I find it strangely telling that when IBM set out to defeat Kasparov, they did so by building the fastest computer that ever played chess, and succeeded, while Micrsoft set out to do so with a lot of hype, media attention, and flashy web pages, and lost...
- /. is like a steer's horns, a point here, a point there and a lot of bull in between.
Kasparov's Endgame Analysis
by
Raereth
·
· Score: 5
After The World resigned, Kasparov announced a 25-move forced mate after move 62 (read: the world would've lost on or before move 87, no matter what it did). You can see the page here, and it has a bit of commentary with Kasparov's analysis.
The game can be seen here.
I find it strangely telling that when IBM set out to defeat Kasparov, they did so by building the fastest computer that ever played chess, and succeeded, while Micrsoft set out to do so with a lot of hype, media attention, and flashy web pages, and lost...
-
After The World resigned, Kasparov announced a 25-move forced mate after move 62 (read: the world would've lost on or before move 87, no matter what it did). You can see the page here, and it has a bit of commentary with Kasparov's analysis.