...you would have to give the user mind-enhancing drugs and "train" them, with a short film, to perform the decryption. The movie itself would be displayed encrypted, and only viewable by someone trained to decrypt it -- which ability they would naturally lose as the effects of the drug wore off.
You've missed my point, which was the GPs saying We didn't take it into account that the current terrorism threat is not seriously proven. The threat is certainly overstated, and a lot of the current security rules are just plain insane, but to say that the threat is 'not proven' on the anniversary of 9/11 is just plain tasteless.
Slashdot Mirror
...you would have to give the user mind-enhancing drugs and "train" them, with a short film, to perform the decryption. The movie itself would be displayed encrypted, and only viewable by someone trained to decrypt it -- which ability they would naturally lose as the effects of the drug wore off.
Something kind of like 'Magic Eye' then?
You've missed my point, which was the GPs saying We didn't take it into account that the current terrorism threat is not seriously proven. The threat is certainly overstated, and a lot of the current security rules are just plain insane, but to say that the threat is 'not proven' on the anniversary of 9/11 is just plain tasteless.
And that is real terrorism. We didn't take it into account that the current terrorism threat is not seriously proven.
Really? Look at the date at the top of your post.