Slashdot Mirror


Russian E2K cracking RC5

Tuna Phish writes "Apparently the new Russian E2K computer is being used to crack distributed.net's RC5 contest! The user has come out on top the past few days with 2.7GK/s, more than 6 times the keyrate of second place. His message states "Russian Elbrus E2K is REAL POWER!" " Great-now we just need to get them to join Team Slashdot, and he can get all the pr0n he needs. *grin* So, I've been doing some looking around, and am doubting the veracity of this: bogus client? First prototype? Anyone have more info? Post it in the comments.

2 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. There doesn't appear to be cause for alarm by Nugget94M · · Score: 4

    From looking at the actual work being performed, there is no reason to believe that this person is using a hacked client. We've been in contact with the user and although the details are sketchy his story seems legitimate.

    We're still talking with him, but for now the assumption is that this activity is legitimate. Our biggest fear is not that he's compromised the project but that he's using resources he doesn't have permission to use.

    For what it's worth, he's not claiming that the blocks are being completed by an E2K. The motto is just his way of showing enthusiasm for the platform. In reality, it's win32 (and a few sparcs) all going through a linux proxy.

    It's still way too early to draw any conclusions, but so far there's been nothing to set off any alarms on our end.

  2. Re:Russia doesn't even have modern fabs by TurkishGeek · · Score: 4

    True, Russia does not have "modern" fabs that match the US/Japanese standards, but it is flat out wrong that they were "decades behind" Western semiconductor technology or designed all their computers/electronic systems with vacuum tube technology. I believe this is a hoax, but there is still a dispute on whether it was the Russians(the team headed by Dr. Boris Babaian, the guy behind E2K project, and Elbrus supercomputers) or the Americans who designed the first superscalar machine. There is no doubt the Soviets had a fully functional, mass produced supercomputers in the late 1970s and early 80s that almost matched their Western counterparts in performance(Elbrus series).

    Besides, McKinley is not the right example to give here. McKinley is still nothing more than a design, while the Alpha is real. As the process technology improves, the current Alpha 21264 and the upcoming 21364 design should still be faster or as fast as McKinley or E2K, unless there is a "quantum leap" kind of innovation in the microarchitecture.

    This particular incident is clearly a hoax, but for God's sake, give the Russians the credit they deserve, guys. They can damn well design advanced microprocessors along a lot of other goodies. Remember, these guys were a superpower not long ago.

    One thing I think the Russians will not be able to design for a long time is a decent car, though. Has anyone here in Slashdot ever driven a Lada Samara?

    --
    Zigbee Central: A Zigbee weblog