Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Cygnus going public in the next six months?

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the stuff-to-read dept.

Lazzaro writes "Red Herring has an interview with the VC Firm that's funding Cygnus, the last paragraph quotes the VC as listing Cygnus along with a few other companies in their portfolio, and saying "most of these companies will go public in the next six months"." There definitely will be a wave of open source IPOs in the next year. The questions are who? (Red Hat and Cygnus are prime candidates despite the fact that neither is saying anything) and others like VA who are up front that going public is their future. And the other question is when.

2 of 19 comments (clear)

  1. IPOs and such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3
    First flash of the obvious, even companies that aren't public are driven by the desire to make a profit. Can't pay folks very well if there's not positive cash flow.


    On the topic of Red Hat, Cygnus and VA.

    Red Hat claims not to be interested in an IPO. However the evidence indicates otherwise.

    • They re-incorporated in Delaware a year or so ago, a standard move on the road to IPO for many, many companies.
    • There is VC money involved. VC's don't invest unless there's a chance of return in the relative near-future, almost always IPO.
    • After the VC's came to the table a new President was hired. He is known for taking software startups public.
    • They have begun seating a board of directors. Not a move exclusive to public companies, but another sign pointing down the same road.

    As far as Cygnus, I have no information at all.


    On the matter of VA;

    • They've placed a board
    • They've got funding
    • They're growing like crazy (they just gobbled up LHS)
    • Their website says they're an IPO track company.

    As they say, "The rest is left as an excercise for the reader."
  2. Re:When companies go public... by tm23 · · Score: 5

    The point of the GPL is freedom. Freedom from onerous copyright/intellectual property restrictions. The freedom to hack the program for your (and then other people's) benefit. Nothing in the GPL says you can't make money off of a GPL'd product (there are bits about distribution). Who says Cygnus isn't interested in making money now? People pay them money to hack egcs. Those hacks get incorporated into egcs. Cygnus employees get to put more cars in their garages. The company that contracted them now has a compiler for their architecture. Everyone is happy.

    And if Cygnus has VC backing, they already have someone telling them what they should do (or not, depending on the VC firm). Also, it's always good to have an employee stock option incentive plan to retain and reward employees--and stock option plans don't work unless the company goes/is public.

    People like you seem to have a distorted view of capitalism and seem to think that just because a company wants to use Wall Street to raise money, they've all but sold their soul and that somehow before this they were giving away product for free, and that employees eschewed salaries in favor of prancing around in a cyber-commune, as opposed to cashing paychecks so they can buy copyleft t-shirts and the latest gear for their home computer.

    The bottom line is, you're wrong. Making money and the GPL can coexist. And for linux to take over the world, they have to, because starving and hacking for nothing only gets you so far.