10+ Gig Removables?
swegerm writes "Well, if you think you're impressed
with the nano magnetics at Cornell - which is years off -
then you'll be even more impressed with the technology that
is here now called "Near Field Recording". The company
TeraStor has developed storage technology that starts at
10 Gig removable on a 5.25 single sided platter for
$700-800 dollars. This will be similar to a CD or Zip
drive. The starting areal density is 10 Giga bits/sq. inch
and approach by the year 2001, 100 Giga bits/sq. inch. The
theoretical maximum is 100,000 Giga bits/sq. inch. It is
based on a combination of optics and magnetic media with
the key solution being in the read/write head. It's
supposed to even exceed GMR technology from IBM. "
How about a $250 drive that stores 650 megs on a single removable 5.25" disk. Total cost of 10 gigs: about $30. Patents pending.
Each cartridge costs about $300 each new, but are available for much less from eBay (I recently got two of them for $150 each, including shipping and handling fee).
Best of all, no new driver support is needed--simply unmount the disk, power it off with hdparm(8), remove it, and take it with me.
It ways a 1/2 kilo, not much more than a Jaz disk, and holes twice as much. It uses the standard IDE interface, although SCSI models are also available.
No special controller cards are needed: it appears a standard ATAPI DISK or SCSI FIXED device to your IDE or SCSI controller.
I am, of course, talking about 10GB fixed disk, as I've been using since my first date with my PCjx's 10MB sidecar.
Cheers,
Joshua.
--jon. Postel is dead. May we all mourn his, and our, loss.
Arggh. s/ways/weighs/g\ns/holes/holds/g.
--jon. Postel is dead. May we all mourn his, and our, loss.
Reading through the article, it sounds like their Evanescent Coupling technique is a direct application of quantum tunneling, though the term and effect is more often discussed with electrons and discontinuous barriers, ie electrons tunneling through a barrier. Perhaps I don't have this right, any physics majors willing to correct me?
It would seem even without the increase in areal density observed, the techniques involved with flying heads and SIL/Evanescent Coupling would revolutionize removeable media, allowing the speed lower latency of current Winchester media and the durability and reliability of MO media.
I'm not sure myself why crescent shaped domains would aide and increase the areal density; is there some sort of implied overlap between data regions? Is it just a function of tighter packing? Or just smaller domains because of SIL and tighter laser focus/embedded magnetic coils in the flying head?
Why wouldn't this be applicable to current magnetic hard drives then? Because magnetic forces cannot be shaped or focused in a way that optical beams can?
AS
-AS
*Pikachu*
Magneto-resistive drives are highly suseptible to outside magnetic influence, so the use of optical writing methods help protect the data.
Current magneto-optical devices are slow because of the head technology, and have relatively low density because of the size of the spot and magnetic domains.
Combining the two allows for the stability of optical data and the density of magnetic storage methods...
Unless you're being sarcastic, you're tape drive won't be of much use for large amounts of data needed to be accessed quickly...
AS
-AS
*Pikachu*