SourceXchange: Open Source development marketplace

fredzo writes "Brian Behlendorf and O'Reilly have started a site, sourceXchange, where developers can register for development projects. While it's open-source software the developer bids for the job and is paid for the work. Paying jobs start in June. HP is the first sponsor. " Haven't met Tim yet, but Brian rocks. Good work, guys.

Comments

For once, I beat slashdot.

[Andrew Leonard]

Got to get up earrrrrlly in the morning to beat slashdot.

http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/1999/05/14/sou rcexchange/index.html

Free Software Bazaar II ?

[dj.delorie]

How is this different from The Free Software Bazaar ? I mean, aside from the pretty graphics :-)

Re:Free Software Bazaar II ?

[Eccles]

The "problem" with the Free Software Bazaar, at least in perception, is that I could spend a fair bit of time working on something for the bazaar reward, and then discover you paid someone else who finished his yesterday. Or we might dispute whether what I've done is of the quality you expect. These guys make it more of a contractual arrangement, along with incorporating a peer review system. The bazaar may work for small projects but not so well for larger ones.

Fundamentally, I think we all agree that programmers don't particularly want to close their source, and we'd more productive as a group if all our source was open. The only issue is getting paid for working, else we have to do something else for a living and programming would be a hobby. This is an alternative scheme for paying programmers for open source, and is worthy of seeing if it can be a viable system.

Versus Free Software Bazaar?

[gavinhall]

Posted by Christopher B. Browne:

The SourceXchange and the Free Software Bazaar have the similarity that both involve the commissioning of works of software. There might be some call to ask if "Open Source" is the same thing as "Free Software," although that's not too crucial.

There are, however, enough differences as to consider them both potentially viable in their own "corners."

• The Free Software Bazaar is nothing if not informal.

  You can pick your license, and there's no one to ask permission of to participate.

  This means that participation is cheap and easy for both "commissioners" and developers.

  Unfortunately, the informality may not sit well with Pointy Haired Managers. Big, complex projects probably need not apply.

• In contrast, what SourceXchange offers is a fairly formal system for arranging "commissioned works."

  If an organization wants something fairly big, involving substantial effort and cost, this formality is quite necessary.

  Unfortunately, the formality will tend to restrict participation to those with fairly "deep pockets."

  I expect that someone that wants to sponsor someone to hack their favorite elisp script to work with both Xemacs and GNU Emacs will find the bureaucracy prohibitive

As a result, I would not regard these "commissioning bodies" as actually competing with one another.

Indeed, it is at least as possible that they could "feed" one another. Jobs "too big" for the informality of the FSB could be directed to "SX," and jobs "too small" for "SX" could be directed to the FSB.