SuSE larger than RedHat
Suse: We are the largest.
As a reaction to the IPO of RedHat, which requires the company to disclose its earnings, german Linux distributor Suse has disclosed their own numbers. While RedHat reported a turnover of $11M between March 1998 and February 1999, Suse reported a turnover of almost $15M (Deutschmark 26.6 M) between 01-Apr-1998 and 31-Mar-1999. Like RedHat, most of this is due to their distribution sales (Deutschmark 17.4M). Unlike RedHat, who lost $130.000 during this time, Suse was able to report earnings of an undisclosed amount during this time.
Both companies employ approx. 130 people each at the time and are growing rapidly: In 1Q1999 Suse reported a turnover of Deutschmark 9.5M, an increase of 230% compared to the year before. Since the funding of SUSE Inc. in the USA, german Distributor Suse is focusing more and more on the international market. CEO Roland Dyroff reported a larger than proportional growth of the US daugther. He did not want to answer direct questions about an IPO, though. "
A Pentium III -- what a wimp, using somebody else's ready-made CPU.
My CPU doesn't even have transistors, it uses electromagnetic relays hand-made from old paperclips and rubber bands. And toggle switches -- a real programmer just touches the bare wires together.
Kids these days.
-- Alastair
"Well, my distro's company has 135 people on-staff, and yours only has 127."
"Oh, yeah, well, my distro uses the latest version of the KNODE desktop, and yours defaults to an older version of GNM!"
"Oh yeah, well, my distro has version 1.0.3a of libdumbthing, and yours is stuck at version 1.0.3!"
"Oh yeah, well my distro is supported in my native language, at least!"
"Oh yeah, well my distro's company channels 127% of their profits into development of Open Source software for getting food to Vietnamese orphans!"
"Oh yeah, _VIETNAMESE_ orphans... that went out with glibc 2.0. My distro's entire staff pays $25/hour for the privelege of contributing to the code, into a fund to educate Laotian children to program in Java."
"Whatever."
"Moron."
I re-write the kernel everytime I turn my machine on, changing memory locations manually with static electricity gathered by rubbing a ballon against my head...
by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
Becuase accounting standards in Germany and the US are quite different. US accounting standards are very conservative when compared to the accounting standards of most European countries. Whatever "Profit" SuSE earned may be a loss if their books were calculated according to US GAAP.
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
If you think a Red Hat monopoly would be bad, imagine a world with a SuSE monopoly. Red Hat has invested a lot of money to further free software development: RPM, hiring Alan Cox, Gnome, now even a KDE developer. Everything they write is GPL. What has SuSE done? They release some proprietary X servers and contribute some code to XFree86. That's all I can think of off hand. Their distro is also loaded with freedom subtracted products.
It's important to remember that 'losses' or
'gains' in any quarter or year are all a matter
of accounting, especially for a these relatively
young and small companies.
In some situations it
is better for them to report losses and avoid paying income taxes than to report huge gains and end up paying taxes on them.
Without a serious analysis of the two companies'
financial situations, I wouldn't put much stock in the article.
"If you are falling, dive." -Joseph Campbell
For what it is worth... the general rule of
thumb for US businesses is that during the first few years of operation they want to post a small
loss -- particularly if they are looking to obtain
investors. There are tax reasons for this, but
the general logic is that a company should not
show a profit for the first few years so that it
is clear that they are reinvesting their receipts
into development of the business.
Incidentally, I have RH6 because that's what they
had at work, but I'd agree SuSe is probably the
better dist.