Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Mint Claims Rights To Words "One Cent"

knorthern knight writes "A weird intersection of copyright/trademark with politics is playing out in Canada. Short background: various Canadian cities and municipalities have launched a publicity/lobbying campaign seeking a fixed take from the GST (Goods and Services Tax, a national Canadian sales tax similar to European VAT). The amount sought is 1 cent for each dollar of the purchase price. This is summarized by the slogan 'One Cent of the GST NOW.' According to a press release, the Royal Canadian Mint (the federal agency that prints Canadian paper currency and stamps Canadian coins) has demanded from the City of Toronto $47,680 in royalties for use of the phrase 'one cent', and the image of the Canadian penny. $10,000 covers the use of the words 'one cent' in the campaign website address (www.onecentnow.ca) and email address (onecentnow@toronto.ca). An additional $10,000 is demanded for the use of these words in the campaign phone number (416-ONE-CENT). The remaining $27,680 covers the use of the image of the Canadian penny in printed materials such as pins and posters." Here's a National Post article on the brouhaha.

286 comments

  1. My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh shit...

    1. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And you have to pay double.

    2. Re:My two cents by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please someone tell me this is a joke.

      --
      I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
    3. Re:My two cents by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      You're fine. The copyright is for "one cent." Crap...

    4. Re:My two cents by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1
      No - it's deliberate infringement, so we can treble the damages to arive at having to pay six times over!

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
    5. Re:My two cents by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope 50 Cent doesn't try selling music in Canada, or he's screwed.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:My two cents by PinkPanther · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope 50 Cent doesn't try selling music in Canada...

      When it comes to Canada, 50 Cent is already screwed

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    7. Re:My two cents by Creepy · · Score: 1

      heh - but they still let him in...

      50 Cent is more like 49.5 Cent in Canada, anyway.

    8. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trademark! The only copyright in the story is for the image on the coin.

    9. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, they think he's half loonie.

    10. Re:My two cents by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      I hope 50 Cent doesn't try selling music in Canada... Even more so than you think, since obviously, 50 Cent is known up there as 75 Cent :D
      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    11. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That copyright must be worth a mint...

    12. Re:My two cents by nocomment · · Score: 1

      50 cent? Is that you? Dood, you are screwed!

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    13. Re:My two cents by trolltalk.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not a joke, but the mint will lose in court.

      1. There is NO copyright notice on ANY Canadian currency.
      2. Any copyright old enough to defeat a prior use claim will have expired
      3. Any copyright recent enough to be enforceable is defeated by prior use, not just in Canada, but other countries
      4. If they insist, we'll all just switch to Canadian Tire money. After all, eBay accepts it (Canadian Tire bought a bank - they're very heavy in the credit business).
    14. Re:My two cents by goaliemn · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've never looked at paper currency. On the back side, on the bottom margin, there is a copyright notice on the $5 and $20 bills (all I have handy..)

    15. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 Cent sells music??

    16. Re:My two cents by rs79 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (This applies to Canada)

      You need to look up "official mark". Although handled through the trademark office an official mark has enhanced protection unter the law. Official marks can be granted for things you can't get a trademark for and the exact wording does not need to be registered. And this is a trademark issue that has nothing to do with copyright. The right to copy money falled under the criminal code. A case could be made for protection as an registered industrial design though.

      Having said that, according to the (govt) strategis database there are 123 hits for trademarks with "cent" in them.

      The questions are: is the likeness of the penny similar enough to warrent infringement. Courts so far seem to want things to be very very close. They could lose on that point. Is "one cent" protected? If it is it hasn't been enforced in the past, not that this matters a whole lot as far as an official mark is concerned.

      See
      1) http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/app/cipo/trademarks/search/tmSearch.do?language=eng

      2) 9(1)(n)(iii) of the Trade-marks Act

      This case could go either way. And they might or might not be reversed by a higher court. There is no federal court ruling on this and lower course have been inconsistant. It's a distractive strategy IMO to piss off the Toronto poeple.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    17. Re:My two cents by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Not on a single penny, nickel, dime, loonie or twoonie. also not on the $5, $10 and $20 notes I just looked at . They don't have a copyright notice for the amount, just for the whole design, and only for 2006, 2005, and 2004 respectively. The mint has NO copyright claim to the term 1 cent, or any other denomination, and they WILL lose.

    18. Re:My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      50 Cent is known up there as 75 Cent

      You're about five years behind the times. These days, he's only about 49 cents

    19. Re:My two cents by evalhalla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) Under the Berne convention there is no need for copyright notices for works to be protected
      2) prior use / art applies to brevets, not to copyright
      3) as above
      4) well, that could work, but I don't see it as mattering in court

      I don't see the mint winning either, at least on the "one cent" phrase; they may have a point on the use of the image of the canadian penny, however.

    20. Re:My two cents by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Toronto's "Government" that's the joke.

      Instead of raising taxes on Million dollar homes assessed at $1K, they're bitching about more money from the feds.

    21. Re:My two cents by Run4yourlives · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Haven't been watching the currency markets lately have you?

    22. Re:My two cents by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Under the Berne convention, you don't get damages for unregistered copyright - just the ability to say "cease and desist." The mint is asking for $$$$.

      On the question of trade marks, when did the Canadian Mint register 1 cent as a trade mark, and did they renew the trade mark as required every 15 years?

    23. Re:My two cents by belmolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although there are 123 marks containing "cent", some of them are things like "nutracent", which does not contain the word "cent". Only one result comes up when I search for "one cent", and this is not actually a mark - it is an index term for a banknote design. In sum, I see no evidence that the mark "one cent" is owned by anyone, much less that "one cent" is an official mark of the Crown or of the Mint. Have I missed something?

      A second point is that registration of an official mark does not prevent the use of the same words in a generic sense, only as a competing mark. It is less than clear to me whether all of the uses to which "one cent" is being put in this campaign constitute use as marks.

    24. Re:My two cents by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      2) prior use / art applies to brevets, not to copyright

      Actually, prior art must apply to copyright. It's just not worded that way. If someone else wrote something last week (prior art) that you just wrote today, then THEY hold the copyright and you are infringing on their copyright.

      So, IF you can copyright the phrase "one cent", then if ANYONE wrote it before the Canadian Mint first wrote it, the copyright either belongs to someone else or has expired and the phrase is in the public domain. I highly suspect the phrase was used before Canada became a country.

      Now, TRADEMARK, that's a whole nother story.

    25. Re:My two cents by InvisibleSoul · · Score: 1

      That's pretty ironic, especially in light of the fact that we (Canada) are looking into the possibility of getting rid of the penny altogether.

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/economy/penny.html

    26. Re:My two cents by lgw · · Score: 1

      I don't think any country relies on copyright law to protect their money from duplication. Governments tend to get rather upset about that sort of thing. You problably want "trandemark" not "copyright". Doesn't the Canadian government have this "official mark" concept which is stronger than a trademark to protect it's own marks?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    27. Re:My two cents by d^2b · · Score: 1

      People might find the views of a Canadian IP Lawyer interesting. He seems to think that the copyright claim is non-sense, and the official mark one likely won't fly based on recent Supreme court rulings.

      I dunno much about either, but the copyright on an image from 1937 does seem like a stretch. Maybe someone should have some t-shirts printed and really rub it in.

      Credit where credit is due: this comes via Michael Geist.

    28. Re:My two cents by nutnut · · Score: 1

      watch out they may have copyrighted THAT too.

    29. Re:My two cents by evalhalla · · Score: 1

      The difference between prior art in brevets and copyright is that you can write the same copyritghted thing that someone else wrote a week before, and as long as you're able to prove that you didn't copy from the other work you're fine.

    30. Re:My two cents by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "People might find the views of a Canadian IP Lawyer interesting. He seems to think that the copyright claim is non-sense, and the official mark one likely won't fly based on recent Supreme court rulings"

      I dunno, this IP lawer makes little sense to me. First he's going on about Copyright, God knows why. Second, the supreme court ruling he's talking about is about using trademark to extend patent duration, third he states an official mark has soektimes more or less punch than a trademark; I'm still trying to find where it has less, and can't.

      He makes less sense than your average slashdotter IMO.

      It all depends on the judge. Official Mark case law is not well estrablished or predictable from what I've read. We'll have to see.

      Pro: don't but fucking stupid, it's a blowup of a penny. Dismiss.
      Con: it's the govt's image, who have absolute control, and we don't mind it being used anywhere but here. It's infringing because we say it is. Period. Request summary judgement under 9(1)(n)(iii) of the Trade-marks Act. Thank you m'lord.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    31. Re:My two cents by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was supposed to be a joke.

      captcha--"pathetic"

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    32. Re:My two cents by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I expect Stephen Colbert will come asking for American royalties on One Cent next anyhow.

      Soon though, Americans will be using Canadian Tire Money as their national currency. There's a Facebook group proposing that already. One Canadian Tire dollar is worth more than the American Greenback!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    33. Re:My two cents by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Canadian Tire Money - paypal accepts it ...

  2. first we need to clarify by edittard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is that one cent, or point zero one of a cent?

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    1. Re:first we need to clarify by youthoftoday · · Score: 3, Funny

      Um, sir, can't you see they're the same thing? I see no problem there.

      --
      -1 not first post
  3. This is outrageous by Daimanta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    But that's just my two cents.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    1. Re:This is outrageous by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you think its bad, consider how much Curtis James Jackson III will end up paying ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:This is outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This makes absolutely no cents! ;-)

    3. Re:This is outrageous by sherms · · Score: 1

      Let put in my 2 cents worth...

      oops I don't live in Canada.

      INFRINGEMENT!
      INFRINGEMENT!
      INFRINGEMENT!

    4. Re:This is outrageous by sherms · · Score: 1

      Watch out there going after 2 cents next!

  4. When will it end?! by Enoxice · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are some days I have to double check myself and make sure I'm not reading the Onion by mistake. Those days seem to be becoming larger in number.

    --
    Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
    1. Re:When will it end?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will end when the whole "Intellectual Property" debacle caves in on itself.

    2. Re:When will it end?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some days I have to double check myself and make sure I'm not reading the Onion by mistake. Those days seem to be becoming larger in number.

      Not that big of a deal, come on! We can use mathematical equations to work around the registration.

      "Two halfcents", "five cents without four cents"?

      Or how about the simple "Sinus of ninety degrees cents"?

    3. Re:When will it end?! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Just after this little dust up. Then all the copyright issues will have been straightened out, and we can live in non-infringing golden age!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:When will it end?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some days I have to double check myself and make sure I'm not reading the Onion by mistake. Those days seem to be becoming larger in number.

      Well, at least now you know the real reason why they are so afraid to name he-who-shall-not-be-named in Hogwarts.

    5. Re:When will it end?! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      If you laugh, it's not the Onion.

    6. Re:When will it end?! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Or how about the simple "Sinus of ninety degrees cents"?

      Is that that new-fangled nasal trigonometry that I keep hearing about?

    7. Re:When will it end?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:When will it end?! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sorry, but I have trademarked the phrase 'Intellectual Property' for my new real estate firm which specializes in homes for professors. Please cease and desist usage on this forum.

      Sincerely

      Darl McBride

    9. Re:When will it end?! by fork_daemon · · Score: 0

      There are some days I have to double check myself and make sure I'm not reading the Onion by mistake. Those days seem to be becoming larger in number. Oh! And I thought The Onion was a National Daily ;)
    10. Re:When will it end?! by edittard · · Score: 1

      Is that that new-fangled nasal trigonometry that I keep hearing about?
      No, I think it's snot.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    11. Re:When will it end?! by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      Nope, people really are getting stupider in their conquest for one cent!

      I don't get how they can expect to own the phrase "one cent" given that other countries have similar denominations also called "one cent" and that the phrase "one cent" is actually an abbreviation of a mathematical term in common usage (one percent).

      The exact design of the coin, maybe, but not even the mint really owns that because they're just government owned company and the people are supposed to own/be the government in a democracy (the politicians are elected to represent the people because not everyone would fit in the government house). By default the people own the copyrights on any government generated work and can choose to do as they see fit with them.

      Go figure?

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    12. Re:When will it end?! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      The exact design of the coin, maybe, but not even the mint really owns that because they're just government owned company and the people are supposed to own/be the government in a democracy (the politicians are elected to represent the people because not everyone would fit in the government house). By default the people own the copyrights on any government generated work and can choose to do as they see fit with them.

      Go figure? Not... entirely... true. The government owns the copyrights and uses them as a defensive measure against anyone misusing them. For example, in the absense of anti-counterfeiting legislation, the government could whack counterfeiters with copyright violation. People aren't allowed to "do as they see fit" with government marks and copyrights, because the potential for misuse is too high. As a result, the government usually has the most liberal "terms of use" seen anywhere. As an example, I work at a government entity and the copyright on our website is "Material featured on this site is subject to copyright. All material may however be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source and copyright status must be acknowledged.".

      Granted, I live in NZ, but that's surely not the point... right?
      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  5. ummm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the Romans had the cent long before Canada.

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      > I thought the Romans had the cent long before Canada.

      ummmm, no. They had the denarius. That's why British LSd money referred to their _penny_ as 1d -- d for denarius.

      And a _penny_ was not the same thing as a _cent_. There were 240 "old" pence in the pound.

      Those of us on {Dollars|Euros|Pesos|Rands|etc.}, and Cent(avo)s are using new fangled decimal money that came much later on.

    2. Re:ummm by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, but (odd bit of trivia), they did have the census, which measured someone's total wealth, and eventually morphed into Zins in German, their word for (bank) interest.

    3. Re:ummm by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what they are referring to is that the Cent (I am guessing here) is probably based upon the Latin form for Centurion or Centurio (or however it is spelled), of which in a Roman Legion I believe had authority over about 100 soldiers, hence 100 Cents in a dollar or some such. Just as a Decurion (again not going to bother looking up real spelling), had authority over a squad of 10 (within the 100, etc..). While the Romans had military names for such things, Cent was probably just taken from the Latin for 100 things or some such.

    4. Re:ummm by neoform · · Score: 1

      They forgot to copyright the name I guess.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    5. Re:ummm by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fun fact of the day:

      A Roman Centurion who commanded a normal full-strength centuria generally had about 80 soldiers, not 100 as the name would suggest. The missing 20 men were non-combat servants or people with special skills.

    6. Re:ummm by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      From the Dictionary widget on my MacBook...


      cent: ORIGIN late Middle English (in the sense [a hundred]):from French cent , Italian cento , or Latin centum 'hundred.'


      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    7. Re:ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I think what they are referring to is that the Cent (I am guessing here) is probably based upon the Latin form for Centurion

      This gets modded interesting?

      No need to guess, Dictionary.com tells us that words like cent, century, centennial, centenary, centigrade, etc., comes from the Latin centum (hundred) and 'centuria' (group of a hundred).

      But the Romans didn't divide their money into units of 10s or 100s and they didn't have a coin called a "cent," which is, after all, what the discussion is ostensibly about.

    8. Re:ummm by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I think I did say "about" as I know this wasn't an exact number.... Also through the history of the Roman Empire, they changed the numbers around some, so the Legion which usually had about 5,500 (I think) men, would sometimes be smaller or larger due to configuration of the time. Also the numbers usually didn't include the legates or the political officers (forget the name for em'). They also had skirmishers and varying amounts of light horse (depending on period), and any irregulars (allies, etc..).

      My favorite fun fact is the history of the word "Decimation". It was a form of punishment in the Roman Legion, in which for serious crimes (cowardice or treason or something like that), rather that just killing everyone (which they couldn't really afford as they needed the trained soldiers), they would randomly kill 1 in every 10 soldiers as an example. Pretty neat eh? :)

    9. Re:ummm by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Informative

      This as nothing to do about "coins", other than that is the subject. (wow make sense of that sentence)

      Anyway this is about the Canadian Mint claiming copyright on the word "Cent". (Which as a Canadian I am embarrassed)

      I think the original post is eluding to the fact that the word "Cent" existed and has been in use long before the Canadian Mint came around (Nor is the Canadian Mint the only one to use it in Monetary terms).

      I can understand if a company wants to protect its brand name, as they may have spent a lot of money advertise that name and to promote their product over time, and if another is trying to profit off of that name. However the Canadian Mint's claim in my view is stupid. Is the USA (or whoever was first) going to try and sue us for using the word "Dollar". Not to mention that it is a government institution (corporate or not), makes this even more stupid (Particularly when targeting another branch of Government. Your all generally on the same team, play nice!).

    10. Re:ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they would randomly kill 1 in every 10 soldiers as an example. Pretty neat eh? :)"

      I guess that depends greatly on what number you get...

    11. Re:ummm by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "Anyway this is about the Canadian Mint claiming copyright on the word "Cent" "

      Where did you see the word copyright anywhere in any claim.

      It's an "official mark" which is comes under trademark law, and they're not the same as trademarks.

      Interestingly, the National Post site is at canada.com which if the govt wanted to could get WIPO to take it away from them as so far they have always ceded official mark domains back to the government.

      Remember, it doesn't have to be fair, it just has to be legal.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    12. Re:ummm by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Got any LSd? Sure. Here is a five-pound note. YOu can get your LSd at the bank ;-)

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    13. Re:ummm by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      ok you are right. After I posted I regretted using the word "copyright". I meant "the explicit right to use that word", whatever legislation that falls under.

      without getting it to weeds, and details about trademark law, the whole point is how can you have the exclusive rights to a word that is common.

      Like the jerk down south that trademarked "Stealth" or whatever it was, it is silly. If it is your Brand name, than thats one thing. So if the City of Toronto decided to try and make money under the auspices of "The Canadian Mint" well that might be a problem (though not really as it isn't like they are competing with anyone for brand recognition). To do the same for Cent to me just doesn't make sense. It would be like the Ministry of Transportation charging other Ministries that wish to use the phrase "Licence" publicly because they issue drivers Licences. Licences existed before they coined it (heh no pun intended), nor are they they only ones in the world to use it currently. To say they have the explicit right to that name is stupid. That is all I am trying to say.

    14. Re:ummm by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      No, they didn't, though the word does come from the Latin word for 'a hundred', centum (cognate with English hundred via Gothic hund, if anyone's interested).

      The earliest uses of the word as a monetary unit are summed up by the OED as follows (interesting stuff, much more detail than they give for most words):

      Apparently the first mention of cent occurs in the letter of Robert Morris to the U.S. Congress in 1782, suggesting that the American monetary unit should be the of a dollar, and that a coin equal to 100 of these or of a dollar (about 3d. Eng.) should be made, and called a cent. This proposal was not taken up; but it may have suggested the name 'cent' for the coin = of a dollar, ordained by the Continental Congress on 8 August 1786 (see quot.). There exists, however, an American copper token, commonly called the Washington cent, bearing on one side a head in a wreath with the legend 'Washington and Independence', and date '1783'; on the other the words, 'One Cent', and the exergue . But it is not certain that 1783 represents the date of issue; this token was probably struck as late as 1789, the date 1783 being merely that of the conclusion of the War of Independence. Previously to the coining of the cent, or of a dollar, and down to 1789, accounts were kept in dollars and ninetieths, a relic of the time when the Spanish piastre or piece of eight reals, called by the colonists 'dollar', was worth 7s. 6d. (90 pence) of the money of account of Maryland and Pennsylvania. (From notes communicated by the late Prof. J. W. Andrews of Marietta Coll., Ohio.)
  6. Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by jcc · · Score: 5, Funny


    Loonies!

    1. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Many of you may not know anything about Canadian currency. The Loonie is a colloquial term given to the Canadian dollar coin, because on the reverse side is a 'loon' -- a type of duck common in Canada.

    2. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Except a Loon is not a type of duck.

    3. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Walk like a duck? Check.
      Quack like a duck? Check.

      Hmm... ;)

      (Yes yes, I know it's a 'diver' etc etc.)

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Sqweegee · · Score: 1

      I've never heard one quack... they have a very haunting kind of whistling call that can be heard for miles across a lake on calm mornings.

    5. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Scruffy+Dan · · Score: 1

      only if by duck you mean the national Canadian bird

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    6. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Okay, okay. The 'duck' should have been in quotes. There are many people who have no idea what a loon is. The closest approximation is a duck. Both are waterfowl, and the loon is pretty duckoid. Yes, loons are divers, whereas ducks aren't. Loons ... errrmm.... whistle/yodel/howl .... whereas ducks quack. But if you saw one, and didn't know what you were looking at, you might assume it to be an odd type of duck. That's all I'm saying.

      Disclaimer: I grew up in Detroit, MI. I also happen to live near Tampa, FL. As a result, I'm very familiar with the various types of North American waterfowl. Moreso than someone from Iowa or even Ohio. Definitely moreso than those living on the other side of the Big Pond.

    8. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Eastern Fighting Turtle.

      The aggressive snarl of the Eastern Fighting Turtle can carry for up to 5 miles across still water. Even this is not a safe distance away, for this turtle is a very fast swimmer and will attack without provocation.

      -TMBG

    9. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by jonnythan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh..... Loons don't quack.

      I spend at least a week every year up on Squam Lake in New Hampshire. The place is riddled with loons. I hear them make all manner of spooky-ass sounds, but I've never heard one quack.

      They're not ducks. They're not even in the same order. They don't even look like ducks. Look at their bills.

    10. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Don't blame us, all the good birds and animals were taken by other countries. That's why we have the loon and beaver as our nation symbols.

    11. Re:Parity with US$ has gone to their heads! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Well, most Federal and State hunting regulations make no distinction between ducks and divers. Most hunters I know don't either. There are "diving ducks" and "puddle ducks", but they all count against the same bag limit.

      EXCEPTION: The only diver that is separated into it's own category as far as seasons and bag limits goes (at least in South Carolina), is the Merganser. For some reason while they only let you kill 6 ducks per day (and that includes divers - there are some limits as to the number of each species of duck that can make up that 6 too - only two wood duck unfortunately, which is the most common type I see and shoot), they let you kill 15 mergansers. Not sure why they allow that, or why anyone would want to shoot one to begin with. Divers in general don't taste very good, and mergansers in particular are just awful. I MIGHT would take a Hooded Merganser drake, only for a mount (maybe), but barring that, I generally let them pass, as I do most other divers except for Redheads.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  7. this could happen.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..only in America.

    1. Re:this could happen.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...would they forget that Canada's not another state.

    2. Re:this could happen.. by Michael_gr · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...Or that America is a continent.

    3. Re:this could happen.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... actually the same thing happened here in Chile, a bank (BancoEstado) used our national heroes (as they appear in the bills) for a TV ad, also showing the bills.

      The "Banco Central", the entity that prints the chilean peso, press the bank to "cease and desist" showing bills in the ad, as they were considered "copyright material" (!!!????)... this is wierd!!... and listen to this... BancoEstado is also state owned... (state vs state?)

      BTW Lincoln (and the US$5 bill) appears in a version of this ad.

      you can see the ad here:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_XgdDMCWmE

      To put you in context, the heroes are putting money to celebrate our national day, and the Duck is the bank mascot.

      Enrique.

    4. Re:this could happen.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what continent is Chile on? Oh, right. South AMERICA.

    5. Re:this could happen.. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, America is *two* continents. :-)

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    6. Re:this could happen.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is much less likely to happen in the US. See 17 USC 105 and a post on Bricoleur http://www.bricoleur.org/2007/10/ip-in-canadian-penny-47k-usd.html.
      Howard Knopf also has a great post on the Canadian situation http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2007/10/excessive-nonsense-about-one-cent.html

    7. Re:this could happen.. by SEE · · Score: 1

      Hmm? Canada is another American state. Says so right here.

  8. Simple to fix... by renesch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... change the tax to 'two cents', and forward all complaints to the 'Royal Canadian Mint'

    1. Re:Simple to fix... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you misunderstand. The tax is already at 6%. The cities have long complained that they do not receive enough support from the federal government for infrastructure costs, so this publicity campaign is trying to put pressure on the federal gov't to dedicate part of the GST (1/6th of it) directly to the cities. Right now Ottawa gives money to the municipalities mostly on an ad hoc basis, whereas a cut of the GST would give cities a steady and dependable stream of income that would make it easier to invest in long-term infrastructure projects (Vancouver's Evergreen Skytrain line, I'm looking at you!).

  9. Southern Inspiration by Valacosa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Canadian mint must have been inspired by all the similar antics that happen in America.

    Canadians can't stand for this. We have to stamp the crazy out now, before it spreads.

    --
    "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    1. Re:Southern Inspiration by Jaxoreth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Canadians can't stand for this. We have to stamp the crazy out now
      Why? Is it replacing the loony?
      --
      In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
    2. Re:Southern Inspiration by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The US certainly has a huge number of problems, but it still amazes me that not one thread can go by here without someone karma whoring by inserting a veiled or not so veiled reference that says 'It must be the United State's fault'.

      The US Mint has never done anything at all similar. Private companies have, but those are not a Government entity. Let's keep on topic and focus on Canada for once, ok?

    3. Re:Southern Inspiration by Fizzl · · Score: 0

      So you think it is nearly impossible to get reminded of US when these kind of issues pop out elsewhere?

      "Wow, Steve sure is acting like that crazy lady who throws cats around and rambles incoherently!"
      "Huh wha? How can you be reminded of him!? Steve's throwing _pink_ cats and speaking pig latin! I think that's quite inappropriate! Now apologize the crazy cat lady!"

      PS. Any similarities between US and crazy cat lady is purely coincidental.

    4. Re:Southern Inspiration by ozbird · · Score: 1

      ...not one thread can go by here without someone karma whoring by inserting a veiled or not so veiled reference that says 'It must be the United State's fault'.

      Right... like nobody blames Canada.

    5. Re:Southern Inspiration by dbIII · · Score: 1

      We get the weird news from the USA and it appears that the most of rest of the world is infested with failed US management that are presumably sent out to stop them causing trouble at home. Those are the things that give you the "only in America" moments. As press freedom is increasing in China we're getting those sort of stories from there too - anywhere with a lot of people has room for a lot of idiots.

    6. Re:Southern Inspiration by syzler · · Score: 1

      Private companies have, but those are not a Government entity.

      Hmm, you are talking about the U.S. government, right?

        Oh, I get it it. You said "private" companies. The U.S. government is a publicly traded company whose stock is purchased through specialized stock brokers aka lobbyist/activists.

    7. Re:Southern Inspiration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're missing the point. No discussion of any issue pertaining to Canada can be complete without someone trying to point blame at the United States. I studied Political Science at Concordia University in Montreal and there was always someone who would blame the States.. Lord Durham's report, the uprisings of 1837, The October Crisis of 1970...All somehow the fault of the Americans. Granted, Concordia is the Berkeley of the north, but still!

    8. Re:Southern Inspiration by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Let's keep on topic and focus on Canada for once, ok?

      Sooo... How's the weather?

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Southern Inspiration by Fizzl · · Score: 1


          70% Overrated
          30% Funny

      Never bruise the American ego. It's so young and tender it might throw a tantrum.

  10. Sorry, Canada by beavis88 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can only assume this is some of our special overzealous brand of business retardation creeping north over the border. You have my apologies on behalf of the handful of us left here who aren't complete tools.

  11. If they get through with this .... by aix+tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .... Toronto should pay. .... In cash. .... In pennies.

    1. Re:If they get through with this .... by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

      That makes a lot of cents.

    2. Re:If they get through with this .... by gingerTabs · · Score: 1

      hmm, you owe me $lots*10000

    3. Re:If they get through with this .... by rustalot42684 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope. You can't use more than 26 pennies in a single purchase. It's the LAW here.

    4. Re:If they get through with this .... by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you can try, but no agency or store is forced to accept.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    5. Re:If they get through with this .... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Close. If the seller will accept it you can pay with whatever you want. But the seller can refuse more than 26 pennies if they like. It's not illegal to show up with more though, you just take your chance of being refused service.

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:If they get through with this .... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Is this a purchase though?

    7. Re:If they get through with this .... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      I'm sure their copyright was worth every cent.

    8. Re:If they get through with this .... by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they can make micropayments of approximately $0.26

    9. Re:If they get through with this .... by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      The world needs more change like this.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    10. Re:If they get through with this .... by KJE · · Score: 1
      Does any one have a reference for this?

      I tried but couldn't find anything official...

    11. Re:If they get through with this .... by Geak · · Score: 0

      Actually, paying in pennies would get them in more hot water. Beleive it or not, it's against the law to pay a bill with coin if the bill exceeds $20.

      Not that I am a law abiding citizen though. Interesting anecdote: I deposited a government issued tax rebate cheque. The bank held the cheque for 3 days even though their policy is to honor government cheques the day they are deposited. As a result my rent cheque bounced. I got nailed with a $35 NSF fee and they refused to reimburse me for it. I returned the favour by putting $35 into a deposit envelope, and depositing the money into my bank account at one of their ATM's. Shortly after my deposit, "Out of service" flashed up on the screen. I'm guessing the repair bill came to more than $35 dollars. They haven't held a government issued cheque on me since.

  12. Your license to carry has been revoked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please hand in your cents, coins and dollar bills.

    What, did you actually think you owned those?

    1. Re:Your license to carry has been revoked by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Canada hasn't had dollar bills in 20 years :)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  13. Bruhaha? by thedbp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bruhaha? Ha, ha ha! You've got the wrong guy, I spell my name... Nnn... DANGER!

    Brought to you by the Department of Redudancy Department.

  14. silly canadians by Brian+Lewis · · Score: 1

    what's next, someone suing all canadians who say "eh" and "aboot"?

    First Bush claims the Northwest Passage is considered an international shipping lane,
    Then some dumbass politian sues GOD,
    And now this.

    The worlds gone crazy.

    Crazy.

    1. Re:silly canadians by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

      You know, only maritimers actually say "aboot". Do you know how small the maritime region is in comparison with the rest of Canada?

      I _never_ understood why Americans seemed to think that we say that, when I'd never heard it at all (I'm from Quebec), but now I've totally caught a friend of mine from Halifax saying it more than once now.

      Anyways, not only is this completely stupid.. (how many times have Canadian coins been used in commercials and no one's been sued?? surely that's a precedent..), but more importantly WHEN ARE WE GOING TO GET RID OF THE PENNY?

      I'm very much willing to round up prices just to get rid of the damn thing.
      Nickels are the new penny! Pass the word!

    2. Re:silly canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote the words of one Roger Clyne, "The world ain't gone crazy now, no the world ain't gone crazy now. The world ain't gone crazy now, it was born that way."

    3. Re:silly canadians by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then some dumbass politian sues GOD, Do you actually realize how much shit that guy's responsible for?
    4. Re:silly canadians by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " You know, only maritimers actually say "aboot" "

      Nonsense. They just have more of an accent. If you've never been outside Canada you never notice this, but if you've lived in, say, the US for a while you notice "out" and "about" and commonly pronounced as "ooot" and "aboot" even yrar later but nearly all Canadians, albeit sometimes only slightly. But it's there.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    5. Re:silly canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree. Canadians in the US are very easy to pick out because of this.

    6. Re:silly canadians by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      I say that is all slander and libel! I have never known him to do anything at all!

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    7. Re:silly canadians by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I hear the prosecution has a written confession...

  15. Yeah, that would show them by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the mint, they deal with TONS of cents EACH AND EVERY DAY, you think 4.768.000 coins is going to scare them? They got machines for that. Oh and processing fees.

    If you have any kind of a decent bank, they just take your old jar of coins, empty it in a machine and a little later they got a nice total and the money sorted. if your bank charges you for this, you know you got a bad bank. Granted, it is getting harder to find a good bank, in my youth banks went out of their way to advertise bank accounts to small kids, allowing them to save coins and then deposit them in a savings account. Their way of getting future business I guess. Today if you show up with a ton of cash to put into their accounts so they can make amazing profits on it, they charge you a deposit fee. Ah progress.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yeah, that would show them by aix+tom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think 21.646 tons of cash would scare them if they get it on one load at the same time.

      That's would be about 542 trucks if you use 40 tonners. The traffic jam alone would be impressive. ;-)

    2. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      in my youth banks went out of their way to advertise bank accounts to small kids

      It worked for me. I've with the same bank from 14 to now. Through three mergers that changed the name of the bank even. I was actually told that I had had a slightly illegal account when I went in to adjust things - my parents should of been on the account.

      Of course, I've heard horror stories about my bank, but I've never experienced them - and given that you can find horror stories about almost every business, much less any large bank, I figure they're at least average, plus the new larger bank has good ATM coverage in most areas I wander.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Yeah, that would show them by torkus · · Score: 1

      Erm...you mean .542? 21.646/40 ~= 0.5 by my math

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    4. Re:Yeah, that would show them by sayfawa · · Score: 1

      For six years I lived at an apartment and never spent my pennies. Every time I came home I threw my change on a dresser or something. The silver would sometimes get picked up again, but not the pennies.

      When I moved I lugged over $100 worth of pennies to Bank of Montreal. The guy I dealt with was more amused than upset. But I suspect his jokes were a way of covering his slight irritation. It took about a half hour to process.

      Just thought I'd share.

      --
      Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    5. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "they charge you a deposit fee"

      Two words, "credit union". The fees with credit unions is a tiny fraction of what regular banks stick you with.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Yeah, that would show them by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh.... I was completely mixed up with the German / English grouping characters during copy/paste it seems ;-)

      Correct would be (I hope):

      1 penny = 4.54 grams

      $47,680 = 4,768,000 pennies

      4,768,000 pennies * 4.54 grams = 21,646,720 grams = 21,646.720 kilos = 21.646 tons

      21.646 tons / 40 tons = .518 trucks.

      Yeah. That's not really very impressive. Bummer.

    7. Re:Yeah, that would show them by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can't just pay in pennies.

      Amounts that are considered legal tender in Canada (which means they can't be refused):

      1. up to 25 pennies
      2. 1 dollar in nickels
      3. to dollars in dimes
      4. 40 quarters
      5. 20 dollars in loonies ($1 coin)
      6. 40 dollars in toonies *$2 coin)

      So no, they're not obligated to take a ton of pennies.

    8. Re:Yeah, that would show them by john83 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd be more inclined to drop it to them from a great height.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    9. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Okay, it's a big fat myth in the US, but are you saying it's actually still true in Canada?

    10. Re:Yeah, that would show them by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Legal Tender means that someone selling something can refuse a sale if someone wishes to purchase it with small change (within certain limits). In this case they are paying a fine, I doubt payment in any form can be refused unless Canadian Legal Tender laws are hugely different to UK law. Basically I can choose not to take your money (legal tender) I can't say you HAVE to give me it in a different form.

    11. Re:Yeah, that would show them by telso · · Score: 1

      Here's the relevant legislation.

    12. Re:Yeah, that would show them by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      So no, they're not obligated to take a ton of pennies.

      So, what about $50's and $100's? Surely they're legal tender and people should be forced to accept them, right?

      But, I see a lot of places claiming they won't accept those. I've always wanted to challenge someone on that, because to the best of my knowledge, if you accept money, you have to accept my $50 bill.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:Yeah, that would show them by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Maybe in your country. In my country (USA) "credit union" means "scam bank, also not 'insured' by FDIC" I have been member of a couple, and in all cases the fees were higher than banks I've been an account holder in, which usually didn't even have fees for most things, and didn't even care if you had an account to cash a check or make change.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    14. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Thanks much. I guess you (or I) learn something every day.

    15. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Swaffs · · Score: 1

      I wish I could remember exact numbers, but...

      Pennies come in boxes of 5000 each ($50), which weigh roughly 10 pounds each. There's roughly 100 boxes to a pallet (96 maybe?) or $5000 and roughly 1000 lbs. So you'd need about 10 pallets to pay that debt off, which could fit in two average sized armoured cars. Its a long drive from Toronto to the Mint. And I'm quite certain that they only accept rolled coin, unless its damaged. It would be a lot easier and cheaper just to mail them a cheque.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    16. Re:Yeah, that would show them by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      I've wondered that myself. I think the only solution will be to go to coins for all currency. Just don't make the $50 and $100 round - it would be too bad to lose $100 because it fell out of your hand and rolled away. Rectangles or squares with rounded edges (so they don't wear a hole in people's pockets or purses) would be okay.

    17. Re:Yeah, that would show them by rootEToTheIPi · · Score: 1

      It's legal tender for all debts. A store/restaurant isn't a creditor, it's a merchant. If you present your mortgage holder with $85k in pennies, they must accept it (maybe not if the promissory note has a section restricting forms of payment), but Denny's can refuse to accept $100 bills.

      --
      When it comes to pastry theft, I take the cake.
    18. Re:Yeah, that would show them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's legal tender for all debts. A store/restaurant isn't a creditor, it's a merchant. If you present your mortgage holder with $85k in pennies, they must accept it (maybe not if the promissory note has a section restricting forms of payment), but Denny's can refuse to accept $100 bills. If payment is due for goods already consumed or services already rendered, that is by definition a debt. (You might like to check whether a creditor can legally say "pay me with a high-denomination bill if you like but you won't get any change".)
  16. So the Canadian Mint's in Sports now? by darthflo · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, FIFA, UEFA and the Olympics guys all tried to trademark extremely generic names like "Deutschland 06" (Germany 06) and "WM 2006" (WM referring to the german "Weltmeisterschaft", en. "World Cup"). Seems to be a growing trend, so trademark your favourite words now!

  17. 50 Cent by noz · · Score: 1

    Will they sue 50 Cent fitty times?

  18. "One Cent" by kaszeta · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm a little surprised that they assert that "one cent" is their phrase, since, unlike US coinage, they actually use numeric denominations on their coins. The Canadian penny actually says "1 cent" on it.

    Maybe the US Mint should insist they get paid instead...

    Oh, and the Royal Canadian Mint isn't a "Federal Agency". It's a Crown Corporation (status similar to the US Post Office).

    1. Re:"One Cent" by notgm · · Score: 1

      ah, an important bit to note. i am curious if in canada, like the united states, it is impossible to copyright any work of the government - it's all public domain.

    2. Re:"One Cent" by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No.

      Although, as mentioned, the Royal Canadian Mint is a Crown corporation, not a government agency.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    3. Re:"One Cent" by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      But they aren't claiming copyright, they're claiming trademark. And if you don't defend your trademark you lose it. So if they indeed to have it trademarked, and the government should be able to trademark certain things, so that not just anyone can set up shop and call themselves the department of defense, or something like that, then they have to protect the trademark, or they risk losing it.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:"One Cent" by Applekid · · Score: 1

      True, but this isn't about a person counterfeiting coins or making novelty coins in the image of the real things (although I'd call that parody, personally). It's a government institution attacking another government institution within the same government.

      It's kind of like those Coke Zero commericals where Coke wants to sue itself: rediculous.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    5. Re:"One Cent" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "redicule" you talk of?

    6. Re:"One Cent" by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "And if you don't defend your trademark you lose it"

      True. And this is not the first time the Canadian penny has been used like this. So in theory the Mints trademark for, um, their brand of penny is already lost.

      Trademarks exist to protect consumers from confusion as to the source of goods or a service in a specific class of goods or service in a specific geographic area.

      Now, it's not like there's any consumer confusion with the Canadian penny. In fact there are federal laws that make sure there's no other source of the penny. There are laws the prevent you from using life size likenesses of money but that's no the case here, it's really meant to prevent ounterfitting of bills, but this is from pre-security measures on bills such as the gold foil stripes on the notes which cannot be printed.

      As for the idea they can trademark "one cent" as their brand of money, that's just rediculous, it's a generic term and cannot be trademarked.

      BUT! There's a special subsection in Canadian trademark law ("9(1)(n)(iii)") that deals with "official marks" which have enhanced protection, to be used by the Royalty, Universities, Canadian government etc to protect things like official government marks such as seals and coats of arms.

      Case law is muddy here, until federal court hands down some decisions this could go either way. I can see them retaining the right to the penny graphic (and I can see it being rejected because the graphic in the poster is not similar enough - it's too big) but the text "one cent" - I cannot imagine any competant court finding the government having exclusive rights to that phrase.

      This is just a pissing contest between to parts of government and is an utter time waster. If it gets to court it'll be interesting.

      I think somebody ought to warn the March of Dimes poeple though...

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:"One Cent" by jdgeorge · · Score: 2, Funny

      True enough. USA pennies have used the phrase "ONE CENT" for more than one hundred years. If Canada's mint wants to claim "ONE CENT" as their trademark, they'll have to duke it out at the highest court in the land.

      Take that, strong Canadian dollar!

    8. Re:"One Cent" by Applekid · · Score: 1

      I think it's somewhat related to "cofee", where lack thereof prevents proper spelling.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    9. Re:"One Cent" by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good point. If the Canadian Mint doesn't go after the people in this campaign for using the term "one cent" in its promotion, we may see the day when anyone can use the term "one cent" in any context whatsoever, because they didn't go after the people who started misappropriating it.

      I don't want to see that day. And I don't want my kids to, either. The RCM worked hard to put meaning into the term "one cent". If not for their diligent efforts, "cent" would just be a meaningless homophone of "scent" and "sent".

    10. Re:"One Cent" by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      True enough. USA pennies have used the phrase "ONE CENT" for more than one hundred years.

      More than two hundred, actually, according to the OED. I posted this elsewhere on this page, but here's the relevant snippet:

      There exists, however, an American copper token, commonly called the Washington cent, bearing on one side a head in a wreath with the legend 'Washington and Independence', and date '1783'; on the other the words, 'One Cent', and the exergue . But it is not certain that 1783 represents the date of issue; this token was probably struck as late as 1789, the date 1783 being merely that of the conclusion of the War of Independence.
    11. Re:"One Cent" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior Art: http://www.coinfacts.com/small_cents/indian_head_cents/1864_cent_copper_nickel.htm

      A "One Cent" copper/nickel AMERICAN coin from 1864.

  19. trademarks of common vocabulary by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    This fits well into other cases, where one has attempted to trademark common vocabulary:
    • "You have mail" AOL
    • "Hall of Fame" National Baseball Hall of Fame
    • "Entrepreneur" Entreprenour Media
    • "Windows" Microsoft (ruled generic 1993)
    • "Memory game" Ravensburger (a website I maintain was involved in that once)
    Tradmarking common vocabulary is as questionable as patenting common tasks. The problem is that it is often cheaper to pay off than go through a legal fight. And that encourages the litigators. The good thing is that such battles usually are PR desasters for the companies involved.
    1. Re:trademarks of common vocabulary by simong · · Score: 1

      In the UK, Barclays Bank have trademarked the phrase 'hole in the wall' for their ATMs. I'm sure there must be prior art and that they didn't invent the term, but no-one seems to have complained yet.

    2. Re:trademarks of common vocabulary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, 'hole in the wall' means something very different from (to) an ATM. "He's so drunk, she might as well be a hole in the wall."

    3. Re:trademarks of common vocabulary by mpe · · Score: 1

      In the UK, Barclays Bank have trademarked the phrase 'hole in the wall' for their ATMs. I'm sure there must be prior art and that they didn't invent the term, but no-one seems to have complained yet.

      But they didn't get a trademark on "Cash Machine", "Money Dispenser", "Bank Machine" or even the American "ATM". The phrase they trademarked is something other than a plain langauge description of their business, goods, services, etc.
      Note that a piece of common vocabulary used outside of it's normal context can be considered a good trademark. e.g. "Amazon" as a book seller. But it probably wouldn't be such a good idea to try and use it as a trademark for boat trips on the Amazon river or a women's athletics team.

    4. Re:trademarks of common vocabulary by DarenN · · Score: 1

      I should trademark "Drink Link", then? And sue all the college students that use it. For one (european) cent.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
  20. Let'em have it so the US can dump the penny by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    The penny has no redeeming value in the current economy.

    1. Re:Let'em have it so the US can dump the penny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are working on that one too. I think anything less than a quarter has no value but no one listens to me.

  21. Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by TomTraynor · · Score: 2, Informative
    It is not the phrase, it is the image of the penny itself. To quote the first sentence

    Demands from the Royal Canadian Mint that the city of Toronto pay for using pictures of a penny in its "One Cent" campaign
    It is only fair, if someone uses an image that you created wouldn't you want to control how it is used and get compensated for the use of your image?
    --
    Panic now, beat the rush!
    1. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by omnispace · · Score: 1

      Who took the pictures? What if they made their own pictures of the penny?

    2. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      According to copyright law, whoever took the photo holds the copyright to that photo.

      (Note that I think both copyright and trademarks as currently governed by law are stupid.)

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    3. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's both the phrase and the image, and both claims are bogus. Won't stop the lawyers on both sides from making a living, though.

    5. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope the mint goes after everyone listed on google for showing a picture of "their penny". http://images.google.ca/images?q=canadian%20penny&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

    6. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      so if I take a photo of a Nike swoosh and then stick that on some shoes is that ok cos I 'made my own pictures of the swoosh'?

    7. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It is only fair, if someone uses an image that you created wouldn't you want to control how it is used and get compensated for the use of your image?

      They should also sue all those people who keep using that image in financial transactions.

    8. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " so if I take a photo of a Nike swoosh and then stick that on some shoes is that ok cos I 'made my own pictures of the swoosh'? "

      Another mitigating factor here is that in the US products made with slave, forced or child labour are not protected by trademark.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    9. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They're charging for the use of the phrase "one cent" as well. how did you read the part about the pictures and miss the bits about the words?

    10. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is only fair, if someone uses an image that you created wouldn't you want to control how it is used and get compensated for the use of your image?

      It's only fair if the owner is not your government.

      And a dick government at that.

    11. Re:Read the article first, it is not the phrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Read the article yourself, it is the phrase:

      Included in this amount is a request for $10,000 for the use of the
      words "one cent" in the campaign website address (www.onecentnow.ca) and the
      campaign email address (onecentnow@toronto.ca), and an additional $10,000 for
      the use of the words "one cent" in the campaign phone number (416-ONE CENT).
  22. AHA! Aboot time! by db32 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Take that you smug little bastards! You sit up there all pointing and laughing at how insane the IP system has gotten in the US... HAH! Welcome to the new world, not so smug now eh? One Cent...holy crap... And its not even some profit mongering megacorp up there, its your freakin federal agency suing the city. On top of that the irony involved in the fact that the whole thing is about trying to get 'one cent' out of the tax, and the government response is to charge them for asking for it! Aaaahahahahahaa. Now maybe you won't be so damned smug when stupid shit happens here down south of you.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:AHA! Aboot time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your country's crappy economy starting to get your panties in a bunch, eh? Or maybe it's the crime, trash and fat people. That could do it too.

    2. Re:AHA! Aboot time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just mean... For that, a "Canadian Bacon" quote.

      "Canada has massed 90% of its population along the border in obvious preparation for an attack."

      Canada is so stuck sucking on the nipple of the United States, if we go down we're taking Canada with us. So watch it, one centers.

    3. Re:AHA! Aboot time! by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Actually, i didn't even realize Canada was big enough to have a mint. Why don't they just use US dollars?

      Or even trade in those canadian flags that every single tourist attaches to their backpack. Canadian flags could trade against the one dollar bill and those "Canadian Chicks Rock" t-shirts could be their 10-dollar bill.

    4. Re:AHA! Aboot time! by notrelevant · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that this is an example of Canadian "Loonacy". We too have our share of idiots, but just look at the amount of money involved. Less than $50,000. It just goes to show that at least our stupid moves are less dangerous or costly than in many other parts of the world and lets hope it stays that way.

  23. Stephen Colbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Colbert suggested a few weeks ago that US should sue Canada over the use of the world "dollar"?

  24. It's Scott! by Slagged · · Score: 1

    Cartman: Who's that? Canadian: It's Scott. (He works at the mint.) He's a d1ck.

    --
    Just ask the good Jedi how they feel about "Balance" now...
  25. "A penny for your thoughts"... by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "A penny for your thoughts", quite literally. What's with this obsession with "intellectual property"? I have thought of many, many things. I have used these thoughts to create physical objects from raw maerials, to compose texts, to extend these notions and to combine them, to create new, previously un-thought thoughts. And it never occurred to me that I should pay the people that inspired those mental processes, nor did it occur to me to ask for remuneration for those thoughts I in turn shared with my environment. How can anyone claim ownership of a phrase, a collection of words, a simple idea like this and ask for rent?
    This is getting more and more absurd. If you can let people get away with the claim that they "own" the words "one cent", where can we expect them to stop? Is there any reason they could not claim that the word "one", as an essential part of that phrase, is also their property? I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, I'd really like to hear an argument that could apply to "one cent" but not to "one".

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
    1. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      I believe it's safe to assume that at least part of this story couldn't have happened here in the U.S. The design of pennies is a work of the Federal Government, and as such is not eligible for copyright. However, see this section from the U.S. Mint website:

      Designs of the new quarter-dollar coins issued under the 50 State Quarters Program may be derivative works of designs covered by third-party copyrights licensed to or assigned to the U.S. Mint, or in some cases may be covered by third-party copyrights assigned to the Mint.
      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to be sarcastic here, I'd really like to hear an argument that could apply to "one cent" but not to "one".
      The guys claiming the rights to "one cent" have a lot of money, and a lot of lawyers.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by crimperman · · Score: 1

      You could even say they have licence to print[1] money.

      [1] yes I know they only mint coins but the phrase didn't right without "print"

    4. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by flynnternet · · Score: 1
      And if they run out they just print/mint some more!!

      Like here in the US...

      (Wait, why isn't my money worth $hit anymore....)

      --
      ----------

      I'd buy That (sig) for a Dollar...

    5. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Well, I would say that in the right context the word 'One' could be included in the catch-all intellectual property phrase. There is a phone company here in Australia called 'Three'. Their logo is the numeral 3. I don't doubt they would try to protect that brand through courts if somebody used 'Three' in a context that would conflict with their brand. This is all to blame on the fact that phrases are like memes from the ether, or in other words language is like a virus from outer space. Therefore this 'intellectual property' stuff is nonsense until metaphysics formulates a quantifiable aether matrix.

    6. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      What's with this obsession with "intellectual property"?

      Usually when it comes down to it this is the new feudalism - except those using it as a weapon can neither weild it themselves like the barbarians of old or do productive stuff like the farmers and craftsfolk of old. That these people come accross as complete parasites is no accident - don't blame the lawyers blame the clueless fools employing them that got to head up a company because daddy had money.

    7. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by mpe · · Score: 1

      There is a phone company here in Australia called 'Three'. Their logo is the numeral 3.

      Typically logos are quite specific pieces of artwork. If they include text the font, font colour, relative size of the text, is part of the definition.

    8. Re:"A penny for your thoughts"... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1
  26. Re:Exchange rate by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

    U.S. and Canadian dollars are about the same right now.

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  27. Fucking idiots by Porchroof · · Score: 1

    I've copyrighted the phrase "fucking idiots"

    Now I'm goint to sit back and get filthy rich.

    --
    Fata viam invenient.
  28. Government can claim copyright too? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So governments can claim copyrights, trademarks, and get patents? I thought the point of these was for commercial enterprises in the market, which the government is not in (since it can grant itself a monopoly on anything it wants). What's their justification, that without the protection of copyright they wouldn't be able to make a profit...er... they already get taxes by law. They wouldn't be able to finance projects like coining (ha) the phrase "one cent"? I just don't get it.

    1. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by topham · · Score: 1

      Canadian copyright flows from the monarchy, to the government and then to us peons.

    2. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      I think that if you examine U.S. law a bit, you'll find that it's very feudal in nature. You don't "own" the land your house is built on, you "hold title", and that title ultimately can be traced back to a government grant. And when you get a patent, it is the government that issues it. The government is obliged to protect your rights to these things, and if the government is overthrown, your rights disappear. I'm pretty sure the same thing applies to Canada.

      Still, I think it's pretty wacko to for the government to be able to assert copyright over the image of a coin -- after all, the "government" is supposed to be the people. Oh -- maybe not in Canada. I think it's still part of the English monarchy, and I froget whether the monarch governs with the consent of the people, or whether she holds her position by divine fiat.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    3. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada, the government cannot claim copyright. Anything the government produces is a public document. The Royal Canadian Mint is not the Government. It is a crown corporation which has the somewhat bizarre status of being a separate entity owned by the "crown," but it is not the government. It can in theory hold copyrights. IANAL, but I strongly doubt that the image of currency is copyright-able, however. Certainly, "One Cent" would never hold up as a trademark.

    4. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      I forget whether the monarch governs with the consent of the people, or whether she holds her position by divine fiat. Nobody else knows, either, so don't worry too much about it.
      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    5. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "So governments can claim copyrights, trademarks, and get patents?" "

      Not relevant. This is a "official mark". Which is like a trademark but has (greatly) enhanced powers. Only for use by govt or govt regulated organizations for "the benefit of the public".

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    6. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Still, I think it's pretty wacko to for the government to be able to assert copyright over the image of a coin -- after all, the "government" is supposed to be the people. Oh -- maybe not in Canada. I think it's still part of the English monarchy, and I froget whether the monarch governs with the consent of the people, or whether she holds her position by divine fiat.

      A few things:

      1) In Canada the government serves the Crown, who represents the Canadian people.
      2) There is no such thing as the "English monarchy", it was abolished in 1707 when the United Kingdom was formed, but that's neither here nor there.
      3) Notwithstanding point 2, the Crown, or the monarchy, is the Canadian monarchy, nobody else's. We share the Crown the person with many other countries, but the institution is separate. In theory we can kick out the British Queen and replace her with our own.

      And yes, she theoretically holds her position by devine fiat, just look at a Canadian coin. They say "Elizabeth II D.G. Regina", which means "Elizabeth II by Grace of God, Queen".

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    7. Re:Government can claim copyright too? by SEE · · Score: 1

      The justification is nothing more than that the Crown can grant a monopoly on anything it wants. That is, in fact, how copyright and patents started in England, with the Crown granting itself and anyone who was currently in favor "letters patent" on works or inventions. In the United Kingdom, the Crown still has a Royal Perrogative, equivalent to a copyright on the King James version of the Bible, first published in 1611.

      In the United States after the Revolution, this sort of royal monopoly was seen as a form of tyranny, and a much more limited system intended to "promote the progress of science and useful arts" was established. Obviously, giving the Federal Government a copyright on its own works is pointless under such a system, so the system didn't give the government any.

  29. Actually, it's both by michaelwigle · · Score: 1

    $10,000 for the use of the words "one cent" in the campaign website address (www.onecentnow.ca) and the campaign email address (onecentnow@toronto.ca)

    $10,000 for the use of the words "one cent" in the campaign phone number (416-ONE CENT)

    The remaining $27,680 has been assessed against the City for the use of the image of the Canadian penny in printed materials such as pins and posters. So we have $27,680 for the actual image and the rest is for the use of the term "one cent". Regardless, the use of the term "one cent" is ridiculously common and generic and shouldn't be allowed to be copyrighted. The sad thing is the legal battle that would ensue over fighting this would likely cost more than the $47680 they're being asked to pay. As for copyrighting the image... I guess I could see it but I still disagree with it (not that my opinion counts :P )
    1. Re:Actually, it's both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, the use of the term "one cent" is ridiculously common and generic and shouldn't be allowed to be copyrighted.

      You're right. That's why they are claiming it's a trademark.

    2. Re:Actually, it's both by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      Which, again, is so common and generic it shouldn't be trademarkable.

      Like "Windows", "Word", "Excel", "Works", "Money"....

      Oh, wait...

      Microsoft already owns the trademark for "Money". Microsoft should sue every bank, mint, and government in the world!

      And, a quick check at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) shows no registration for "One Cent", although the Bank of Canada even has a trademark on the image of a $100 note! (Although it is listed as "Prohibited Mark: Official Mark", meaning it is a "badge, crest, emblem or mark adopted and used by any public authority, in Canada as an official mark for wares or services. "

      Quick, some Canuck register "One Cent", and send a threatening letter to the .ca mint!

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  30. Nancy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Betty Joe? Betty Joe Biolofsky? I haven't heard that name since college. Of course, everyone knew you as "Nancy"...

    1. Re:Nancy? by thedbp · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you may remember me as ... AUDREY FARBER?

    2. Re:Nancy? by flynnternet · · Score: 1
      A Firesign Theater reference! Very Nice.

      Signed: Ralph Spoilsport

      (Antelope Freeway 1/8th of a mile....)

      --
      ----------

      I'd buy That (sig) for a Dollar...

    3. Re:Nancy? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      No, but I recognise the sig as Cat Stevens.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  31. You've got your math wrong by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    ...unless Canadian pennies weigh 9 pounds each.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  32. Paper Currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hmm. I'm Canadian and I haven't heard of this...

    Just a correction to the summary: The Canadian Mint doesn't print paper currency.

    "The Bank of Canada" prints paper currency.
    "The Royal Canadian Mint" only makes coins.

  33. RCM != Paper Money by alexburke · · Score: 5, Informative

    the Royal Canadian Mint (the federal agency that prints Canadian paper currency and stamps Canadian coins)


    Nope. The Royal Canadian Mint stamps coins only. The Bank of Canada is responsible for paper money, the actual printing of which is performed by Canadian Bank Note Company, Limited and BA International Inc (formerly British American Banknote).
  34. obligatory rocky and bullwinkle by farker+haiku · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks Bullwinkle, a ruble for your troubles!

    No! Not one red cent!

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    1. Re:obligatory rocky and bullwinkle by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You meant "one kopeyka", right?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:obligatory rocky and bullwinkle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no dumbass, it's a quote. Correct the brilliant writers of Rocky and Bullwinkle instead.

  35. 1 cent Candian now more valuable by kooky45 · · Score: 1

    The Canadian mint didn't have a reason to do anything before their cent became a lot more valuable.

  36. Seriously by mdigiac1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am embarrassed to be Canadian. Clearly this is the first of many stupid things to happen. Next Up: Canadian Election. Do I vote for tweedle Dee or tweedle Dumb.

    --
    Windows on a mac is Windows under Supervision. - Frank Soltis(Chief Scientist/Designer of AS400)
    1. Re:Seriously by icebrain · · Score: 1

      I think you just described the next US election as well...

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    2. Re:Seriously by alexo · · Score: 1

      I am embarrassed to be Canadian.
      Don't be. There are idiots everywhere.

      Next Up: Canadian Election. Do I vote for tweedle Dee or tweedle Dumb.
      Ontario elections coming tomorrow.
      Vote for MMP in the referendum and help change the system for the better.
    3. Re:Seriously by Fox_1 · · Score: 1
      Relax, you're looking at just a little bit of debate/negotiation tactics. There are a few things going on here:

      1. It's not a good idea to make available images of currency - especially high resolution images - which this campaign is doing with their pictures of the penny. The Mint/Bank of Canada have a number of tools to control what images are distributed and copyright/trademark infringement is just the first tool. This is just the penny after all, not Toonies or not 50$ bills.

      2. Everybody wants a piece of the GST, it's an ugly issue. The municipalities didn't properly cover their asterisks when they launched this campaign, despite have communication with the mint before the launch. It's no surprise that the gov swings the hammer left too them. Hitting the campaign in the pocketbook, while dirty, is still part of the game.

      3. The Canadian Mint is actually a business. They make currency for other countries, and until recently had an edge of the world in the technology used to mint coins. Now they are losing business to upgraded mints in Europe and elsewhere, but that doesn't make them any less concerned with profits and intellectual property.

      I suspect this case is politically motivated, but I don't mind the mint cracking down on the use of Canadian Currency IP. Money/Currency is too important to allow random muddying of it's image and IP. There's a reason you don't photocopy money, or scan it, or draw Mr. Spock on 5$ bills - it's not some random meme but an Instrument of Trade. Even the littlest penny.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
  37. No, it's one PER cent by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 1

    "One cent for every dollar of the purchase prize", in my book, is a 1% VAT. Am I right? Because a 1% tax on nearly every item sold is not "just one cent", it's a considerable new tax burden.

    1. Re:No, it's one PER cent by Tridus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The tax in question (the GST) already exists as a 6% (formerly 7%) sales tax, all the money goes to the Federal Government.

      The goal of the campaign is to take 1/6th of the revenue from the tax and give it to Municipal governments. So they don't want a new tax, they want to shift what the existing tax pays for.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:No, it's one PER cent by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

      "One cent for every dollar of the purchase prize", in my book, is a 1% VAT. Am I right? Because a 1% tax on nearly every item sold is not "just one cent", it's a considerable new tax burden. Not exactly. The federal government already collects a 6% VAT (GST), and the City of Toronto is asking the feds to hand over 1/6 of it to them directly.
    3. Re:No, it's one PER cent by j-cloth · · Score: 1

      For further clarification (sorry if it's explained below, I can't see it), the impetus for the "One Cent" program is that the federal government made a campaign promise to drop the GST from 7% to 5% over a couple years. The municipalities are screaming for money so they're asking the feds to give the tax money that they no longer want to the cities. I think the reason they call it One Cent (per dollar) as opposed to one percent is that it's more publicly acceptable. People don't give a damn about a penny, but they know that 1% adds up.

    4. Re:No, it's one PER cent by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

      >The municipalities are screaming for money

      Um, no. TORONTO is screaming for money because they want to continue to live in some sort of "my house is only worth $50,000" vacuum.

    5. Re:No, it's one PER cent by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      Wow. Sales tax here in Ireland, VAT (value-added tax), is 21% for most goods. The lower rate for certain goods/services is still 12.5%!

      Just to rub it in though, our goods cost more here in the first place too, despite favorable exchange rates for import. Elementary maths should tell you that at $1.40 or so to the euro, our prices should be numerically lower here than in the US despite the VAT rate, we shouldn't have higher numerical prices. I'll tell you what though, it makes it great when over in the US for a trip or whatever - not only do the prices *look* cheap, they're even better than they look! Still not worth the trouble of US immigration to get into the US (that's even with getting it over and done with on Irish soil) and possibly having to deal with Irish customs & excise if bringing much back in obviously new condition.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    6. Re:No, it's one PER cent by defrex · · Score: 1

      There aren't any $50,000 houses in Toronto, trust me. Property values are perhaps lower then, say, Calgary, but who's aren't?

    7. Re:No, it's one PER cent by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Wow. Sales tax here in Ireland, VAT (value-added tax), is 21% for most goods. Wow, that adds significant value to the product price!
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:No, it's one PER cent by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

      That's my point. They're paying taxes on "market values" that are nowhere near the actual value of the property. When you live in Rosedale there is no way your property taxes should be calculated on values of $250K-$500K!

  38. This is a joke, right? by flajann · · Score: 1
    This "one cent" thing is a joke, right?

    At least this is a funny joke, as opposed to the not funny joke that is the president of the US.

    1. Re:This is a joke, right? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      At least this is a funny joke, as opposed to the not funny joke that is the president of the US. Not to troll or flame or anything, but the anti-GW crowd doesn't even seem to be trying now. As much as I realize the man is stupid, that joke was just pitiful.
  39. Prior Art/Public Domain? by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    The term One Cent has been used in common english for over a hundred years, as America uses the term on their one cent pieces http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Eagle_cent the image of the Canadian cent design is probably enforceable, but the name 'one cent' is going to far.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Prior Art/Public Domain? by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      As screwed up as the US is with regards to intellectual property, at least we have government works in the public domain by default, so this wouldn't even be an issue here. One shouldn't have to defend the use of the English language as public domain.

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
  40. I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they cannot use the phrase "one cent," what phrase are they supposed to use to accurately describe the amount being sought?

    do they have to always represent it numerically? "0.01"? Or would they get sued for that too?

    Obviously there must be a common collection of words which can be used to communicate without fear of being sued...I mean really, this is so absurd.

  41. I Called It!! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I have dibs on "two cents". Now pay up Canada.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  42. struth by abonstu · · Score: 1
    it seems like we continually have more and more headlines that are designed to make me angry.

    everyday i read the front page and bump into **AA shenanigans, patent bullshit, entity X thats apparently screwing me and lawsuits that seem all doomsday.

    it would be really nice and refreshing to read down the list one day and feel EXCITED and POSITIVE about technology again.

    i realise 'controversial' stuff is all the rage and keeps the forums ticking over in a glorious eternal flame but i miss the days of being dazzled by cool stuff that i just HAD to know about.

    it just seems like my favourite page to read everyday leaves me feeling pissed off rather than psyched - does it have to be this way?

    1. Re:struth by mynameismonkey · · Score: 1

      No mod points, but dammit man I agree with you! It's getting to be nothing but blood-boiling nonsense. We want more happy news for nerds!

      --
      -- Religion is not an exact science
    2. Re:struth by Xybre · · Score: 1

      You could just block off the Politics and Your Rights Online sections.

      --
      Eternity is a time bomb.
  43. Decimal commas versus decimal points by hummassa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Using the USofAn/English style decimal POINTS:

    21,646 ton / 4,678,000 coins =
    21,646,000 kg / 4,678,000 coins
    ~~ 4.627 kg / coin

    (which would be a quite heavy penny IMHO)

    I suspect each Canadian penny weights 4.627 _g_ per coin, so it would be
    21.646 ton (21646 kg) per 4678000, ie, _ONE_ 40-tonner truck half-full of pennies.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  44. The Copper Penney is screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  45. Just Politics ... by bonoboboy · · Score: 1

    As someone living in Toronto, I'm happy to say that this probably isn't so much an issue of "silly" as it is an issue of "politics."

    The issue at hand here is that the City of Toronto is essentially going bankrupt. The reason, the city asserts, is that the federal and then provincial governments have pushed expenses down all the way to the city; a good example is that cities in Ontario are now paying for social services (something the province once did). The Federal government just posted a CA$13 billion surplus, and the province has their own surplus as well; none, both have said, will go to help the City of Toronto with its near half-billion budget deficit.

    Of course, the higher levels of government take a huge amount out of Toronto in taxes to subsidize the rest of the country. Torontonians are feeling a bit jaded knowing this now that there's such a huge budget shortfall for the city.

    So the City of Toronto has been campaigning for both the province and federal governments to help out. The One Cent campaign was part of this, demanding more money from the higher levels of government. My guess? The demand for royalty payments from the mint is a political ploy from the federal government to slap Toronto on the wrist for, I'm guessing, rocking the boat.

    1. Re:Just Politics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because they want Toronto to become a province.

    2. Re:Just Politics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an FYI, Toronto's not the only place being gouged by the feds to help out Quebec...

      (Quebec is not the "rest of the country") There's a lot more to the west of you you know...
      and some of us are actually doing quite well for ourselves.

      It's attitudes like the phrase "the higher levels of government take a huge amount out of Toronto in taxes to subsidize the rest of the country" that make the west feel like they're ignored. and their contribution is insignificant. dispite the fact that it most definately is significant.

      But I forget Toronto's the centre of the universe... nothing exists outside it's bounderies.

    3. Re:Just Politics ... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Finally, a comment making sense (no pun intended) of the entire dispute, and you don't even get modded up :-P

    4. Re:Just Politics ... by Pitr · · Score: 1

      What Toronto needs to do is declare bankruptcy (Like NYC in 1976), then when the Canadian Dollar plummets the federal and provincial government will take the city's finances seriously. If Miller's balls ever drop we might see it happen. We need something drastic to offset the Federal Finance Minister laughing when presented with Toronto's cash problems.

      Then again, this being Canada, we won't actually declare bankruptcy, we'll just talk about it.

      --

      --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
  46. Note on currency conversion by Random832 · · Score: 1

    $47,680 Canadian = $50,000 US.

    --
    We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    1. Re:Note on currency conversion by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      actually according to the last trade on yahoo finance, it's actually $46975.37
      Slight difference. $3000 whats the difference?

    2. Re:Note on currency conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not any more it's not. $45,680 Cdn is apx $45,680 USD. The Looney has almost reached parity with the Dollar. Thanks for destroying the value of the currency FED!

    3. Re:Note on currency conversion by Random832 · · Score: 1

      It's already over parity. Which my post was meant to poke fun at.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
  47. Wouldn't the U.S.A. likewise have rights... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    ...to "Dollar"?

    Stephen Cobert had a humorous bit about the U.S. charging Canada for trademark infringements for the use of the word "Dollar". Of course, he requested that the payment be made to the U.S. in Canadian dollars....

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    1. Re:Wouldn't the U.S.A. likewise have rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. is ready to go to war with the Canadian Mint over our copyright to the words "one cent." George Bush is still in office you know. ;)

    2. Re:Wouldn't the U.S.A. likewise have rights... by russotto · · Score: 1

      The US dollar was a rip-off of the Spanish dollar.

    3. Re:Wouldn't the U.S.A. likewise have rights... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We acquired the rights to the word along with Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philipines. Remember the Maine?

  48. I thought it refered to the weight... by Numen · · Score: 1

    I had always thought that 1d refered to its weight, 1 dram. Hence the term "penny dram" I could be wrong though, it's just what I had rattling around my head. I note that Wikipedia agrees with your good self on this matter however.

  49. Tweedle Dumb? by Prototerm · · Score: 1

    I didn't know George Bush was running for office in Canada. Who knew?

    --
    "My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right." --Senator Carl Schurz (1872)
  50. Now I know by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    the world has gone insane. At least I can know point out to my Canadian relatives that America isn't the only country full of stupidity.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  51. Pedantry rules!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to be pedantic but it is $48,430.68

    1. Re:Pedantry rules!! by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

      RIGHT... I went the wrong way. my bad... :S

  52. TO is broke, and scrambling for cash by olivercromwell · · Score: 1

    The campaingn was launched, as TO is broke. The current administration was re-elected by the sheeple of the GTA, even though Mayor Miller, and his cabal of socialists ran up both a huge debt, and a huge defecit in their first term. The Provincial Government of Duhlton McSquinty has already told Miller the Industry Killer to pound salt when he went cap in hand begging for more money, and after some smarter councillors vetoed a HUGE property tax increase, Miller started in on this whine fest. he is basically trying to back-door the Federal Government, and try to shift his own poor administrative skills on to ALL Canadian taxpayers. I would not be surprised if the PMO had a quiet word with the Governor of the Bank of Canada about this. I sure hope the sheeple of the GTA wake up, and realize what a mess their mayor has made.

    1. Re:TO is broke, and scrambling for cash by Semptimilius · · Score: 1

      There are many mayors in the GTA. Miller represents about 2.5 million of about 6 million people in the GTA. (Both guesses.)

  53. Morons by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Sometimes Canada is just plain stupid. Anything owned by the government is, in the end, owned by the people themselves!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  54. Where's the (c) by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Hey, have they put the (c) copyright symbol on all their coins?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  55. Political garbage by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Just like the USA and many other nations, things get weird and stupid the closer we get to elections. It's all just one huge pissing match between overgrown suit-wearing preschoolers.

    This won't accomplish anything useful, but it does garner lots of attention and sets up an opportunity for some political leader to "be a hero". It's all just a game

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  56. Mod this and parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...since they're the most informative posts I've spotted so far.

  57. An answer by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    "One Cent" being on the currency. 2 cents not. Hence they should start registering "my-two-cents.ca" and the like, and change their demand from one cent per dolar to two cents per dollar.....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  58. Wake up by lawnsprinkler · · Score: 0

    It might be fair if the one cent coin wasn't an integral part of your environment that every single person, government, corporation, or any other entity in Canada must deal with. The mint's value in the image is in facillitating trade. It's not intellectual property, it's currency which has its own special protections. If it wasn't currency, no one, including the City of Toronto, would care to communicate about it. If it's intellectual property, then there should be another source for legal tender currency & they can be absolved of that responsibility to society so they can tend to their intellectual property. Impeding communication & education about the basic constructs used to function in a society chips away at that society's foundation. If you can't see that, you're losing sight of the forest for the fake trees.

  59. Re:Exchange rate by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think the CAD is slightly ahead at the moment.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  60. Way to protest by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Send a letter like the following to the royal Candian mint:

    Dear sir;

    My business sells services based on open source software internationally. Open source is a revolutionary means of developing software which has grown greatly in the past decade. I am sure you have heard of Linux, Apache, and other open source programs.

    One of the distinguising features of open source is that you do not have to pay for license fees. That is right, Nobody has to pay even ONE CENT for the right to install and use the software. That is right-- you can make your pennies go further by not having to pay ONE CENT for license fees!

    Please feel free to contact us so we can discuss what we can do for you. We will be sending this sales letter out to every governmental office (including every courthouse) across Canada.

    Best Wishes, ....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  61. Interesting fact, but UGH!!! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    While reading the headline for this story out loud to a friend of mine, he interrupted me with the same detail you pointed out, so that my tongue crashed into the top of my mouth. I bristled at him, "Is that relevant at this exact moment?"

    He shrugged, "Sorry. It's in my geek nature to radiate trivia when it's least useful."

    Know and love yourself, I guess. But, FUCK!


    -FL

  62. Fine, jerks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the "penny" campaign, the website will be at www.onepennynow.ca, the phone number will be 416-66PENNY, and we'll show a picture of a blank, copper-coloured disk with a poor, hand-drawn scrawl of Liz on one side and a poplar leaf on the other (i.e. a parody).

  63. From a Canadian. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Well, of course. I live in Canada, and I've never once claimed that our politicians didn't come from the same snak-pak as those south of the border. The public is just programmed with a different kind of stupid up here. Not as fast-acting, but just as troubling.

    Hopefully the level of stupid currently occupied by the Canadian public will still allow somebody in office to be publicly humiliated and fired for implementing this insane penny ruse.

    I think things might be a bit better if every now and again the public would haul a politician out of office to be thrown into the nearest lake for the crime of evil and greed. The only problem is that a significant portion of the populace is too stupid and greedy themselves to know which politicians need throwing. I would happily tell them, but nobody attends my soap box seminars.


    -FL

    1. Re:From a Canadian. . . by db32 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...well your scumball plan of exporting your stupid has failed you! Tom Green, Jim Carrey, Keanu Reeves, and so on...you couldn't get rid of them fast enough and now your screwed too!

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    2. Re:From a Canadian. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      It was retribution for stealing away John Candy.

      By the way, do you want a Shania Twain? Cheap?


      -FL

  64. You don't know what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They aren't insured by the FDIC because they are insured by the National Credit Union Administration. The NCUA and the FDIC are both backed by the US government. In general, Credit Unions tend to pay out more interest and charge less interest than banks, but have fewer ATMs, services, and other options than banks. Credit Unions also tend to be localized: your local credit unions (which, apparently, are not some of the better ones) may not have branches in any other cities, much less other states. Banks and credit unions vary so wildly that it's hard to say one is better- certainly a bad bank is worse than the average credit union, and a bad credit union is worse than the average bank.

  65. Thank-you by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    Thank you all for voting conservative. Americanization forms to the right.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  66. Blame Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because everything's gone wrong
    since Canada came along
    with their beady eyes and flapping heads -
    they're just trash!

    And when they charge you with their hockey sticks or whatever, just remind them that this is the US© and
    "it cain't happen herez!"

    [cheap flag graphic]

  67. Re:Legal tender, debt to restaurant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if I have already eaten (ie: incurred a debt to the restaurant) and then the only way that I can pay my bill is via the hundred dollar bill I have in my wallet?

  68. thanks... by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

    *Yawn*

    You're just so incredibly witty, a literary genius to be sure. Where _do_ you come up with this stuff?

    --
    blah blah blah