived as coming from a ‘pro-Trump’ ‘pro-Russia’ source.”

    "WikiLeaks didn’t write again until Election Day, November 8, 2016. “Hi Don if your father ‘loses’ we think it is much more interesting if he DOES NOT conceed [sic] and spends time CHALLENGING the media and other types of rigging that occurred—as he has implied that he might do,”

    And then there was the requested pay back,
    “Hi Don. Hope you’re doing well!” WikiLeaks wrote on December 16 to Trump Jr., who was by then the son of the president-elect. “In relation to Mr. Assange: Obama/Clinton placed pressure on Sweden, UK and Australia (his home country) to illicitly go after Mr. Assange. It would be real easy and helpful for your dad to suggest that Australia appoint Assange ambassador to [Washington,] DC.”

    And there's the Russian connection again:

    "Bini paid a three-hour visit to Assange, leaving around 9pm in June 2016, just a week after the whistleblower received visits from RT’s London bureau chief, Nikolay Bogachikhin, who is Russian, and one of its presenters, Afshin Rattansi, a British citizen."

    Yeh, I forgot his paid RT propaganda programs.

    Geez, he was the Trump/Russian intelligence conduit, and expected to get the Australian Diplomats jobs as reward, so he could go free. I'm guessing a Trump pardon will head his way.

  16. False flag? by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    Cui bono.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.