Slashdot Mirror


Spooks in the Wire

Salon is running a cool article about numbers stations - shortwave radio stations that broadcast encrypted messages to spies worldwide. I hadn't known about this, though it makes sense if you think about it - the U.S. government uses a similar scheme to communicate with nuclear subs at sea. The article includes links to a site which has .mp3 recordings of some of the transmissions. Spooky. They've even transcribed some messages for a possible crack attempt, though if the men in black are truly using one-time pads this seems (ahem) unlikely to succeed.

16 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. One time pads by RallyDriver · · Score: 4

    Since WW2 it has been standard practice for field operatives sending and receiving traffic over totally insecure channels in this manner to use one time pads.

    In the days of pencil and paper, a one-time pad was easier to apply (usually simple addition) than an algorithmic cypher, and of course infinitely more secure. I can't see that the computer era would do anything but facilitate it.

    Nuclear submarines at sea still receive VLF carrier modulated (morse code style) transmissions for low volume traffic as they are one of the few things that penetrate easily to patrol depths. The Royal Navy still uses Rugby WT for this purpose, and I know there is a US equivalent.

    1. Re:One time pads by kuro5hin · · Score: 3
      I can't see that the computer era would do anything but facilitate it.

      Not necessarily. A lot of people seem to have lost the distinction between sources of random data and sources of pseudo-random data in the era of the computer. Or discovered that what they thought was random really wasn't, even though they were really careful. Really, this has always been pretty much the only weakness of one time pads, though. And you can bet the folks broadcasting this stuff know where to get some grade A randomness. :-)

      ----
      We all take pink lemonade for granted.

      --
      There is no K5 cabal.
      I am not the real rusty.
    2. Re:One time pads by jonathanclark · · Score: 2

      Is this just speculation, or do you have first hand experience? In my opinion one-time pads are *less* secure than public-key or symmetrical block ciphers. This is because the one-time pad must be protected and carried around, while a single key can be easily memorized. Yes, you can use a block cipher to protect your one time pad, but if you trust block ciphers for that, why not trust it all the way?

      Most compromises of secret information involve people - not fancy algorithms, and one-time pads are a real people problem. They are easily lost, destroyed, stolen, or exhausted.

  2. ELF and subs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    To communicate with subs deep in the water they use a transmitter that actually transmits its signal straight into the ground at such low frequencies that it can reach subs deep under water. Unfortunately it is also very slow (less than 1 character/second)

  3. One-time pads by Kyrrin · · Score: 2

    Quick, where's Randy Waterhouse when you need him??

  4. Number Stations by dark&stormynight · · Score: 2

    As far as I know, these stations have been around since the sixties. Personally, I think the numbers being read are messages for a one time pad. The intended reciever could write down the numbers between two given time periods, apply a key for that date & time and decode the message. To anyone else listening, the numbers remain a mystery.

  5. Not that big of a mystery.. by Ozone+Pilot · · Score: 4

    Couple of comments.

    First would be that some enterprising shortwave listeners have indeed "DF'd" these things (traced them to their source). One major source of Spanish and English language numbers stations is (no surprise) some sort of State Department or CIA (nobody is quite sure) facility near Warrenton, VA. I believe a few years ago that Monitoring Times ran a story on the guys who figured this out.

    Second, I would disagree with the statement that these are outmoded by satellite communications. You must remember that these are spy communications; as such, this is still the ideal medium. Why? First of all, should a field agent be caught/interrogated/searched, a shortwave radio is a much more anonymous travelling accessory than some strange satellite contraption. Reliability is also an issue. One can purchase a shortwave radio in just about any business district in any part of the world. What if an agent in the field loses his one-off satellite communications unit?

    Given the security that one-time pads provide, there really isn't a disadvantage to still use shortwave. Atmospheric conditions and propogation are always an issue, and at times can be less than reliable, but some of these stations are pumping out some *serious* power, and repeat their messages many times a day on different bands.

    These things have been infamous for years with the shortwave listening community. They're a little less obscure in Europe; there, the shortwave bands are much more populated (especially the low frequency ones) by broadcasters that occasionally, numbers stations have been known to have been pushed down into the standard broadcast bands. In fact, one of Stereolab's albums features a long sample of a numbers station (Transient Random Noise Bursts with Announcements if you're interested, available just about anywhere).

    Ozone Pilot

    --
    ozone pilot
    1. Re:Not that big of a mystery.. by kees · · Score: 2

      You are right that not all shortwave communications will disappear. My remark was mainly aimed at the general degradation of HF usage.

      It is interesting to observe though that some military organisations are starting to expand their presence on shortwave again. Satellites have the nasty habit of passing only once every 90 minutes and then being only visible for about 12 minutes when they have a maximum elevation of 90 degrees. And of course, if you are playing soldier on a spot where there is no 100% satellite coverage, this is a very real problem. This became clear when the operations in Yugoslavia were at their peak.

      Rumor have it that the US army is even starting to train morse code operators again....

    2. Re:Not that big of a mystery.. by kees · · Score: 2

      There is one major problem with geostationary satellites and that is that they are at a distance of several tens of thousands of kilometers. For one-way communication such as TV broadcast, that is not a problem. When you use them for two-way communication such as telephony, the delays will get so large that they are noticable. Especially when the conversation is going back and forth quickly that is a realy problem. But we digress from the orignal post ;)

  6. Re: numbers stations by kees · · Score: 5

    Numbers stations on shortwave have been active
    for decades now. A lot of speculation has always
    gone around regarding where they are coming from.
    Years ago, the prevailing opinion was that they
    were North-Korean spy stations broadcasting data
    to field agents.

    Shortwave listeners have always been very
    interested in these spooky stations. There is
    an organisation called World Utilitity Network
    (WUN for short) and they publish a newletter every
    week with this kind of information. It can be
    found at http://www.wunclub.com/. For the
    un-initiated: with the term utility station we
    mean shortwave radio (30 MHz) users that are not
    amateur radio operators.

    There are many more resources out there on the
    web. Without any doubt, they are rather exciting
    to listen to. Sadly, the current tendency is that
    shortwave communication is phases out by a lot of
    these organisations in favor of satellite communications.

  7. These are easy and fun to listen to! by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 2
    If you buy just a cheap radio shack shortwave radio (mine was like $100 and covers two bands pretty broadly) and scan in the big empty areas, you'll usually find two or three of these stations. Being in the pacific northwest doesn't help, though, since we have the worst shortwave radio reception in the world.

    They're ueber-creepy late at night, though... and when you're listening to Agent Orange (depeche mode) on the stereo.. *shudder* ;)

  8. Re: numbers stations by kees · · Score: 3

    Well, finding the location of these stations is
    not so easy as you might say. Shortwave signals
    are refracted by the atmosphere, which is the
    first reason why it might be harder to pinpoint
    the origin. In worst case, you aim your antenna
    at the last bouncing point somewhere in the
    earth atmoshpere.

    The second reason is that because of the good
    propagation conditions on shortwave, you can hear
    the signal coming from two sides. The earth is
    more or less round, so you have a short path
    propagation and a long path propagation.

    The third reason is that the signals don't necessarily(sp?) originate from the country that
    is responsible for transmitting them. In the case
    of US stations, it is very possible that they
    are broadcast from one of the allied countries
    in Europe or the Pacific.

    Also, if you want to triangulate a shortwave
    station by car, you must realise that it very
    possible for shortwave stations to reach for
    several thousands of miles. To illustrate this,
    I spoke to an Argentinian operator from the
    Netherlands only last weekend, and I only used
    a power of 100W. These number stations habitually
    use several kilowatts. Triangulating a station
    which is several thousands of miles away needs
    pretty large legs on the triangle.

    Of course, this doesn't mean its impossible to
    determine the direction of HF signals, its just
    a nicer challenge ;)

  9. Padding by dmiller · · Score: 2

    I would guess that a large portion of what these numbers stations "play" is random padding to prevent traffic patterns inadvertently giving away information (e.g. a large number of messages on the eve of an invasion).

    Of course this padding would be statistically indistinguishable from the OTP encrypted material they play the rest of the time, and about as "crackable".

  10. damn, cook big brother is good for something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    maybe we should get some CIA, NSA guys on stage and have them do a spoken word over a break beat. maybe they are just artists trapped in the highly efficient and secret machinery of the first world captalist regime. I will hear navajo code talkers at my next rave. ummmmm delicious baby.

  11. Numbers station sound files by MDX-F1 · · Score: 3

    Here's a link to a pretty cool site I've had bookmarked. It's got RealAudio files of numbers stations, as well as clandestine stations, unidentified broadcasts, etc:

    http://www.cisquet.demon.nl/soundsframe .htm

  12. ELF transmissions by Anonymous+Chemist · · Score: 2

    ELF transmissions go out in Oahu at a marine base off of Hammerhead Bay. The attennae is about .75 mile across with ~ 5 interconnected arrays. The mountains form a horseshoe with the attennae connected between these peaks. The transmissions are so low frequency, as the other poster noted , that the frequncies are transmitted throught he ground.I believe they are also now using blue green lasers from orbit to communicate the flash traffic as well.As an aside, the mountain has a set of ladders going up 3000 ft which you can climb (they call it the stairway to Heaven on the base). Great fun, takes about 6 hours up and down. The controller for the array is at the end of the Stairway.