Slashdot Mirror


Alexandre Julliard gets job Hacking Wine

Douglas Ridgway writes "Alexandre Julliard, leader of the Wine project, will be moving to Silicon Valley to work full-time on Wine. See the press release for details. "

21 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Re:good luck by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    Jesus, calm down.

    I assume your comments are directed at me? How was what I said not true or a flame?

    It is a FACT that we have had problems with older versions of some office apps not able to read files created by newer versions. I did not say or mean to imply that office 2000 files could not be read by previous versions. I have no experience in this, I've yet to get any 2000-format files. I just said that it does happen.

    And how did you come up with the inference that I think there is a 'desktopdatabase' or anything running on a linux box. I didn't even come close to it. I didn't say anything was bad or better than something else. I was just pointing out an instance where wine might not be a viable alternative to keeping up with ms office apps under win32.

    Christ, go un-knot your underwear, or something?

  2. Re:good luck by spectecjr · · Score: 2

    MS will make defeating this project -- with "enhancements" -- priority one.

    Hmmm... interesting claim... but a pretty far out one. There's no way that MS can "defeat this project with enhancements" without screwing up backwards compatibility with existing apps -- which is a MAJOR thing at Microsoft. It's why Win32 is (as people repeatedly claim here) a mess -- they can't change things without breaking software that's out there that people use day in, day out.

    So what if Wine will always be a couple of years behind? That's still 100's of 1000's of apps that will run on the emulator. That's a massive software base to run.

    Simon
    [old APIs never die - they just end up in c:\windows\system32]

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  3. Future Caveats of WINE by Rydian · · Score: 2

    While I believe that WINE is a great tool (I use quite a bit myself). I hope this doesn't prevent companies from doing a true port over to all the variants of *NIX. I can just hear a company saying, "Why should we? We can just develop our aplications for Windows, then let all the *NIX people run it with WINE if they need it."

    This is a problem that OS/2 had, and part of the reason that it didn't flourish as it could have. Companies could develop for the Win16 environment, then market it for both because of OS/2's Win16 compatibility layer.

    Anyways, congratulations to Alexandre, and I hope this will help both him and the development of WINE out!

    --
    chown -R us. /base
    1. Re:Future Caveats of WINE by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 3

      This is a problem that OS/2 had, and part of the reason that it didn't flourish as it could have.

      So far this sort of problem isn't happening in the Linux world. I think there are a number of reasons why.

      OS/2 didn't provide enough good reasons to write native apps. One problem I think is that also sharing a history with MS-DOS, it really wasn't perceived as different enough from Windows. Linux clearly doesn't have this problem.
      I think OS/2 also had difficulty courting developer mindshare because of a percieved deficiency in native development tools (either in availabilty, quality or cost). This is not a problem for Linux which was able to initially draw on the strong history of UNIX development tools (many of which are free) and has now started to attract many of its own or ports from other platforms (such as CodeWarrior). Linux clearly has significant developer mindshare and is quickly growing it, which is something that OS/2 never really achieved.
      Furthermore WINE (and Twin and TWINE) is not just an emulator, it is also a porting toolkit. Which should help serve as a bridge for Windows-centric developers to port their code to Linux. Once they have things running, they can write more native apps if they want. Unfortunately, OS/2 never really offered a good way to port Windows code over. In the early days of OS/2 that didn't matter so much, because there weren't very many Windows apps and the Windows API and MFC were't very popular yet, but today a lot of developers feel locked into those or at least have code that is.

  4. With VMware is WINE still needed? by fr0g · · Score: 2

    I understand that WINE is way different than VMware but with VMware why would we still need wine?

    1. Re:With VMware is WINE still needed? by sethr · · Score: 2

      VMWare isolates programs from the host machine, WINE programs can interact with programs on the host machine.

      You can cut and paste between linux programs and programs running in a win 98 virtual machine.

      Seth
    2. Re:With VMware is WINE still needed? by Matrix · · Score: 2

      Because while VMWare is a virtual 386 (requiring you to install and own Windows, etc), WINE lets you run apps by themselves, without windows. WINE is also open source (or more so than VMWare ... I don't recall WINE's license but I'm pretty sure it's not GPL). VMWare costs an arm an a leg compared to WINE. If something's broken in WINE, you can fix it. etc etc.

    3. Re:With VMware is WINE still needed? by lalleglad · · Score: 2
      A Windows installation program is still just a program under Windows and as such Wine should be able to run it as well as other programs under Windows.


      Simple and neat :-)

    4. Re:With VMware is WINE still needed? by Gleef · · Score: 4

      VMWare is proprietary, WINE is Free
      VMWare is costly, WINE is free
      VMWare requires a Windows license, WINE is independant of Windows
      VMWare is by design slower than Windows, WINE is potentially faster than Windows
      VMWare isolates its programs from the host machine, WINE programs can interact with programs on the host machine.

      VMWare is better for some things, but it's completely different than WINE, there's plenty of room for both.

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    5. Re:With VMware is WINE still needed? by xeno · · Score: 2

      "Need" is subjective, but I'd still say a generalized 'yes.' VMware is a commercial software product that operates underneath the typical OS, and allows multiple OSs to run concurrently. You have to buy a MS-licensed copy of Windows to run on top of VMware. That's where the "VM" (virtual machine) comes from.

      WINE, on the other hand is a mapping of win16 and win32 calls to 'nix calls. It's windows functions without the windows itself. It's not a VM, and therefore has a theoretical performance edge by reducing the number of application layers (although it'll be a while before WINE performance becomes acceptable).

      Besides, WINE is open source, and will probably survive the next curve-ball that MS pitches. The way I see it, VMware is playing a dangerous game with MS by directly interfacing with their bread-and-butter products. Sort of like dating a guy whose previous 5 wives have all mysteriously disappeared after a long history of abuse. MS is likely to make a change to the EULA that specifies that you cannot run their OS on a VM, on a processor that wasn't purchased with the OS, etc etc. If this ever happens, VMware becomes the next Tektronix/WinDD or similar victim.

      --
      I think not...(*poof*)
  5. Alright! by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    Good for him! I'm looking forward to getting the apps keeping Windows on my HD over to Linux; hopefully this should help.

    On a side note, I may not be able to code Wine, but I sure can drink it - anyone wanna hire me?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  6. Nice thing about WINE (big grin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Now we're able to run ActiveState Perl for Win 32 (I AM joking, y'all).

    Mark Edwards
    Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

  7. Re:Good by Eccles · · Score: 2

    I'd say Wine already picked up the pace. My company's Windows app now sort of works with Wine as of the 073199 release, whereas it crashed shortly after the splash screen with the releases of six months ago. There's still refresh problems with it, but otherwise it's close to usable.

    My hope is that demonstrating that it works with Wine will influence our higher-ups to consider a full-fledged port to Linux.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  8. Re:Swiss federal institute of technology by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    Sorry if I'm getting hooked by a troll, but he has been one of the lead developers of Wine (an open-source project) for several years now (at least three). His open-source credentials are impeccable.

  9. Re:Is Corel still donating to/working on wine? by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    Download the current copy of the wine source from http://metalab.unc.edu/pub /Linux/ALPHA/wine/development/, gunzip and untar it, and run:

    grep corel ChangeLog

    from the base directory (wineYYYYMMDD) and see how many contributions Corel has made. They've made less than I personally hoped, but they've made quite a few. To be fair, I've poked in that code some, this is not a trivial project. In many ways it is much more complicated than the Linux kernel (I guess that shouldn't surprise any of us!). Corel's team may well be still finding their way around. They may also be concentrating on those things that affect their applications primarily.

    They are there and they are doing things...

    I doubt this news will do anything but improve Wine's situation. A guy who has done much of the lead work on Wine in his spare time will now be working on it full time and being paid to do so. I can't see how this can do anything but help.

  10. Re:good luck by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

    Right, these are good points, just have one comment:

    >Oh, the new version doesn't work? Don't buy it.

    The only flaw in this logic is something we have experienced IRL here at my job.

    We do business with a major client, who, for some reason, is married to redmond and always has the very latest versions of MS Office. They send us documents in Word, powerpoint, excel, whatever in the newest file format, which of course we can't open with the previous version of the same MS Office programs (grr).

    So we have to upgrade every machine in the office to office 95, then 97, now 2000 - so we can still exchange documents with our customer.

    Now, in the scenario where we are using WINE to run Windows apps and then MS breaks compatibility with the new version, we would be skrewed because we can't excange documents with our Microsoft-happy customer.

  11. Also by IntlHarvester · · Score: 3


    As has been pointed out many times, the *most* important applications to many businesses are the ones that have been developed in house in VB/Delphi/VC++/Access/DBase/Whatever. The likelyhood that corporations would/could port these apps to Linux is pretty low.

    In house apps nail the average corporate desktop to Windows, so without something like WINE, you'd probably never see Linux on an average corporate desktop.

    (The good thing about most corporate apps is that they're unlikey to use the latest Windows voodoo API, so there's no worry about MS breaking WINE compatiblity.)


    --

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  12. Code for Toddlers by DonkPunch · · Score: 3

    Dump this to a line printer and put it up in the nursery:

    A is for ASCII
    B is for Beta
    C is for, well, C
    D is for Drivers
    E is for Emacs
    F is for free() -- see M
    G is for gcc
    H is for Hex
    I is for int
    J is for jmp
    K is for Kilobyte
    L is for long
    M is for malloc() -- see F
    N is for NULL
    O is for Open Source
    P is for Perl
    Q is for Queue
    R is for Recursion -- see R
    S is for Socket
    T is for TCP/IP
    U is for *nix
    V is for Vi
    W is for Window Manager -- see X
    X is for wimps who can't handle a command line
    Y is for Yacc
    Z is for ZZ

    --

    Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs.
  13. RTF? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

    Isn't that what the RTF (Rich Text Format) is for? I thought that that was about the only way that Word users communicate with each other.

    --
    They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    1. Re:RTF? by Jburkholder · · Score: 2

      Naw, we communicate quite happily with doc, xls, ppt files. Its just a pain when the new Office comes out and we are forced to upgrade.

  14. Re:Why WINE and not native by cxreg · · Score: 2

    That happens to be pretty close to what libwine does. And exactly how Corel is porting their Suite to Linux.