911 Calls Linux
911 Calls Linux - For Reliable Service
In January 1998 I began testing linux for our 911 Center here in St. George Utah. We are the 911 Center for the South west corner of Utah. In November of 1998 Testing was complete with great success. I implemented Linux as the workstation for our 911 Center using RedHat 5.2 and AfterStep as the windows manager. These workstations get worked on 24 hrs a day seven days a week and run several apps on screen.
Some of the apps that we run our Eterm to connect to the main HP Server, X3270 for our State computer connection, WordPerfect for different reports the dispatchers create, and some custom apps I have written in C.
Our WordPerfect was given to us Mike Cowpland CEO of Corel. The WordPerfect 8 has worked perfectly. Thanks Mike.
Our uptime has been over 200 DAYS. This doesn't even come close to the reboot once a day with the Microsoft OS. I could give several horror stories of when the dispatcher is in the middle of a hot call, then had to reboot.
Linux has done so well, that I have unplugged the reset buttons and disabled the power switch. This was done to prevent finger glitch when they have to restart the NT box our radios work from (I just wish Motorola would switch over), that sits next to the linux box. Linux is the main console that the 911 Dispatcher works from, and has held up better than any I have ever seen. Linux has been doing great in the server end, but I have heard it's not very good at the client end. NOT TRUE. My installation time for the first pc was 45 minutes for full install with apps. By the time I got to the last set it was 30 minutes for full install. As a client it has worked great.
The only shutdowns have been from one power supply failure, and a kernel update for each. The workstations are still running great.
Officer Sherman Stebbins
St. George Police Department
e-mail policesa@infowest.com
NOTE: this is NOT flamebait. It's an honest-to-goodness question
First let me say that I think it's great that Linux is getting this good exposure. My question is this: Why does everyone say it's a great article when somebody writes about NT's downtime, and how Linux is better than NT. However, if someone writes something positive about NT (or BSD, or anything that's NOT Linux), it's instantly labelled as "FUD" or "flamebait".
I think Linux is great and all, but it's not perfect (yet), we need to be fair in advocating it.
Juiced? Or Not?
Yes its real, Ive been an officer for over 12 yrs.
our Address is 200 E. 265 N. St. George Utah, if you want to see the 911 center and myself in person (if you don't believe). I take care of the 911 center network and Fatal accidents.
Sherm
*beep*
Are you sure you want to speak with an operator?
*BEEEP!*
This operation could not be completed because an error of type -4019 occurred. Please standby, transferring you to the next available operator. Your expected wait time is: 493 minutes. Please have your MS-PIN and Certificate of..
*BEEP!* *BEEEEEEEEP!* *BEEEEEEEP!!*
... and thank you for using MS911!
*click*
NO CARRIER
--
I called the St. George Police Department through its published non-emergency phone number, verified Officer Stebbins' identity, and chatted with him personally (by phone) before posting the story. Note the emphasis on using a *published* phone number for initial contact. It is as easy to spoof a phone number as an e-mail address; all you have to do is claim you're giving out a "private line."
Without proper verification, this story would not have run. Period.
Robin "roblimo" Miller
roblimo@slashdot.org
Or even something relatively minor like a credibility/validity index or something as part of the article's summary.. A few static/standard values such as:
1. Validated first-hand (by "author")
2. Validated by submitter
3. Validated by submitter (with author's doubts)
4. As posted elsewhere
5. Validated by web presence (thus with doubts)
6. Unverified
7. N/A (for things like funnies)
etc.