Chilean Congress does the CDA thing

A lengthy submission, but I find it rather fascinating to look at how other countries handle the internet. Someday people will write books about this, but for now, the pattern seems to be that as soon as public use of the net reaches a certain point, sensational journalism kicks in, the public (most of whom have no direct experience with the internet) rises up in outrage, and the first net-regulation laws get passed.

Miguel Farah writes "Chile has been connected to the Internet since 1992, and during all this time, it's been working mostly free of external regulations. All the time since then, though, those of us who've been on the net have feared that the day would come when our Congress would try to regulate it by law. Aw, hell... eventually it had to happen, and has happened now.

There's a "bulletin" (a project of law) that's just been formally appointed, and now it has to be conducted through the whole process, which may take as short as three months and as long as six years (this is because our Congress has a knack for treat non-urgent, non-political laws with great inefficiency timewise (the canonical example is the infamous "Sports law" that promotes sports, that's been on the edge of approval for more than four years, even though it's generally felt it's important to have it approved at once).

This project is, in my opinion (please note that I'm an engineer, not a lawyer), extremely poor: it's filled with generalities and has more holes than a Gruyéere cheese. It is pretty obvious that the intentions of those who wrote the bulletin simply wanted to write down the word "Internet" in a law, following the urge to regulate everything that is typical in our country's lawyers.

I quote the bulletin here, as is, and below provide a translation.

-----ACTUAL BULLETIN---------8

 "