NSI E-mail Vunerability
blackwidow sent us the latest in the Web-mail security gaffes. After creating accounts that had easily guessable passwords, it turns out the security for the NSI Webmail accounts is...breachable (Hint - understatement). Ya know, all I wanted was my domains to work - I don't want more then I ask for *sigh*.
On the other hand, NameSecure's policy is exactly opposite to NSI's. They don't transfer the domain until they get the court order.
That is a reason enough to switch to NameSecure. Not to mention that the totally moronic email screw up is outrageous.
___
If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
If you think of MS as a company that adds unwanted features to such an extent that it's too big to properly support, you'll probably be whispering 'deja vu' to yourself right now.
Competition is opening up, and NSI want to add features so that people'll stay with them. Unfortunately, they're adding these features quickly so as not to miss the boat, little realising that half-assed, bug-ridden pseudo-features are the pretty much guaranteed to drive the masses away in hordes.
(Score: -1, Thou Hast Lost an Eighth)
NSI: if you're going to give us additional features, then
a) make them optional in an opt-in setup. you'll get fewer immediate signups, but they'll be people who wanted the service.
b) make them secure. your market is a reasonably technically savvy audiance, and they can spot this stuff a mile away.
c) make them RELEVENT. The world doesn't need Yet Another Web-mail provider. There's already hotmail, mail.com, etc, etc, etc. not to mention the fact that you targetted people who already administer their own domains. Most of us are happy with our domains.
d) follow your own rules. If I'm not allowed to use your database for spamming, you certainly aren't allowed to use it to spam either. that's just basic ethics.
Now if only they'd take this into consideration...
IMHO this is another example of a company doing what dejanews did.
Usually, sending compliments to people for a fine job is great. Dejanews was a different story.
Once dejanews had a email soliciting comments about their service. As it was a great service, I let them know why it was valuable to me and told them "don't change a thing!"" because it was perfect. A short time later, they did the unthinkable and trashed a fine search interface with bloated crap from hell. So much for my suggestion. I still have that email and the thanks they gave me for the compliments.
I suspect they were looking for emails of praise and saving them for later as testimonials. Dirty tricks... Why do so many commercial companies wish to screw customers?