Slashdot Mirror


Stealth Software Used To Spy On Employees

Baraka writes "As if reading the e-mails of their employees wasn't enough, some corporations have gone as far as to install hidden software on their client boxes. The software secretly monitors all keyboard and app activity. At the end of the day, the gathered information is e-mailed to the "offending" employee's boss. Read it and weep, folks. Looks like Big Brother is alive and well in the officeplace. "

4 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting article by bjk4 · · Score: 4
    I was quite surprised by that article. It began like a sales pitch -- listing elite customers including sensitive government agencies. Then it switched gears and talked about the moral implications of this type of software.

    Actually, in retrospect, this might be a ploy by the company to generate interest in its product. The more controversy surrounding this product, the more people who are informed about it -- kinda like Apple complaining about export policies in order to brag about how fast the G4 is.

    Personally, I think monitoring is not a good idea. If an employee can double his/her productivity by taking short breaks to chat with friends online, then by all means that employee should do so. It should be painfully simple to discover when someone is making trouble online. At that point, convensional methods should suffice unless special surveilance is required. In general though, spying on employees betrays trust.

  2. Why do employees put up with it? by Hobbex · · Score: 4


    It seems American companies are willing to just about anything to spy and generally make life suck for there employees, but at the same time I keep hearing about how companies are scrambling to find people for there technical jobs.

    If having to worry about finding another job is not a problem, why would anybody stay at a company when it starts spying on you, forbidding you to send private email etc etc? Is this just a matter of greed, because I know that as far as I am concerned some level of freedom at a job is worth a number of K $s.

    Maybe I'm just not disillusioned enough yet...


    -
    /. is like a steer's horns, a point here, a point there and a lot of bull in between.

  3. But is a work environment of fear any better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    Snooper software may catch who is surfing what sites, but is this good for business? Companies should IGNORE minor transgressions by employees, especially for employees in creative occupations (i.e., software design). To maintain a clear head and to stay creative, periodic breaks are needed. This may mean a quick game of Quake or Tetris, reading Slashdot, or netnews. So what if company resources are used for this? So long as the job gets done, let people enjoy their diversions. Cracking down on "unauthorized use" will not help the bottom line the way you may think. It will create an atmosphere of ph33r and paranoia that will actually end up hurting productivity than if you simply let things be. Can you work productively when someone's standing behind you staring over your shoulder constantly? Monitoring software is no different. So I say that as long as employees are getting their work done and not offending other employees (i.e., surfing porn where others can see it) ant not sucking up the company's whole T1 while engaging in brief periodic non-work activities from their private terminals and workstations, I say let 'em be. Happy workers are productive workers. No one wants to work for Big Brother. If my employer did this, I'd leave. Others would too. Of course, no company will explicitly say "Yes, you can surf pr0n, or play games on company time". Companies don't have to do this either. All companies need to do is evaluate employees on the results of what they produce. The means by which they do it are really a non-issue.

  4. Re:That stuff doesn't work by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 4

    What about office workers who are not ``technologically savvy''? Not everyone knows enough to look for and disable such a thing.
    Ignoring that, there could be nevertheless hidden difficulties behind trying to stop something like this. And not all the difficulties are necessarily technological.

    If the employer is running software like this one everyone's workstation as a matter of policy, then by disabling it, you are violating company policy. If you get caught trying to disable the software, you could be disciplined or fired. It would be trivial to design monitoring softwarethat cannot be simply turned off without detection. For example, the software could periodically respond to special pings from a central server. Hacking up software to fake the responses could be a major challenge depending on how the program is constructed. If there is some serious crypto authentication, it would have to be reverse engineered and faithfully reproduced in the impostor program. Most people would have to wait for some hacker group to release such an ``anti-big-brother'' impostor.

    Another problem is, it would seem suspicious if nothing is being recorded by the monitoring program. You would have to arrange for your impostor program to provide some sensible looking activity record while you conduct personal business. Otherwise you would have to explain the idle periods---and what if the monitoring is being used to detect idle workers as well as ones who are using the equipment for personal use?

    A third problem is that even though you stop keyboard monitoring, your employer can still snoop the network. Presumably, any interactions you have with the Internet go through the company's routers. The boss doesn't necessarily need a tedious record of your keystrokes; just some software that can monitor TCP streams and other data. By tapping TCP streams, it should be possible to recover telnet sessions, FTP transfers, ICQ or IRC chats, Usenet reads and posts, etc. This is kind of spying is probably a lot more useful than having some keystroke record. (Of course, one could use an encrypting proxy system, but that alone could draw suspicion.)

    I don't think that there is any real technological protection against this. Any such measures treat the symptom rather than the disease anyway! You have to treat the disease. If you happen to fall into such a predicament, organize with other users who are in the same boat, and let the corporation know that you won't take the spying. In other words, the classic organized labor solution to the problem of worker oppression.

    Failing that, terrorist tactics might work. The spying has to be implemented by another employee. Simply threaten to, in the parking lot, break the legs of anyone who supports the company's oppressive measures. Distribute an anonymous flyer which threatens to blow up the premises if the spying isn't put to an end by a certain date. Phone in bomb threats. Etc.