Creative Labs and Linux
redemption wrote
in to tell us that Creative Labs has a
Soundblaster Developers page
for Linux. Not much yet, but it looks like the start of
support. Perhaps just as interesting is that redemption wrote
in to tell us that 4Front
has announced an Alpha (and very incomplete) driver for the SBlive.
This is not fully right. All DVDs i have are readably by ISO9660 complient standard drivers. Additional there is a UDF driver available for linux. Both drivers have the problem that they can not readout the data of some of the DVDs. I'm afraid that the problem in this DVDs is the Content Scrambling System (CSS). But as there are software only DVD players for Windows this can not be a real problem.
Why does there seem to be more support for the OSS package than for writing pure open-source kernel drivers for linux? If we're putting together a nice Linux box without paying for the OS, the Windowing system or any of the millions of programs we use, it starts to seem a little unfair when we need to pay for something as simple as a sound driver, when Creative Labs could just release the specs of their boards.
:)
I know that there are some chipset manufacturers that refuse to let companies like Creative release the chip specs, but does is this really a good business practice? I can't see a manufacturer holding an advantage over another by holding on to the specs. It might stop the practice of cloning, but Creative Labs wasn't hurt by this during the early 90's.
Never trust a program you don't have the source to!
æeee!