Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Sells Chip Unit for $1.6 Billion

Rude Turnip writes "Motorola is selling its semiconductor components unit to privately-held Texas Pacific Group. Motorola hopes to concentrate on the high-end semiconductor business that provides embedded chips, while keeping some interest in the components business. "

34 comments

  1. Re:Recently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, you are mistaken.

  2. Here is the other copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the second copy of the story is gone, but for all the doubting Thomases out there, here is the link to it. http://slashdot.org/articles/99 /05/12/1444200.shtml

  3. Re:Probably a good move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh, how about they make a cell phone that wont slowly give you a tumor. Then I might accually get one.

  4. Re:Probably a good move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >First of all, ENOUGH WITH THE "DEJA VU" COMMENTS!
    >So far this discussion is content-free.

    It's fat free too, basically this is Slashdot lite, less calories, more filling, in general better for you...

  5. Something Fishy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Motorola shareholders are getting a fair deal. EE Times had a more thorough article (http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG19990511S0032). The board ignored a higher bid that came in later, with somewhat circular excuses that the other bid "came very, very late in the process", and that the group had a "somewhat speculative ability to complete the transaction" (probably due to being forced to put it all together at the last minute).

    Personally, I think they're gutting Motorola and this is the beginning of the end.

    1. Re:Something Fishy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this has been coming for about a year,
      and fits in with Motorola's aim to move
      towards being a system solution house and
      getting away from being a foundary and
      components company.

      The same way they are moving away from owning
      fabs and are subcontracting foundary space.

      Compenent manufacture doesn't fit in with
      this model.

      The TPC bid was made about 9 months ago, as
      opposed to the other one that appeared a few
      weeks ago

  6. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and cigarettes don't cause cancer...

  7. Texas Pacific Group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't TPG, or at least David Bonderman involved in the Continental turnaround? I think they (or at least Bonderman) has part of Beringer Wineries and Washington Mutual. Good News is they have a reputation for turning companies around and making them extremely profitable unlike some other venture companies that have reputations for being liquidators.

  8. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no scientific evidence that cigarettes cause cancer. All "evidence" is either empirical or hearsay. Correlation does not imply causality.

  9. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refer to the post below this... it is not prooven that cigarettes cause cancer.

    Of course there is an abundance of evidence showing a correlation between the 2 (cancer and cigarettes), but nothing can be prooven.

    For all we know, maybe people who will get cancer are predispositioned to smoke... the argument goes both ways.

  10. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nicotine isn't a carcinogen. It's merely the
    addictive agent. The potential carcinogens
    are tar and various other products of combustion.
    As for whether cigarette smoking causes cancer,
    you can't prove that definitively. There is
    however a very marked increased incidence of
    lung cancer in smokers compared to non-smokers which can't be accounted for.
    There is also an increased risk of coronary
    heart disease.

  11. Re:Motorola changes: are the 8-bit CPUs surviving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AFAIK, Motorola is retaining a 10% stake in
    the former SCG and will continue to have
    special deals/ relationships to ensure that
    Mot gets the best possible support from
    the new company, when it is spun off to
    its own identity in a few months time.

    It being a $1.5billion business in its own
    right, I guess buying it for $1.6billion means
    it should start making a bigger profit soon. Not being dragged down or dragging down the rest of
    Motorola should help, and allow some inward
    investment too.

    None of the processor cores are affected by this
    really, as it is all the discrete components that
    are being shipped out in the components group.

  12. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right. That really explains why people
    who chew tobacco and even people who role cigars
    for a living have cancer problems too. I'd also like to hear your behavioral explanation for the fact that if you smoke and have other risk
    factors like asbestos exposure, your risk goes as the
    product of the individual risk factors.

    Sophistry aside, at this stage of the game there
    is about as much doubt in the theory that tobacco
    causes cancer as in the theory that the earth travels around the sun. Get a clue.

  13. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, there is no doubt that cigarettes cause cancer, but it cannot be prooven. Case closed.

  14. Sigh... by Erich · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that my Motorola TTL manual is going to be obsolete? Surely they won't change the pinouts on the good ol' 74LS00 quad 2-input NAND gate chip!

    --

    -- Erich

    Slashdot reader since 1997

    1. Re:Sigh... by Melbert · · Score: 1

      They should be the same ol' pinouts that I find in my hardbound Texas Instruments TTL manual from about 1975. Some things will never change.

      I have TTL gates from the very early 70's. And at least a few op-amps from the late 60's. I wonder if chips will eventually become collectable? My Intel 8008 is probably already collectable...

  15. Re:FYI:Cell phone myth.. by adamsc · · Score: 1

    Uh-huh, that's why all these models/actresses are rushing to have their implants removed, because there aren't any health effects.


    Yes, I try to get all of my science from models and actresses too. After all, it's not like they might emotionally follow trends or anything.


    Millions of people choose to smoke, drink, eat fatty foods or have risky sex lives, too. It doesn't mean these activities aren't dangerous...



    Just because no one has found any evidence doesn't mean that there isn't any to be found.


    No, but the fact that no scientific investigation has found any evidence after years of intensive study does suggest this is the case. Or are you one of those conspiracy lunatics who thinks that every single investigator is controlled by a Large Evil Corporation?
  16. Re:FYI:Cell phone myth.. by Gregg+M · · Score: 1

    Maybe they settled.
    Years ago the silicone implant companies settled a lot of lawsuits, but after years of studies, no data linking silicone and ill health could be found. It just doesn't happen!

    --
    Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
  17. Re:Cell phone myth.. by Millennium · · Score: 1

    You're speaking of different thnigs. There's hard evidence that cigarettes cause cancer. It's been around for years now.

    Cell phones haven't even been around long enough that such data can be reliably collected. It'll be several more years before anything truly conclusive can be drawn up.

    By the way, the same theory which says that cell phones cause cancer also works for power lines, hair dryers, and other such nasties. Face it; being born inevitably leads to death.

    Someone alert the media.

  18. Re:Motorola changes: are the 8-bit CPUs surviving? by Decibel · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, they (we) are only getting rid of the 'discrete' components, such as OP-amps. Personally, I feel it's a bit of a shame... I know of several designers who specify only Motorola parts when available due to the very high quality. But, I guess if we can make more profit by doing something else with the capital, that's what should be done...

    Jim C. Nasby
    Motorola AIEG (That's the automotive group, so don't bother asking me for a free cell-phone! :P)

  19. Winmodems not programming problem. by Some+guy+named+Chris · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone else with more information can comment, but I believe the problem with WinModems is not so much in writing the drivers, but in the licensing costs of the V.90 protocol.

    Go see this page for a little more information.

    Or, if you want to see why most of the real linux kernel guys hate Winmodems, follow this thread.

    Alan Cox estimated 200k+ lines of code, running in kernel space.

    So, forget about the specs. Even if you had them, they would be either too expensive to use or not worth the impact to the kernel to implement. Better off spending the few extra bucks, and taking a load off your CPU.

    1. Re:Winmodems not programming problem. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      No, of course a Linux user wouldn't bother with winmodem. However, at $17 it makes a very servicable telephony interface, particularly when it comes with a full-duplex speakerphone. There's more information on the Linmodems page.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  20. Re:Cell phone myth.. by erice · · Score: 1

    Personally, I haven't even heard of a plausible mechanisim. This is a far cry from ciggeretes where major components, like nicotine, are known carcinigens.

  21. FYI:Cell phone myth.. by webslacker · · Score: 2

    Actually, a woman won in court against Motorola over that. Her husband died because of a brain tumor, his wife blamed the cell phone and the court found Motorola liable. This was something like 4 years ago. Whether it was a frivolous lawsuit, I dunno. Maybe early cell phones really were dangerous, maybe she just needed to point the finger quickly. Either way, she won.

    1. Re:FYI:Cell phone myth.. by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

      Breast implants are just stupid.. But I guess i like my women real..
      "Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.

      --
      I ate my tag line.
      -=Ellis (D)25=-
    2. Re:FYI:Cell phone myth.. by mattreilly · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh, that's why all these models/actresses are rushing to have their implants removed, because there aren't any health effects. Just because no one has found any evidence doesn't mean that there isn't any to be found. So what was the "it" in "it just doesn't happen?"

      cheers,

      Matthew

  22. Probably a good move. by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 2

    First of all, ENOUGH WITH THE "DEJA VU" COMMENTS! So far this discussion is content-free.

    Now, I think this is a good idea for Motorola. By selling off their components division they can concentrate more on advancing things like the PowerPC and, of course, all their embedded microprocessors. This, of course, means better Macs, better cell phones, and better whatever-the-heck-else-they-use-embedded-microproc essors-for.

    This may also help boost profits -- after all, how much do they really make on op-amps? It can't be all that much.

    Anyway, I think it makes good business sense, sort of a trimming-the-fat move.

    --
    Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  23. Better what? by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    A better Mac? Scarry!
    "Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  24. Cell phone myth.. by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    Never been proven..
    "Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  25. /. + RC5? by Ellis-D · · Score: 0

    didn't know /. had an RC team..
    "Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.

    --
    I ate my tag line.
    -=Ellis (D)25=-
  26. Motorola changes: are the 8-bit CPUs surviving? by Melbert · · Score: 1

    I was initially worried when I heard the news about Motorola, because I like a number of their 8-bit chips for embedded work. But it sounds like what's really being divested is the non-CPU silicon, i.e. logic gates, and discrete semiconductors like transistors, diodes, and thyristors. Has anybody heard to the contrary? I 'm not working in a job right now where I have a Motorola rep I can call to be certain they aren't killing the 'HC11 and 'HC05. I like those chip families (it can be a matter of pride to be able to say the code you're working on runs in 512 bytes of RAM, with a 500 KHz clock).

  27. well... by / · · Score: 1

    It still does lovely things like dilate your arteries. Besides, who wants to put an insecticide into one's body anyway (nicotine, like caffeine, is a pesticide). It's just one of those things like not consuming most artificial dyes is probably a good thing, since most were originally developed by the German textile industry as textile dyes. It's not a hard rule, since, in this world, your poison may be my dietary nutrient. It's a good rule of thumb, though.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  28. Does this include their SM56 winmodem chipset? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if this sell-off includes their SM56 winmodem chipset? Hopefully this will loosen up programming documentation for it, since I'd like to write some Linux code.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  29. Motorolas Organization by B.B.Wolf · · Score: 2

    There seems to be alot of misunderstanding about
    Motorolas structur. The organization that produces
    the CPUs and MPUs is not part of SPS, let alone
    SPG.
    SPG is Motorolas jelly bean factory. They make the
    cheap commodity parts. Much of what SPS, the larger
    organization that SPG belongs to, does is custom.
    Look at your hard drive. There is a good chance that
    there is a fairly large LSI flatpack with the
    batwing logo. Commodity parts just clog up the
    fabs. Other companies are better suited to cranking
    out standard TTL and CMOS, etc. As far as anolog
    ICs, most of the good stuff is made by a different
    organization within SPS. SPS is still a huge part
    of Motorola.

    I spent 10 years with the company and enjoyed
    every one.

    Couldn't /. come up with a decent "Batwing"?