Slashdot Mirror


Internet Rating System Plans to Globalize

The New York Times ran a great article about the upcoming Global Rating System, coming to a country near you sometime next year. Stephen Balkam, the characteristically disingenuous defender of rating systems, is described as saying that so far no governments have mandated that content providers use online rating systems. Okay, that's true - because it hasn't been passed yet. Australia's states are in the process of implementing model legislation which would criminalize failing to rate or mis-rating a site - even accidentally. Similar legislation has also been proposed in Great Britain and the U.S. -- michael

4 of 111 comments (clear)

  1. Deja? by ajs · · Score: 4

    What about services like search-engines and Deja that display other people's content? Will Deja have to rate all of USENET? Will Google have to rate all of their cached pages?

    This just can't work. Not on the Net.

  2. International? Yeah, right. by rde · · Score: 4

    I notice that the noble censors (pardon, raters) are planning on getting together a bunch of advisors from around the world to help with such things as national and ethnic considerations.
    Twelve people.
    Do not take the following as an 'I hate Americans' statement
    The problem is that as far as the US is concerned, everyone else is secondary. To a certain extent this is admirable; no government can succeed unless the needs of its people are paramount. But when that nation is as powerful as America, and that nation perceives international web sites as a threat to its moral purity ("for the children!!!") then by gosh the world better fall in line with the US.
    This wouldn't be so much of a problem if the Americans could come up with a reasonable and fair system of rating. Unfortunately, there ain't no such animal. So we're likely to be stuck with a shitty rating system that pays lip service to the problem of American Children Seeing Breasts and proves to be (at least) an inconvenience to the majority of surfers around the world.

    Yes, I know Bertelsmann's report hailed from Germany. I never said the Americans had a copyright on stupidity.

  3. How to prevent this. by Amphigory · · Score: 5

    I think just about everyone who reads slashdot would radically dislike a rating system enforced by the government. Unfortunately, there is a very real and substantial problem with the Internet for many people right now: namely, there is no way for me to protect my children from the most disgustingly vile content imaginable short of cutting off the Internet entirely.

    I can't keep them from accessing it, even by sitting over the shoulder the whole time, because pornographic sites deliberately misrepresent themselves as appropriate sites. And many (most?) of these sites deliberately include images on their front pages which are inappropriate for children (and me for that matter). Do you really want your seven year old daughter seeing pictures of a man peeing on a woman, even for a second as you make a dive for the monitor power switch? If you think this isn't a problem, you are either a fool or have never been a parent. For examples, take a look www.whitehouse.com sometime.

    And the fact is that you can't watch your kids all the time. You have to sleep sometime. Don't even get me started on page jacking -- your kids don't even have to be doing something wrong to get sent to some of the worst smut on the Internet.

    To make matters worse, anyone without Internet access is rapidly being marginalized by our society. So, my choice is to (a) have my children be marginalized or (b) have them grow up thinking that normal sexuality is whips, chains, and defecating on each other. Or milder, but just as bad, have them grow up thinking that pornography is harmless and a normal expression of sexuality (its not -- pornography treats people as objects. I though that was something geeks were against?).

    As I see it, ratings systems are a good thing because if they aren't setup, the government will find a way to outlaw porn all together. At least outside the united states. In the US, they will come up with some way to worm around the 1st ammendment and water it down just as they have the second.

    What is desperately needed (now) is an organization and appropriate technologies to construct a publically, freely available list of offensive sites. You want to resist censorship? Help construct this list. Believe me, it is far better to exercise responsibility voluntarily than with the government making you.

    --
    -- Slashdot sucks.
    1. Re:How to prevent this. by vyesue · · Score: 3

      someday, parents are going to have to grow up and realize that it's a big, bad world out there.

      teach your children what filth is. tell them that your value system doesnt support men peeing on women or girls fucking snakes. if you raise them correctly, seeing this garbage isnt going to permanently scar their minds. and if you think it's going to, keep your damned kids off the internet.

      I, for one, refuse to label my web pages. and I suspect that a huge number of people will make the same choice that I will if this passes, and there will be waaay too many of us to arrest.