Slashdot Mirror


Intel's StrongArm Roadmap

Midvale writes "PC Week article about the plans Intel has for the next set of StrongArm chips, .18 micron process, up to 600mHz. These things would be great CPU's for wearable computers." Its nice to see that this isn't gonna die out.

55 comments

  1. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course one is powerful enough, for god sakes thats what the EMPEG uses.. .. decoding mp3's takes _very_ little cpu usage if you have a good OS such as linux.

  2. Where can you even get them in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some friends and i have been looking at building
    mp3 car units for some time now, strongarm setups
    would be perfect, BUT we've had _no_ luck finding
    resellers in the US.

  3. no need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check
    www.empeg.com

  4. Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And to think, the 1st handheld to use the ARM, the Newton, is no more.

    Perhaps the GNU/Linux project at:
    http://www.calcaria.net/
    will actually become more than a proof of concept.

  5. Re:Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I have to say is, show me a real palmtop that boots Linux and I'll write a UI for it. Seriously.

  6. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a pretty interesting idea, but that'll take some power.

    But if MP3's are the future of music (or some other digital format), the standard shouldn't be 44khz, 16bit, stereo, 128 kbps. I think they'll come up with at better format for quality digital music encoding, but for now I think the standard for true digital music recoring for mp3 should be greater, for example: raise the bitrate to 256kbps (see the bladeenc page to find out why, sorry, I forgot the address).

  7. Re:Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3Com Palm.

    *duck*

  8. Plampilot not a real palmtop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All I have to say is, show me a real palmtop that boots Linux and I'll write a UI for it. Seriously.

    The Palm Pilot isn't a real palmtop?

    --
    Erik Corry without his cookies

    1. Re:Plampilot not a real palmtop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you need special hardware to run ucLinux on your palm pilot. If they want to provide that hardware to me for free, that's a different matter, but I'm a starving student--

  9. Re:StrongARM is an interesting little chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said: '...Acorn Computers (the "A" in ARM)...'

    Eh? What _are_ you smoking? From http://www.arm.com/FAQ/index.html : "We are ARM Ltd., previously named 'Advanced RISC Machines'..."

  10. Re:Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How about the Psion Series 5?

    Try here.

  11. Even the ARM 7100 can do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hugo Fiennes has built a car mp3 player using the ARM7100, which is a fraction of the power of a StrongARM. He runs it on Linux, which he ported (to the same processor as the Psion5!). Read more details at http://mp3.com/news/042.html

    The StrongARM is easily powerful enough for this application, despite not having FP. You need to optimise the popular source for integer arithmetic if you want to hammer the CPU for doing other things.

  12. Intel says big whoop was Chk out the ARM10 as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big whoop.
    If its a wonderful technology, Intel will licence it.

  13. Re:Wow - pretty sure they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an earlier version of the ARM chip used to be able to parallel process, so i'm pretty sure these will be able to. You used to be able to do it with Acorn Risc PC's a couple of years ago....

  14. It was *not* ARM ltd. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was Acorn ltd.

    They were searching for a new CPU for their next homecomputers and all what they found was too lame for them (eg. 68000, x86). So they built the "Acorn Risc Machine", the prototype ARM1 was finished around 1985 (IIRC). I still have one of those "Acorn Risc Machines", an 8 MHz ARM2 wich "powers" my old Acorn A3000 :-).

    IMHO that's the reason of ARM's success: Since Acorn always was a very small company, they had to make the ARM simple. That's why ARM cores are so tiny and not so dammned bloated like Intel ones.

    Acorn founded later (early 1990s) together with Apple and VLSI "Advanced Risc Machines", wich is ARM ltd. now.

    Oh, BTW: Acorn was the company that sold the first
    RISC personal computers - the now legendary Archimedes (1987) - and not Apple!

    (This article is Y2K-ready! :-)

    1. Re:It was *not* ARM ltd. by Andy+Cole · · Score: 1

      FYI - I knew that.

      This message is written under an Acorn Risc PC with a StrongARM processor inside it. I've got an A5000, with an ARM3, in the next room.

      When I said 'ARM Ltd designed the whole ARM thing' I meant the people who transferred from Acorn to ARM thus becoming the ARM people.

  15. and NetBSD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it runs NetBSD! - the coolest OS on this planet!

  16. no SMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the StrongARM is based on the ARM4 core, and explicitly has the connections for SMP cut. (I don't know if the ARM4 core was ever really good for SMP anyway.)

    I remember some group working on a kludged shared-memory map for StrongARM, but they killed it after a while, b/c it was a kludge, and it showed.

    The ARM10 core is supposed to kick-all-ass in SMP, but unfortuneately no one has announced plans to put it in silicon.

  17. errn *meep* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARM Ltd. designs the cores of ARM cpus. A core is not a completed CPU, and thus ARM licenses core designs to, well, a whole hell of a lot of different vendors. Like Digital. (Btw, the reason the StrongARM was so cool was that Digital achieved cpu performance 4-10 times that of other ARM licensees. Just a footnote.)

    Yes, the ARM10 core rocks the free world.

    No, the ARM10 core will not be in your hands this year. ARM has announced it, it's probably done by now, but no vendor has announced it in silicon yet. REPEAT. No vendor has announced ARM10 cpus yet.

  18. Re:Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, but the people at Calcaria call their project "Linux 7k".

    No "GNU" in sight.

    Who are you to rename it?

    Fricking GNU Nazis.





  19. Low power? How about a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    This would make a nice basis for a Linux laptop.

    I'm thinking of something with as nice a keyboard as possible and as low power consumption as possible. A built in modem and ethernet, no floppy or CD, net boot eprom for OS installs and a battery that lasts for ever.

    The screen options could include 640x480 black and white which should be fine for vi/mutt/tin/lynx or emacs and save a lot of batteries (and RAM, which saves batteries) or 1024x768 for the X addicts. I don't think the intermediate resolutions are interesting to Linux users. A tuned kernel that does delayed atime updates and doesn't swap unless it has to to keep the hard disk spun down would complete the picture.

    Has anyone tried putting their .newsrc and mail folders under CVS to keep them synchronised between a laptop and a stationary?

    Erik Corry without his cookies

    1. Re:Low power? How about a laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's been done -- check out the HP Jornada 820 (sorry, I don't have a url for ya). It has almost exactly the specs you describe, 10-15 hour battery life, and a 190MHz StrongARM.

      Now if only someone would port Linux to it, so that I wouldn't have to use WINCE, it would be an awesome little machine. It seems to me that if we can get Linux running on the little Psion5, the Jornada should be no trouble.

      And yeah, the StrongARM (like all ARMs) is a thing o' beauty.

    2. Re:Low power? How about a laptop? by vanye · · Score: 1


      Does anyone know if there is a project to do that ?

      With (the just invented) eGTK (embedded GTK) (well really eGDK but eGTK sounds better). We could have a small machine that could run the same apps as the desktop (same GTK API) and we wouldn't need an X server (at least initially).

    3. Re:Low power? How about a laptop? by SalsaDoom · · Score: 0

      I hate touchscreens!!!

      Except though, I have to admit for some reason that having a touch screen and using the LCARS Enlightenment theme is strangely attractive...

      huh.

      --
      "Computers will never truly be free until the last windows user is strangled with the entrails of the last mac user."
    4. Re:Low power? How about a laptop? by Dave+Manning · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the Apple eMate, which came out two years ago. Of course, getting the touch screen to work under Linux might be a bit hard.

    5. Re:Low power? How about a laptop? by beppu · · Score: 0
      Has anyone tried putting their .newsrc and mail folders under CVS to keep them synchronised between a laptop and a stationary?

      That's a good idea. Hmmmm...

  20. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So far as powerful enough is concerned, expect
    the new SA's to actually have FP units (or at
    least some of them).

    Quoting from www.arm.com
    "The ARM10T processor is designed to deliver 400
    Dhrystone 2.1 MIPS at 300 MHz, and features an
    optional Vector Floating-Point unit capable of
    delivering 600 MFLOPS."

    As for SMP, that would still be useful, but consider dedicating one SA to the decoding (which
    it should be able to do) and another to the rest
    of the system (have them running async with respect to one another)

  21. ARM SMP by Yarn · · Score: 1

    IIRC they have no SMP ability, could still do a beowulf style thing tho.

    They are nice chips in general.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    1. Re:ARM SMP by tak* · · Score: 1

      SMP may not be possible but perhaps the can put many small boards in one case and have them run in parallel. There could be a mainboard with some PCI slots and all the ports, and slots where you can plug in these semi-computerboards with the processor, cache, memory sub-system and slots...
      Could work...I wonder if 64bit 66MHz PCI would have enough through-put...hmm
      It's far easier to forgive your enemy after you get even with him.

      --
      It's far easier to forgive your enemy after you get even with him.
    2. Re:ARM SMP by Dusty · · Score: 1

      Your description sounds remarkably like this
      8 processer StrongARM PCI card described here:-

      http://www.dnaco.net/~kragen/sa-beowulf/

      Personally I think they'd make a great addition
      to my RC5 key speed.

  22. Re:A nice warm feeling... by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Given ARM's repuation for low power chips... The cooling fan in the Netwinder is there for the sake of the HD, and if I am not mistaken, the support chipset puts out more heat than the chip itself -- and thats at 275Mhz

    --
    John_Chalisque
  23. Re:Forget GNU/Linux...its too bad the 1st handheld by Misagon · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to do that? The only reason why Linux should be ported to a handheld is that Linux should get more prestige, as the operating system that runs on more hardware platforms than any other.
    Linux (and other unices) are built for computers with disk drives and a keyboard. Most handhelds don't have neither or the hardware support is poor.
    Another problem is the lack of virtual memory. If there is none, the usual way of letting applications have control of a large memory area of their own is not efficient.
    If anyone is working on an open source operating system for handhelds (that isn't cLinux), mail me. I am interested.

    --
    "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  24. They seem to have forgotten Linux by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

    They seem to have forgotten Linux on the list of OSes that support the StrongARM processor (Corel Netwinder). It's nice to see that there will most likely be a new generation of faster netwinder machines.

    I have heard that these machines have amazing SMP capabilities. Anyone know anything about this?

    1. Re:They seem to have forgotten Linux by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

      Uhm.. I meant these PROCESSORS, not machines :)

  25. StrongARM is an interesting little chip by aheitner · · Score: 2

    It's got some unusual properties -- relatively high tolerance for hard radiation for one. I read the following use in an AMSAT journal a few months back.

    It turns out AMSAT (the lunatics who build themselves satellites out of parts they find at KMART :) has been using the same ancient 8bit microcontroller on their satellites for some time now, as most ucontrollers are not suitable to the radiation levels in space. But these days .5 MIPS just doesn't cut it, so they went around looking for a better chip -- and found StrongARM. Their next satellite will have a 133MHz ARM, plenty of CPU power to go around.

    I wonder if they'll run Linux :)

    1. Re:StrongARM is an interesting little chip by SpinyNorman · · Score: 3

      The ARM is one of the few true RISC designs around, with all 32 bit instructions, and all instructions conditional. This is the reason for the tiny die size and low poer requirements. I used to work for Acorn Computers (the "A" in ARM) in the early 80's, and knew the main designer of the ARM - Steve Furber. As of a couple of years ago he was working at the University of Manchester (UK), where he had fabricated a fully asynchronous ARM CPU that he had been working on for years. This is basically a dataflow design, and (potentially) saves huge amounts of power by removing the need to clock the whole chip. The ARM was partly inspired by the 6502 which was what the early Acorn computers were based on, and was minimal enough to practically be a RISC design itself. Ah, the good old days...

  26. Re:600 mHz? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I used to tease my brother when he'd say "millihertz" (meaning megahertz, of course). Now, I'm going to his college graduation this weekend. Hopefully he learned something. ;-)

    --Joe

    --
  27. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Graymalkin · · Score: 1

    I would hate to drive near any of you guys. Mixing MP3s in your car? How about a simple Mp3 player that fist in the space my stereo fits now. Grab the dinky little chip out of the Rio and plug it in. I'd just like to be able to take my MP3s on the road with me, before you stick a Beowulf cluster in my trunk, make me a removeable storage media that costs about as much as a blank CD, is rewriteable, and is about the size of a CompactFlash card. The problem with portable MP3 players isnt the processor, it's the storage, 100+ dollars for a 48Mb CompactFlash card. I'll build the in-dash MP3 player if you get me a cheap removeable media.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  28. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by variable · · Score: 1

    Well, I have a Netwinder (~280 MHz) and it can
    play back MP3s using about 10% CPU under Linux.

    --
    ........ "The faster I go, the behinder I get" - Lewis Carroll
  29. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by variable · · Score: 1

    Ummmm, the OS plays but a small part in how much CPU overhead is involved in decoding MP3s. It is far more important to have an efficient program than an efficient OS. There will be a point where the OS vs App graphs cross but I doubt that they have yet.

    --
    ........ "The faster I go, the behinder I get" - Lewis Carroll
  30. Re:errn *meep* (look here my friend) by johnjones · · Score: 1

    Ok yes digtital did some work with ARM and their CPU but acording to the guys who live upstairs where I worked

    (ARM)

    they took most of the desighn and then improved it so they could make more money and left digital to their own devices, Digital wail on about itsy but have a look at what

    EPOC has done and will do very clever little OS


    their are people wandering around with the suits I surpose I dont work their anymore always the way tho

    there was mutter about controlers for HD anyone ?

    have fun

  31. Check out the ARM10 as well by Andy+Cole · · Score: 1

    ARM Ltd (the firm who originally thought of the whole ARM idea and co-developed the StrongARM with DEC) are planning to release the ARM10 core sometime this year. Complete with a FPU. Check out


    http://www.arm.com/Pro+Peripherals/Cores/ARM10/

    for more details. IMHO it looks better than the planned StrongARMs.

  32. A nice warm feeling... by zunger · · Score: 1

    Given Intel's infamous chip-temperature record, I'm not sure I'd want a 600MHz chip in anything that's going to be on my lap...

  33. Re:Forgot BeOS too by PinheadX · · Score: 1

    I read something a week or two ago that said there would be a version of BeOS running on StrongARM procs. Cool stuff!

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I run BeOS. The rules don't apply.

    --

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    I run BeOS. The rules don't apply.
  34. 600 mHz? by Lucifer · · Score: 1

    I guess it finishes 0.6 clock cycles per second!

    ;)

  35. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by listen · · Score: 0

    Wow! Synchronicity.

    I have already been researching this area. I have currently got a 1024 node Z80 beowulf cluster walking on stilts behind my car, and its present performance is satisfactory for Bangles tunes such as "Eternal Flame".

    The motion control program is written in an experimental Perl interpreter ( I call it Pyyrrrl) running in Jpython, which runs in a partially functional JVM I found somewhere.

    I would appreciate it if people could test out the clusters scaling by going to http://monkey.conspiracy.nu/

  36. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by listen · · Score: 1

    The way I have mine configured is to encode direct from a ZX Spectrum tapedrive , and decode on the fly. This is done to ensure the maximum hiss.

    Boldy noise reduction circuitry is then utilised to remove this hiss, and provide an 11.1 channel multi aural ( and oral) surround experience.
    The subwoofer is currently made of ivory, so this has some issues and may be replaced with other hard tissue. The good thing is that it can be driven by anyone with an HGV licence!

    This may go into production sometime in the future. Watch for more news!

  37. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by listen · · Score: 1

    I thank you muchly.

    These giraffe necks will mesh far more pleasantly than the substances I am currently using, and the occasional whiplash should create a good original beat in the rythym.

    I propose that you be given the Nobel prize for music immediately.

  38. Wow - can they parrallel process??? by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

    I am thinking of creating an MP3 player for my car, based round a handheld.

    I am currently working on a parrallel MP3 coder/decoder, and have had some success on my small 4 node Beowulf Cluster.

    I dont think that a single StrongARM would be powerful enough, so does anyone know if they will support parrallel processes, and if they will work in parrallel - I have not had the time to do more research on this chip.

    Thanks

    1. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      I said ENCODER/decoder

      I am sick of having convert to wav, or other sample type, then encode

      I want my player/recorder to record on the fly

      By connecting it to my cars CD player, I want to be able to play a CD and encode it at the same time - so that I can then put the CD back on the shelf next to my vinyl album collections and act as an efficient dust collector.

      MP3 is THE future of music, the CD's are the archive backups.

    2. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Point_Blank · · Score: 1

      One CPU is never enough. What you want, is 6 way tandem CPU action!!

      You want to be able to mix 6 MP3s simulataneously, just by using the indicators, and be able to switch musical genres to hardcore rave by pressing the accelerator, and a bit of Mozart when you hit the break.

      Also, I think that you should link the headlights to the VU meter and make them flash in assorted colours in time with the music.

      My monkeys are working on this now, typewriters in hand.

    3. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Point_Blank · · Score: 1

      This sounds good. Lesbian Beowulf CPU action!

    4. Re:Wow - can they parrallel process??? by Point_Blank · · Score: 1

      I have visited your site
      http://monkey.conspiracy.nu

      There seems to be a problem with the stilts that you are using. I would like to donate my collection of old giraffe necks for use as new stilts. They would be far more efficient in a multi-clustered environment.

  39. Origin of the name ARM by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

    ARM originally stood for Acorn Risc Machine - it was designed by Acorn. The acronym was changed to mean Advanced Risc Machines when it was spun off as a separate company with Apple and VLSI technology.

  40. Once intel is done I wonder... by darkglobe · · Score: 1

    ..if it too will heat my basement, fry eggs, keep my coffee hot, and make the lights dim every time I start up a process (netscape comes to mind) :-P