Slashdot Mirror


Feature: Good vs. Evil on the World Wide Web

We have been subjected to endless debates over whether children need protection from Internet porn and violence. But isn't there at least as much positive as negative material on the World Wide Web? I decided to find out by using opposing pairs of good and evil keywords in a series of AltaVista searches. The results were somewhat surprising. To begin with, the keyword good brought up a total of 18,803,720 results, while evil netted a mere 1,185,680. In other words, good appears to be more than 10 times as popular as evil online!

More evidence of Internet goodness:

Life got 23,765,261 results;
Death got only 5,973,580.

Love got 14,985,600 results;
Lust got only 889,330.

God got 5,596,690 results;
Satan only got 164,850;
Devil only got 635,160.

Marriage got 3,626,700 results;
Divorce only got 649,930.

Heaven got 977,930 results;
Hell only got 707,410.

Joy got 1,137,460 results;
Sorrow only got 190,740.

Linux got 3,461,380 results;
Unix got 1,948,040 results;
Windows NT only got 1,208,125.

Intelligence got 1,888,970 results;
Stupidity only got 77,430.

Apparently those misguided souls who condemn the World Wide Web as some sort of hellhole (3965 results) need to think again. The word Education was mentioned on 34,470,924 Web pages, while a search for Ignorance only came up with 141,530. And, despite endless yammer about kids getting hold of bomb-building instructions online, cruising the World Wide Web is statistically more likely to make them fat than to teach them how to blow up buildings; the word cooking netted 2,167,210 Web pages, the word Bomb only got 622,050, and the phrase homemade bombs only brought up 662.

Religious believers should take heart from the fact that Salvation drew 280,700 AltaVista responses, while Damnation only came up with 8141. Christians, instead of condemning the Internet as immoral, might want to change their tune and start boasting about their online dominance - the word Christian drew 6,715,031 results, as opposed to 93,240 for Jew, 322,740 for Muslim, 279,990 for Buddhist, and 236,420 for Hindu, while the word Atheist only came up with 78,870 pages.

What does all of this mean? I have no idea. This small (but rigorously unscientific) study, like the psychic hotlines advertised heavily on late-night cable TV, is meant to be used for entertainment purposes only. Please feel free to add to it (or subtract from it) and draw your own conclusions, which I'm sure will be far more insightful than any I could possibly come up with on my own.

22 of 252 comments (clear)

  1. LOTS of digits of PI! by jd · · Score: 2
    I've downloaded the first 240 million digits of PI, for no readily-apparent reason. The website actually boasts the first 400 million, which I'll probably get.

    http://www.hepl.phys.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~mitsuru/pi-e. html

    The world record for PI digits stands at 52,539,607,510 digits. Again, you can download some of these over at:

    ftp://www.cc.u-tokyo.ac.jp

    What I want to know is, why are the Japanese obsessed with knowing PI to this kind of accuracy? Carl Sagan's book was FICTION, guys!

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  2. Way to go Roblimo by My_Favorite_Anonymou · · Score: 2

    Your comments are way more interesting than Jon Katz's

    CY

  3. You poor misguided canadian... by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

    Considering that Altavista hasn't even indexed, what, 20% of the available webpages? That makes for a considerable margin of error. What's worse, a lot of those might have gone 404. So let's take the results with a grain of salt, okay people?

    I'd also like to point out that politicians tend to note the presence of things, not the absence - just because good outweighs evil online doesn't mean they see it that way. They think that kids *enjoy* watching pornography, and they're on a holy mission to save them from themselves. Nevermind that the average 9 year old would just be grossed out at the concept of boys and girls.. well.. you know.



    --

  4. Easily explained by grappler · · Score: 2

    All these findings are easily explained by the incredible amount of advertising (more likely to use words with good connotations) and religious fanatic sites (which will talk about being 'saved' and the glory of god and the kingdom of heaven more often than they will warn of the smoking pits of hell) Anyway, I know it's just a joke to begin with.

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  5. Conclusions by Mart · · Score: 2

    >What does all of this mean? I have no idea.

    It means you have way too much free time.

  6. Pie vs. Cake by lilgorgor · · Score: 2

    pie: 735,420
    cake: 708,370

    PIE RULES!

  7. Giants Vs. Midgits by Rabbins · · Score: 2

    Midgits fall very short of the Giants' large presence:

    Giants: 474,930
    Midgits: 129

  8. That's because you misspelled "midgets" :-) (N/T) by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2

    N/T

  9. Have your cake and eat it too by Gleef · · Score: 2

    I got the following from Altavista:

    +cake: 735,420 Web pages.
    +cake +"eat it": 57,155 Web pages.

    So about 13% of the cake sites have their cake and eat it too!

    ----

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  10. Why bother downloading it? by grappler · · Score: 2

    Calculating it involves a fairly simple algorithm. Just leave the algorithm running and saving to disk in the background day and night until your disk is full.

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
    1. Re:Why bother downloading it? by jd · · Score: 2

      Downloading is quicker. :)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  11. Re:Monkeys beat kittens! by ethereal · · Score: 2

    But not a real green dress - that's cruel.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  12. That can't be right... by grappler · · Score: 2

    163120 for "insane"
    only 103430 for "sane"

    ??????????
    "sane" should be found at LEAST as many times as
    "insane"

    :-)

    --
    Vidi, Vici, Veni
  13. Re:Like what? by jd · · Score: 2
    Good drugs (expr.) Most are highly toxic to biological life. The rest merely screw it up. See: Terms, contradiction of.

    Good sex (expr.) If you're busy judging it, you're probably not doing it. See: Terms, contradiction of.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  14. Microsoft by drwiii · · Score: 2
    Microsoft got 11,558,850 results;
    Satan got only 221,090.

    I don't know about you, but that just made my day.

  15. Re:A sure sign! by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    Well I wouldn't really call Mac evil. Crappy, yes, maby, but I think their intentions are in the right place.. maby.

  16. You missed a spot... by Grueben · · Score: 2

    What about sex (9,952,677) and abstinence (47,660)?

  17. All this, and OS wars too! by davew · · Score: 2

    WIth an even more exciting methodology, the OS Sucks/Rules-o-meter uses highly refined mass survey techniques to survey the relative merits of different Operating Systems!

    Translation: search Alta Vista for "Linux sucks", "Windows rules" etc., and graph the results.

    Dave

    --

  18. Free vs Open Source by Gleef · · Score: 2

    Altavista reports:

    +free: 102,950,414
    +"open source": 39,761
    +proprietary: 521,860

    I think the meaning is clear :-)

    ----

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.
  19. Re:Monkeys beat kittens! by Hobbex · · Score: 2

    "I like penguins" - 114

  20. Beatlemania by drwiii · · Score: 2
    Beatles got 758,730 results;
    Jesus Christ got only 426,920.

    I'll be damned. I guess Lennon was right.

  21. The Elvis Index by RobotWisdom · · Score: 2
    I did a whole mess o' these a few years back, using 'elvis' as the calibration standard: the Elvis Index.

    I just recently started doublechecking those old numbers using FAST's 200M-page index... so far the rankings are still pretty comparable.