Slashdot Mirror


User: CmdrTaco

CmdrTaco's activity in the archive.

Stories
11,617
Comments
333
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 333

  1. Re:Subscribtions on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 2

    I would prefer to see sites like SourceForge or Freshmeat do that myself. I don't really want to use Slashdot as a software announcement system. We do post a reasonable number of them, but its a minor portion of Slashdot.

  2. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 2
    82% read 10 or fewer pages a day. 15% read 30 or less. 3% read more than 30 a day.

    We don't track it per user and don't plan to, so we won't be putting that info in your user info page. Sorry, the DB just can't handle that load.

    Currently pages that are not index/comments/article are shown ad-free provided you are a subscriber and have ads suppressed on at least one of the three page types. Those pages aren't counted.

    The queue thing is quite possible someday.

  3. Re:PayPal? on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 2

    Did you read what I wrote in that article? Yes, we will accept credit cards directly. Paypal was just first becuase it was quick and easy to do. I also hope to get ThinkGeek to be able to accept payment for Slashdot Subscriptions too, just 'cuz I think it'd be fun ;)

  4. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3

    We figure that people are going to subscribe on the honor system anyway, so this just doesn't really matter. Users who really don't want ads will run Junkbuster.

  5. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you load 100 pages a day, then as I said before, you are in the 3% of users for whom the subscription is not ideal. Its really targetted at the other 97% of readers who read less then 30 pages a day.

    I'm sorry we don't have a system in place to tell you your activity in advance, but those realtime updates are DB hogs and we don't do them for everyone.

  6. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here's the thing tho. It sounds like you want to subscribe. Put in $5, and set Slashdot to display ads on comments & the index. You'll still have the big ads on articles suppressed (and any other benefits of subscribing) and it'll take awhile to chew through those pages.

    We don't expect everyone to subscribe. And we know that most people won't subscribe to suppress ads. We just want to give people the ability to pay if they want to, and to give them something in return.

  7. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 5, Informative

    Frankly we doubt that 3% will really pay us at all. Notice the venom posted in this discussion: this comes largely from that very 3%. Its ironic that those who profess to hate us the most also load the most pages ;)

  8. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 2

    Yeah this is kinda a problem. Subscribers at least get that data, but we don't bother tracking it for everyone. You could subscribe and see how fast you chew through the thousand pages... also you can to choose you page types. So if you just hide banner ads on article.pl... well you get the idea.

  9. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bingo!

  10. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3

    To put it in perspective, the 3% of readers who read Slashdot the most load 25 times the pages as normal users.

  11. Re:PayPal? on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3

    I personally have been using Paypal for eBay and such for some time. As I said, we're going to offer other options because we know it is a problem for many people. But we also know that millions of net users have Paypal accounts and don't have a problem with them.

  12. Re:Subscribtions on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As I said, I'd like to do filtering based on subscriptions (thats what I mean by the Gold Star for posting). Operating under the assumption that a troll wouldn't want to give us his credit card number (half of them post through anonymizing proxy servers, so I seriously doubt that they'll be giving us their CC num ;)

    It'd be a user option of course, just like all the other filters. You can set a +1 to subscribers. I dunno if everyone would like that, but I would think it would be interesting to see at least.

  13. Re:Metered pricing vs. flat rate on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'd like to do a flat rate, but we have a tiny percentage of users that load thousands of pages a week.

    This system works well for 82% of Slashdot readers- for them the cost is the same as a typical magazine.

  14. Re:PayPal? on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 5, Informative

    As mentioned in the article, and on the subscription page, we will support other payment methods. Paypal was just quick and easy, and we knew a lot of readers use it anyway.

  15. Re:hypocrites... on Announcing Slashdot Subscriptions · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yes we all work for free with donated bandwidth and servers. *cough*

  16. Re:The real question..... on Kathleen Fent Read This Story · · Score: 5, Funny

    No... but you can paypal either of us... and I'd settle their 45 inch plasma TV ;)

  17. Re:I *should* have gotten First Post! on Kathleen Fent Read This Story · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah... this way you're on topic and you should get a load of karma.

  18. Re:Go ahead, make my list! on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you want to wade around in the sewer, then don't complain when you step on poop ;)

  19. Re:killfile timothy! on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ladies and gentleman, meet Sumdamn, the amazing humor impaired boy! The 10 o'clock show is completely different, g'night!

  20. Re:all this code... on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 3, Troll

    Nothing stopping anyone from submitting their diffs with these features. We only code what we want.

  21. Re:Go ahead, make my list! on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 1, Troll

    Don't read at -1 ;)

  22. Re:Go ahead, make my list! on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 2, Troll
    Anonymous Coward is a seperate thing, and can be filtered as such... just flag AC as a -2 penalty or something, and suddenly your comment view gets much smarter.

    I agree about logging in. I think there is a time and a place for AC posting, and only about 1% of all Slashdot AC posts use it appropriately. Hence the ability to blow them all away in your user preferences.

  23. Re:killfile timothy! on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 3, Troll

    Unwritten? Hells no, its written in the sacred scroll that each author must sign in blood before he gets access to the submissions bin.

  24. Re:Woohoo. on Slashdot Code Update · · Score: 2, Troll

    I've thought about that and decided against it. It opens up more problems then it fixes. Plus, I like to believe that you have to insert your foot into your own mouth... you don't get to chop off your mouth.

  25. Re:Nice music library on Review of the Audiotron Stereo MP3 Component · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually my home MP3 collection is totally legal.