If you certified that PC for use in the current configuration it will have to be recertified now that it has changed, the cost of re-certification should count as damage.
I can't remember - Diebold voting machines don't run on a version of windows do they?:) Damn, I can't believe I even forgot about certification. That would definitely cost a bit. I'm sure you could also count your hourly rate in re-testing everything to make sure it works and make sure the recertification would happen.
Also, how about some emotional distress? We all know that all SA's cry when stuff is changed/broken while they took that quick nap.
Say, for instance, that I have my XP machine setup just the way I want it. I don't want any other changes as it is perfect, to me, as it is (yes, I know this would never happen with a Microsoft product but still..). By Microsoft coming in and forcing an update, they are damaging my otherwise perfect setup. If one piece of software stops working, can a person not easily blame this on the update they forced on me?
I know it's just a principle, but who knows... debate!:D
If a person who uses vista or xp did not want any updates to their OS, they turn off Automatic updates. It's their choice. Where does Microsoft get off thinking that something like this is acceptable?
If I ran either of those operating systems, I would probably file a lawsuit, as to me that is a huge invasion of privacy. If they can force you to update those few files, they can absolutely view any and every file on your computer.
After spending hours on breaking and re-breaking wifi on my laptop, I went out and bought a $20 wifi card with an Atheros chipset. It has worked flawlessly sense, without having to jump through the ndiswrapper hoops.
And any time someone new the *nix asks me about wireless, and why it isn't working, I always insist they spend the $20 on the Atheros chipset, as, again, it is damn near flawless.
This is one of the many reasons I have not used AT&T in years. I actually just quit a job with a contractor for AT&T's U-Verse service, and the way they look at customer service is horrible. I think it's time congress takes a look at 'Ma Bell and gets rid of the re-formed monopoly. In so many areas the customers have no other choice for service.
Also, if any of you have that AT&T U-Verse service, call in and tell them that you are going to cancel unless they give you a $90 credit. All of their tech support reps are required to give out up to $90 if you threaten to cancel.... too bad AT&T wireless doesn't work the same way:(
Slashdot Mirror
what's next, someone suing all canadians who say "eh" and "aboot"?
First Bush claims the Northwest Passage is considered an international shipping lane,
Then some dumbass politian sues GOD,
And now this.
The worlds gone crazy.
Crazy.
I can't remember - Diebold voting machines don't run on a version of windows do they?
Also, how about some emotional distress? We all know that all SA's cry when stuff is changed/broken while they took that quick nap.
Damages can be shown in several ways.
:D
Say, for instance, that I have my XP machine setup just the way I want it. I don't want any other changes as it is perfect, to me, as it is (yes, I know this would never happen with a Microsoft product but still..). By Microsoft coming in and forcing an update, they are damaging my otherwise perfect setup. If one piece of software stops working, can a person not easily blame this on the update they forced on me?
I know it's just a principle, but who knows... debate!
Is it me or does this just seem down right nasty?
If a person who uses vista or xp did not want any updates to their OS, they turn off Automatic updates. It's their choice. Where does Microsoft get off thinking that something like this is acceptable?
If I ran either of those operating systems, I would probably file a lawsuit, as to me that is a huge invasion of privacy. If they can force you to update those few files, they can absolutely view any and every file on your computer.
Although, this should come as no surprise...
After spending hours on breaking and re-breaking wifi on my laptop, I went out and bought a $20 wifi card with an Atheros chipset. It has worked flawlessly sense, without having to jump through the ndiswrapper hoops.
And any time someone new the *nix asks me about wireless, and why it isn't working, I always insist they spend the $20 on the Atheros chipset, as, again, it is damn near flawless.
This is one of the many reasons I have not used AT&T in years. I actually just quit a job with a contractor for AT&T's U-Verse service, and the way they look at customer service is horrible. I think it's time congress takes a look at 'Ma Bell and gets rid of the re-formed monopoly. In so many areas the customers have no other choice for service. Also, if any of you have that AT&T U-Verse service, call in and tell them that you are going to cancel unless they give you a $90 credit. All of their tech support reps are required to give out up to $90 if you threaten to cancel.... too bad AT&T wireless doesn't work the same way :(
Maybe they were going "accidently" nuke new orleans...
we can only hope.