Slashdot Mirror
ABC TV Does Two Major Cracker Stories
karma vs Dogma writes "ABC ran a couple of stories tonight on the "Evils of Crackers/Hackers". Read the summaries of the World News Tonight story and the 20/20 story. I am just wondering where they keep getting these huge figures on the costs of replacing one html document with another."
What was it that sysadmin said? "It cost us hundreds of thousands of dollars to reboot and repair those servers." Maybe I should hack my own site at work and tell my boss I need $300,000 to reboot the servers. Can you say new house? :)
_______
2B1ASK1
And the easiest thing to make someone afraid of is something they are dependent on, but can't control or don't understand. Fear is a great hook--you're watching Friends or whatever and all of a sudden some talking heads pop up and says, "Why bottled water may be bad for you, tonight on the 11AliveCast." So you watch the 11AliveCast and they keep teasing you along until 11:26PM, when they tell you bottled water isn't fluoridated so please for ghod's sake brush.
And the next week bottled water sales are down. They really are. Air travel drops a small but significant amount after airline crashes, and boy-oh-boy do those ever grab airtime. The irony is that lots of those panickers end up driving, which is far more dangerous than flying.
Or one sociopath goes and puts cyanide in Tylenol capsules in Chicago in 1982. The press went absolutely batshit over that one, and within a month seven local poisonings became 270 copycats poisonings nationwide, and every bottle of Tylenol in the U.S. had to be taken off the shelf. Within a year all OTC pharmeceuticals were repackaged to be tamper resistant, for over $1.3 billion per year in direct costs, never mind the indirect costs of making otherwise harmless medicines impossible for elderly people to open.
Sending the population into a panic also makes governments adopt hasty, poorly thought-out measured to remedy what their citizens are convinced are terrible, terrible problems. Does anybody remember the plastic handgun scare of 1985? Huge panic, many laws passed, product did not exist and is still technologically unfeasible.
Whipping up a frenzy of concern and fear may not be responsible journalism, but it brings in readers and viewers, consequences be damned. Speaking of hasty government actions, read about W.R. Hearst's interest in the Spanish-American war some time, if you're ever curious about the lengths people have gone to to sell papers.
Moral: The manipulation of public perception can turn minor problems into major problems, not the least of which will be the public perception itself.
--
This is not my sandwich.
What annoys me most about all these "hacker" stories (and most other stories too) in the news is that the reporter never ever has a friggin clue about the subject. I'm sure that l0pht and maybe GH to some extent have some legit hacking/cracking abilities, but for all I know it could just be another article glorifieing script kiddies. I bet that if ABC interviewed some random 13 year old script kiddie in place of these groups, the article would pretty much be the exact same. We'd probably read something like, "Using these advanced password cracking programs, a skilled hacker like l33tb0y13 could break into even the most secure computers in the world" or some such inane tripe.
I notice how most of the articles never really deal with the methods the crackers use. Instead what I see are quotations of the hackers boasting, and of the writer fearfully agreeing. Throw in some quotes from a paranoid and clueless law enforcement official and you got yourself an article.
I wish ABC would have hired someone who knew what he was doing to interview those "hackers." Get an authentic security expert (and not someone like Vranesevich) and have ask some technically oriented questions. I wouldn't mind seeing some big time cracker group exposed as a band of script kiddies or even seeing a real legit group's skills be verified by a competent source. As it stands, every hacker article appears to be FUD and needless paranoia written and advertised by someone who cant tell a telnet port from his ass. I want to see facts and commentary by someone who understands what he is talking about rather than seeing so many broad, unfounded statements rubber stamped and published.